Skip to main content

Gujarat High Court turns down "benefit of doubt" given to man accused of attempting to rape three year old girl

By Our Representative
In an important judgment of far-reaching significance, the Gujarat High Court has refused to give benefit of doubt to a 30-year-old person accused of attempting to rape a three-year-old girl because the child could not identify genital organ before the investigators. Even as finding the accused, belonging to village Baska in Panchmahals district, guilty molesting the girl with finger, the sessions court had ruled that it was not rape.
High Court judges Ravi R Tripathi and Sonia Gokani did not find the sessions court view tenable, ruled that "in the fitness of things", awarded the accused imprisonment of seven years for the offence punishable under section 376 read with Section 511 of IPC (attempt to rape). Asking the rapist to pay a fine of Rs. 5,000, of which Rs 3,000 be paid as compensation to the victim, court also directed Gujarat government to to work out state compensation payable to her.
The judgment was delivered on May 4.
The incident dates back to October 4, 2011, when the three-year-old daughter of a poor single woman, abandoned by her husband, was sought to be raped. On that date, like earlier, the mother went to the market leaving her to Nayanaben, wife of Pratapsinh Lalsinh Rathod. In the evening, when complainant was bathing the girl, she noticed redness and swelling on her private parts. The child told her mother that Rathod  inserted his finger-like thing in her private parts.
The daughter was unable to pass urine and complained of severe pain in stomach. The mother talked over with neighbouring women, and on the next day, went to Halol Police Station to file a complaint. The referral hospital in Halol transferred the girl immediately to the SSG Hospital at Vadodara, where she was admitted as an indoor patient for 10 days.
Later, the girl was taken for counseling for her mental trauma to the Child Guidance Clinic and the Indian Council of Social Welfare in Vadodara. On hearing Rathod's side, the sessions court convicted the accused under 354 IPC (assault or criminal force to woman with intent to outrage her modesty) and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for just two years.
Finding the punishment lenient, and considering it a case of attempted rape, advocate Shilpa Shah, appearing for the state, said the sessions court "ought to have appreciated the limitation of the young girl who was barely three years old and who would have no clue with regard to the male genital."
The sessions court called it a "case of outraging the modesty of a woman" because of "insufficient expression" on the part of the small girl. Disputing this, Shah said, the "only ground of acquittal is because the victim has stated that it was insertion of the finger, where in fact, what she stated was finger like."

The mother, said Shah, had already stated that "the daughter had told her that the Anchal’s father had put finger with nicker (“chaddi wali angli”) in her urinary track", adding, she had told about this to her maternal aunt, Khairunisa Shaikh, who she trusts most.
Shah further said, "A male genital to which a child is unfamiliar with is described as a 'finger with knicker'. Had it been merely the act of fingering, child would not make it complicated in its expression. Such expression coupled with other oral evidences lead to the conclusion that the prosecution succeeded in proving that the accused of attempting rape.”
The High Court in its order said the testimony of the single mother was "unimpeachable". Then, there was the evidence of thematernal aunt and other neighbours, which do not indicate anywhere any previous enmity or any other motive between the accused and the victim's family. It added, "No mother would like her child to undergo any adverse publicity on account of such incident."

Comments

TRENDING

Missed call drive for VVPAT verification follows online plea to "pressure" poll panel

By Our Representative
Several political activists have begun a new campaign, asking concerned citizens to give a missed call on 9667655855 to “support the demand that 2019 Loksabha elections must be declared only after verification of 50% electronic voting machines (EVMs) with Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) receipts.” The effort, supported by civil society networks across India, is meant to "further pressure" India's election machinery to ensure that the poll outcome becomes more transparent.

Did Modi own, buy digital camera costing Rs 7 lakh in 1987-88, also used email?

Counterview Desk
In an interview to the news channel News Nation, aired on Saturday last, Prime Minister Narendra Modi declaring that he had approved the air strike despite bad weather because he felt the clouds would hide Indian planes from Pakistani radar is known to have become a laughing stock across India.

When a neo-nationalist "invaded" hijab clad ladies, Bengali looking scholar in Delhi metro

By Aditi Kundu*
Travelling in Delhi metro on a daily basis to commute from Mayur Vihar to Dwarka, I see diverse people everyday. One can hear them talk about different aspects of life, from kitchen pilitics to national politics. On the morning of May 13, I witnessed a strange incident; disturbing and amusing at the same time.

Terror attacks: Difference in public reactions in India, those in Colombo, Christchurch

By Battini Rao*
Recently, on April 20 during Easter Sunday, more than 250 people were killed in a series of coordinated terrorist attacks in churches and hotels in Colombo, Sri Lanka. Local Islamic organisations Thawheed Jamath (NJT) and Jamathei Milathu Ibrahim (JMI) are held responsible for the attack. Islamic State has also claimed responsibility.

Women lost 88 lakh jobs in 2018: Why Modi "failed" to address their disempowerment?

Counterview Desk
Five human rights leaders Anjali Bhardwaj, Shabnam Hashmi, Purnima Gupta, Dipta Bhog, and Amrita Johri of the Women March for Change have posed 56 questions (alluding to Modi’s claim of 56 inches chest) to Prime Minister Narendra Modi and BJP against the backdrop of his interview with a Bollywood star, which was allegedly masqueraded as a “non-political” conversation.

PepsiCo warned: Withdraw cases against Gujarat farmers or face dire consequences

By Our Representative
About 200 farmers’ leaders and activists, in a letter to Dr KV Prabhu, chairperson, Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Authority (PPVFRA), and Dr R C Agrawal, registrar general, PPVFRA, Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Government of India, have demanded that PepsiCo immediately withdraw all the legal suits it has slapped on many potato farmers in different districts of Gujarat.

World Bank clarifies: Its 26th rank to India not for universal access to power but for ease of doing business

By Our Representative
In a major embarrassment to the Government of India, the World Bank has reportedly clarified that it has not ranked India 26th out of 130 countries for providing power to its population. The top international banker’s clarification comes following Union Power Minister Piyush Goyal’s claim that India has “improved to 26 position from 99” in access to electricity in just one year.

During Emergency, the ruler was extolled but Opposition wasn't punched around: Scribe

By Rajiv Shah
A just-released book, “India: The Wrong Transition”, by a top Delhi-based scribe Anand K Sahay, has quoted “journalistic circles” to say that the Indian mainstream media – with certain “honourable exceptions” – has virtually abandoned the “practice of journalism”, and  this happened following a “sting operation” that showed that “the crème de la crème of Indian journalism were only too willing, for a suitable price, to let poisonous Hindutva propaganda prevail in their news columns.”

Ex-IAS, IPS, IFS officers tell Modi: Pragya Thakur doesn't represent India's rich heritage

Counterview Desk
In an open statement, a group of former civil servants have said that normally they would have dismissed the candidature of Pragya Thakur, who is BJP’s choice for the Bhopal Lok Sabha constituency, as an act of political expediency. However, they were forced to react to her candidature after none other than Prime Minister Narendra Modi termed has as a “symbol of our civilisational heritage.”

Disproportionately high death sentences against Dalits, Adivasis, Muslims: UN told

Counterview Desk
In their joint submission to the United Nations Human Rights Committee to meet for the listing of adoption of list of issues at its 126th session, July 1-26, 2019, top Dalit rights organizations have taken strong exception to, among other things, "disproportional application of death sentencing by the judiciary of minorities, such as Muslims, Dalits and Adivasis".