Skip to main content

Gujarat government's Food "Insecurity" Act?: Poorest of poor return from ration shops empty handed

By Pankti Jog*
The Gujarat government announced implementation of National Food Security Act (NFSA), 2013 from April 1, 2016, almost two-and-a-half years after it was passed in Parliament. However, in the very first month, the state has shown extremely poor performance, leaving large sections without food grains.
Under the NFSA, 75% of the rural households and 58% of the urban households are to be covered for food security in order to provide 5 kg of ration per person for Rs 2 per kg. Every state has to prepare a list of “priority households” as per the inclusive and exclusive criterion, mentioned in the Act.
The Gujarat government decided take the socio-economic and caste census (SECC) data of 2011 to prepare the “priority list”, eligible for getting ration under the NFSA. Till mid-March, this list remained a big mystery. After many efforts by RTI activists in Anand, Nadiad, Surendranagar and many other districts, the list of priority households was finally uploaded on the Food and Civil Supplies Department of the Gujarat government in the first week of April.
As per the provisions of the Act, Antyoday, below poverty line (BPL), unorganized workers, women headed households, landless labourers, nomadic, denotified and primitive tribes were to be automatically included, and households having government service, with a four-wheeler vehicle and having income more than 1.2 lakh per year were be excluded.
The Gujarat government, through its government resolution (GR) dated July 14, 2014 provided details of the criteria with some elaboration. However, the list, as per the SECC 2011 data, excludes a large number of poor families from the inclusive criteria. This has happened because the SECC survey was conducted in a very messy manner.
In Dhrangadhra city in Surendranagar district, the issue was taken up by right to information (RTI) activist Saiyyad Imtiyaz, wherein it was revealed that more than 5,500 needy families have been left out without ration.
Surprisingly, the state government has not prepared any format for “dava arji form” (claim form) for a request to be included in the list, leading to a situation that the “dava arji” format is being designed according to the whims and fancies of each taluka mamlatdar, a lower level revenue official, known for a very limited understanding of NFSA.
In Dhrangadhra, the claim form runs into six pages, in Kutch it is 12 pages, and in Panchmahals it is four pages. The “demands” include affidavits and several documents, which are difficult for the needy and marginalized families to seek.
Families from the denotified tribes category from Surendranagar district complained on RTI helpline (run by the NGO Mahiti Adhikar Gujarat Pahel) that they were being asked to produce electricity bill, house tax bill, and a certificate of income from talati (village level revenue official). It a common knowledge that they do not have any of these – they have always stayed make-shift hut-type structures outside villages.
The Siddi community from Gir sanctuary, Padhar families of the villages near Nalsarovar, and Kathodia Bhils from Sabarkanth, all of whom fall in the primitive tribes category, have been excluded from the NFSA list of Gujarat, though they entitled for having Antyodaya card as per the guidelines of the Supreme Court.
As per the NFSA, the state government should not disturb the Antyodaya (poorest of the poor) list at all. However, many of the existing Antyodaya families have complained that, when they approach the ration shop in April, they were told that their name did not exist on the list.
Another big issue of concern is the quantity decided by the the government. As per NFSA provision, the government needs to give rice, wheat and millets, all together 5 kg per person, while the Antyodaya should get a regular ration of 35 kg.
The Gujarat government, through its GR dated March 18, 2016, changed this quantity to 5 kg of rice and 30 kg of wheat from 16 kg of rice and 19 kg of wheat. For priority households, it is 4.25 kg of wheat, and just 750 gms of rice per person; the millets have simply vanished. Surprisingly, the GR does not give any provide any background information as to on what basis these drastic changes have been made, affecting people’s food security.
As per the provisions of the NFSA, there should be a block-level committee to look into the issue of priority households, and there should be a district-level grievances redressal officer, who is supposed to accept the grievances and should dispose these of as per the provisions of the Act.
In Gujarat, these offices are simply refusing to accept the “dava arji” or complaints. Officials are returning the complaints saying, “The list is final and there won’t be any change hence forth”.
The government had started a helpline for ration card holders -- 18002335500. However, people have complained that it is not working. Worse, no information is shared regarding how many complaints have been registered and how many have been disposed of even district wise or month wise. Thus, there is not transparency and accountability of the helpline, though the state government calls its website “pardarishita portal”.
Meanwhile, the RTI helpline over the last one month has received several phone calls from BPL, Antyodaya, nomadic, denotified and premitive tribes, as also workers and single women, complaining that they did not get ration in the month of April, and their names have been not included in the priority list. There is reason to believe: The NFSA has been turned into Food Insecurity Act by the Gujarat government.
---
*Mahiti Adhikar Gujarat Pahel, Ahmedabad

Comments

TRENDING

Did Modi promote Dholavira, a UNESCO site now, as Gujarat CM? Facts don't tally

By Rajiv Shah  As would generally happen, Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s tweet – that not only was he “absolutely delighted” with the news of UNESCO tag to Dholavira, but he “ first visited ” the site during his “student days and was mesmerised by the place” – is being doubted by his detractors. None of the two tweets, strangely, even recalls once that it’s a Harappan site in Gujarat.

Labelling a Jesuit a Marxist? It's like saying if you use a plane, you become American

Jesuits: Cedric Prakash, Stan Swamy By Fr Cedric Prakash SJ* A thirteen- fourteen-year-old has many dreams! That's an impressionable age; at the cusp of finishing school. It is also a time when one tastes a different kind of freedom: to go for camps with boys of your own age (not with ones family). Such camps and outings were always enjoyed to the hilt. The ones, however, which still remain etched in my memory are the mission camps to the Jesuit missions in Maharashtra and Gujarat.

Buddhist shrines massively destroyed by Brahmanical rulers in "pre-Islamic" era: Historian DN Jha's survey

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Giant conglomerates 'favoured': Whither tribal rights for jal-jungle-jameen?

Prafull Samantara By Mohammad Irshad Ansari*  The struggle for “Jal, Jungle and Jameen” has been a long-drawn battle for the tribal communities of India. This tussle was once again in the limelight with the proposed diamond mining in the Buxwaha forest of Chhatarpur (Madhya Pradesh). The only difference in this movement was the massive social media support it gained, which actually seems to tilt the scale for the tribal people in a long time.

If not Modi, then who? Why? I (an ordinary citizen) am there! Main hoon naa!

By Mansee Bal Bhargava*  The number of women ministers is doubled in early July from the first term after cabinet reshuffle by the present government led by Narendra Modi. While there were 06 women ministers in the previous term, this term there are 11. The previous two governments led by Dr Manmohan Singh had 10 women ministers in each tenure. Are these number of women ministers something to rejoice in the near 75 years of independence? Yes maybe, if we think that things are slowly improving in the patriarchal system. This change is less likely to achieve gender balance in the parliament otherwise we require more than 11 as per the 33% reservation . This change is also less likely because the men politicians’ inability to handle the country’s mess is becoming more and more evident and especially during the corona crisis. Seems, the addition of more women ministers may be a result of the recent assembly elections where women played a decisive role in the election results. For example

Effluent discharge into deep sea? Modi told to 'reconsider' Rs 2275 crore Gujarat project

Counterview Desk  In a letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, well-known Gujarat-based environmentalist, Mahesh Pandya of the Paryavaran Mitra, has protested against the manner in with the Gujarat government is continuing with its deep sea effluent disposal project despite environmental concerns.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Gujarat govt gender insensitive? Cyclone package for fisherfolk 'ignores' poor women

By Our Representative A memorandum submitted to the Gujarat government by various fisherfolk associations of the Saurashtra region of Gujarat under the leadership of Ahmedabad NGO Centre for Social Justice's senior activist Arvind Khuman, who is based in Amreli, has suggested that the relief package offered to the fishermen affected by the Tauktae cyclone is not only inadequate, it is also gender insensitive.

Debt bondage, forced labour, sexual abuse in Gujarat's Bt cottonseed farms: Dutch study

By Rajiv Shah  A just-released study, sponsored by a Netherlands-based non-profit, Arisa , “Seeds of Oppression Wage sharecropping in Bt cottonseed production in Gujarat, India”, has said that a new form of bondage, or forced labour, exists in North India’s Bt cottonseed farms, in which bhagiyas, or wage sharecroppers, are employed against advances and are then often required to work for years together “without regular payment of wages.”

Covid: We failed to stop religious, political events, admits Modi-dharmacharya meet

Counterview Desk An email alert sent by one the 11 participants, Prof Salim Engineer, on behalf of the Dharmik Jan Morcha regarding their "religious leaders' online meet" with Prime Minister Narendra Modi, even as offering "support to meet challenges of Corona pandemic", blames religious congregations, though without naming the Maha Kumbh and other religious events, which apparently were instrumental in the spread of the second wave.