Skip to main content

Covid 2 & governance deficit-1: 'Callous' decision making, management collapse

By Prof Ujjwal K Chowdhury* 

When the ongoing Covid mayhem in India hopefully ends, the questions that will remain: Was it largely a manmade disaster? Could this be avoided or impact lessened?
On May 7, India's coronavirus cases hit a grim global record with 4,12,262 fresh infections in the last 24 hours. And 3,919 deaths were reported. India recorded over 4 lakh cases for the first time on May 1, after reporting 3 lakh daily infection for nine straight days. The country -- hit by a deadly second wave -- logged 1 lakh cases in a day for the first time about three weeks ago. While the total case-load has crossed 2.1 crores, the active cases are above 35 lacs, and deaths have crossed 2.3 lacs in total, as per government figures.
Since the testing is very low, in many states like UP private laboratories are ordered not to conduct tests, and many test reports are not coming even after five days, one never knows the actual number of infections. Then, since many cases are not reported but deaths are happening, in rural India reporting of deaths is even lower, and many Covid induced deaths have been passed off as deaths due to some co-morbidity, the death figures are highly under-reported.
The entire scenario rapidly deteriorated since April first week, May first week being the worst so far. It is now being reported that the deaths and suffering are more due to lack of ICU beds, oxygen and some critical drugs than the disease itself. And we need to look at the reasons for the same.

National disaster law and centre-state mistrust

The Disaster Management Act, 2005, extends to the whole of India and provides for "the effective management of disasters and for matters connected there with or incidental thereto." The Act calls for the establishment of National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA), with the Prime Minister of India as chairperson. Under section 6 of the Act it is responsible for laying "down guidelines to be followed by the State Authorities in drawing up the State Plans".
Power bestowed by DM Act on Central Government and NDMA are extensive. The Central Government, irrespective of any law in force (including over-riding powers) can issue any directions to any authority anywhere in India to facilitate or assist in the disaster management. Importantly, any such directions issued by Central Government and NDMA must necessarily be followed the Union Ministries, State Governments and State Disaster Management Authorities. In order to achieve all these, the prime minister can exercise all powers of NDMA.
The March 2020 national lockdown was imposed under DM Act as per the order of NDMA ‘to take measures for ensuring social distancing so as to prevent the spread of Covid 19’. Hence, the responsibility of arresting the pandemic lies squarely and primarily with the central government.
Undoubtedly, India’s large population poses an administrative challenge in dealing with any disaster, especially a pandemic such as Covid-19. However, overall management could have been strengthened through three possible ways, on which the government has failed.
Firstly, biological disaster of a national magnitude necessitates a close administrative and political coordination, led by Centre and followed by State governments. Issues like movement of migrant labourers, availability of food, arranging livelihoods to daily wagers, relief camps, entitlement of statutory minimum relief, movement of essential drugs and oxygen, availability of additional beds, ventilators and health-workers, all of which affecting millions in the country needed special attention and advanced planning, for which the Central government was empowered by the DM Act.
Secondly, as per mandate of DM Act, a concerted effort was required to ensure that the state disaster management bodies were administratively, politically and financially empowered, on which several lacunae have been pointed out by media and political circles.
Third and finally, in times such as these, constitutional courts must play its role. There are complaints of discrimination, police excesses, starvation, lack of medical aid, non-availability of drugs, oxygen and beds from various corners of the country. Pertinently, there is a bar on jurisdiction of courts and there is no grievance redressal mechanism under DM Act. Good to see that the Supreme Court and several High Courts only recently have taken up issues arising out of the failure of disaster management by the Centre and several State governments.

Lockdown, curfew & containment policy

In 2020, the hurried national lockdown with 4-hours of notice was seriously flawed. This was not demonetization type of an issue. The short window brought trains, buses, trucks stop midway. Lakhs of migrant labourers with families, left in the lurch by their employers and governments, had to walk back, dying, being beaten, being run over and suffering on the way. Wherever lockdowns were announced in the world, there were prior preparations, no dramatic measures taken and time was given to all to help implement the mass quarantine.
While many nations have taken resort to localized containment zone, limited operations, occasional and localized curfews over the last one year, the PM who in March 2020 had ordered the hasty all-out lockdown, in April 2021 now appeals to state governments to consider lockdowns as the last resort when the cases (total and daily) are several times higher than the last year.
Yes, in this scenario, lockdown should be considered as a measure of the last resort to be used when no other steps work, to contain the spread of the virus, keeping also in consideration the abysmal state of the economy. Even if it is resorted to, it should be short (within two weeks duration), and at least half the population will need to be fed during the lockdown period. Top US epidemiologist Anthony Fauci has also suggested a complete lockdown as an immediate step.

Beds and hospital infrastructure, plight of frontline workers

India’s total healthcare spending is a mere 3.5% of GDP, far lower than in countries ranging from the world’s wealthiest like France (11.3%) and the U.K. (10%) to other emerging economies like Brazil (9.5%) and South Africa (8.3%). And only a third of India’s health care spending comes from the government, with the rest mostly coming out of citizens’ pockets.
Understandably today, India’s health system is on the brink of collapse. Hospitals across the country are running out of oxygen supplies, ventilators and beds. Indians are rushing to buy drugs with prices surging, while labs struggle to process growing backlogs of Covid-19 tests. There is an urgent need to expand healthcare infra-structure by transforming all stadia, large halls, worship places, educational institutes into temporary Covid care hospitals, the process of which has started, spearheaded more by the civil society. Some 151 recognized journalists and at least 330 health-workers have died while on job due to Corona. It is heartening to see that the Sikhs in Delhi are running Oxygen Langar and opened up Gurudwaras for patients. Maharashtra Chief Minister Uddhav Thackeray has gone on record thanking the Muslims of Mumbai for their yeomen service in opening up mosques, donating plasma and blood, and providing oxygen to the needy. To that extent, 5-crores membership strong Rashtriya Swayam Sevak (backing BJP) is missing in action today.
India has started airlifting oxygen generators and other supplies from abroad, with countries including Australia, the U.K., Germany, China, UAE and even Pakistan & Kuwait offering support. The US is sending ventilators, test kits, PPE and oxygen concentrators to Delhi, and has overturned a ban on the export of raw materials India needs to ramp up vaccine production.
In the short term, this emergency disaster relief—along with lockdowns in hot spots and a national mask mandate—is key to curbing the second wave.

Vaccination production, availability and pricing, export of vaccines and oxygen

Modi’s insistence on Atmanirbhar Bharat, the principle of self-reliance, made India slow to approve and purchase foreign vaccines, including Pfizer-BioNTech’s, in favor of its own Covishield and Covaxin. In the meantime, the government was keen to wield its image as the “pharmacy of the world,” exporting 6.5 crores of doses even as it vaccinated only 0.2% of its population per day (only 16 crores of 101 crores adults are vaccinated till date). Today while the Modi government has gone on back foot and opened up for foreign vaccines, they have no capacity to take immediate orders to supply to India. Only Russian vaccine Sputnik is being taken up by Reddy’s Labs to produce in India.
While most nations have given advances to pharma companies to research on and produce vaccines, India did not support Serum Institute and Bharat Biotech initially with any funds. Serum (SII) invested Rs.2000 crores by itself and got Rs.2200 crores from Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. While US had invested Rs.44,700 crores in vaccines by Moderna, Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, etc., as early as August 2020, India only on April 19, 2021, gave an advance of Rs.4500 crores to vaccine makers in India. Our current monthly vaccine doses need is around 180 million, while production capacity is at best 80 million! Less than half. India placed its first order of vaccines in January 2021 and only for 16 million doses!
Are vaccines being distributed just for the purpose of image building of Modi whose government is on a back foot in multiple issues?
In the longer term, vaccinations are desperately needed to prevent a third wave. With limited vaccine supply, and less than 15% being vaccinated with the first dose, the most effective way to reduce transmission may be to target hot-spot areas and higher-risk people -- which means India needs better data, and fast, and not the rampant data-fudging as is done today.
The Supreme Court took note of different prices of Covid-19 vaccines for Centre, states and the private hospitals and asked the Central Government to explain to it the “rationale and basis” behind such a pricing policy. Covishield available to the Centre at Rs.150 per unit, is being offered to the states at Rs.300 and to the private hospitals at Rs.600 per unit. The top court, hearing a suo motu case related to "distribution of essential supplies and services during pandemic", also asked the Centre as to how it was going to meet the sudden surge in demand of vaccines now in May when vaccination for all above 18 years of age has started, to which no viable plan has been placed yet.
The Kerala High Court issued a notice to the Central Government on two pleas challenging its "discriminatory Covid-19 vaccination policy". By virtue of the new policy, dual pricing of vaccines has been allowed and states are forced to contend with private players to purchase the vaccines in the open market, whilst the Central Government procures them at a discounted/ subsidised rate. Also, the Centre should adhere to the National Vaccination Policy when it comes to procurement of vaccines. Polio and Small Pox vaccination drives earlier were free and universal, without any discrimination.
Earlier, as part of vaccine diplomacy, India has supplied around 65 million doses of vaccines to around 70 countries. It is perplexing that India was carrying out vaccine diplomacy till March 2021 at such a large scale when it is facing shortage of supplies in many of its own states. For what purpose such a large-scale of vaccine diplomacy was being implemented in such a time of national public health crisis in the middle of a second wave? Is the vaccine diplomacy being carried out to skirt away the questions over the efficacies of the two indigenously manufactured vaccines? And are the vaccines being distributed just for the purpose of image building of Modi whose government is on a back foot in multiple issues which have come under international attention; farmers’ protests and suppression of dissent being some examples?

PM CARES & disaster relief funds

Prime Minister’s Citizen Assistance and Relief in Emergency Situations Fund (PM-CARES) was set up after the first scourge of Covid in 2020. The Government of India had denied that the PM CARES Fund is a public fund for the purposes of transparency laws such as the Right to Information Act 2005, even though the Fund uses government infrastructure and the national emblem of the Government of India. But, strangely, it was also told that donations to PM CARES Fund will also qualify to be counted as Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) expenditure under the Companies Act, 2013. PM CARES Fund has also got exemption under the FCRA and a separate account for receiving foreign donations has been opened.
The opposition leaders, especially Trinamool MP Mohua Moitra, has raised question as to why there is no accountability of the PM Cares Fund. She had also noted the unfair treatment of identical contributions to the state relief funds is against public interest, against public policy, completely disincentivises corporate contributions which the state governments otherwise would have got. Some 38 leading Public Sector Units have donated more than Rs 2,100 crore to the Fund, which is above 70% share of the fund. Yet PMCares is not subject to auditing by the State! In effect, the PM Cares Fund diverts funds from local communities into this dark hole where not even a speck of light can enter.
Further, critics have asked why PM Cares fund was not used to fund the return of the migrant labourers many of whom were charged for their movements in extreme duress. The Rs.200 crores allotted for the oxygen plants are not spent yet.
Then there are questions on the need to set up a fund similar to Prime Minister’s National Relief Fund already existing and which is a public fund, subject to auditing and RTI transparency.

Celebrations too soon

Cases peaked around 93,000 per day in September, 2020 -- less than a fourth of the daily tallies India is reporting in May 2021 -- and then the curve began to flatten. A narrative emerged that India may have quietly achieved herd immunity, thanks to its comparatively young population -- the median age is 27, and just 6.4% of Indians are over 65 -- and the fact that 66% of its population live in rural areas, spending most of their time outdoors. This optimism was ill founded. The optimistic account has since been complicated by two facts: cases are now hitting the young, and also surging in poor, rural states like Bihar and Uttar Pradesh.
Experts say the current crisis could have been avoided if the government had acted earlier. But it did not being steeped in incompetency and complacency. Also, many Indians who took strict precautions last year abandoned their masks and gathered indoors when the broader public messaging implied that India had conquered the virus.
The RBI in its bulletin of January 21, 2021, said, “Soon the winter of our discontent will be made glorious summer.” The next day, Prime Minister Narendra Modi heralded the spirit of Atmanirbhar Bharat (self-reliant India), claiming that had helped India secure victories in two major battles: on the cricket field against Australia and in the pandemic. “A positive mindset always leads to positive results,” he declared. On February 21 this year, Modi’s ruling Bharatiya Janata Party passed a resolution unequivocally hailing the “visionary leadership of Prime Minister Modi” in turning India into a “victorious nation in the fight against Covid.” Crucially, the public complacency was encouraged by the government’s “mission-accomplished mentality.”
Recently Reuters had released a story about how a consortium of national laboratories tasked with genome sequencing, Indian SARS-CoV-2 Genome Sequencing Consortia (INSACOG), had forewarned the government in early March that they have high concerns about variant strains of coronavirus that were particularly contagious and were in danger of taking over the country. Dr Rakesh Mishra and other members of INSACOG have so far claimed that these warning has either been ignored by the government or at least not properly acted upon. India’s leaders ignored warning signs in the data and the news of variants circulating in other countries.
There is hence a pressing need to set up a formal judicial commission of inquiry with at least three sitting Supreme Court judges to take a 360-degree look at how India’s Covid-19 management system collapsed and came to this sorry pass. This is the very least we owe to those whose lives were lost due to the sheer callousness of the decisions taken or not taken by the government and its leadership. There are more to this on the failure of the powers that be, and we take them up in part two of this research piece.
---
*Educationist, columnist and television panelist, currently working as Pro Vice Chancellor of the Adamas University, Kolkata

Comments

TRENDING

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.

BSF should take full responsibility for death of 4 kids in West Bengal: Rights defender

By Kirity Roy*  One is deeply disturbed and appalled by the callous trench-digging by BSF in Chetnagachh village under Daspara Gram Panchayat, Chopra, North Dinajpur District, West Bengal that has claimed the lives of four children. Along the entire stretch of Indo-Bangladesh border of West Bengal instead of guarding the actual border delineated by the international border pillars, BSF builds fences and digs trenches well inside the Indian territory, passing through villages and encroaching on private lands, often without due clearance or consent. 

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

How GMOs would destroy non-GMO crops: Aruna Rodrigues' key submissions in SC

Counterview Desk The introduction of Bt and HT crops will harm the health of 1 billion Indians and their animals, believes Aruna Rodrigues, who has made some 60 submissions to the Supreme Court (SC) during the last 20 years. As lead petitioner who filed Public Interest Litigation in 2005, during a spate of intense hearings, which ended on 18 January 2024, she fought in the Apex Court to prevent the commercialization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in Indian agriculture. 

Social justice day amidst 'official neglect' of salt pan workers in Little Rann of Kutch

By Prerana Pamkar*  In India’s struggle for Independence, the Salt Satyagraha stands as a landmark movement and a powerful symbol of nonviolent resistance. Led by Mahatma Gandhi, countless determined citizens walked from Sabarmati Ashram to Dandi in Gujarat. However, the Gujarat which witnessed the power of the common Indian during the freedom struggle is now in the throes of another significant movement: this time it is seeking to free salt pan workers from untenable working conditions in the Little Rann of Kutch (LRK).

Corporatizing Indian agriculture 'to enhance' farmer efficiency, market competitiveness

By Shashank Shukla*  Today, amidst the ongoing farmers' protest, one of the key demands raised is for India to withdraw from the World Trade Organization (WTO). Let us delve into the feasibility of such a move and explore its historical context within India's globalization trajectory.

Jallianwala massacre: Why Indian govt hasn't ever officially sought apology from UK

By Manjari Chatterjee Miller*  The king of the Netherlands, Willem-Alexander, apologized in July 2023 for his ancestors’ role in the colonial slave trade. He is not alone in expressing remorse for past wrongs. In 2021, France returned 26 works of art seized by French colonial soldiers in Africa – the largest restitution France has ever made to a former colony. In the same year, Germany officially apologized for its 1904-08 genocide of the Herero and Nama people of Namibia and agreed to fund reconstruction and development projects in Namibia. .

Interpreting UAPA bail provisions: Is Supreme Court setting the clock back?

By Kavita Srivastava*, Dr V Suresh** The Supreme Court in its ruling on 7th February, 2024 in   `Gurvinder Singh v State of Punjab’ held that its own well-developed jurisprudence that "Bail is the rule and jail the exception" will not apply to those charged under the UAPA.

A 'distorted narrative' of Indian politics: Congress failing to look beyond LS polls

By Prem Singh*  About 15 days ago, I told a senior journalist friend that there are not even two   months left for the Lok Sabha elections, Rahul Gandhi is roaming around on a delectation (tafreeh). The friend probably found my comment exasperating and replied that he is not on a delectation trip. The conversation between us on this topic ended there. 

Livelihood issues return to national agenda ahead of LS polls: SKM on Bharat Bandh

Counterview Desk  Top farmers' network, the Samyukta Kisan Morcha (SKM) has claimed big success of Grameen Bharat Bandh and industrial /sectoral strikes, stating, the “struggle reflected anger of farmers, workers and rural people across India”, adding, the move on February 16 succeeded in bringing back peoples’ livelihood issues in the national agenda just ahead of the general election to the Lok Sabha.