Skip to main content

Nirma varsity demand for higher fees 'illegal', violates Article 14: Letter to Gujarat HC

Counterview Desk
Students of Gujarat’s top private institute, Nirma University, situated in the outskirts of Ahmedabad, in a letter to the Chief Justice the state High Court, have complained that the authorities are demanding “full fees” from students, without taking into account the “disproportionate impact” the lockdown has on the livelihood of students and families.
The students have complained that the varsity authorities have ignored the Universities Grants Commission (UGC) circular suggesting that higher educational institutions should address the grievances regarding fee payment in a ‘considerate manner’ in the present time of crisis “keeping in view the present Covid-19 pandemic.”
Worse, the letter, forwarded as an email alert without signatures of consenting students for unknown reasons, said, “To mock the misery of the concerned stakeholders, the university has outrightly conveyed on July 22, 2020 that ‘cost per student would go up’ in online learning methodology and that fee be paid on time to ‘avoid any inconvenience’. It also conveyed that, ‘in this regard no further communication shall be entertained’.”
It pleaded with the court to take suo-moto cognisance in the matter, asking the university to waive off a part of the fees being charged and refund the proportionate fee of those students who have already paid, insisting, the court should consider the varsity decision “arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutional.”

Text: 

The students of Nirma University beg to submit that by circular dated 01-07-2020 [Annexure A], the institute is demanding full fees from all students. The notification has been issued without keeping into due consideration the practicalities. The in-question decision has been clearly passed without application of mind and giving due regard to the disproportionate impact the lockdown had on the livelihood of families of the students.
The relationship between a student and a college has two unique aspects. First, colleges do not provide a traditional service for profit as defined under commercial laws but serve a public good. Second, students do not have the same bargaining power as the college and thus the college has certain leverage over students. To this end, Covid-19 has highlighted such gaps in our education regulatory system and how it has negatively impacted the rights of students.
Here it must be noted that a fair balance would provide that if there is any reduction of cost, there should also be a proportionate reduction in the fees. If the benefit of reduction is not shifted to the students, it would lead to colleges earning beyond the standard set by the law and thus, would be considered illegal.
Hon’ble Supreme Court, in its 5-Judge Bench decision in Modern Dental College v. State of Madhya Pradesh (2016 7 SCC 353) has reiterated that a University cannot charge a fee that is beyond the purpose of fulfilling the object of education. In simpler terms, a university is not allowed to profit from running an educational institution. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has regularly reiterated that education is not a business but a charity.
Having such a moral outlook towards education has further allowed the Supreme Court to limit the scope of fees of colleges only to the extent of cost of running an institution and a reasonable surplus. Any income beyond this standard would be considered as profiteering which has been explicitly held to be illegal. In light thereof, it is fairly difficult to believe that the university is expecting to incur more cost than would have in any other normal academic year.
It is also saddening to note that the university has not found it just to reasonably explain its stance on the issue of fees or to make an attempt to justify the unreasonable non-relaxation provided to the student community. UGC has already released a circular suggesting higher educational institutions to address the grievances regarding fee payment in a ‘considerate manner’ in the present time of crisis keeping in view the present Covid-19 Pandemic. [Annexure B]
To demand full fees, which obviously includes numerous charges not being utilized in the online teaching, is arbitrary
The institute was functional only for one and a half months previous semester, for the rest of the time, the institute was closed and thus remained completely unused by students and for most of the time by faculties. But the university has unjustifiably failed to provide any reasonable explanation towards the refund or adjustment of ‘balance amount’ for the previous semester till date.
To mock the misery of the concerned stakeholders, the university has outrightly conveyed on 22.07.2020 [Annexure C] that ‘cost per student would go up’ in online learning methodology and that fee be paid on time to ‘avoid any inconvenience’. It also conveyed that, ‘in this regard no further communication shall be entertained’.
If the interests of students are to be fairly kept in mind in order to strike the sought-after balance, such a decision without taking into due consideration the realities and circumstances of students, is extremely regrettable and reflects a myopic approach to deal with the impending issues at hand. It is illogical, irrational and manifestly arbitrary to say that online teaching will incur more cost.
Violation of the right to equality is determined not by looking at the intent of the State action, but by its effect. The effect of a lockdown – with the shutting of establishments and physical workspaces, and bans on transportation – is disproportionately felt by numerous families of Nirma University students whose job description made ‘work from home’ impossible. This disproportionate impact, in fact, is directly linked to socio-economic class - a relevant ground under equality law.
Consequently, where the nationwide lockdown had disproportionate impacts upon the livelihood of student families, prima facie attracting Article 14; there exists a positive obligation upon the University to appropriately mitigate the disproportionate impact that has been caused by the state’s decision to order and enforce a lockdown.
The need for such positive obligations is also enhanced by the consequent and continuous abrogation of the right to meaningful existence under Article 21. Furthermore, to demand full fees as previously demanded, which obviously includes numerous charges not being utilized in the online teaching is sheer arbitrary. Therefore, the move is manifestly arbitrary, illegal and thus unconstitutional being hit by Article 14 of the Constitution.
Hon’ble Supreme Court in EP Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu, (1974) 4 SCC 3 had held that equality under Article 14 of our Constitution had a substantive content which, simply put, was the antithesis of arbitrariness which pervades the entire constitutional scheme and is a golden thread which runs through the whole of the fabric of the Constitution.
Further, as per Rule 34A of Academic Regulations Published vide Notification no. NU-442, dated 27.1.2004 the fees of the university has to be decided by the Director General in consultation with the Board of Governors [Annexure D]. But as per the official website of Nirma University the last meeting of the board was conducted on 28-09-2019 [Annexure E].
This proves that the university is unwilling to change its fee structure even in these uncertain times. Furthermore, the prevalent situation indubitably warrants from the university to arrange and provide for special considerations in these unprecedented times. Appropriate relaxations are a bare minimum threshold that the University should have ideally met without any external calling.
The Institutes’ Student Grievance Redressal Committee on behalf of the students had submitted the fee related grievances to the Dean and Director of the Institute, but the same was not resolved by the concerned authorities. Apart from this the students also submitted a signed petition to the university.
If the University insists on charging the regular exorbitant amount of fees from all students, it will be failing in its duty to protect the students as a consequence of its unilateral actions which ultimately violates their right to access education.  
In view of the aforesaid, it is most humbly prayed:
  • that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to take suo-moto cognisance in the matter and may be pleased to stay the notification dated 01.07.2020;
  • that this Hon’ble Court may ask the university to waive off a part of the fees being charged and accordingly refund the proportionate fee of those students who have already paid; 
  • that this Hon’ble Court may ask the university to provide for an in detail bifurcation of fees; 
  • that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to declare the notification arbitrary, illegal & unconstitutional; 
  • this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to pass any other Order as it deems fit so as to do complete, equal and fair justice to the students. 
We sincerely hope that this Hon’ble Court will be pleased to issue appropriate directions in order to avoid unfair, unjust and unequal treatment to the students.

Comments

Anonymous said…
I am a student of nirma university. The university is obliged to tell us about the expenses incurred in our teaching and also should justify with proper proofs for the complete fee demand. On the other hand the university reasons that the fee taken would be used to licence an online teaching software instead of leveraging free open source softwares. The university has spammed all the pleas and request by the students without taking into consideration the pandemic effects. It is running on a sole purpose of earning profits and doesn't comply to the betterment of the students or the parents as a whole.
Anonymous said…
Yes all private universities and schools must tell us how they spend our money. Many of their people don't get adequate salary. This education mafia syndicates need to be checked. Through the GB mechanism in name of autonomy they bypass all labour laws and social safety nets for employees. Harash sub ordinate staff. We must have an accountablity committee in such institutions with third party supervision.
vidhyaforall said…
Its clear violation of Article 14
Anonymous said…
I am writing this post as anonymous, for obvious reasons. As many of you, I have also been a part of Nirma University. What do you expect from a University founded on the business motives of profit and greed? I have personally seen the kind of conversations their teaching staff (so-called professors) indulge in. They are all obsessed with money, investments, movies, restaurants etc. If a student has a genuine doubt or query, they will normally brush you aside. The non-teaching staff is worse than those in government offices - they eat pan-masala, discuss about female students etc.
This culture is deeply ingrained from top to bottom in the university, across every teacher and every staff.
The so-called university continues in its nonsensical quest to be "multidisciplinary" by adding more and more courses. In each course, they charge an average of Rs. 2.5 lakhs, plus other expenses per annum. This is clearly a case of unregulated money making by the university. Students and parents are being exploited.

TRENDING

Unlike Soviet Union, Russia is no friend to India: Ukrainian scholar tells 'Indian friends'

Counterview Desk In an open letter to "dear Indian friends", Anastasia Piliavsky, born in Odessa, Ukraine, studied at Boston and Oxford Universities (on a Rhodes Scholarship), and now teaches at King’s College, London, has said that she faces "deep moral dilemma", personally and professionally, over the "astonishingly unified Indian response to the war in Ukraine." Based on her interaction with a "number of thoughtful and caring Indian friends", in this letter, she says, she is "reeling at the ubiquitous silence at, justifications of or outright support for Putin’s terror, which now prevails in India, at the ubiquitous #IStandWithPutin and #istandwithrussia hashtags." She insists, India must understand, "Unlike the Soviet Union, Russia is no friend to India. Soviet leaders, beginning with (the Ukrainian) Nikita Khrushchev – who declared hindi rusi bhai bhai – built up deep political and cultural exchange with India." Text : I

Teesta treaty? Modi sends ball to Mamata's court amidst Hasina's mango diplomacy

By Samina Akhter*  Most Bangladeshi and India media reports say that the West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has received 600 kg of mangoes from Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina as part of her "mango-hilsa diplomacy." Hasina also delivered mangoes to President Ram Nath Kovind and Prime Minister Narendra Modi this month, according to the Bangladesh Deputy High Commission in India. In all, 1,200 kg of Amrapali mangoes were delivered to the residences of the President and the Prime Minister of India. According to a Bangladesh's deputy high commission official in Kolkata, a few more chief ministers in the eastern region will likely receive similar gifts. Last year, not only President Kovind and Prime Minister Modi, but also the chief ministers of West Bengal, Tripura, and Assam also received mangoes from Prime Minister Hasina. Hasina delivered mangoes from Rajshahi, including kinds like Golapkhas and Amrapali, as it is the peak season for the delectable fruit in

Technocratic globalism, tyranny? Health Ministry warned: bill to 'enslave' Indians

Sandeep Pandey, Tushar Gandhi By Rosamma Thomas*  Union of Concerned Citizens, a group comprising Magsaysay Award winner Prof Sandeep Pandey, human rights activist Tushar Gandhi, former judge of the Bombay High Court BG Kolse Patil, pediatrician Dr Jacob Puliyel and several renowned Indian citizens have written to the Union Health Minister cautioning him against tabling the draft Public Health Bill in the Monsoon Session of Parliament. “The Public Health (Prevention, Control And Management Of Epidemics, Bio-Terrorism And Disasters) Bill, 2017 and a Prospective Bill of 2022 as discussed in news articles, is straightforwardly violative of Fundamental Rights of the citizens of India and therefore, Ultra Vires of the Indian Constitution. It contravenes several International Treaties and Conventions including the Nuremberg Treaty of 1947 which was enacted to ensure that no country would repeat such inhuman medical atrocities on fellow human beings”, the 12-page letter reads. “Strangely, t

Cops 'refuse to register' complaint after BSF shot landless worker off Bangla border

By Our Representative  Kirity Roy, secretary, Banglar Manabadhikar Suraksha Mancha (MASUM), and national convener, Programme Against Custodial Torture & Impunity (PACTI), in a complaint to the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), referring to the incident of “firing and execution” of a poor Muslim youth, has alleged that the 26 year old was was shot at “without giving any warning” one and half kilometers inside the Indian territory from Bangladesh border by an on- duty Border Security Force (BSF) personnel. Stating that the person, Ruhul Mondal, belonged to an Other Backward Class (OBC), and hailed from Ramnarayan Para village under Sagarpara police station in Murshidabad district, West Bengal, Roy in his representation said, the BSF person who shot at him is “attached with Singpara Border Outpost, 141 Battalion”, underlining, the BSF has now floated “self defense theory” to cover up its operation. According to the BSF officials, the incident took place in the jute fields in

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Protesters demand release of Teesta Setalvad, Sreekumar, seek review of SC order

By Our Representative  Protests broke out across India on June 27 following Teesta Setalvad’s arrest demanding her immediate release. Sabrang India , a site run by Setalvad, claimed she was “arrested on trumped-up charges after the Supreme Court dismissed the petition moved by Zakia Jafri demanding an investigation into the larger conspiracy behind the 2002 Gujarat violence.” The protesters also demanded release of former DGP Gujarat police RB Sreekumar, also arrested simultaneously. The protests were preceded by over 2,200 people from across the globe signing a statement demanding their immediate release. Leading signatories such as People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) general secretary V Suresh, National Alliance of People’s Movements (NAPM) convenor Medha Patkar, former Naval chief Admiral Ramdas. “The state has used the observations made in the judgment to falsely and vindictively prosecute those who had struggled for justice even in the face of state callousness and complicit

Electoral bonds scheme 'compromises' voluntary nature PM relief fund donations

By Rosamma Thomas*  The Prime Minister’s National Relief Fund (PMNRF) is meant to collect voluntary donations from the general public, either individuals or organizations, to enable assistance to people in times of natural disaster, or for expensive medical treatment. That fundamental voluntary character of the fund, however, has changed in recent years.  The gazette notification of January 2018 announcing the Electoral Bond scheme states, in Clause 12 (2): “The amount of bonds not encashed within the validity period of fifteen days shall be deposited by the authorized bank to the Prime Minister’s National Relief Fund”. The Union government has, thus, through notification, directed funds to be deposited into what was meant to be purely voluntary. Commodore Lokesh Batra, who has been campaigning for transparency in government functioning, holds that once a gazette notification has been issued directing that funds be deposited into the PMNRF, the character of the whole fund has changed,

Bulldozing houses in UP: India isn't Israel, Muslims living here 'aren't Palestinians'

By Naveen Tewari, Sandeep Pandey*  A recent full front page of the advertisement by a Bhartiya Janata Party government declares, 'House is not just a word. It is a place where power to dream comes and aspirations are fulfilled. Home is much about dignity and security than it is about shelter.' It further goes on to quote Narendra Modi, 'It is my dream that every Indian has a pucca house by 2022.' The occasion was dedication of houses built by a private builder Balaji to the poor. Having witnessed over the past few days the now iconic picture of a bulldozer running down the Prayagraj house of parents of female Muslim student and activist Afreen Fatima, who participated in the anti-Citizenship Amendment Act and National Register of Citizens protests, one is almost tempted to look for a fine print at the bottom of the page to the effect that the promise of house is subject to the condition that one doesn't participate in any anti-government protest otherwis

Church in India: Rooted in patriarchy, Pope Francis-initiated reforms remain on paper

By Fr Cedric Prakash SJ*  It is ‘Laity Sunday’ once again on June 26! A time for the Church once again to introspect and to see whether the much flaunted ‘lay collaboration’ actually exists in reality or not! In a highly clerical and patriarchal Church, which has stubbornly refused to accept in toto the changes envisaged by Vatican II and as desired by the then Popes John XXIII and Paul VI, introducing any reforms is certainly very difficult. But Pope Francis, in his typical style, is apparently succeeding in doing so! On March 19, 2022 (Feast of St Joseph) the ninth anniversary of the formal inauguration of his pontificate, he published Praedicate Evangelium (Preach the Gospel),his new constitution for the restructuring of the Vatican Curia. It was a reform that was promised at the beginning of his pontificate; several aspects of it have already been implemented over the years. The final document, however, does make some significant changes and provides the vision of a Curia that

'Highly abnormal': AltNews journo's arrest suggests 'deterioration in media freedom'

By Bharat Dogra*  Leading media organizations have come out in strong support of recently arrested journalist Mohammed Zubair. These organizations include, among others, the Editors Guild of India, the Press Club of India, the Delhi Union of Journalists and DIGIPUB, a platform for several important digital media organizations. All these organizations have condemned the recent arrest of the noted journalist and demanded his immediate release. While leading human rights organizations and political parties have also made somewhat similar statements, the strong support of media organizations is particularly important as the effort of the authorities has been to try to present the arrested journalist as someone who has been indulging in irresponsible journalism.  In such a situation the support of those media organizations who are familiar with his work and who are most capable of judging the quality of his work is very important. In this context it is important that some media organization