Skip to main content

Stop harassing Sarvodaya leader: Ex-Gujarat BJP CM, 200 others write to Rupani

Former BJP chief minister Suresh Mehta
Counterview Desk
More than 200 academics, activists, students, business-persons, other concerned citizens have sought Gujarat chief minister Vijay Rupani's intervention to stop harassment of Gandhian Sarvodaya activist Lakhan Musafir, an active campaigner for tribal rights and opponent of land acquisition for the Statue of Unity tourism project.
Signed by former BJP chief minister Suresh Mehta, veteran Gandhian Indukumar Jani, Sarvodayaist Prakash N Shah, sociologist Prof Ghanshyam Shah and environmentalist Rohit Prajapati, referring to the notice given to Musafir by Rajpipla sub-divisional magistrate, the letter says, the decision to bar him from entering five South Gujarat districts is defamatory, illegal, malafide, and a misuse of one's position to deny a person his fundamental rights.

Text:

We, the undersigned, are social and political activists and guardians of public life and wish to draw your urgent attention to an extremely important matter. It pertains to the upholding of democratic norms and a vibrant public life and we expect that you will treat the matter with the seriousness and urgency that it deserves and take appropriate steps.
Lakhanbhai Musafir has been served a notice barring his entry in five districts (Narmada, Bharuch, Vadodara, Chhota Udepur and Tapi) for two years by the Rajpipla Sub-Divisional Magistrate KD Bhagat. Citing a police report, he states that:
“… We know Lakhanbhai Megjibhai Musafir very well and he is not into any ‘honest business or profession’ and along with his companions is always involved in anti-social and illegal organizing of people in the Kevadia area against the Statue of Unity and other projects of tourism being undertaken by the Narmada Nigam and is misleading the people into anti-government activity and indulges in anti-government slogan shouting in public, creates obstacles in government’s work and disturbs the law and order of the area.
"If he is stopped in doing so he and his companions organize into illegal groups and organize violent attacks and they argue and get into altercations with the staff of Narmada Nigam on trivial matters and creates an atmosphere of terror.
"He displays a communal mindset and often targets the Statue of Unity by getting together antisocial elements, gives refuge to anti-government elements from outside the state and organizes meetings in the neighbouring villages and disturbs the peace of the area….”

The notice is long and repetitive and hence we are not reproducing it here.
The entire description, without any exaggeration on our part, is piece of fiction spun by a police constable which an officer of the rank of a Sub-Divisional Magistrate (SDM) has merely ‘copied and pasted’ without any investigation at his level and displays a lack of discernment and ordinary common sense on his part.
We wish to appraise you with details of just who this individual, Lakhan Musafir, thus described by the SDM really is.
  • 1982: He is the one who heard of Vinoba Bhave’s Gauraksha Satyagraha against abettoirs at Deonar (Mumbai) in 1982 and was inspired to follow in Gandhi’s footsteps; 
  • 1985: He worked for five months in VInoba Bhave’s Pavnar ashram (Wardha, Maharashtra) in 1985 and worked in the gaushala there; 
  • First half of 1985: He spent one and a half years with Dr Dwarkadas Joshi (a noted Gandhian and a successful eye specialist in Mumbai, who left his medical practice to join freedom movement, later he settled near Vadnagar, started a centre for TB patients there) during his gau-gram padyatra in North Gujarat, Kutchchh and contributed in the youth camps, organic farming and other rural development initiatives. This is the same Dr. Dwarkadas Joshi who the current PM and the former CM of Gujarat had acknowledged as owing his public life to the inspiration provided by Dr. Joshi and who presided over the function to felicitate the then CM in a public function in Visnagar. Thus, his formation as a social worker happened under the guidance of a leading Gandhian of that time. 
  • From 1986 to 1989 he stayed in Rajpipla on a friend’s farm and practiced organic farming along with helping to build public toilets and bathrooms and bio-gas plants in the neighbouring Adivasi villages. 
  • From 1989 to 1992 he stayed in Dheduki area of Rajkot district where he continued his engagement on promoting toilet-bathroom construction and organic farming and also initiated educational activities like balwadi and aanganwadi. 
  • Then again from 1992 to 1998 he remained in Kantindra village of Rajpipla where he continued his focus on organic farming and also organized the production of chemical-free organic jaggery so that farmers may realize a good price and consumers can get chemical-free jaggery. 
  • From 1998 to 2004 he continued his efforts to promote organic farming and turn farmers towards it. 
  • 2004 onwards he worked relentlessly to get farmers to start value-addition to their produce in order to augment their incomes and reap the benefit of their hard work. He also worked to get the Adivasi children admitted in the Navodaya Vidyalaya there so that the education level and the prospects of Adivasi children could improve drastically. Alongside, he kept up his engagement with the local farmers so that they could independently work to resolve their local issues. 
Lakhan Musafir
The year 2013 onwards he stood alongside the small Adivasi landowners/farmers in their (yet more state-sponsored) crises – Garudeshwar Wier, and KADA – Kevadia Area Development Authority. He not only provided legal guidance but also approached the National Green Tribunal and the High Court of Gujarat with petitions.
In the anti-KADA agitation the then Revenue Minister Anandiben Patel and the then Finance Minister Nitinbhai Patel held meetings with him and ultimately the government canceled its decision to declare an ADA there.
The person who has devoted his entire life to preserving constitutional values and who walked tirelessly in Gandhi’s footsteps, who eschewed the path of “earning money” and dedicated his life to public good and public welfare is today being termed by the SDM as...
“…this anti-social person routinely issues threats and resorts to physical force or violence…”!
How can SDM even imagine that this person, who walks on Gandhiji’s path of non-violent social service, lives among the poorest of the poor, works for their education, is an anti-social person and resorts to physical force?
“…does not do any acceptable honest work…”!
Disagreements with issues or motives or social movements is acceptable part of democracy, and debates and solutions can follow from that
How can a social worker, who has devoted his life to serving people, be doing acceptable honest work? We have had several social workers like Ravishankar Maharaj, Babalbhai Mehta, Jugatramkaka and Chunibhai Vaidya who have never pursued a profession ever. They found their life’s mission in serving the poorest of the poor, the last person.
The third serious charge against Lakhan Musafir in the notice is: He has a communal mindset. Who has accused him so? Without any complaint or law suit to the effect, without any proof or examination, how can the police determine his “communal mindset”?
We, the undersigned, have known Lakhanbhai directly or through his work and writings. The Lakhan Musafir described in the notice is a fictitious character and not to be confused with the real Lakhan Musafir who we all know. The ‘charges’ in the notice (if at all they can be called so) are not just outright lies but are most obviously defamatory. We thus call upon you to recall the notice with immediate effect.
We, as aware and vigilant citizens, wish to also make it clear to you that this is not a healthy precedent being set in your term as CM, and must be stopped immediately. Disagreements with issues or motives or social movements is an acceptable part of democracy, and debates, discussions and solutions can follow from that.
But hurling defamatory charges at an individual and misusing the law or one's position to deny a person his fundamental rights is an illegal and malafide act. We have no reason to believe that this would have happened on orders from your government. If so, then we wish to draw your attention and demand that:
  • The notice be recalled immediately; 
  • A high-level inquiry be instituted into how the notice came to be, who did it and on whose orders;
  • Immediate punitive steps be initiated against the officer out to deny democratic rights to an individual by spinning a fiction.
If the above are not initiated then it would mean one thing and one thing only: viz the entire episode happened on the orders of your government. This case cannot stand in a court of law and may/can/will result in “bad press” for your government, within and outside Gujarat.
We are hopeful of immediate and adequate actions in the interests of constitutionality, legality and morality.
Looking forward to immediate steps in the interests of the state and society.
---
Click here for the list of signatories 

Comments

TRENDING

Sergei Vasilyevich Gerasimov, the artist who survived Stalin's cultural purges

By Harsh Thakor*  Sergei Vasilyevich Gerasimov (September 14, 1885 – April 20, 1964) was a Soviet artist, professor, academician, and teacher. His work was posthumously awarded the Lenin Prize, the highest artistic honour of the USSR. His paintings traced the development of socialist realism in the visual arts while retaining qualities drawn from impressionism. Gerasimov reconciled a lyrical approach to nature with the demands of Soviet socialist ideology.

Nepal votes amid regional rivalry: Why New Delhi is watching closely

By Nava Thakuria*  As Nepal holds an early national election on Thursday (5 March 2026), the people of northeast India, along with other regional observers, are watching the proceedings closely. The vote was necessitated after the government of Prime Minister Khadga Prasad Sharma Oli collapsed in September 2025 following widespread anti-government protests. The election will determine the composition of the 275-member House of Representatives, originally scheduled for 2027, under the stewardship of an interim government led by former Supreme Court justice Sushila Karki.

From plagiarism to proxy exams: Galgotias and systemic failure in education

By Sandeep Pandey*   Shock is being expressed at Galgotias University being found presenting a Chinese-made robotic dog and a South Korean-made soccer-playing drone as its own creations at the recently held India AI Impact Summit 2026, a global event in New Delhi. Earlier, a UGC-listed journal had published a paper from the university titled “Corona Virus Killed by Sound Vibrations Produced by Thali or Ghanti: A Potential Hypothesis,” which became the subject of widespread ridicule. Following the robotic dog controversy coming to light, the university has withdrawn the paper. These incidents are symptoms of deeper problems afflicting the Indian education system in general. Galgotias merely bit off more than it could chew.

'Policy long overdue': Coalition of 29 experts tells JP Nadda to act on SC warning label order

By A Representative   In a significant development for public health, the Supreme Court of India has directed the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) to seriously consider implementing mandatory front-of-pack warning labels on pre-packaged food products. The order, passed by a bench of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and K.V. Viswanathan on February 10, 2026, comes as the Court expressed dissatisfaction with the regulatory body's progress on the issue.

From non-alignment to strategic partnership: India's ideological shift toward Israel

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak*  India's historical foreign policy maintained a notable duality: offering sanctuary to persecuted Jewish communities dating back centuries, while simultaneously supporting Palestinian self-determination as an expression of its broader anti-colonial foreign policy commitments. The gradual shift in Indian foreign policy under Hindutva-aligned governance — moving toward a strategic partnership with Israel while reducing substantive engagement with the Palestinian cause — raises legitimate questions about ideological motivation and geopolitical consequence.

Development vs community: New coal politics and old conflicts in Madhya Pradesh

By Deepmala Patel*  The Singrauli region of Madhya Pradesh, often described as “India’s energy capital,” has for decades been a hub of coal mining and thermal power generation. Today, the Dhirouli coal mine project in this district has triggered widespread protests among local communities. In recent years, the project has generated intense controversy, public opposition, and significant legal and social questions. This is not merely a dispute over one mine; it raises a larger question—who pays the price for energy development? Large corporate beneficiaries or the survival of local communities?

Indian ecologist urges United Nations to probe alleged Epstein links within UN ranks

By A Representative   A senior Indian ecologist and long-time United Nations environmental negotiator, Dr. S. Faizi of Thiruvananthapuram, has written to António Guterres, urging the United Nations to launch a high-level investigation into alleged links between certain current and former UN officials and the late American financier Jeffrey Epstein, following disclosures of email communications by the U.S. Department of Justice.

Vaccination vs screening: Policy questions raised on cervical cancer strategy

By A Representative   A public policy expert has written to Union Health Minister J. P. Nadda raising a series of concerns regarding the national Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination campaign launched on February 28 for 14-year-old girls.

The new anti-national certificate: If Arundhati Roy is the benchmark, count me in

By Dr. Mansee Bal Bhargava*   Dear MANIT Alumni Network Committee, “Are you anti-national?” I encountered this fascinating—some may say intimidating—question from an elderly woman I barely know, an alumna of Maulana Azad College of Technology (MACT, now Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology - MANIT), Bhopal, and apparently one of the founders of the MACT (now MANIT) Alumni Network. The authority with which she posed the question was striking. “How much anti-national are you? What have you done for the Alumni Network Committee to identify you as anti-national?” When I asked what “anti-national” meant to her and who was busy certifying me as such, the response came in counter-questions.