Skip to main content

There is very little likelihood that government hostility to civil society activism will end in the near future

By Fr. Cedric Prakash sj*
Civil society activism is under attack in India as never before! A careful analysis of this past year clearly reveals that those who have accompanied the poor and the marginalised, the vulnerable and the victims of society have often to take up cudgels against the powerful and other vested interests; more often than not, it is also against the Government be it State or Central.
Civil society activism in India today involves a whole range of stake-holders which include individuals, academic institutions, writers – scholars, human rights and other non-government organisations and in short anybody and everybody genuinely concerned about what is happening in the country today. There are individuals and institutions who work at the grassroots with Dalits and Adivasis, with women, children and LGBTs, with small farmers, with the displaced and refugees, with slum-dwellers and with the differently-abled and perhaps with every disadvantaged individual or group who have legitimate grievances and who need to be accompanied and empowered in order that they get what is rightfully theirs.
Civil society activism is about the Constitution of India where individuals and collectives become increasingly conscious and also create awareness that justice, liberty, equality and fraternity (solidarity) are not merely ideas and concepts relegated to mere words in the Preamble but need to be made alive and mainstreamed among every section of society particularly among the most vulnerable.
Civil society activism has therefore been all along an indispensable wheel for a healthy and vibrant democracy because such activism not merely acts as a watchdog but also in several ways becomes a voice for the voiceless and a deterrent for those who have no conscience in trampling upon the rights of others.
One needs to look at some of the causes being taken up by these activists: a multi-national company suddenly starts constructing a huge industrial complex in a tribal area; land is taken away from the tribals; uents; the forest is destroyed; the air and the waters around are polluted by effluents; there are no environmental safeguards and of course the bosses of the multi-nationals have the “right” connections both locally and nationally.
No one dares challenge them. Enter an NGO who is genuinely concerned about the plight of these tribals and make them aware of what is happening, the need and importance that their' jal, jungle and jameen' needs to be protected; the tribals see a ray of hope. In a matter of time, the NGO is hounded and harassed, they are branded as 'naxalites' and 'anti-patriotic'; there are frequent visits from the police officials; their sources of funding are squeezed; paid media carries sensations stories and it goes on. and other of sensational stories and it goes on. All this surely sounds like a weird fairy-tale of a totalitarian regime belonging to another age.
The sad truth is that this is exactly what has been happening in India this past year – a country which claims to be a democracy! There are scores of examples all across the country to evidence this. We have classic examples of Teesta Setalvad and Priya Pillai, Prashant Bhushan and Medha Patkar, Govind Pansare and Professor Saibaba. You take on the Government, you try to expose corruption and the anti-people policies and actions of the corporate sector and big business, then you certainly have to pay the price.
False cases are foisted on you; witnesses turn hostile; people you once trusted are made to turn against you; you are arrested and even killed. There is no end...! Civil society organisations like INSAF, People's Watch, Sabrang Trust, Citizens for Justice and Peace, Greenpeace India among others were systematically targeted, maligned and subject to no end of harassment in this past year.
There have been several others who have been subject to subtle and indirect intimidations which include pressure on the top management, innuendoes, threats, innumerable governmental enquiries, rumours etc; such tactics often put those who want to take a stand on the back-foot and several tactfully move into the background; fade into oblivion.
There is another strategy that is often adopted by the Government or the big business. This is through cooption or even buying up those who oppose them. In the recent past, some activists who took on the Government not only became silent but they seem to undergo some 'conversion' like some kind of 'ghar wapsi' when all of a sudden they begin toeing the Government line in a total u-turn from what they have been espousing all along.
In a strongly worded letter addressed to the Prime Minister of India and released on May 6, 2015, a whole range of civil society activists and organizations wrote, “Today, standing in solidarity with India's most marginalized communities, with the NGO sector and donors who support us, affirmed by the guiding principles of our Constitution – justice, equality and liberty - we address you through an open letter.
“As you are aware, NGOs work both in the welfare sector and in empowering people to be aware of and enforce their rights as enshrined in our Constitution. Such action may include questioning and protesting decisions taken by government in many areas. This work is both our right and our responsibility as civil society actors in a democratic nation. Indeed the Indian government acknowledged this. At the Universal Periodic Review of India at the UN Human Rights Council in 2012, the Government spoke of '…the Government's active association with civil society and the increasing and important role that civil society and human rights defenders are playing in the area of human rights.' Government of India further said that, 'The media, civil society and other activists have helped the Government to be vigilant against transgressions'.
“Many of us receive both Indian and foreign donations in compliance with laws and carry out activities intended to help those marginalized in India's development. Many of us have partnered with Government, both at State and Central levels, towards many goals - achieving universal education, access to health care, women's empowerment, and providing humanitarian relief in times of tragedy such as the recent earthquake. We have also worked in pilot projects - some over the years have been scaled up, and others have richly contributed to the policy framework of the Government of India. It should be a matter of pride for any government and a sign of robust people-centric engagement that NGOs and citizens have impacted State policy.
“On other issues, your government and indeed previous governments may or may not agree with some of our views. These may include the issue of nuclear power plants, acquiring tribal and other lands, upholding Dalit rights, protecting rights of minorities against the scourge of communalism, protecting rights of sexual minorities, or campaigning for the universal right to food. Yet, we expect that Government protect our right to work and express our views. It does not behove the Government to label icting voice on these issues as 'anti-national', 'against national security' or 'donor any and every con es “a crack down on NGOs.” These very words seek shame any society. 'Watch lists” and “crack-downs” belong in another age and have no place in a modern democracy.
“Your government has raised the issue that some NGOs may not have complied with the Foreign Contribution Regulation Act (FCRA), the law governing receipt of foreign donations in India. We state categorically that we stand fully for transparency and accountability in both government and NGO practice, and it is in fact civil society actors who have fought hard for these principles to be enshrined in all areas of public life. So let us constructively ensure transparency and legal compliance across the vast NGO sector, including societies, trusts and a range of public and private institutions. However, such efforts cannot be capricious, selective or based on flimsy grounds. At the moment it seems that ‘compliance’ is serving as a garb to actually target those organizations and individuals whose views disagrees with, and indeed to monitor and stifle disagreement itself.
“There is irrefutable documentary evidence that State action against select organizations has been arbitrary, non-transparent, and without any course of administrative redress. The effect has been to harm important work being done by NGOs at the grassroots and send a signal of threat to civil society. Our concern includes the manner in which many Indian NGOs and international partners have been targeted for different reasons. Thus, civil society organizations in India today find themselves where the only avenue of redress appears to be through the judiciary. Mr Prime Minister, this kind of coercive domestic environment being created under your watch does not augur well for the world's largest democracy that professes aspirations to being a global leader in promoting freedoms and democratic values.
“Further, in an increasingly globalized world, where even business interests freely collaborate across national boundaries, to label any individual or NGO that engages with international forums or any donor who supports such NGOs, as 'anti-national' is illogical. India is signatory to international conventions and treaties and seeks to adhere to the highest international standards of democracy, liberty, justice and human rights. The Government of India regularly reports at these forums. It is accepted practice that NGOs and civil society actors also present their views at these forums, often disagreeing with the views of their respective governments.
“Many of us, signatories to this letter, engage in active advocacy at international forums. This upholds the best traditions of global democratic debate, and the right to seek a more just nation and more just world. It is not anti-national to do so. We do not believe that any government can claim that it alone has the prerogative prerogative to define what is national interest. The citizens, who elect the Government into power, are the ultimate stakeholders, and must be allowed to articulate and work towards their idea of 'national interest' too, whether or not it concurs with the views of the Government.”
Article from this book

Given the make-up of this particular Government and the fact that it subscribes to an ideology which is not in the best interest of the country, there is very little likelihood that the hostility to civil society activism will end in the near future. However, one thing is sure that come what may, civil society activists who are targeted today will never cow down; they are committed to the future of India; being there and standing up for the high ideals which India embodies and accompanying the millions of people who need their whole-hearted support and cooperation is ultimately what matters!
---
*Human Rights Activist

Comments

TRENDING

Missed call drive for VVPAT verification follows online plea to "pressure" poll panel

By Our Representative
Several political activists have begun a new campaign, asking concerned citizens to give a missed call on 9667655855 to “support the demand that 2019 Loksabha elections must be declared only after verification of 50% electronic voting machines (EVMs) with Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) receipts.” The effort, supported by civil society networks across India, is meant to "further pressure" India's election machinery to ensure that the poll outcome becomes more transparent.

Did Modi own, buy digital camera costing Rs 7 lakh in 1987-88, also used email?

Counterview Desk
In an interview to the news channel News Nation, aired on Saturday last, Prime Minister Narendra Modi declaring that he had approved the air strike despite bad weather because he felt the clouds would hide Indian planes from Pakistani radar is known to have become a laughing stock across India.

When a neo-nationalist "invaded" hijab clad ladies, Bengali looking scholar in Delhi metro

By Aditi Kundu*
Travelling in Delhi metro on a daily basis to commute from Mayur Vihar to Dwarka, I see diverse people everyday. One can hear them talk about different aspects of life, from kitchen pilitics to national politics. On the morning of May 13, I witnessed a strange incident; disturbing and amusing at the same time.

Terror attacks: Difference in public reactions in India, those in Colombo, Christchurch

By Battini Rao*
Recently, on April 20 during Easter Sunday, more than 250 people were killed in a series of coordinated terrorist attacks in churches and hotels in Colombo, Sri Lanka. Local Islamic organisations Thawheed Jamath (NJT) and Jamathei Milathu Ibrahim (JMI) are held responsible for the attack. Islamic State has also claimed responsibility.

Women lost 88 lakh jobs in 2018: Why Modi "failed" to address their disempowerment?

Counterview Desk
Five human rights leaders Anjali Bhardwaj, Shabnam Hashmi, Purnima Gupta, Dipta Bhog, and Amrita Johri of the Women March for Change have posed 56 questions (alluding to Modi’s claim of 56 inches chest) to Prime Minister Narendra Modi and BJP against the backdrop of his interview with a Bollywood star, which was allegedly masqueraded as a “non-political” conversation.

PepsiCo warned: Withdraw cases against Gujarat farmers or face dire consequences

By Our Representative
About 200 farmers’ leaders and activists, in a letter to Dr KV Prabhu, chairperson, Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Authority (PPVFRA), and Dr R C Agrawal, registrar general, PPVFRA, Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Government of India, have demanded that PepsiCo immediately withdraw all the legal suits it has slapped on many potato farmers in different districts of Gujarat.

World Bank clarifies: Its 26th rank to India not for universal access to power but for ease of doing business

By Our Representative
In a major embarrassment to the Government of India, the World Bank has reportedly clarified that it has not ranked India 26th out of 130 countries for providing power to its population. The top international banker’s clarification comes following Union Power Minister Piyush Goyal’s claim that India has “improved to 26 position from 99” in access to electricity in just one year.

During Emergency, the ruler was extolled but Opposition wasn't punched around: Scribe

By Rajiv Shah
A just-released book, “India: The Wrong Transition”, by a top Delhi-based scribe Anand K Sahay, has quoted “journalistic circles” to say that the Indian mainstream media – with certain “honourable exceptions” – has virtually abandoned the “practice of journalism”, and  this happened following a “sting operation” that showed that “the crème de la crème of Indian journalism were only too willing, for a suitable price, to let poisonous Hindutva propaganda prevail in their news columns.”

Ex-IAS, IPS, IFS officers tell Modi: Pragya Thakur doesn't represent India's rich heritage

Counterview Desk
In an open statement, a group of former civil servants have said that normally they would have dismissed the candidature of Pragya Thakur, who is BJP’s choice for the Bhopal Lok Sabha constituency, as an act of political expediency. However, they were forced to react to her candidature after none other than Prime Minister Narendra Modi termed has as a “symbol of our civilisational heritage.”

Disproportionately high death sentences against Dalits, Adivasis, Muslims: UN told

Counterview Desk
In their joint submission to the United Nations Human Rights Committee to meet for the listing of adoption of list of issues at its 126th session, July 1-26, 2019, top Dalit rights organizations have taken strong exception to, among other things, "disproportional application of death sentencing by the judiciary of minorities, such as Muslims, Dalits and Adivasis".