Skip to main content

Centre has done the right thing to initiate a probe into the funding of Islamic preacher Zakir Naik’s NGO

By Firoz Bakht Ahmed*
Some ten years ago, while I had started to hear Zakir Naik, my first impression was that he is an Islamic researcher, having command over his other religions’ scriptures, with an amazing memory bank backed by skilled oratory. However, when time progressed and he started disparaging and belittling other religions and their gods and goddesses, I could gauge through his nefarious design of spreading the Wahabi-Salafi brand of exclusivist and dogmatic Islam under which extremism and bigotry are allowed.
The way, Zakir is propagating his petro dollar funded religion with Islamic supremacy and belittling other religions, this is not Islam at all as in Islam, the biggest sin is hurting the other person’s feelings. Naik’s trend is similar to that of the ISIS.
Now that Naik is in the quagmire of an international controversy and banned in the UK, Canada, Indonesia and Malaysia, I could connect to the fact that this quandary was not very far. Though it took almost ten years in secular and safe India for the government to have awakened and understood the purport of the exclusivist and radicalized Naik, however, better late than never.
Even the suicide bombers, absolutely castigated by Islam, are allowed in the obscurantist Wahabi Islam. Perhaps, Zakir Naik was carrying out a design — arabized Islam — a dangerous option. The irony is that this very brand of Islam that he preaches is un-Islamic and has given a u-turn to the a, b, c, d of Islam from amicability to animosity, benignity to barbarism, compassion to cruelty, dialogue to deadlock and rationalism to radicalism.
In radicalized Wahabi Islam, there is no room for modernity and moderation — both inseparable features of Islam preached by Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) and the holy Quran. Wahabis sham Sufi saints and instruct to pull down their graves, including that of the Prophet. Their terrifying vocabulary is fully negative with words like — bidat (infringement), shirk (equating someone with Allah), jahannam (hell) etc. Even for the minutest flaws like seeing a film, dancing, singing etc, a Muslim is hell bent according to Naik’s hellish explanations based on the Salafi tenet which believes in everything that harms and hirts Islam. The Wahabis believe that all the non-Muslims are to be subjected to biggest misery including the Sufis and Shias even. They do not recognize even Prophet Muhammad.
The massive funding by Naik’s supporter, the Saudi government and other unknown sources from various nooks and crannies of the world, aim at tarnishing and defilement of the Sufi or moderate and accommodative version of Islam, basically followed in India and most of the world. Once in the 13th century, the eminent traveler, Ibn-e-Batuta came to India and commented that the Indian version of Islam was the best. It that pluralistic vision that is being hit at its roots by the Wahabi Naik.
Zakir Naik, under the guise of interfaith understanding, is in reality, indulging in misunderstanding and misinterpretation through his mammoth memory of the lines, verses, pages and chapter numbers of the holy scriptures of different faiths which actually casts a magical spell on the innocent and unassuming listeners taking him to be an enigma.
Truth is that it is an impious cocktail after the mix-up of all religion, ritual and orthodoxy in the horrendous cauldron of Naik’s misguided zeal. He takes them for a ride that way. What is very loathsome is the clapping of the huge populace at his gatherings laughing at the mockery and disparaging of the Hindu gods and goddesses.
This immature act will not augur well for a common Muslim as whatever creaking doors of Hindus brethren, are opening upon him, will stop, rather, be banged upon him. Naik will come out of this imbroglio owing to his clout; however, a common Muslim on the street will face the backlash as he will be branded as Zakir or Owaisi follower.
In public, he claims his religion to be the best while disparages others’ faiths. In one of his live lectures, he stated that Ganpati was killed before his father who couldn’t save him; therefore how would Hindu Gods protect their followers. Beyond doubt, it was a very hurting and incendiary comment. How bad the Hindu brethren would have felt? As a matter of fact, Quran says,”Lakum dinokum, waley yadeen”, meaning, “You follow your religion and let’s follow ours.” According to Prophet Muhammad, the most hateful act is hurting somebody and Naik hurts and hurts on the pretext of calling a spade a spade.
Truth is that in Islam, hurting other people’s feelings, is considered to be the biggest sin. The problem is that the adamant preachers like Zakir Naik through their so called intolerant and fanatical homilies and sermons, hurt people beyond redemption. Naik is very arrogant to the point of publicly humiliating those people whose questions challenge him. Anyone who wants to have a debate with him, he turns inflexible and rigid stating that before debating him, one must enjoy the confidence of a gathering of at least ten thousand followers. While uttering all that jargon, he often demeans and publicly humiliates the unassuming person.
Naik preached that all Muslims could turn into terrorists if Islam was in danger. He also stated that the graves and temples need to be demolished. He favoured the breaking the Bamiyan Buddhas’s statues to teach a lesson to the Buddhists. He even praised Yazid who had slashed the jugular of the Prophet’s grandson, Imam Hussain. It is a blasphemy. According to him if a Muslim, out of interfaith goodwill smears a bit of gulal (red powder) on his forehead on the occasion of Holi, he is deprived of his religion and is excommunicated from Islam. What humbug!
Based on false piety, Naik’s explanations regarding polygamy, kufr (atheism), family planning,burqa, talaq and afterlife, are all puerile and unacceptable by a common Muslim. He cursed Sania Mirza playing tennis stating that she was hell bound. He favoured suicide bombing and Osama. There wasn’t a single word by him on Saudi Arab Medina blasts. Owing to being backed by huge funding, he has been branding and packaging the Wahabi tenet from his designer stages worth millions of rupees. Innocent Muslims get carried by that immense spectacle.
The Centre has done the right thing to initiate a probe into the funding of Islamic preacher Zakir Naik’s NGO, Islamic Research Foundation (IRF), after his speeches came under scanner for inspiring the Dhaka attack in which Bangladeshi militants killed 22 people, mostly foreigners as two of the terrorists, Rohan Imtiaz and Nibras Islam, were influenced by his misguided ideology. There are allegations that the NGO's funds were used to “induce” people to follow Islam and radicalize youngsters.
Rohan and Nibras were indoctrinated and brainwashed by the speeches and websites of Zakir Naik like Bangalore’s Kafil who had carried out the Glasgow terror attack, Najibullah Zazi who had carried out the attacks in the US and Rahil Sharif, the 7/11 train blasts accused besides others. While I heard Naik and his ilk stating in defence that they had no hand in the terror attack, it holds no water as what is of paramount importance to note down, is the ideology and logic of the that hideous ghetto mindset that encourages acts of terror.
There are fatwas (an Islamic decree) even against him by the Darul Uloom Deoband that his content and methodology of treating other religions inferior, is against the Islamic tenets and away from knowledge and wisdom (Fatwa 288/ 4894 and Fatwa 1541/ 1322). They call him Ghair Muqallid (not following true Islam).
What is most shocking is that despite having known about his nefarious plans pertaining to Wahabi indoctrination, the previous and present governments besides the Bihar and UP ones, never fixed Naik owing to their own perfidious plans of vote bank politics. He is a half baked preacher with half truths and lies in the market of packaged religions like any other baba! Whether he is imprisoned or not, it is it is for the investigating agencies to decide, however, the way is is avoiding to come to India, smacks of all that is fishy.
---
*Columnist, educationist, chairman of Friends for Education, grandnephew of Maulana Abul Kalam Azad, India’s first Minister of Education

Comments

TRENDING

US govt funding 'dubious PR firm' to discredit anti-GM, anti-pesticide activists

By Our Representative  The Alliance for Sustainable & Holistic Agriculture (ASHA) has vocally condemned the financial support provided by the US Government to questionable public relations firms aimed at undermining the efforts of activists opposed to pesticides and genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in India. 

Modi govt distancing from Adanis? MoEFCC 'defers' 1500 MW project in Western Ghats

By Rajiv Shah  Is the Narendra Modi government, in its third but  what would appear to be a weaker avatar, seeking to show that it would keep a distance, albeit temporarily, from its most favorite business house, the Adanis? It would seem so if the latest move of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEFCC) latest to "defer" the Adani Energy’s application for 1500 MW Warasgaon-Warangi Pump Storage Project is any indication.

Bayer's business model: 'Monopoly control over chemicals, seeds'

By Bharat Dogra*  The Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) has rendered a great public service by very recently publishing a report titled ‘Bayer’s Toxic Trails’ which reveals how the German agrochemical giant Bayer has been lobbying hard to promote glyphosate and GMOs, or trying to “capture public policy to pursue its private interests.” This report, written by Joao Camargo and Hans Van Scharen, follows Bayer’s toxic trail as “it maintains monopolistic control of the seed and pesticides markets, fights off regulatory challenges to its toxic products, tries to limit legal liability, and exercises political influence.” 

105,000 sign protest petition, allege Nestlé’s 'double standard' over added sugar in baby food

By Kritischer Konsum*    105,000 people have signed a petition calling on Nestlé to stop adding sugar to its baby food products marketed in lower-income countries. It was handed over today at the multinational’s headquarters in Vevey, where the NGOs Public Eye, IBFAN and EKO dumped the symbolic equivalent of 10 million sugar cubes, representing the added sugar consumed each day by babies fed with Cerelac cereals. In Switzerland, such products are sold with no added sugar. The leading baby food corporation must put an end to this harmful double standard.

Militants, with ten times number of arms compared to those in J&K, 'roaming freely' in Manipur

By Sandeep Pandey*  The violence which shows no sign of abating in the ongoing Meitei-Kuki conflict in Manipur is a matter of concern. The alienation of the two communities and hatred generated for each other is unprecedented. The Meiteis cannot leave Manipur by road because the next district North on the way to Kohima in Nagaland is Kangpokpi, a Kuki dominated area where the young Kuki men and women are guarding the district borders and would not let any Meitei pass through the national highway. 

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.

Can voting truly resolve the Kashmir issue? Past experience suggests optimism may be misplaced

By Raqif Makhdoomi*  In the politically charged atmosphere of Jammu and Kashmir, election slogans resonated deeply: "Jail Ka Badla, Vote Sa" (Jail’s Revenge, Vote) and "Article 370 Ka Badla, Vote Sa" (Article 370’s Revenge, Vote). These catchphrases dominated the assembly election campaigns, particularly across Kashmir. 

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Will Bangladesh go Egypt way, where military ruler is in power for a decade?

By Vijay Prashad*  The day after former Bangladeshi Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina left Dhaka, I was on the phone with a friend who had spent some time on the streets that day. He told me about the atmosphere in Dhaka, how people with little previous political experience had joined in the large protests alongside the students—who seemed to be leading the agitation. I asked him about the political infrastructure of the students and about their political orientation. He said that the protests seemed well-organized and that the students had escalated their demands from an end to certain quotas for government jobs to an end to the government of Sheikh Hasina. Even hours before she left the country, it did not seem that this would be the outcome.