Skip to main content

Why Tagore 'pleaded' with Lord that he be spared the curse of being reborn in Bengal

By Bhaskar Sur* 

Hindu Bengalis of West Bengal celebrated the 160th birth centenary of their poet exactly two days after he was born .Why? Because they follow an outdated, archaic calendar. Like so many matters they are behind the time. This is an indicator of their stubborn conservatism rooted in Brahminical tradition.
Meghnad Saha, the famous astrophysicist, long back urged for a new Bengali calendar based on scientific method but it fell on deaf ears. The life of Hindu Bengalis from womb to the crematorium is guided by astrology. The old calendar is based on Hindu astrology which will explain why Marxists who ruled the state for three and half decades, left it untouched.
Bengali Tagore occupies an insignificant niche in the Hindu pantheon, far below the highly revered Ramkrishna-Sarada Devi-Vivekananda trio whose icons have acquired the stature modern deities .'Progressive' Bengalis worship Tagore with flowers and songs, but they oppose almost everything he stood for -- the value of the individual, freedom, reason and creativity. Throughout his life Tagore suffered the hostility of the community and died a bitter and disillusioned man.
Tagore came from a reformist Hindu tradition inspired by the ideas of Raja Ramohun Roy and the best tradition of British liberalism. The Brahmos, though a minuscule minority, were active in the fields of education, women's emancipation, anti-caste movement and labour movement .It produced a reaction in the form of Hindu revivalism whose most charismatic figure was Swami Vivekananda.
Vivekananda was opposed to widow remarriage and women's emancipation. He wanted women to model themselves on Sita and Savitri. He also defended caste system as a useful institution giving Hinduism necessary discipline and strength to fight the challenge of Islam. Most significantly, Vivekananda championed a sexual ethic based on fear and repression. In all this he was the opposite number of Tagore and needless to say, they intensely disliked each other.
Tagore had nothing but disgust for the guru cult that had built around the figure of the mystic Ramkrishna Paramhansa who for his disciples was the an avatar, their blind faith and aversion to social reform. Vivekananda on his part regarded Tagore as an aristocratic fop spoiling the young generation with his ' effeminate lifestyle' and erotic songs. 
In his time Vivekananda enjoyed more popularity but Tagore will have sweet revenge in in novel “Gora”, whose protagonist, a sexually repressed Hindu fanatic, would find the meaning of life in love. Hindu revivalism would later influence Swadeshi movement and militant nationalism.
Tagore was both opposed to nationalism which he saw as 'collective selfishness' and terrorism which only breeds hatred, moral insensitivity, distrust and dehumanization. In 'Home and World' he ruthlessly exposed the inner corruption of hollowness of Swadeshi politics.
Bengali Hindus, on the other hand, have always glorified terrorism and violence. Khudiram Bose who ended up killing two innocent Irish women is lionized as a hero. I wonder how Bengali Leftist intellectuals can both worship Tagore and the terrorists without being hypocritical.
Tagore valued the individual and tirelessly defended freedom in an age when it was under attack both from the Left and the Right. He dreamt of a society which would based on cooperation rather than competition; freedom rather than obedience; creativity rather than repetition.
Tagore's "Woman's Face"
Bengalis on the contrary became blind nationalists and even rabidly xenophobic. Their hatred of the British and all it represented turned them into blind admirer of Hitler. Subhas Bose came to believe until the Nazis delivered India it would remain under the British thrall for another hundred years. It is a Bengali who can reach such an atrocious conclusion!
Tagore valued the individual and tirelessly defended freedom in an age when it was under attack both from the Left and the Right
After the defeat of Nazis they found their saviour in Stalin and later, Mao. They were least bothered about how the political model based on one party rule could be fitted in a democratic structure. In other words they were and are afraid of freedom and will find peace only by submitting themselves to a all powerful party like the CPI-M or a ' suprimo' like Mamata Banerjee .
Tagore would like individuals to be free and fearless, treading, if necessary a lonely path. Bengalis go by herd instinct; they like big rallies and mammoth gathering where the individual is lost in the amorphous crowd.
Tagore's most ambitious project was his university Visva Bharati where he wanted the East and the West to meet. Scholars like KM Sen, Amarya Sen's maternal grandfather, joined him, accepting voluntary poverty. But he found it difficult to meet its mounting expenses. Andrew Robinson in his admirable biography has rightly noted it was like an albatross round his neck.
Tagore reluctantly had to undertake many foreign tours just to earn some money to pay the teachers. He was close to the Bengali elite but it did not come to his recue. Gandhi had little appreciation for Tagore's dream, yet he got GD Birla to shell out Rs 4 lakh in a patronizing manner. Tagore felt humiliated but he had little choice.
Only a few years after his death, Viswa Bharati was made a central university which relieved it of financial difficulties but only to reduce it to a lifeless hollow shell -- a pretentious show piece. Why didn't the Bengali elite and intellectuals come forward to save the institution? Simply because they didn't have the ability.
The long British rule had developed in them a dependence mentality which still persists. In the past they used to blame the British for all their failures; now they have shifted it to the Marwaris. Tagore was a builder, Bengali intellectuals are wreckers. They have ruined almost all the excellent institutions that grew up during the colonial period by politicking, nepotism and corruption.
Tagore had the added misfortune of being successful. He was first to receive the Nobel among Asians. He was also strikingly handsome with innumerable women admirers around the world. At 64 he fell for an Argentinean beauty Victoria Ocumpo who was also an art critic. It was she who arranged his solo painting exhibition in Paris.
.Bengalis who are manically jealous, did not take it kindly. From the early days they launched a smear campaign against him. When in 1916 he travelled to USA on a lecture tour, it was remoured that he had gone there to receive treatment for an aggravating venereal disease. At Viswa Bharati where boys and girls could mix freely irked them more. They saw it as a school for scandal.
Tagore was attacked relentlessly for being an 'anti-national', encouraging promiscuity and undermining morality. Extremely generous and warm, he was also open to exploitation by innumerable parasites who had gathered round him.
At the end of life, worn out by hostility, general turpitude and endless rancour he expressed his disappointment in the following words: "If there be anything like rebirth, my Lord, the only plea I hold is that, spare me the curse of being born here in Bengal."
---
*Source: Author's Facebook timeline

Comments

Chandra Vikash said…
Namaskar! I just read your article on Rabindranath Tagore in Counterview. Geniuses have often met with violent resistance from mediocrity...till the tide turns a century later as humanity faces an existential crises. A lot of this perfect storm of the crises - ecological health and civilizational can be traced back to our failure to pay heed to truthful visionaries like Tagore. My new initiative www.gaiasansad.org is a comprehensive "sandwiched" top down and bottoms up approach to respond to the present crises and my way of paying a tribute to the towering legacy of Tagore who in perspective stands head and shoulders above many of his popular peers. Regards, Vikash
Anonymous said…
The article appears to be far from objective analysis and is heavily biased against Vivekanada, peppered with some incorrect facts. Vivekanada opposed the caste system. He served food to the dalit untouchables at Belur Math himself. Besides, he was a strong believer of women's emancipation (read his essays on comparison between women of the west and the east), although his version of women's emancipation was still along patriarchal lines if viewed through the lens of the 21st century. I do not agree with plenty of Vivekananda's views but this article is not at all useful from academic perspective. The tone of the article sounds rather like a propaganda.

TRENDING

Insider plot to kill Deendayal Upadhyay? What RSS pracharak Balraj Madhok said

By Shamsul Islam*  Balraj Madhok's died on May 2, 2016 ending an era of old guards of Hindutva politics. A senior RSS pracharak till his death was paid handsome tributes by the RSS leaders including PM Modi, himself a senior pracharak, for being a "stalwart leader of Jan Sangh. Balraj Madhok ji's ideological commitment was strong and clarity of thought immense. He was selflessly devoted to the nation and society. I had the good fortune of interacting with Balraj Madhok ji on many occasions". The RSS also issued a formal condolence message signed by the Supremo Mohan Bhagwat on behalf of all swayamsevaks, referring to his contribution of commitment to nation and society. He was a leading RSS pracharak on whom his organization relied for initiating prominent Hindutva projects. But today nobody in the RSS-BJP top hierarchy remembers/talks about Madhok as he was an insider chronicler of the immense degeneration which was spreading as an epidemic in the high echelons of th

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.

Modi govt intimidating US citizens critical of abuses in India: NY Christian group to Biden

Counterview Desk  the New York Council of Churches for its release of an open letter calling on the Biden administration to “speak out forcefully” against rising Hindu extremist violence targeting Christians and other minorities in India. In the letter addressed to President Biden, Secretary of State Antony Blinken, and other major elected officials, the NY Council of Churches expressed "grave concern regarding escalating anti-Christian violence" throughout India, particularly in Manipur, where predominantly Christian Kuki-Zo tribals have faced hundreds of violent attacks on their villages, churches, and homes at the hands of predominantly Hindu Meitei mobs.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Green revolution "not sustainable", Bt cotton a failure in India: MS Swaminathan

MS Swaminathan Counterview Desk In a recent paper in the journal “Current Science”, distinguished scientist PC Kesaven and his colleague MS Swaminathan, widely regarded as the father of the Green Revolution, have argued that Bt insecticidal cotton, widely regarded as the continuation of the Green Revolution, has been a failure in India and has not provided livelihood security for mainly resource-poor, small and marginal farmers. Sharply taking on Green Revolution, the authors say, it has not been sustainable largely because of adverse environmental and social impacts, insisting on the need to move away from the simplistic output-yield paradigm that dominates much thinking. Seeking to address the concerns about local food security and sovereignty as well as on-farm and off-farm social and ecological issues associated with the Green Revolution, they argue in favour of what they call sustainable ‘Evergreen Revolution’, based on a ‘systems approach’ and ‘ecoagriculture’. Pointing ou

Link India's 'deteriorating' religious conditions with trade relations: US policymakers told

By Our Representative  Commissioners on the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) raised concerns about the “sophisticated, systematic persecution” of religious minorities by the government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi at a hearing on India in Washington DC.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Why is green revolution harmful for nutrition, food safety, environment, climate change

By Bharat Dogra*  A lie repeated a hundred times will not turn a lie into a truth. The big media should realize this and stop perpetuating the lie of the green revolution saving India from hunger, long after the world has awakened to the reality of how harmful the green revolution has been from the point of nutrition, food safety, environment and climate change.

Alarming Odisha arrests, 'illegal' detentions ahead of Vedanta bauxite public hearing

Counterview Desk  More than 80 lawyers, legal academics and researchers have written to the Governor of Odisha raising concerns about the “alarming arrests and illegal detentions” of about two dozen persons from Rayagada district in Odisha in anticipation of the upcoming public hearing for the Sijimali bauxite mine proposed by M/s Vedanta Ltd.