Skip to main content

Continuing to pursue politics of otherness, Modi 'lacks' creative qualities as a leader

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak*
A prime master of propaganda, Narendra Modi has survived all ordeals of Indian politics with the help of media myth making, on one hand, and his effective diversionary tactics, on the other. It gives Modi an immediate edge over his political opponents. The organisational network of RSS and BJP provide the ideological framework on which Modi pursues his politics of otherness.
In the short run, Modi and his ideological mentors in RSS may go ahead with destroying the founding principles of India as a republic: Social and religious harmony and secular political culture. A disastrous thrust, it would, however, fall in the long run due because of the inherent arrogance of his leadership.
Leadership in politics is not only about winning elections by hook or crook. It is about creative application of available ideas and resources for the greater good of the society. Creative politics is the heart of social, economic and cultural transformation which upholds democratic values, individual freedom and liberty and collective well-being at the top priority in everyday governance of the state and government.
Such creative ideals transform a political leader into statesman or stateswoman who engages with issues of the present and fortifies a sustainable future for generations. Modi does not care. His mission and vision are clearly shaped by RSS, which derives its ideological inspiration from European fascism and Nazism. Such ideological framework is seeking to push Indian society into indefinite darkness of hate.
Indeed, from all counts, Modi lacks creative qualities as a leader. Propaganda can hide the failures and entice the population to vote for a while. But propaganda cannot change the ground realities of lives and livelihoods of people. Creativity in political leadership demands to step back and reflect on everyday realities of the masses and their future.
The monumental blunders of demonetisation, failure of Goods and Service Tax (GST), mismanagement of economy, catastrophic handling of the pandemic, and centralisation of decision making and foreign policy failures show that Modi lacks qualities to reflect as a leader.
A leader learns from his or her own mistakes or learns from people but Modi has failed to learn from his own experiences or from others’ experiences. The top-down and dictatorial approach to politics takes a leader to the dustbin of history. There is reason to believe that history will judge Modi as a leader who destroyed the social fabric of India.
A nationalist leader inspires confidence and taps ideas from diverse sources and encourages collaboration between different people to deliver public welfare. India’s recent border conflict with China shows that Hindutva nationalism is a sham. It does not inspire confidence on national security. Modi is neither a team player nor a team builder. He prefers one-man show in front of the camera.
Propaganda can hide failures and entice people to vote for a while, but can't change ground realities of lives and livelihoods
There is no attempt by Modi to develop collaborative culture to overcome the crisis in India. Diversity is an asset in the making of nation states but it is an anathema to Modi as a leader. He promotes the RSS-led unhealthy culture of competitive bigotry in India. The authoritarian outlooks and fascist tendencies that we witness today are the products of RSS ideological training.
Good leaders are transparent about their strengths and weaknesses. By being open and liberal, leaders enhance innovation and diversity of decision making. Modi is neither transparent about his life, wife, degree or decision making. He moves secretly under the cloud theory of stealth and invisible courage. His vindictive actions against political opponents show his cowardice as a leader.
A successful leadership follows the historical legacies of a society and celebrates its past to share the present and future. Modi and his brethren in RSS and BJP are making every effort to destroy India’s glorious past by rewriting it and replacing it with myths. This appears essential for them to promote neoliberal capitalism and its consumer culture in India.
Helping accelerate the wealth of capitalist cronies, even as it may mean misery for millions, Modi appears keen to destroy existing institutions of governance with the help of his policies and politics. It helps him centralise power, which is concomitant with the requirements of capitalist accumulation of profit at the cost of people and environment in India.
An efficient and creative leader flames motivation and allows people to follow their passion in life but Modi follows people in social media, who give rape threats. Modi patronises social media trolls, who are violent and hate mongering invisible profiles. The people behind these invisible profiles are trained by RSS and BJP.
Meanwhile, the Hindutva forces are trying to impose their medieval mindset on students and youths of India by asking them what to wear, whom to love and marry, what to eat and whom to pray. These private and personal individual choices of everyday lives are sought to be restricted in the name of Indian culture and Hindu way of life. It suggests dangers of talibanization of Indian society.
A committed leader stands with people during crisis and shows the path to recover from the crisis. The empathy and sympathy are twin characters of a committed leadership but Modi gives shock therapy to people and put them in indefinite crisis. It is easier to control people in crisis than people in prosperity.
The Modi has little exposer to the history of radical resistance movements in world history. Like all religious and right-wing forces, the Hindutva forces have very little exposer to historical knowledge, science, social and political history.
The safety and survival of India as a modern, liberal and constitutional democracy and the future of Indians depend on defeating the ideological framework of RSS and BJP, which produces leaders like Modi. The propaganda has limited time span. It is a matter of time before people will rise up against such medieval forces. These forces have no place in a modern and democratic society. Good leadership is a product of political struggles.
It is time to pull together all liberal, progressive, nationalist, patriotic, and democratic forces to fight and defeat Hindutva fascism in India.
---
*Coventry University, UK

Comments

TRENDING

US govt funding 'dubious PR firm' to discredit anti-GM, anti-pesticide activists

By Our Representative  The Alliance for Sustainable & Holistic Agriculture (ASHA) has vocally condemned the financial support provided by the US Government to questionable public relations firms aimed at undermining the efforts of activists opposed to pesticides and genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in India. 

Modi govt distancing from Adanis? MoEFCC 'defers' 1500 MW project in Western Ghats

By Rajiv Shah  Is the Narendra Modi government, in its third but  what would appear to be a weaker avatar, seeking to show that it would keep a distance, albeit temporarily, from its most favorite business house, the Adanis? It would seem so if the latest move of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEFCC) latest to "defer" the Adani Energy’s application for 1500 MW Warasgaon-Warangi Pump Storage Project is any indication.

Bayer's business model: 'Monopoly control over chemicals, seeds'

By Bharat Dogra*  The Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) has rendered a great public service by very recently publishing a report titled ‘Bayer’s Toxic Trails’ which reveals how the German agrochemical giant Bayer has been lobbying hard to promote glyphosate and GMOs, or trying to “capture public policy to pursue its private interests.” This report, written by Joao Camargo and Hans Van Scharen, follows Bayer’s toxic trail as “it maintains monopolistic control of the seed and pesticides markets, fights off regulatory challenges to its toxic products, tries to limit legal liability, and exercises political influence.” 

Militants, with ten times number of arms compared to those in J&K, 'roaming freely' in Manipur

By Sandeep Pandey*  The violence which shows no sign of abating in the ongoing Meitei-Kuki conflict in Manipur is a matter of concern. The alienation of the two communities and hatred generated for each other is unprecedented. The Meiteis cannot leave Manipur by road because the next district North on the way to Kohima in Nagaland is Kangpokpi, a Kuki dominated area where the young Kuki men and women are guarding the district borders and would not let any Meitei pass through the national highway. 

105,000 sign protest petition, allege Nestlé’s 'double standard' over added sugar in baby food

By Kritischer Konsum*    105,000 people have signed a petition calling on Nestlé to stop adding sugar to its baby food products marketed in lower-income countries. It was handed over today at the multinational’s headquarters in Vevey, where the NGOs Public Eye, IBFAN and EKO dumped the symbolic equivalent of 10 million sugar cubes, representing the added sugar consumed each day by babies fed with Cerelac cereals. In Switzerland, such products are sold with no added sugar. The leading baby food corporation must put an end to this harmful double standard.

Can voting truly resolve the Kashmir issue? Past experience suggests optimism may be misplaced

By Raqif Makhdoomi*  In the politically charged atmosphere of Jammu and Kashmir, election slogans resonated deeply: "Jail Ka Badla, Vote Sa" (Jail’s Revenge, Vote) and "Article 370 Ka Badla, Vote Sa" (Article 370’s Revenge, Vote). These catchphrases dominated the assembly election campaigns, particularly across Kashmir. 

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

NITI Aayog’s pandemic preparedness report learns 'all the wrong lessons' from Covid-19 response

Counterview Desk The Universal Health Organisation (UHO), a forum seeking to offer "impartial, truthful, unbiased and relevant information on health" so as to ensure that every citizen makes informed choices pertaining to health, has said that the NITI Aayog’s Report on Future Pandemic Preparedness , though labelled as prepared by an “expert” group, "falls flat" for "even a layperson". 

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.