Skip to main content

Hinduism has "well-establshed, traditional system" of disposing of dead cows, says VHP, invites Dalit ire

By Our Representative
The Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP), Sangh Parivar “cultural” arm, may have triggered a major controversy by declaring that the “Hindu religion has a well-established system of disposing of cows and other animals who die a natural death”, and this has been a part of the Hindu "tradition.”
Issued by the VHP's Gujarat unit general secretary Ranchhodbhai Bharwad on July 19, the statement has been made in order to “condemn” the Una incident, in which four Dalit youths were tied to an SUV and beaten up with iron rods for seeking to skin a dead cow.
Saying that one cannot equate what the Dalit youths were doing in Una with cow slaughter, it adds, “We condemn in strongest possible terms efforts atrocity committed by by certain elements in this context.”
In an immediate reaction, Rajesh Solanki, a senior activist with the Ahmedabad-based Dalit Hak Rakshak Manch (DHRM) has called the statement “highly objectionable”, insisting, “This atrocity of disposing of dead animals was imposed on Dalits by Manu's caste system.”
Addressing the VHP leader's statement, he insists, “Whatever you do, you will now have to take care of the last rites of the mother cow”, referring to the Dalits' massive protest by refusing to dispose of carcasses of cow as part of the protest against the July 11 Una incident.
The VHP statement comes, ostensibly, ignoring huge amount of literature already available on how disposing of cow and other animals is part of the caste occupation of a section of Dalits by heredity associated with the job of tannery.
Dalits in the job of this work are quoted as saying that that “the holy cow is alive, it is divine”, but “the moment that animal dies, it ceases to be sacred.” Arun Kumar, a sweeper in a notified area in Odisha is quoted as telling well-known scribe P Sainath: “Those who worshipped it while it was alive will not touch it. They are desperate to get rid of it.”
VHP statement
Another Dalit, Bijoy Sindhur, says he “survives” on the disposal work. "I have been doing this utava kaam - lifting of carcasses - since I was a child helping my parents. And on my own for nearly 10 years. The last cow I lifted was a few weeks ago."
Well-known Dalit write Kancha Ilaiah says, “The Dalits have had to pay an enormous price — of remaining untouchables — for removing carcasses from villages and towns for thousands of years. They had to pay the price of remaining illiterate and insecure for building up the leather economy of India.”
Ilaiah quotes Dr BR Ambedkar, father of Indian constitution, as saying that in ancient India the Dalits could not imitate the savarnas in giving up beef-eating, because they "could not afford it”, adding, “The flesh of the dead cow was their principal sustenance. Without it they would starve.”
Dr Ambedkar further says, “Carrying the dead cow had become an obligation though originally it was a privilege. As they could not escape carrying the dead cow they did not mind using the flesh as food in the manner in which they were doing previously".

Comments

TRENDING

Noam Chomsky, top scholars ask NRIs to take stand on human rights violations in India

Counterview Desk
Renowned world scholars, including Noam Chomsky, James Petras, Angela Davis, Fredric Jameson, Bruno Latour, Ilan Pappe, Judith Butler, among others, have issued a statement castigating the Narendra Modi government for allegedly creating an environment of fear through arrests, intimidation and violence.

Actionable programme for 2019 polls amidst lynch mobs, caste violence, hate mongering

Counterview Desk
Reclaiming the Republic, a civil rights network, has released a document prepared under the chairmanship of Justice AP Shah (retired) -- and backed, among others, by Supreme Court advocate Prashant Bhushan, bureaucrat-turned-human rights activist Harsh Mander, economist Prabhat Patnaik, Right to transparency activist Anjali Bhardwaj and social scientist Yogendra Yadav  (click HERE for full list) -- with the "aim" of putting forth policy and legislative reforms needed to “protect” and “strengthen” the Constitutional safeguards for India’s democratic polity.

Call to support IIM-Bangalore professor, censured for seeking action against Uniliver

Counterview Desk
Sections of the Indian Institute of Managements (IIMs) across India have strongly reacted to the decision to censure Dr Deepak Malghan, a faulty at IIM-Bangalore. Prabhir Vishnu Poruthiyil, who is faculty at IIM-Tiruchirapalli, has sought wider solidarity with Dr Malghan, saying, "The administration has censured Deepak for merely suggesting a meaningful action against Hindustan Unilever for their abysmal environmental record" by “disinviting” it for campus placement.

India under Modi "promoted" crony business, protected financial fraudsters, fueled bigotry

By Sandeep* and Rahul Pandey**
Narendra Modi's ascension to power was accompanied with jubilation and expectation. His supporters were expecting an end to era of corruption and initiation of good governance which was described as Achche Din. His party's adherence to idea of nationalism was believed to make India a vibrant country and guide India to be a world leader. He gave the slogan of 'Sabka Saath, Sabka Vikas' conveying that his government was for all.
Corruption The government system is infested with corruption. A minimum of 10% is siphoned off from government schemes and projects, some of which goes back to political party in power and remaining is pocketed by various administrative, executive and political functionaries. This corruption continues and has increased. Now an additional Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh (RSS) person working as Official on Special Duty or some equivalent position in every government department also has a share in this booty.
The Narendra M…

Inviting Rajapaksa to India "insult" to 1,40,000 Tamils killed by Sri Lankan army

Counterview Desk
In the context of Sri Lankan opposition leader Mahinda Rajapaksa being invited in India, about 75 human rights activists*, claiming to be concerned about rights violations during the civil war in Sri Lanka, especially in 2009, have joined together to express their dissent through a statement.

Post-advisory, Govt of India appears reluctant to ban e-cigarettes, "harmful" to kids

By Rajiv Shah
Is the Government of India dilly-dallying over the issue of banning e-cigarettes, which have been declared by anti-tobacco activists across the world as providing “an entryway to nicotine addiction”, especially among the kids? It would seem so, if the latest developments are any guide.

A Godse legacy? BJP rulers have "refrained" from calling Gandhi Father of the Nation

By Dr Hari Desai*
What an agony! On one hand, the entire India is celebrating the 150th birth anniversary of Mahatma Gandhi under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, but on the other side, so-called Hindu Mahasabha members have been found mock-enacting the killing of the Mahatma and celebrating the murder by distributing sweets!

No aadhaar, no ration? Hard blow by Gujarat govt on poor and marginalized

By Pankti Jog*
Only those who have aadhaar registration and linked it with ration card will get ration from a Public Distribution System (PDS) shop. This decision of the Gujarat government has hit very badly thousands of poor and marginalized communities of Gujarat, especially during the drought year.

World Bank needs a new perspective on development, not just a new president

By Maju Varghese*
The resignation of the World Bank President Jim Yong Kim was an unexpected development given the fact that he had three more years to complete his tenure. Resignations at such a high level after bidding for a second term is unusual which prompts people to think what would have led to the act itself.

Not just Indian women engineers, men too face sexual harassment at workplace: US study

By Rajiv Shah
A recent research, carried out jointly by two US-based non-profit organizations, Society of Women Engineers (SWE) and Center for WorkLife Law (WLL), based at the University of California, Hastings College of the Law, has found that 45% of women engineers as against 28% of men engineers complained that it was perceived as “inappropriate when women argued at work, even when it was work-related.”