Skip to main content

81 per cent Indians have "no objection" if fleeing refugees take refuge in the country: Amnesty survey

By A Representative
A new survey by a multinational advocacy group, Amnesty International, has said that 81 per cent of Indians would have no objection in welcoming into India people who flee war or persecution in another country. While this may appear to be quite high, there are 16 other countries where a higher percentage of people would be ready to accept refugees.
Thus, the survey – carried out across 27 countries based on interviews with 27,000 people – shows that Spain tops the list with 97 per cent of people saying they were willing to accept refugees in their country, followed by Germany 96 per cent, Jordan and China 94 per cent, each.
People willing to accept fleeing refugees in their countries
Surprisingly, Pakistan has a higher, 87 per cent, of people willing to accept refugees suffering from war and persecution than India. The countries with the lowest percentage of people willing to accept such refugees are South Africa 69 per cent, Poland 56 per cent, and Russia 33 per cent.
The survey has been released ahead of the next week’s World Humanitarian Summit in Istanbul on 23-24 May in order to press for a new, permanent system for sharing the responsibility to host and assist refugees. The summit has been called by UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon to address the biggest humanitarian and refugee crises in 70 years.
Amnesty believes, there is a need to resettle 1.2 million refugees by the end of 2017, which is far more than the 100,000 per year governments are currently taking annually, but less than a tenth of the 19.5 million refugees in the world today.
People willing to accept refugees in home
“Governments at the World Humanitarian Summit must address the $15 billion shortfall in humanitarian funding highlighted by the UN at the start of 2016, putting forward more money to support both refugees and the countries hosting large numbers of refugees”, the Amnesty survey report says.
To yet another question posed by Amnesty, just about six per cent of Indians said they were ready to accept people fleeing war or persecution into their home. This is lower than people in 17 other countries out of 26 surveyed.
Significantly, as many as 11 per cent of Pakistanis – nearly double that of Indians –said they were ready to accept such refugees in their home.
While the Chinese topped the list with 46 per cent people welcoming such refugees in their home, followed by UK (29 per cent) and Greece (20 per cent), just about one per cent of people from Russia and Indonesia said they were willing.
To a third question whether people should be allowed to take refuge in other countries to escape from war or persecution, 65 per cent Indians said answered in the positive, which is less than people in 20 of the 27 countries surveyed.
Here, again, a higher per cent of Pakistanis, 81, said they believe their county should allow refugees from other countries. Germans tops the list with 94 per cent, followed by Syria (93 per cent), while in the rock bottom were Turkey 47 per cent and Thailand 27 per cent.
People wanting their government to do more for fleeing refugees
Asked if the government should do more to help refugees fleeing war or persecution, just 41 per cent of Indians answered in the positive, which is one of the worst among the 27 countries surveyed. People from two other countries – Thailand (29 per cent) and Russia (26 per cent) – showed a lesser inclination to this end.
The Refugees Welcome Index was prepared interviewing 27,000 people in 27 countries how closely they would accept refugees on a sliding scale: in their home, their neighbourhood, their city/town/village or in their country – or if they would refuse them entry to the country altogether.

Comments

TRENDING

Was Netaji forced to alter face, die in obscurity in USSR in 1975? Was he so meek?

  By Rajiv Shah   This should sound almost hilarious. Not only did Subhas Chandra Bose not die in a plane crash in Taipei, nor was he the mysterious Gumnami Baba who reportedly passed away on 16 September 1985 in Ayodhya, but we are now told that he actually died in 1975—date unknown—“in oblivion” somewhere in the former Soviet Union. Which city? Moscow? No one seems to know.

Love letters in a lifelong war: Babusha Kohli’s resistance in verse

By Ravi Ranjan*  “War does not determine who is right—only who is left.” Bertrand Russell’s words echo hauntingly in our times, and few contemporary Hindi poets embody this truth as profoundly as Babusha Kohli. Emerging from Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, Kohli has carved a unique space in literature by weaving together tenderness, protest, and philosophy across poetry, prose, and cinema. Her work is not merely artistic expression—it is resistance, refuge, and a call for peace.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Asbestos contamination in children’s products highlights global oversight gaps

By A Representative   A commentary published by the International Ban Asbestos Secretariat (IBAS) has drawn attention to the challenges governments face in responding effectively to global public-health risks. In an article written by Laurie Kazan-Allen and published on March 5, 2026, the author examines how the discovery of asbestos contamination in children’s play products has raised questions about regulatory oversight and international product safety. The article opens by reflecting on lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic, noting that governments in several countries were slow to respond to early warning signs of the crisis. Referring to the experience of the United Kingdom, the author writes that delays in implementing protective measures contributed to “232,112 recorded deaths and over a million people suffering from long Covid.” The commentary uses this example to illustrate what it describes as the dangers of underestimating emerging threats. Attention then turns...

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Authoritarian destruction of the public sphere in Ecuador: Trumpism in action?

By Pilar Troya Fernández  The situation in Ecuador under Daniel Noboa's government is one of authoritarianism advancing on several fronts simultaneously to consolidate neoliberalism and total submission to the US international agenda. These are not isolated measures, but rather a coordinated strategy that combines job insecurity, the dismantling of the welfare state, unrestricted access to mining, the continuation of oil exploitation without environmental considerations, the centralization of power through the financial suffocation of local governments, and the systematic criminalization of all forms of opposition and popular organization.

Echoes of Vietnam and Chile: The devastating cost of the I-A Axis in Iran

​ By Ram Puniyani  ​The recent joint military actions by Israel and the United States against Iran have been devastating. Like all wars, this conflict is brutal to its core, leaving a trail of human suffering in its wake. The stated pretext for this aggression—the brutality of the Ayatollah Khamenei regime and its nuclear ambitions—clashes sharply with the reality of the diplomatic landscape. Iran had expressed a willingness to remain at the negotiating table, signaling a readiness to concede points emerging from dialogue. 

The kitchen as prison: A feminist elegy for domestic slavery

By Garima Srivastava* Kumar Ambuj stands as one of the most incisive voices in contemporary Hindi poetry. His work, stripped of ornamentation, speaks directly to the lived realities of India’s marginalized—women, the rural poor, and those crushed under invisible forms of violence. His celebrated poem “Women Who Cook” (Khānā Banātī Striyāṃ) is not merely about food preparation; it is a searing indictment of patriarchal domestic structures that reduce women’s existence to endless, unpaid labour.

The price of silence: Why Modi won’t follow Shastri, appeal for sacrifice

By Arundhati Dhuru, Sandeep Pandey*  ​In 1965, as India grappled with war and a crippling food crisis, Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri faced a United States that used wheat shipments under the PL-480 agreement as a lever to dictate Indian foreign policy. Shastri’s response remains legendary: he appealed to the nation to skip one meal a day. Millions of middle-class households complied, choosing temporary hunger over the sacrifice of national dignity. Today, India faces a modern equivalent in the energy sector, yet the leadership’s response stands in stark contrast to that era of self-reliance.