Skip to main content

Gujarat whistleblower's murder: State government "created circumstances" for the gruesome incident

By A Representative
The People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL), India’s premier human rights organinization, has alleged the Gujarat government not only failed to protect the Banskantha district’s right to information (RTI) activist and whistleblower Ratansinh Chaudhary last month, but actually “created circumstances” that led to his murder.
A PUCL investigation team, which visited the village to which Chaudhary, an other backward caste (OBC) community, belonged, said, with his murder, the total number of whistleblowers which have so far been murdered has reached 11. Others who are been murdered are Amit Jethva, Nadeem Saiyad, Vishram Dodiya, Jabar Dan Gadhvi, Amit Kapasiya, Shailesh Patel, Rayabhai Gohil, Ketan Solanki, Jayesh Barot, and Yogesh Shekhar.
A PUCL report released to the media said, Chaudhary first sent their complaint to the Chief Minister on October 7, 2015 through fax and later by post” about “misappropriation” of flood relief funds. As per routine, the complaint was transferred to the lower level on October 12.
On the very same day, an RTI application was filed by Chaudhary. Instead of taking any action, the administration leaked the information to vested interests of the village. “The accused attacked Chaudhury saying that he was lodging complaints against them and he was murdered”, the PUCL said.
The fact-finding team, consisting of Jatin Sheth of PUCL, Pankti Jog of Mahiti Adhikar Gujarat Pahel, Mahesh Pandya of Paryavaran Mitra, Nita Mahadev of Gujarat Lok Samiti, Meenakshi Joshi of Movement for Secular Democracy, visited the village in Suigam taluka of Banaskantha district, where massive floods invaded large number of villages during the monsoon.
In his complaint, Chaudhary had insisted that the chief minister should to withdraw all the relief amounts paid to people due to heavy corruption, and carry out re-survey, as the relief had not reached to genuinely affected persons, “and if reached, it was pretty small amount”. He had added, only “influential persons” had “grabbed cheques of big amounts, and that, too, in the different names of the same family.”
The report said, what was also shocking was that, while two of the four accused in the murder of Chaudhary had been arrested, they were already out on bail, suggesting how seriously the Gujarat government’s investigation agencies are taking the case of the murder of a whisteblower.
The report further said, RTI reply to PUCL suggested that the Gujarat State Disaster Management Authority (GSDMA), Gujarat’s premier anti-disaster body, had “no plans” to save the lives of people trapped in flooded areas of not just Banaskantha and other affected districts Surendranagar and Amreli.
“The information received by Jatin Sheth (PUCL) through his RTI application reveals that there was no advanced planning. The answers to various questions are ‘we have zero information’! Amreli district had only one boat for rescue of people, and that too was out of order”, the report said.
The PUCL further said, “No information of relief fund survey is available online as the information is not displayed on any of the websites of the government, including the state government, the district collector and so on”, though this should have been as part of voluntary disclosure under the RTI Act.
“The questions such as who received what relief amount, what were the parameters fixed for survey team, what to do and whom to approach in case of injustice, how many days it will take to resolve the complaint lodged etc. remain unanswered till date”, the report said.

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan  The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra   We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

'Big blow to crores of farmers’: Opposition mounts against US–India trade deal

By A Representative   Farmers’ organisations and political groups have sharply criticised the emerging contours of the US–India trade agreement, warning that it could severely undermine Indian agriculture, depress farm incomes and open the doors to genetically modified (GM) food imports in violation of domestic regulatory safeguards.

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram   The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman*  In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

From Puri to the State: How Odisha turned the dream of drinkable tap water into policy

By Hans Harelimana Hirwa, Mansee Bal Bhargava   Drinking water directly from the tap is generally associated with developed countries where it is considered safe and potable. Only about 50 countries around the world offer drinkable tap water, with the majority located in Europe and North America, and a few in Asia and Oceania. Iceland, Switzerland, Finland, Germany, and Singapore have the highest-quality tap water, followed by Canada, New Zealand, Japan, the USA, Australia, the UK, Costa Rica, and Chile.

Michael Parenti: Scholar known for critiques of capitalism and U.S. foreign policy

By Harsh Thakor*  Michael Parenti, an American political scientist, historian, and author known for his Marxist and anti-imperialist perspectives, died on January 24 at the age of 92. Over several decades, Parenti wrote and lectured extensively on issues of capitalism, imperialism, democracy, media, and U.S. foreign policy. His work consistently challenged dominant political and economic narratives, particularly those associated with Western liberal democracies and global capitalism.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative   A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.