Skip to main content

Minimalistic approach to rule-making creates confusion on implementing J&K RTI Act

Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative (CHRI) chairperson Jenaab Wajahat Habibullah, former Chief Information Commissioner, Central Information Commission, has sought the intervention of the Jammu & Kashmir chief minister on effective implementation of the J&K Right to Information Act, 2009. Text of the letter:
***
I am writing to you in my capacity as Chairperson of CHRI an international, independent, non-partisan, non-government organization headquartered in New Delhi. As you know, CHRI has worked closely with officials in the State Government and members of civil society in J&K for the practical realisation by the people of the State of the fundamental right to seek information from public authorities. Apart from spreading awareness about the procedures for seeking information from public authorities at the community level, CHRI is currently working with the district administration and social activists in Kulgam to make that district a model for the implementation of the J&K Right to information Act, with particular emphasis on proactive disclosure of information as per the law.
I am writing to invite your urgent attention to three issues. First, the J&K State Information Commission (JKSIC) has been functioning with only one State Information Commissioner for several months. The posts of State Chief Information Commissioner and that of an Information Commissioner are vacant. Appeals and complaints are accumulating before the Commission due to these vacancies, which arose when the State was under Governor’s rule, hampering the Commission’s ability to dispose of cases in a time bound manner, as required by the Act. You will appreciate that if the Commission is not able to dispose of people’s grievances regarding access to information in a timely manner, there is a real danger that they might lose faith in the Commission, and in the Act, which I know that you personally have always supported.
As the Chief Minister is the Chairperson of the 3-member committee that recommends names of suitable candidates for appointment to the JKSIC to the Hon’ble Governor, urge that you direct the General Administration Department (GAD) to initiate the process of identifying candidates for filling up the vacancies in continuance of J&K’s established tradition of selecting experienced experts from fields other than administration and governance such as law, social service, journalism, mass media, science, technology and management as specified in Section 12(5) of the J&K RTI Act.
In order to boost people’s confidence in the selection process, GAD, the nodal agency for implementing this law, might be directed to advertise the vacancies and invite applications from qualified people. Adopting a participatory process in the selection process will demonstrate your government’s commitment to select the most qualified and deserving candidates for appointment in a transparent manner.
Second, the comprehensive RTI Rules notified by the State Government in 2010 were replaced by a shorter set of Rules in 2012. This minimalistic approach to rule-making adopted by the previous Government has created confusion regarding the manner of implementation of the J&K RTI Act. For example, the 2010 Rules provided guidance about the rank at which a Public Information Officer may be appointed in every public authority. Those Rules also provided the legal basis for the Registry, the Secretariat and staff of the JKSIC. It also provided for a wing in the Commission to monitor compliance with the provisions of the RTI Act in various public authorities and a Public Relations Wing to smoothen the relationship between the seeker and the supplier of information.
The 2010 Rules, which carried the endorsement of the Central Information Commission as an improvement on the then Rules of the Government of India, provided for a detailed procedure for the disposal of first appeals within a public authority, and the manner in which the JKSIC would inquire into complaints and appeals. It also provided for a methodology to ensure compliance with the orders of the JKSIC. All these provisions are missing in the RTI Rules notified in 2012.
Consequently, there is lesser clarity about the manner in which the J&K RTI Act must be implemented. This was also brought to the notice of then Hon’ble Chief Minister Jenab Omar Abdullah. I suggest that you set up a committee comprising of representatives of all stakeholders such as Government, civil society actors and the JKSIC to re-examine the current set of RTI Rules as well as the Rules notified in 2010 and strengthen the procedures for implementing the J&K RTI Act.
Third, Section 23(1)(a) of the J&K RTI Act places a duty on the Government to conduct awareness raising programmes for the people of J&K about their rights for seeking and obtaining information with particular emphasis on disadvantaged segments of society. The J&K RTI Act is a seminal law that replaces the paradigm of governance from one of secrecy to that of openness, treating people as equal partners in decision-making, as it must be in any truly functional democracy.
A good way of spreading awareness about RTI would be to incorporate it as a subject matter in school and college text books. Children and youth inculcated early with the values of transparency and accountability necessary in public life will surely grow to be responsible citizens with a deep commitment to these values. This will greatly assist in your own endeavour towards inclusion of the youth in making governance in J&K more democratic, participatory, responsive and accountable than before. Indeed, it will be a strategic step to change the current mindset of undue secrecy and lack of adequate responsiveness towards the people that has been so evident at all levels up to the present.
Should you wish to discuss the issues raised in this letter in detail, you know that I personally and CHRI would be honoured to be at your disposal. I might be contacted at whabibullah@gmail.com or my colleague Mr. Venkatesh Nayak, Programme Coordinator, Access to Information Programme, CHRI (venkatesh@humanrightsinitiative.org; 011-43180215), in the matter.

Comments

TRENDING

Retired civil servants slam CJI’s remarks on environmental litigants

By A Representative   An open letter issued on May 22, 2026, by the Constitutional Conduct Group (CCG), comprising 71 retired civil servants from the All India and Central Services, has strongly criticized recent remarks made by the Chief Justice of India (CJI) against environmental litigants. 

The farmer's burden: How oil, war, and climate are rewriting the price of food

By Vikas Meshram   The scorching flames of the Middle East conflict are now slowly reaching the kitchens of ordinary people. The true price of this war is paid in daily markets, vegetable shops, and in the shattered minds of farmers. Expensive crude oil, skyrocketing fertilizer prices, and rising agricultural costs are together creating the conditions for global food inflation — and this crisis is directly tied to what people eat and drink every day.

Economic nationalism under strain as Indian corporates turn to America

By Sandeep Pandey*  U.S. federal prosecutors withdrew a criminal case involving allegations that Gautam Adani had bribed officials in India to secure solar energy projects, stating that they lacked sufficient evidence. Gautam Adani and his nephew Sagar Adani also settled a civil fraud case with the Securities and Exchange Commission by paying a fine of around ₹180 crore without admitting wrongdoing. In addition, Adani Enterprises reportedly deposited around ₹2,750 crore into the U.S. Treasury to resolve allegations that it had violated U.S. sanctions on Iran through purchases of Iranian liquefied petroleum gas (LPG).