Skip to main content

Gujarat government's Food "Insecurity" Act?: Poorest of poor return from ration shops empty handed

By Pankti Jog*
The Gujarat government announced implementation of National Food Security Act (NFSA), 2013 from April 1, 2016, almost two-and-a-half years after it was passed in Parliament. However, in the very first month, the state has shown extremely poor performance, leaving large sections without food grains.
Under the NFSA, 75% of the rural households and 58% of the urban households are to be covered for food security in order to provide 5 kg of ration per person for Rs 2 per kg. Every state has to prepare a list of “priority households” as per the inclusive and exclusive criterion, mentioned in the Act.
The Gujarat government decided take the socio-economic and caste census (SECC) data of 2011 to prepare the “priority list”, eligible for getting ration under the NFSA. Till mid-March, this list remained a big mystery. After many efforts by RTI activists in Anand, Nadiad, Surendranagar and many other districts, the list of priority households was finally uploaded on the Food and Civil Supplies Department of the Gujarat government in the first week of April.
As per the provisions of the Act, Antyoday, below poverty line (BPL), unorganized workers, women headed households, landless labourers, nomadic, denotified and primitive tribes were to be automatically included, and households having government service, with a four-wheeler vehicle and having income more than 1.2 lakh per year were be excluded.
The Gujarat government, through its government resolution (GR) dated July 14, 2014 provided details of the criteria with some elaboration. However, the list, as per the SECC 2011 data, excludes a large number of poor families from the inclusive criteria. This has happened because the SECC survey was conducted in a very messy manner.
In Dhrangadhra city in Surendranagar district, the issue was taken up by right to information (RTI) activist Saiyyad Imtiyaz, wherein it was revealed that more than 5,500 needy families have been left out without ration.
Surprisingly, the state government has not prepared any format for “dava arji form” (claim form) for a request to be included in the list, leading to a situation that the “dava arji” format is being designed according to the whims and fancies of each taluka mamlatdar, a lower level revenue official, known for a very limited understanding of NFSA.
In Dhrangadhra, the claim form runs into six pages, in Kutch it is 12 pages, and in Panchmahals it is four pages. The “demands” include affidavits and several documents, which are difficult for the needy and marginalized families to seek.
Families from the denotified tribes category from Surendranagar district complained on RTI helpline (run by the NGO Mahiti Adhikar Gujarat Pahel) that they were being asked to produce electricity bill, house tax bill, and a certificate of income from talati (village level revenue official). It a common knowledge that they do not have any of these – they have always stayed make-shift hut-type structures outside villages.
The Siddi community from Gir sanctuary, Padhar families of the villages near Nalsarovar, and Kathodia Bhils from Sabarkanth, all of whom fall in the primitive tribes category, have been excluded from the NFSA list of Gujarat, though they entitled for having Antyodaya card as per the guidelines of the Supreme Court.
As per the NFSA, the state government should not disturb the Antyodaya (poorest of the poor) list at all. However, many of the existing Antyodaya families have complained that, when they approach the ration shop in April, they were told that their name did not exist on the list.
Another big issue of concern is the quantity decided by the the government. As per NFSA provision, the government needs to give rice, wheat and millets, all together 5 kg per person, while the Antyodaya should get a regular ration of 35 kg.
The Gujarat government, through its GR dated March 18, 2016, changed this quantity to 5 kg of rice and 30 kg of wheat from 16 kg of rice and 19 kg of wheat. For priority households, it is 4.25 kg of wheat, and just 750 gms of rice per person; the millets have simply vanished. Surprisingly, the GR does not give any provide any background information as to on what basis these drastic changes have been made, affecting people’s food security.
As per the provisions of the NFSA, there should be a block-level committee to look into the issue of priority households, and there should be a district-level grievances redressal officer, who is supposed to accept the grievances and should dispose these of as per the provisions of the Act.
In Gujarat, these offices are simply refusing to accept the “dava arji” or complaints. Officials are returning the complaints saying, “The list is final and there won’t be any change hence forth”.
The government had started a helpline for ration card holders -- 18002335500. However, people have complained that it is not working. Worse, no information is shared regarding how many complaints have been registered and how many have been disposed of even district wise or month wise. Thus, there is not transparency and accountability of the helpline, though the state government calls its website “pardarishita portal”.
Meanwhile, the RTI helpline over the last one month has received several phone calls from BPL, Antyodaya, nomadic, denotified and premitive tribes, as also workers and single women, complaining that they did not get ration in the month of April, and their names have been not included in the priority list. There is reason to believe: The NFSA has been turned into Food Insecurity Act by the Gujarat government.
---
*Mahiti Adhikar Gujarat Pahel, Ahmedabad

Comments

TRENDING

Mystery around Gujarat PSU 'transfer' of Rs 250 crore to Canadian firm Karnalyte

By AK Luke, IAS (Retd)*
While returning from a Board meeting of the Oil India Limited (OIL) in Ahmedabad some time in 2012, two officers of the Gujarat State Fertilizers and Chemicals Ltd (GSFC), Nanavaty and Patel,  saw me off at the airport. They said they were proceeding to Canada in connection with a project GSFC had entered into with a company there. As we were running late, I hastily wished them the best.

Savarkar in Ahmedabad 'declared' two-nation theory in 1937, Jinnah followed 3 years later

By Our Representative
One of the top freedom fighters whom BJP and Prime Minister Narendra Modi revere the most, Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, was also a great supporter of the two nation theory for India, one for Hindus another for Muslims, claims a new expose on the man who is also known to be the original proponent of the concept of Hindutva.

J&K continues to be haunted, as parts of India 'degenerate' into quasi-Kashmir situation

By Rajendran Narayanan*, Sandeep Pandey**
“Jab har saans mein bandook dikhe toh baccha kaise bekhauf rahe?” (How can a child be fearless when she sees a gun in every breath?) remarked Anwar, a gardener from Srinagar, when asked about the situation in Kashmir. On November 30, 2019, a walk through an iron gate in a quiet neighbourhood of Srinagar took us inside a public school. It was 11 am when typically every school is abuzz with activity. Not here though.

Indians have made 119 nations their ‘karma bhumi’: US-based Hindu NGO tells Rupani

Counterview Desk
In a stinging letter to Gujarat chief minister Vijay Rupani, the US-based Hindus for Human Rights (HfHR), referring to the report citing his justification for the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) – that “while Muslims can choose any one of the 150 Islamic countries in the world (for residence), India is the only country for Hindus" – has said, he should remember, Hindus have made several countries, including USA, their home.

Dalits rights meet planned on how citizenship law 'negates' Ambedkar's equality focus

By Our Representative
A Dalit rights meet has been planned at the Dalit Shakti Kendra (DSK), Sanand, Ahmedabad district, to discuss implications of the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), passed by Parliament on December 10-11, for Dalits, Adivasis and other marginalized sections. Announcing the decision, DSK director Martin Macwan said, the meet would take place on December 25, 2019, at 11.00 am, to commemorate the anniversary of burning of copies of Manusmriti by Dr BR Ambedkar.

What about religious persecution of Dalits, Adivasis, asks anti-CAA meet off Ahmedabad

By Rajiv Shah
A well-attended Dalit rights meet under the banner “14 Pe Charcha” (discussion on Article 14 of the Indian Constitution), alluding to Prime Minister Narendra Modi well-known campaign phrase of the 2014 Parliamentary elections, “chai pe charcha” (discussion over cup of tea), organized off Ahmedabad, has resolved on Wednesday to hold a 14 kilometres-long rally on April 14 to oppose the controversial Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), enacted on December 10-11.

'Allow critical thinking': SAARC-sponsored varsity teachers support protesting students

By Our Representative
Teachers of the high-profile South Asian University (SAU), a New Delhi-based international institute sponsored by eight member states of the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) – Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka – have supported “peacefully protesting students and other citizens” against the Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA), 2019 and the National Register of Citizens (NRC).

Upendra Baxi on foolish excellence, Indian judges and Consitutional cockroaches

By Rajiv Shah
In a controversial assertion, top legal expert Upendra Baxi has sought to question India's Constitution makers for neglecting human rights and social justice. Addressing an elite audience in Ahmedabad, Prof Baxi said, the constitutional idea of India enunciated by the Constituent Assembly tried to resolve four key conflicting concepts: governance, development, rights and justice.

Kerala governor turned History Congress into political arena, 'insulted' Prof Irfan Habib

Counterview Desk
In a signed statement, office bearers of the Aligarh Society of History and Archaeology (ASHA), Prof Syed Ali Nadeem Rezavi (president), Prof Jabir Raza (vice-president), Prof Manvendra Kumar Pundhir (secretary) and Prof Farhat Hasan (joint secretary), have said that Kerala governor Arif Mohammad Khan had sought to insult veteran historian Prof Irfan Habib, 88, at the 80th session of the Indian History Congress, even as turning it into his “political arena”.