Skip to main content

India's economic freedom rank, at 112, better than China, Brazil: Fraser Institute report based on 2014 data

By Our Representative
Well-known Canada-based Fraser Institute's "Economic Freedom of the World (EFW) 2016 Annual Report" has ranked India No 112 among 159 countries and territories in its latest EFW ranking, better than two major peer countries, China (No 113) and Brazil (No 124).
The report uses 2014 data, when the Narendra Modi government came to power.
The other two peer countries of the BRICS nations – South Africa and Russia – are found to perform better than India, 105th and 102nd, respectively. BRICS stands for Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa.
The 320 page report, released last week, says insists that if low-income countries “adopt policies more consistent with economic freedom, convergence will occur and the income gap decline.” It believes, “The gap in economic freedom between the rich and poor nations of the world narrowed and so too did the income gap.”
“After two centuries of expanding income inequality, the trend has reversed. Worldwide, income inequality is now declining”, it claims, adding, “Xavier Sala-i-Martin of Columbia University and Maxim Pinkovskiy of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York examined the data on this issue in great detail.”
The report insists, “To a large degree, these trends were driven by the rapid growth of populous countries, particularly China and India. While the ranking of both is still low, the EFW rating of China has increased substantially since 1980 (and India’s rating since 1990).”
Pointing out that “conceptually, economic freedom is present when economic activity is coordinated by personal choice, voluntary exchange, open markets, and clearly defined and enforced property rights”, the report measures its EFW rating on the basis of five major areas: size of government, legal system and security of property rights, sound money, freedom to trade internationally, and regulation.
Interesting, in the size of government, India ranks quite high, 8th, in legal system and property rights it ranks 86th, in sound money it ranks 130th, in freedom to trade internationally it ranks 144th, and in regulation it ranks 132nd.
Providing a few more rankings, the report finds that in credit market regulations it ranks 139th, in labour market regulations it ranks 99th, and in business regulations it ranks 73rd.
Hong Kong and Singapore occupy the top two positions, the report says. The other nations in the top 10 are New Zealand, Switzerland, Canada, Georgia, Ireland, Mauritius, the United Arab Emirates, and Australia and the United Kingdom, tied for 10th, it adds.,
Other major countries’ rankings are the United States (16th), Germany (30th), Japan (40th), South Korea (42nd), France (57th), Italy (69th), Mexico (88th).
The report believes, “Nations that are economically free out-perform non-free nations in indicators of well-being nations in the top quartile of economic freedom had an average per-capita GDP of $41,228 in 2014, compared to $5,471 for bottom quartile nations (PPP constant 2011 US$).”
“In the top quartile, the average income of the poorest 10% was $11,283, compared to $1,080 in the bottom quartile in 2014 (PPP constant 2011 US$)”, the report says, adding, “Interestingly, the average income of the poorest 10% in the most economically free nations is twice the average per-capita income in the least free nations.”
Taking the same logic forward, the report says, “Life expectancy is 80.4 years in the top quartile compared to 64.0 years in the bottom quartile. Political and civil liberties are considerably higher in economically free nations than in unfree nations.”
---
Click HERE to download report

Comments

TRENDING

Gujarat refusal to observe Maulana Azad's birthday as Education Day 'discriminatory'

By Our Representative
The Gujarat government decision not to celebrate the National Education Day on !monday has gone controversial. Civil society organizations have particularly wondered whether the state government is shying away from the occasion, especially against the backdrop of "deteriorating" level of education in Gujarat.

Rushdie, Pamuk, 260 writers tell Modi: Aatish episode casts chill on public discourse

Counterview Desk
As many as 260 writers, journalists, artists, academics and activists across the world, including Salman Rushdie, British Indian novelist, Orhan Pamuk, Turkish novelist and recipient of the 2006 Nobel Prize in literature, and Margaret Atwood, Canadian poet and novelist, have called upon Prime Minister Narendra Modi to review the decision to strip British Indian writer Aatish Taseer of his overseas Indian citizenship.

Visually challenged lady seeks appointment with Gujarat CM, is 'unofficially' detained

By Pankti Jog*
It was a usual noon of November 10. I got a phone call on our Right to Information (RTI) helpline No 9924085000 from Ranjanben of Khambhat, narrating her “disgraceful” experience after she had requested for an appointment with Gujarat chief minister Vijay Rupani. She wanted to meet Rupani, on tour of the Khambhat area in Central Gujarat as part of his Janvikas Jumbesh (Campaign for Development).

Violent 'Ajodhya' campaign in 1840s after British captured Kabul, destroyed Jama Masjid

Counterview Desk  Irfan Ahmad, professor at the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity, Göttingen, Germany, and author of “Islamism and Democracy in India” (Princeton University Press, 2009), short-listed for the 2011 International Convention of Asian Scholars Book Prize for the best study in Social Sciences, in his "initial thoughts" on the Supreme Court judgment on the Babri-Jam Janmaboomi dispute has said, while order was “lawful”, it was also “awful.”

There may have been Buddhist stupa at Babri site during Gupta period: Archeologist

By Rajiv Shah
A top-notch archeologist, Prof Supriya Varma, who served as an observer during the excavation of the Babri Masjid site in early 2000s along with another archeologist, Jaya Menon, has controversially stated that not only was there "no temple under the Babri Masjid”, if one goes “beyond” the 12th century to 4th to 6th century, i.e. the Gupta period, “there seems to be a Buddhist stupa.”

VHP doesn't represent all Hindus, Sunni Waqf Board all Muslims: NAPM on SC ruling

Counterview Desk
India's top civil rights network, National Alliance of People’s Movements (NAPM), even as describing the Supreme Court's Ayodhya judgement unjust, has said, it is an "assault on the secular fabric of the Constitution". In a statement signed by top social workers and activists, NAPM said, "The judgement conveys an impression to Muslims that, despite being equal citizens of the country, their rights are not equal before the law."

Would those charged for illegally demolishing Babri now manage a new Ram temple?

By Fr Cedric Prakash sj*
The long-awaited verdict on the contentious issue of the disputed land in Ayodhya was finally delivered by the Supreme Court on November 9, 2019. The judgement has come after a 70-year-old conflict filled with acrimony, divisiveness, hate and violence between sections of the Hindus and Muslims of the country. At the core of the issue was the Ram Mandir – Babri Masjid dispute: was there a temple on the place where the Masjid was built? To whom should the land be given to?