Skip to main content

NHRC vacancies to be filled up without due process? Petition to Kovind opposes move

Counterview Desk 

The All India Network of NGOs and individuals working with National and State Human Rights Institutions (AiNNI)) has sought to draw the attention of President Ram Nath Kovind on the reported Government of India move to fill up vacancies among the first rung of leadership in National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) without following legal provisions and international norms.
As these vacancies are long pending, certain recent media articles attributing to anonymous sources, have cited names of some recently retired Supreme Court judges as probable candidates preferred by the government for NHRC Chairperson, says the petition to the President, for which signatures were sought from social activists and individuals across India.
The suggestion of preferential candidates being considered in the absence of a formal process undermines the independence and credibility of the NHRC, the petition says.

Text:

We write to draw your urgent attention to the long-pending vacancies at the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC). We write to request you to intervene to ensure that the members of the appointment committee initiate a transparent process that considers all eligible candidates, review their record, experience, and contributions to human rights, and assess them on criteria and indicators which draw from accepted human rights standards.
Section 3 (2) of the Protection of Human Rights (Amendment) Act, 2019 (PHRA) requires that the NHRC has a Chairperson who has been a Chief Justice or Judge of the Supreme Court; one Member who is or has been a Judge of the Supreme Court; one Member who is or has been a Chief Justice of a High Court; and three Members, out of which at least one shall be a woman, having knowledge of or practical experience in matters relating to human rights.
As of May 6, 2021, the NHRC consists of just three members – one judicial and two non-judicial members. The post of the Chairperson has been vacant for five months till date since the retirement of Justice (retd.) HL Dattu in December 2020, position for one judicial member is vacant since the retirement of Justice (retd) D Murugesan in September 2018 (2 years and 7 months), and the position for one non-judicial member is vacant since this position was created through an amendment in July 2019 (1 year and 9 months). NHRC Member Justice (retd.) PC Pant was appointed Acting Chairperson on April 25, 2021, as per Section 7 of the PHRA.
The effect of these long vacancies has been pointed out by Justice Pant himself and it is clear that with a monthly workload of near 10,000 complaints these vacancies have severely and negatively affected the responsiveness of the institution and its image in the public eye. It also allows for violations to continue and impunity to reign.
Section 4 of the PHRA requires a committee comprising the Prime Minister, Speaker of Lok Sabha, Deputy Speaker of Rajya Sabha, Union Minister of Home Affairs, and Leaders of Opposition in Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha to send recommendations to you for appointments in the NHRC. There is no information in the public domain of this committee meeting after April 2019, i.e. for the last appointments made in the NHRC – Justice (retd) PC Pant and Dr Dnyaneshwar Manohar Mulay.
At this juncture, we note with concern certain media articles attributed to anonymous sources citing names of some recently retired Supreme Court judges as probable candidates preferred by the government for NHRC Chairperson. The suggestion of preferential candidates being considered in the absence of a formal process undermines the PHRA. Section 4 requires an impartial appointment process, based on objective criteria, entrusted to a high-level Committee, to determine the composition of the NHRC as spelled out in the PHRA. Even a minor indication of the government preferring a particular judge may compromise the independence of the judiciary and that of the NHRC.
Appointments to the NHRC must respect the fundamental principles of transparency and adherence to the accepted international standards and norms as laid down in the UN Paris Principles. We believe the prerequisite for the appointment committee to recommend names for NHRC Chairperson and Members is a process whereby it considers all eligible candidates and assesses them on objective criteria and indicators as provided for in the PHRA and consistent with international standards. The committee should strongly consider potential candidates’ records, experience, and contributions to human rights.
Appointments to NHRC must respect fundamental principles of transparency and adherence to accepted international standards
We point out that the UN Paris Principles on selection and appointment emphasize (a) a transparent process; (b) broad consultation throughout; (c) advertising vacancies broadly; and (d) maximizing the number of potential candidates from a wide range of societal groups. It also considers the pluralistic composition of an NHRC to be fundamentally linked to the requirement of independence, credibility, effectiveness, and accessibility.
NHRC’s international review and accreditation reports, undertaken by the Sub-Committee of Accreditation (SCA) of the Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions (GANHRI), have repeatedly in 2011, 2016, and 2017 expressed concern about the lack of pluralism in NHRC. There has consistently been an inadequate representation of women, caste, tribe, and religious communities in NHRC’s leadership.
These reports also highlight the need for a transparent appointment process – advertisement of vacancies, assessing candidates on clear and uniform criteria, and holding broad consultations. According to the 2017 review report, “the NHRC has advocated (with the government) for changes to the selection process to include requirements to require the advertisement of vacancies and the establishment of clear and uniform criteria upon which to assess the merit of eligible applicants”.
We request your intervention with the appointment committee. Considering that the process followed is as important as the outcome, any shortcuts that suborn the process are detrimental to the independence and credibility of the NHRC. We urge that the needed appointments are made at the earliest with no further delay, on the basis of the required process and recommended human rights standards, with all efforts to be inclusive and transparent.

Comments

TRENDING

Savarkar 'criminally betrayed' Netaji and his INA by siding with the British rulers

By Shamsul Islam* RSS-BJP rulers of India have been trying to show off as great fans of Netaji. But Indians must know what role ideological parents of today's RSS/BJP played against Netaji and Indian National Army (INA). The Hindu Mahasabha and RSS which always had prominent lawyers on their rolls made no attempt to defend the INA accused at Red Fort trials.

Did Netaji turn blind eye to Japanese massacre while in Andaman during World War-II?

Dr Diwan Singh Kalepani museum off Chandigarh By Rajiv Shah  Did Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose ignore the massacre carried out by the Japanese army in Andaman and Nicobar islands during the Second World War? It would seem so, if one goes by the account of Mohinder Singh Dhillon, who authored a book in memory of his father, 'A Titan in the Andamans, Dr Diwan Singh Kalepani'. Dr Diwan Singh was tortured to death by the Japanese soldiers in the cellular jail in Andaman in 1944.

A golden goose, GoI bent on selling LIC 'for pittance' without consulting stakeholders

By Thomas Franco*  In spite of strong opposition from all sections of the society, the Finance Minister (FM) recently asked her Ministries to speed up Life Insurance Corporation (LIC) Initial Public Offer (IPO). Does she realise that this can lead to collapse of the economy over a period of time because LIC is a golden goose which is giving golden eggs regularly to the economy, development projects and providing social security to the majority of the marginalised people of this country.

Sweden-backed study: India won't achieve 2030 UN goals, officials can't recognise SDG

By Rajiv Shah  A Swedish Society for Nature Conservation (SSNC)-sponsored study, carried out by the advocacy group Consumer Unity & Trust Society (CUTS) India, seeking to analyse the United Nation's Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) No 12, Responsible Consumption and Production (RCP), has regretted, it is "very unlikely" India will achieve any of the targets of SDG 12 by 2030 "unless some serious measures are taken by the government to reverse the present trend."

Modi's Gujarat 'ignores' India's biggest donor of Azad Hind Fauj, Dhoraji's Habib Sheth

By Dr Hari Desai* One surely feels happy that the statue of Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose is being installed near the India Gate in New Delhi. Every Indian and even Netaji’s 79-year-old daughter Prof Anita Bose Pfaff feels happy about the statue at the most important area of the capital. In an interview with an Indian TV, Anita, who is a German citizen, mentions that she thinks if not Netaji’s only Mahatma Gandhi’s statue should have been there. She may be aware that there existed a plan to install life-sized statue of the Father of the Nation at that place.  Even after differences with Mahatma Gandhi and Sardar Patel which led Netaji to leave the Indian National Congress, Bose was the first person to call Mahtma Gandhi Father of the Nation on July 6,1944 in his Ragoon Radio broadcast, and sought Bapu’s blessings as the Supreme Commander of the Indian National Army (INA). Till 1968 there was statue of King George V at India Gate. It was removed and placed in the Coronation Park, New Del

Savarkar 'opposed' Bhagat Singh's, Netaji's dream of India, supported British war efforts

By Shamsul Islam* In a shocking development, the student wing of the RSS put the busts of martyrs Bhagat Singh and Subhash Chandra Bose with Savarkar's on one pedestal at the University of Delhi late in the night on August 20, 2019. Bhagat Singh sacrificed his life for a socialist-democratic-secular republic and Netaji raised Azad Hind Fauj (INA) consisting of people of all religions and regions for armed liberation of India.

Why Church in India today needs a Rutilio Grande, martyred for stance on social justice

By Fr Cedric Prakash SJ*  For the people of El Salvador, January 22, 2022 will be more than just a red-letter day. Three of their sons, Jesuit Fr Rutilio Grande and his two lay associates 72-year-old Manuel Solorzano and 15-year-old Nelson Rutilio Lemus (and Italian Franciscan missionary Fr Cosme Spessotto who was also martyred) will be beatified in San Salvador.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

'Dargah site was a temple': Claim in Gujarat following post-Babri verdict demands in UP

By Rajiv Shah  Will Gujarat also see demands to replace mosques and dargahs with Hindu temples? It would seem so, if a new fact-finding team conclusion is any indication. Apprehending the “danger” of communal conflagration, it has cited the claim on a 15th century dargah was originally a Hindu temple – allegedly quite on line with what has been happening in UP following the Supreme Court verdict on Babri Mosque.

Is it time to celebrate India's 'improved' sex ratio? Reasons to question NFHS data

By Aditi Chaudhary*  The recently published National Family Health Survey (NFHS) factsheet brought cheers amongst the public and the government. With Child Sex ratio (number of females per 1000 males in the age group 0 - 6 years) and overall sex ratio (the total number of females per 1000 males), both showing an improvement, NFHS-5 (2019-21) got applauded by all around.