Skip to main content

Farmers' "indirect tax" crossed Rs 2 lakh crore per annum, says farmers' leader, calls agriculture a "tyrant vocation"

By Our Representative
Well-known farmers’ leader from Punjab Bhupinder Singh Mann has said that the proposal of the Narendra Modi government, to impose income tax on agriculture, will “bury the already dying agriculture”, saying it “exposes” the anti-farmer mindset of the Government of India.
Calling it “a deeprooted conspiracy to finish the agriculture”, in a media statement, Mann, who is national president of Bharatiya Kisan Union (BKU), one of India’s biggest farmers’ organizations, said, already the move has become “nonviable” with large number of farmers “committing suicides”, calling agriculture a “tyrant vocation.”
Mann, who is ex-member of Rajya Sabha, said the move suggests the Modi government has “backed out on its promise made in manifesto to implement the Swaminathan commission recommendations.”
Among important recommendations, the Swaminathan commission report, given to the Government of India a decade ago but remaining unimplemented, had said that the minimum support price (MSP) should be the total cost of production plus 50 per cent, even as the a UPA panel had recommended a margin of about 10 per cent more than the cost of production.
The report had said that there is no other profession which has such low return, calling farming as “the riskiest profession in the world due to uncertain weather conditions arising from climate change”.
Insisting that agriculture is the major livelihood source in India, the report had particularly wanted to “bring small farmers out of the poverty trap for ensuring sustainable food security."
Policy makers under the NDA government under Prime Minister Narendra Modi, however, have been insisting that the nation’s progress lies in migration of the rural population to urban areas by developing industry and service sector, which have a much higher rate of growth than agriculture (click HERE).
According to Mann, farmers are the “already victims of a very high indirect tax”. He adds, “As per the data of Ministry of Commerce report published in 1995, farmers are subjected to indirect tax of Rs 9,872 crore per year.”
Quoting another report, prepared by the task force on agriculture under Sharad Joshi in 2001, Mann said, farmers are “subjected to indirect tax of Rs 1,13,000 crores due to different restrictions imposed on agriculture.”
Making his own estimation, Mann said, “Indirect taxation is increasing every year and is estimated to have reached Rs. 2,00,000 crore per year in 2015. This indirect tax or negative aggregate measure of support to agriculture, is the primary reason for high indebtedness of agriculture which is forcing the farmers to commit suicides.”
“Instead of waiving the loan on farmers, this government is planning to impose income tax on agriculture which will completely kill the agriculture sector”, Mann said, adding, “Farmers are not paid appropriate price of their produce and the same time they are forced to by the input materials at the market price.”
He added, “Restrictions imposed on agriculture are like ‘sanctions’ imposed by hostile countries like US imposed on Iraq and Iran in the past. This is shocking. The government has imposed sanctions on farmers who feed the entire nation.”

Comments

TRENDING

Noam Chomsky, top scholars ask NRIs to take stand on human rights violations in India

Counterview Desk
Renowned world scholars, including Noam Chomsky, James Petras, Angela Davis, Fredric Jameson, Bruno Latour, Ilan Pappe, Judith Butler, among others, have issued a statement castigating the Narendra Modi government for allegedly creating an environment of fear through arrests, intimidation and violence.

Actionable programme for 2019 polls amidst lynch mobs, caste violence, hate mongering

Counterview Desk
Reclaiming the Republic, a civil rights network, has released a document prepared under the chairmanship of Justice AP Shah (retired) -- and backed, among others, by Supreme Court advocate Prashant Bhushan, bureaucrat-turned-human rights activist Harsh Mander, economist Prabhat Patnaik, Right to transparency activist Anjali Bhardwaj and social scientist Yogendra Yadav  (click HERE for full list) -- with the "aim" of putting forth policy and legislative reforms needed to “protect” and “strengthen” the Constitutional safeguards for India’s democratic polity.

Call to support IIM-Bangalore professor, censured for seeking action against Uniliver

Counterview Desk
Sections of the Indian Institute of Managements (IIMs) across India have strongly reacted to the decision to censure Dr Deepak Malghan, a faulty at IIM-Bangalore. Prabhir Vishnu Poruthiyil, who is faculty at IIM-Tiruchirapalli, has sought wider solidarity with Dr Malghan, saying, "The administration has censured Deepak for merely suggesting a meaningful action against Hindustan Unilever for their abysmal environmental record" by “disinviting” it for campus placement.

India under Modi "promoted" crony business, protected financial fraudsters, fueled bigotry

By Sandeep* and Rahul Pandey**
Narendra Modi's ascension to power was accompanied with jubilation and expectation. His supporters were expecting an end to era of corruption and initiation of good governance which was described as Achche Din. His party's adherence to idea of nationalism was believed to make India a vibrant country and guide India to be a world leader. He gave the slogan of 'Sabka Saath, Sabka Vikas' conveying that his government was for all.
Corruption The government system is infested with corruption. A minimum of 10% is siphoned off from government schemes and projects, some of which goes back to political party in power and remaining is pocketed by various administrative, executive and political functionaries. This corruption continues and has increased. Now an additional Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh (RSS) person working as Official on Special Duty or some equivalent position in every government department also has a share in this booty.
The Narendra M…

Inviting Rajapaksa to India "insult" to 1,40,000 Tamils killed by Sri Lankan army

Counterview Desk
In the context of Sri Lankan opposition leader Mahinda Rajapaksa being invited in India, about 75 human rights activists*, claiming to be concerned about rights violations during the civil war in Sri Lanka, especially in 2009, have joined together to express their dissent through a statement.

Post-advisory, Govt of India appears reluctant to ban e-cigarettes, "harmful" to kids

By Rajiv Shah
Is the Government of India dilly-dallying over the issue of banning e-cigarettes, which have been declared by anti-tobacco activists across the world as providing “an entryway to nicotine addiction”, especially among the kids? It would seem so, if the latest developments are any guide.

A Godse legacy? BJP rulers have "refrained" from calling Gandhi Father of the Nation

By Dr Hari Desai*
What an agony! On one hand, the entire India is celebrating the 150th birth anniversary of Mahatma Gandhi under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, but on the other side, so-called Hindu Mahasabha members have been found mock-enacting the killing of the Mahatma and celebrating the murder by distributing sweets!

No aadhaar, no ration? Hard blow by Gujarat govt on poor and marginalized

By Pankti Jog*
Only those who have aadhaar registration and linked it with ration card will get ration from a Public Distribution System (PDS) shop. This decision of the Gujarat government has hit very badly thousands of poor and marginalized communities of Gujarat, especially during the drought year.

World Bank needs a new perspective on development, not just a new president

By Maju Varghese*
The resignation of the World Bank President Jim Yong Kim was an unexpected development given the fact that he had three more years to complete his tenure. Resignations at such a high level after bidding for a second term is unusual which prompts people to think what would have led to the act itself.

Not just Indian women engineers, men too face sexual harassment at workplace: US study

By Rajiv Shah
A recent research, carried out jointly by two US-based non-profit organizations, Society of Women Engineers (SWE) and Center for WorkLife Law (WLL), based at the University of California, Hastings College of the Law, has found that 45% of women engineers as against 28% of men engineers complained that it was perceived as “inappropriate when women argued at work, even when it was work-related.”