Skip to main content

Solidarity note: HDRC ad was meant to promote constitutional values of equality


An advertisement issued on April 6, 2016 by an Ahmedabad-based NGO, Human Development and Resource Centre (HDRC), recently turned into a full-blown controversy in Gujarat two and a half months later, because it called for giving preference to a non-reservation category person for the post of cleaner. It led to violent attacks (click HERE to read) on HDRC’s building, situated within the St Xavier’s College campus. The attackers, owing allegiance to saffron ideology, especially objected to naming caste/religious denominations as examples from whom the sweeper would be preferred. Tens of activists have come forward to support the HDRC and issued the following note:

We the undersigned concerned individual citizens would like to make our position/ stand public regarding a recent Human Development and Research Center (HDRC) advertisement to recruit sweepers for their office, stating that preference would be given to applicants from general category, who do not fall under reserved categories.
A series of violent protests were staged by different community groups against HDRC and its Director Prasad Chacko for hurting their individual and community feelings through that advertisement. This has been covered in both print and electronic media; hence it need not be elaborated. Many individuals and groups have filed a complaint against HDRC and Chacko with Gujarat Police Station under section 153 A of IPC. In addition to that many have given notice for clarification from HDRC and threatened to file legal complaints if HDRC does not provide appropriate clarifications and apologies.
In response to this, HDRC clarified their views on the advertisement clearly stating that it was absolutely not intended to hurt any one’s feelings, but to promote constitutional values and provisions and increased access to equal opportunity for all; especially in the occupations which are forced upon specific communities based on their social and caste identity. HDRC also expressed regret for having hurt the feelings of any individuals or community.
We the undersigned do share following common views and reflections vis-a-vis the advertisement and incidents which took place in its aftermath:The advertisement put forward does not violate any law of the land rather it appears to promote the principles of equality guaranteed by the constitution.
The names of communities mentioned in bracket were presented as instances and not specifying that they seek people from those specific communities.
We appreciate the initiative taken up by HDRC and its director to bring up the most pertinent issue into public discourse and challenge the systemic practices of inequality up front.
We firmly stand by HDRC and its Director Prasad Chacko in this time of anguish they are going through and will continue to support them in fighting for justice.
The protest against the advertisement might have hurt some people`s sentiments as it is claimed. But it also indicates insensitivity on the part of the larger society towards a particular community which has been forced to engage in this occupation for thousands of years. It also highlights how deep-rooted caste system, caste based discrimination exists.
We the undersigned have also come across following views and reflections coming from different people/organizations which are worrisome:Prasad has unnecessarily and intentionally invited the ruckus by way of job advertisement.
A number of secular individuals and organizations joined hands in support of HDRC. Barring some, they were predominantly Dalit rights activists and organizations. Hence, the issue remained a Dalit rights issue and not an issue of human dignity, equality and rights.
It is sad to note that, apart from groups of the so-called upper castes, other marginalized and minority community organizations have also imbibed the social evils of caste system and are practicing it, especially Muslim, Syrian Christians and Parsi communities in this case (this is evident from the fact that community leaders/ organizations from these communities joined the protest, made phone calls and sent memoranda/ complains to HDRC directly or via different mediums).
In the light of the above-mentioned views, reflections, experiences and concerns, we would like to put forward following appeal for action to all those concerned and who are struggling to ensure human dignity, equality, rights and unity. It is a call to ponder upon and contribute in whatever ways they can to take it forward:While continuing our efforts of empowerment and development of the most marginalized, we must stand in solidarity and support any individual/organization which challenges such unjust caste system and takes initiatives towards elimination of unjust systems.
In such situations we should openly come out of our comfort zones and stand firm and united and put aside our individual differences.
We as concerned citizens need to come forward to introspect about this caste based occupation and challenge the connection between occupation and the caste in our own way. So that sweeping and other such occupations are not associated to a particular caste any more. Thus, it should become just as occupations irrespective of caste, religion or any other ethnic identity.
---
In solidarity,
Jitendra Rathod, Hozefa Ujjaini, Debarun Dutta, Manan Trivedi, Rohit Prajapati, Hasina Khan, Nayan Patel, Neha Dabhade, Sahiyar (Shtri Sangathan), Vijay Parmar, Sushila Prajapati, Mustaqueali Shaikh, Fr. Cedric Prakash SJ., Johanna Lokhande, Devendra Makwana, Advaita Marathe, K Shrinivas , Brinda Pancholi, Irfan Engineer, Janisar Shaikh, B Chakradhar, Pankaj Zapadiya, Parsottam Vaghela, Mohan Krishna, Robert David, Geeta Oza, Karuppusamy, S. Vishwanathan, Mehul Manguben, Rafi Malek, Vasudev Charupa, Renu Desai, Rajesh Singh, Annie Namala, Indu Prakash, P.L.Mimroth, Harsh Mander, Shabnam Hashmi, Ovais Sultan Khan, Valay Singh, Shweta Tripathi, Sanjeev Kumar, Vimalbhai, Ishwar Vaghela, Franklin Christian, Asha Kowtal, Reshma Asrani, Rosemary Vishwanath, Fr. Aloy, Oblesh, Vijaya Kumar, Santosh Rohit, Satndar Bhagat, Kannadasan

Comments

TRENDING

US govt funding 'dubious PR firm' to discredit anti-GM, anti-pesticide activists?

By Our Representative  The Alliance for Sustainable & Holistic Agriculture (ASHA) has vocally condemned the financial support provided by the US Government to what it calls questionable public relations firms aimed at undermining the efforts of activists opposed to pesticides and genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in India. 

Modi govt distancing from Adanis? MoEFCC 'defers' 1500 MW project in Western Ghats

By Rajiv Shah  Is the Narendra Modi government, in its third but  what would appear to be a weaker avatar, seeking to show that it would keep a distance, albeit temporarily, from its most favorite business house, the Adanis? It would seem so if the latest move of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEFCC) latest to "defer" the Adani Energy’s application for 1500 MW Warasgaon-Warangi Pump Storage Project is any indication.

Bayer's business model: 'Monopoly control over chemicals, seeds'

By Bharat Dogra*  The Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) has rendered a great public service by very recently publishing a report titled ‘Bayer’s Toxic Trails’ which reveals how the German agrochemical giant Bayer has been lobbying hard to promote glyphosate and GMOs, or trying to “capture public policy to pursue its private interests.” This report, written by Joao Camargo and Hans Van Scharen, follows Bayer’s toxic trail as “it maintains monopolistic control of the seed and pesticides markets, fights off regulatory challenges to its toxic products, tries to limit legal liability, and exercises political influence.” 

Fostered by those in power, hatred 'hasn't been' part of Indian narrative

By Osman Sher*  It is strikingly ironic that the current climate of prevalent hate in India is fostered not by a disruptive fringe of society, but by those in power—individuals entrusted by the citizens to promote their welfare and foster peace and harmony. It is their responsibility to guide and nurture the populace as if they were their flock. 

Muslims 'reject' religious polarisation of Jamaat-e-Islami: Marxist victory in Kulgam, Kashmir

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak*  In the international sphere, an orgy of imperialist violence and wars on multiple fronts is unleashed on the world's population to divide people on religious and nationalist lines, destabilise peace, deepen crises, and control resources in the name of nationalism and religion. Under the guise of fighting Islamic terrorism and exporting the so-called market-led Western democracy, imperialist powers are ghettoising Muslims to control natural resources in various parts of Asia, as well as in Arab and Middle Eastern countries. 

Militants, with ten times number of arms compared to those in J&K, 'roaming freely' in Manipur

By Sandeep Pandey*  The violence which shows no sign of abating in the ongoing Meitei-Kuki conflict in Manipur is a matter of concern. The alienation of the two communities and hatred generated for each other is unprecedented. The Meiteis cannot leave Manipur by road because the next district North on the way to Kohima in Nagaland is Kangpokpi, a Kuki dominated area where the young Kuki men and women are guarding the district borders and would not let any Meitei pass through the national highway. 

Can voting truly resolve the Kashmir issue? Past experience suggests optimism may be misplaced

By Raqif Makhdoomi*  In the politically charged atmosphere of Jammu and Kashmir, election slogans resonated deeply: "Jail Ka Badla, Vote Sa" (Jail’s Revenge, Vote) and "Article 370 Ka Badla, Vote Sa" (Article 370’s Revenge, Vote). These catchphrases dominated the assembly election campaigns, particularly across Kashmir. 

NITI Aayog’s pandemic preparedness report learns 'all the wrong lessons' from Covid-19 response

Counterview Desk The Universal Health Organisation (UHO), a forum seeking to offer "impartial, truthful, unbiased and relevant information on health" so as to ensure that every citizen makes informed choices pertaining to health, has said that the NITI Aayog’s Report on Future Pandemic Preparedness , though labelled as prepared by an “expert” group, "falls flat" for "even a layperson". 

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.