Skip to main content

Rural Gujarat has one of the lowest proportion of pucca houses, majority "live" in one or two room dwellings

By A Representative
The latest Sample Registration System (SRS) data, released by the Census of India, have gone a long way to suggest that housing, especially for the poor, remains one of the most neglected sectors in “vibrant” Gujarat. With just about 48.1 per cent pucca houses in Gujarat, the data reveal that this is well below the national average of 52.2 per cent.
While as many as 13 out of 21 major states having a higher proportion of pucca houses in rural areas, the data show that Punjab and Haryana top the list with 92.8 per cent and 91.8 per cent respectively.
Only so-called Bimaru states – Bihar (31.9 per cent), Chhattisgarh (18.9 per cent), Jharkhand (23.2 per cent), Madhya Pradesh (26.1 per cent), Odisha (30.2 per cent) and West Bengal (28.5 per cent) – have lower proportion of pucca houses in rural areas than in Gujarat.
About 29.8 per cent of the houses in the rural areas of Gujarat are semi-pucca, and another 22.4 per cent are kutcha, the SRS report says. This is against the all-India average of 19.8 per cent and 28 per cent, respectively.
What should be equally worrisome to Gujarat’s policy makers is, a whopping 39.9 per cent of Gujarat’s houses are one room, which is against the national average of 33.1 per cent. Only four states have a higher proportion of one room houses – Bihar 44.3 per cent, 41.9 per cent, Tamil Nadu 47 per cent, and West Bengal 42.7 per cent.
Kerala has just 3.5 per cent of one room rural houses, but it has the largest proportion of big houses in India. As against Gujarat’s just 1.2 per cent of houses having five plus rooms, Kerala has some 12.6 per cent such houses. The all-India average on this score is 3.4 per cent.
Further, Kerala’s 27.8 per cent of rural dwelling units have four rooms, as against Gujarat’s just about 3.1 per cent. The all-India average on this score is 6.1 per cent. And, Kerala’s 38.1 per cent rural houses have three rooms, as against just 9.9 per cent in Gujarat; the all-India average being 13.3 per cent
Majority of Gujarat’s rural population appears to be living in two room dwellings – they form 45.1 per cent of the total dwelling units in the rural areas, as against the national average of 43.8 per cent.

Urban housing

The SRS data, however, suggest that, in housing conditions, urban areas are somewhat better than the national average. Thus, 89.9 per cent of houses in urban areas are pucca, as against the national average of 82.2 per cent. Here, too, the best performing states are Punjab and Haryana with 95.2 and 93.2 per cent of pucca dwellings.
However, majority of Gujarat’s urban population lives either in one room or two room houses – 34.6 and 50.1 per cent respectively. This is against the national average of 31.3 and 40 per cent respectively.
There are just two states, both of them more urban that Gujarat – Maharashtra (49.6 per cent) and Tamil Nadu (41.9 per cent) –that have a higher proportion of one-room dwellings.
Gujarat’s just 11.2 per cent of dwellings have three rooms, 3.1 per cent four rooms, and just 1 per cent more than five rooms – as against the national average of 16, 17.4 and 5.1 per cent respectively.

Comments

TRENDING

To Sonam Wangchuk: 'Will undertake 70 hour solidarity fast in Gujarat'

By Martin Macwan *  Dear Colleague Sonam Wangchuk, I have never met you personally. I wrote a short article at the time of your arrest. Your work correctly introduces you. There is truth in your words. You have embarked on a fast, following the footsteps of Gandhiji. Your intention is to make people think. Your demand is reasonable; I believe that the resignation of a single education minister will not improve the state of education in India. However, the question you have raised is extremely important for the future generation of the marginalized. Education is the key to power, development, and progress, which empowers a citizen.

US civil society coalition slams Hudson Institute for hosting RSS leaders

By A Representative   The Hudson Institute ’s “New India Conference,” held on April 23, featured senior figures from India’s ruling political ecosystem, including RSS General Secretary Dattatreya Hosabale and BJP foreign affairs head Vijay Chauthaiwale . The event also included U.S. officials and former diplomats such as Kurt Campbell, Kenneth Juster, and Nisha Biswal, alongside India’s Ambassador to the U.S., Vinay Kwatra.  

Remembering Rampur ka Tiraha: State violence and the birth of Uttarakhand’s struggle

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  In the turbulent political landscape of the early 1990s, India witnessed events that reshaped its social and regional equations. After the Babri Masjid demolition in 1992, Uttar Pradesh politics shifted dramatically, bringing the Samajwadi Party–Bahujan Samaj Party coalition to power in 1993 under Mulayam Singh Yadav. But the partnership was uneasy. Mulayam was never entirely comfortable playing the “Mandal card.” While Kanshi Ram and the BSP had consistently demanded the implementation of the Mandal Commission recommendations, Mulayam hesitated, wary of how the move might play out.