Skip to main content

Pressure tactics end South Gujarat's 1.5 lakh sugarcane workers' strike for more wages

Sugarcane workers' protest in Bardoli
By Jayesh Gamit, Denis Macwan* 
On the first day of the strike of sugarcane harvesting workers of South Gujarat, February 28, in which tribal migrant workers under the banner of Majur Adhikar Manch (MAM) participated, two teams of the trade union visited labour camps in and around Bardoli to assess the impact. The teams found that around 30 per cent workers went on strike and did not work.
The factory management deployed full strength of its recruitment staff to persuade workers to continue working. Recalcitrant workers were asked to pack up and go home without settlement of their accounts. Supervisors threatened workers, who had stopped work, that they would not be allotted farms for cutting sugarcane.
Nearly one and a half lakh sugarcane workers had agitated for higher wages, improved working and living conditions, and social security for last five years. Hence, on the second day, February 29, a general meeting and rally was proposed in front of the Bardoli Sugar Factory. For this, approval was sought and granted by the office of executive sub-magistrate, Bardoli, on February 27.
It is noteworthy that in spite of the enormity of pressure by the factory management, about 30 per cent of the harvesters had stopped work on the first day of the strike. There was a high possibility that the strike would spread furiously in the area after the general meeting and a rally of the protesting workers to the sub-magistrate’s office in Bardoli.
Fearing this, on the evening of February 28, the block administration cancelled its permission of organizing a public meeting due to the enormous pressure brought on by the sugar factory management and their vast network of political associates.
This became evident through the string of reasons that the administration presented to the members of MAM, Surat, which appeared baseless. The office of the magistrate conveyed that ground approved as the venue for the meeting was the space where the factory vehicles were parked. 
The said space is about 50,000 square feet of vacant space located in front of the factory. Out of this, the union had sought permission for meeting for 200 people only, for which 1000 square feet would be more than enough.
The pertinent question is, if the harvesters working for the factory do not demonstrate in front of the sugar factory for their demands, where else will they go? This step of the administration is a direct violation of the human and labour rights of the workers as per our Constitution. The union appealed against this move to the sub-division magistrate.
There was possibility that the strike would spread furiously in the area after the general meeting and a rally of the protesting workers to the sub-magistrate’s office in Bardoli
This is not the first incident of its kind. Earlier, on February 14, a closed-door meeting organized by MAM with the harvesters in the hall of the Bardoli Medical Association was unceremoniously interrupted by the police and the management of the sugar factory. The management of the Bardoli Medical Association was pressurised to cancel the booking made for the meeting after the attempts by the police to halt the meeting did not work.
It is the constitutional right of the workers to organize and fight for their rights. The factory management and the administration should know that if this right is violated, the anger of the workers will manifest in other ways, as was witnessed in Chalthan Factory in 2016, as per the information received by the union.
The factory management worked day and night to disrupt the strike. Representatives of the factory were using threats such as immediate dismissal and non-payment of wages to deter harvesters from stopping their work. Contractors were also being constantly threatened with non-clearance of accounts and that they would no longer be given work. Furthermore, the management went to the extent of threatening the workers with mechanization which would render the harvesters unemployed.
The extent of pressure being exercised by various powerful stakeholders was experienced by the union team when they were besieged by the sugarcane farm owners in Timbarawa village during the press coverage on February 28 while the strike was going on. The union team was threatened with dire consequences if they did not leave the area.
Given this atmosphere of terror and the excessive pressure by the administration, the union decided to withdraw its call for strike to ensure the safety of the harvesters. It submitted a memorandum on the demands of the workers to the Chief Minister through the province officer.
The struggle for human and labour rights will continue. The union will soon file a suit in the appropriate court against factory management for not following labour laws; while the efforts will continue to organize the harvesters.
---
*Secretaries, Majur Adhikar Manch, Dang and Surat, respectively

Comments

TRENDING

Sergei Vasilyevich Gerasimov, the artist who survived Stalin's cultural purges

By Harsh Thakor*  Sergei Vasilyevich Gerasimov (September 14, 1885 – April 20, 1964) was a Soviet artist, professor, academician, and teacher. His work was posthumously awarded the Lenin Prize, the highest artistic honour of the USSR. His paintings traced the development of socialist realism in the visual arts while retaining qualities drawn from impressionism. Gerasimov reconciled a lyrical approach to nature with the demands of Soviet socialist ideology.

Nepal votes amid regional rivalry: Why New Delhi is watching closely

By Nava Thakuria*  As Nepal holds an early national election on Thursday (5 March 2026), the people of northeast India, along with other regional observers, are watching the proceedings closely. The vote was necessitated after the government of Prime Minister Khadga Prasad Sharma Oli collapsed in September 2025 following widespread anti-government protests. The election will determine the composition of the 275-member House of Representatives, originally scheduled for 2027, under the stewardship of an interim government led by former Supreme Court justice Sushila Karki.

From plagiarism to proxy exams: Galgotias and systemic failure in education

By Sandeep Pandey*   Shock is being expressed at Galgotias University being found presenting a Chinese-made robotic dog and a South Korean-made soccer-playing drone as its own creations at the recently held India AI Impact Summit 2026, a global event in New Delhi. Earlier, a UGC-listed journal had published a paper from the university titled “Corona Virus Killed by Sound Vibrations Produced by Thali or Ghanti: A Potential Hypothesis,” which became the subject of widespread ridicule. Following the robotic dog controversy coming to light, the university has withdrawn the paper. These incidents are symptoms of deeper problems afflicting the Indian education system in general. Galgotias merely bit off more than it could chew.

'Policy long overdue': Coalition of 29 experts tells JP Nadda to act on SC warning label order

By A Representative   In a significant development for public health, the Supreme Court of India has directed the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) to seriously consider implementing mandatory front-of-pack warning labels on pre-packaged food products. The order, passed by a bench of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and K.V. Viswanathan on February 10, 2026, comes as the Court expressed dissatisfaction with the regulatory body's progress on the issue.

From non-alignment to strategic partnership: India's ideological shift toward Israel

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak*  India's historical foreign policy maintained a notable duality: offering sanctuary to persecuted Jewish communities dating back centuries, while simultaneously supporting Palestinian self-determination as an expression of its broader anti-colonial foreign policy commitments. The gradual shift in Indian foreign policy under Hindutva-aligned governance — moving toward a strategic partnership with Israel while reducing substantive engagement with the Palestinian cause — raises legitimate questions about ideological motivation and geopolitical consequence.

Development vs community: New coal politics and old conflicts in Madhya Pradesh

By Deepmala Patel*  The Singrauli region of Madhya Pradesh, often described as “India’s energy capital,” has for decades been a hub of coal mining and thermal power generation. Today, the Dhirouli coal mine project in this district has triggered widespread protests among local communities. In recent years, the project has generated intense controversy, public opposition, and significant legal and social questions. This is not merely a dispute over one mine; it raises a larger question—who pays the price for energy development? Large corporate beneficiaries or the survival of local communities?

Indian ecologist urges United Nations to probe alleged Epstein links within UN ranks

By A Representative   A senior Indian ecologist and long-time United Nations environmental negotiator, Dr. S. Faizi of Thiruvananthapuram, has written to António Guterres, urging the United Nations to launch a high-level investigation into alleged links between certain current and former UN officials and the late American financier Jeffrey Epstein, following disclosures of email communications by the U.S. Department of Justice.

Vaccination vs screening: Policy questions raised on cervical cancer strategy

By A Representative   A public policy expert has written to Union Health Minister J. P. Nadda raising a series of concerns regarding the national Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination campaign launched on February 28 for 14-year-old girls.

The new anti-national certificate: If Arundhati Roy is the benchmark, count me in

By Dr. Mansee Bal Bhargava*   Dear MANIT Alumni Network Committee, “Are you anti-national?” I encountered this fascinating—some may say intimidating—question from an elderly woman I barely know, an alumna of Maulana Azad College of Technology (MACT, now Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology - MANIT), Bhopal, and apparently one of the founders of the MACT (now MANIT) Alumni Network. The authority with which she posed the question was striking. “How much anti-national are you? What have you done for the Alumni Network Committee to identify you as anti-national?” When I asked what “anti-national” meant to her and who was busy certifying me as such, the response came in counter-questions.