Skip to main content

Demonetization: India's economy unlikely to improve till mid-2018, says Motilal Oswal

By Rajiv Shah
Motilal Oswal, one of India’s topmost financial services firms, has predicted that the economic growth of the economy is likely to slow down in the second half of 2017, and is unlikely to improve in the next one year because of demonetization of Rs 500 and Rs 1000 notes. In a sector update, it says, “Overall, while economic growth in the second half of 2017 could be lower than expected, fundamentals of the economy should improve from the second half of 2018.”
Noting that on two earlier times when demonetization was announced – in 1946, just before Independence, and 1978 – it had little impact, as the notes that were withdrawn, of Rs 1,000 and Rs 10,000 (both in 1946 and 1978) and of Rs 5,000 (in 1978) were of high-value and “rarely held by the common public.”
Thus, in 1978, the macroeconomic impact was “negligible”, the firm recalls. “Real GDP growth was 7.7% in financial year 1978 and 7.5% in financial year 1979”, while the “industrial sector grew ~6% and 11% in these two years.”
As for the current demonetization of Rs 500 and Rs 1,000 notes, the firm says, they account for over 86% (or Rs 15 trillion) of the total currency in circulation (over Rs 17 trillion). Unlike in 1946 or 1978, these are held by almost every Indian for day-to-day purchases.”
“The weekly household grocery bill in a tier-II city could easily be INR500”, it says, adding, “Given the ubiquity of the demonetized notes, this time, the impact could be significant.”
Therefore, the firm says, “For a common household, virtually everything from grocery to maid services is paid for in cash. According to some estimates, almost 80% of the economy still runs on cash. The decision will, therefore, leads to some suffering for all in the next few weeks.”
It adds, “Not only Indian citizens, but foreigners (traveling in India) too will face difficulty – tourism might be adversely affected.”
“Our interactions with the management of non-banking financial companies (NBFCs)/ Banks and people in the value chain suggest that the loans against property and construction finance segments are more vulnerable to the demonetization Rs 500/1,000 notes”, the firm points out.
“In the microfinance (100% cash), and gold and vehicle finance (partially in cash) segments, collections and disbursements will be impacted”, it says, adding, “NBFCs and banks are contemplating suitable representations to the RBI.”
“For banks, near-term administrative hassles and resultant loss of management bandwidth would impact near-term asset growth”, the firm says, adding, “Reserve Bank of India (RBI) decision on allowing NBFCs to accept old denomination notes and normalization of liquidity in the market with circulation of new denomination notes are the key things to watch out for in the near term.”
“As many NBFCs, especially those in rural and semi-urban geographies, deal in cash, there could be temporary issues with respect to disbursements and collections”, the firm says, adding, “Growth could slow down and there could be asset quality problems in the shorter term.”
It further says, “Cash collections could get delayed. NBFCs whose collections come from post-dated cheques (PDC)/ electronic cash systems (ECS) would not be impacted much.”
In case of banks, the firm says, “administrative hassles are likely to take maximum bandwidth, impacting asset growth in the near term. Some risk in loan against property (LAP) and vehicle finance segments NBFCs, housing finance companies (HFCs) and Banks dealing in loans against property (LAP) could see some volatility with respect to collections, as most of their borrowers are small traders who do a significant portion of their business in cash.”
“This is also true for vehicle finance players in semi-urban and rural markets, where cash is the primary source of repayments. This could pose temporary asset quality issues”, the firm predicts, adding, “However, disbursements/ collections by cheque/ electronic transfer would be unaffected.”
“Resumption of business as usual would depend on how quickly and effectively the new currency comes into circulation, as liquidity is key for most borrowers”, the firm says, adding, “Most small traders deal in cash on a day-to-day basis. We expect some uncertainty over the medium term. We also await clarity from RBI on developments of the same.”
“On the positive front”, the finance firm notes, the step would “encourage electronic transactions”, adding, “Over time, the tax base should widen, boosting tax collection”, though noting, it would “dampen purchase of high-ticket items.”

Comments

Post a Comment

NOTE: Hateful, abusive comments won't be published. -- Editor

TRENDING

The Nazia Elahi Khan controversy and the normalisation of hate

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan   The registration of two FIRs in the Mumbai Metropolitan Region against BJP Minority Morcha leader and social media influencer Nazia Elahi Khan for allegedly making derogatory remarks about Prophet Muhammad is not merely another isolated controversy. It is a disturbing reminder of how hate speech and communal provocation have become increasingly normalised in contemporary India.

Congress leader Gohil "misinformed" about the OBC caste status of Modi, contend senior Gujarat academics

Shaktisinh Gohil By A Representative Did senior Gujarat Congress leader Shaktisinh Gohil display his poor understanding of the caste system in Gujarat when he declared that Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi does not belong to the other backward class (OBC) but to an upper caste? At least two top senior experts, known for their proficiency in sociology and history of Gujarat, have wondered “how could Gohil go so wrong” on Modi’s caste status. Gohil, who all-India Congress spokesperson, has created a ripple by “disclosing” that Modi included his caste, modh ghanchi, into the OBC list three months after he came to power through a government resolution dated January 1, 2002.

RTI at 21: Study flags data gaps, rising backlogs, appeal pendency across Union government

  By Jag Jivan   As the Right to Information (RTI) Act completed 21 years since its enactment on June 21, 2005, a detailed analysis of the Central Information Commission's (CIC) Annual Report for 2024-25 has raised questions about reporting accuracy, transparency practices and the overall implementation of the law across Union government institutions.