Skip to main content

Cancel BJP politician's appointment to NHRC, you have powers to do it: PUCL writes to President of India

Prabhakar Sinha
By Our Representative
The People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL), India’s premier human rights organization, has asked President Pranab Mukherjee to cancel the proposed appointment of Avinash Rai Khanna, a BJP vice-president, as a member of the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), insisting, he “not ineligible” for the post, telling him, NHRC's function is to protect and promote human rights. 
The PUCL representation, signed by its national president Prabhakar Sinha, adds, the NHRC job can be performed “only by persons who are non-partisan and above temptation of future personal promotion and prospect.”
Recalling that Khanna was earlier appointed as a member of the State Human Rights Commission, Punjab, but resigned to become a member of the Rajya Sabha, Sinha says, “A member of a political party is expected to promote the interest of his party and is not trained to act with impartiality and judiciousness required of a member of the NHRC.”
Alleging that, as NHRC member, Khanna cannot “enjoy the trust of the people whose rights he would be expected to promote and protect against the governments of his own party”, Sinha says, an NHRC member’s “stature and qualifications has to be compared with the other members, who consist of judge of the Supreme Court or the Chief Justice of a High Court” under Section 4 of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993.
He adds, the Act was enacted pursuant to the commitment of India towards binding several international covenants, including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, against the backdrop of “changing social realities, emerging trends in the nature of violence”, which required “greater accountability and transparency.”
Founded, among others, by Jay Prakash Narain, PUCL says, the appointments to the NHRC, including that of the chairperson and other members, by the President after obtaining the recommendations of a Committee consisting of the Prime Minister as chairman, the Lok Sabha speaker, the Union home minister, and the Opposition leaders in the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha, and deputy chairman of the Rajya Sabha.
“These recommendations are not binding on the President as are the recommendations of the Council of Ministers under Article 74 of the Constitution”, the letter underlines, adding, “The President is therefore free to not accept a recommendation of the committee in the interest of the people who are the real stakeholders.”
Pointing out that this is also clear from Section 4 of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993, PUCL says, Khanna’s appointment would send “wrong signals to the international community and to the United Nations where the national representatives have to periodically submit the status of implementation of human rights in the country.”
The PUCL, which had said in a statement that it would approach the Supreme Court against the decision to appoint Khanna, points to the President that it has won major victories in legal battles in the Supreme Court on telephone tapping case (1997), fake encounter in Manipur (1997), disclosure of criminal background and assets by candidates contesting for Parliament and the State Legislature (2003), and challenge to POTA (2004), while one case, on implementing right to food, is still pending before the apex court.

Comments

TRENDING

India under Modi among top 10 autocratizing nations, on verge of 'losing' democracy status

By Rajiv Shah
A new report, prepared by a top Swedish institute studying liberal democracy, has observed that there has been a sharp “dive in press freedom along with increasing repression of civil society in India associated with the current Hindu-nationalist regime of Prime Minister Narendra Modi.” The report places India among the top 10 countries that “have autocratized the most”. Other countries that have been identified for rolling towards autocracy are -- Hungary, Turkey, Poland, Serbia, Brazil, Mali, Thailand, Nicaragua and Zambia.

Savarkar 'criminally betrayed' Netaji and his INA by siding with the British rulers

By Shamsul Islam*
RSS-BJP rulers of India have been trying to show off as great fans of Netaji. But Indians must know what role ideological parents of today's RSS/BJP played against Netaji and Indian National Army (INA). The Hindu Mahasabha and RSS which always had prominent lawyers on their rolls made no attempt to defend the INA accused at Red Fort trials.

Gujarat link of controversial US doctor who 'forced' WHO quiz Trump's wonder drug

By Rajiv Shah
A top American doctor, Sapan Sharankishor Desai, born and raised in the “affluent” North Shore (Chicago) region of Illinois by Indian parents, at one point of time involved in NGO activity through  dedicated to “improving” the lives of the impoverished in Gujarat, is in the eyes of a major international storm following his paper (retracted) in a “Lancet” questioning Donald Trump-promoted drug hydroxychloroquine.

Border conflict? RBI nod India's 'brotherly' help to China internationalise its currency

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak*
In the middle of a global pandemic, China started an unprovoked border conflict with India. It unraveled trust deficit and ties between the two neighbours. As thousands of Chinese troops tried occupying Indian territory, the Narendra Modi-led BJP government directs the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to allow the Bank of China to start regular banking services in India. The Bank of China will now operate in India like any other commercial banks.

RSS supremo Deoras 'supported' Emergency, but Indira, Sanjay Gandhi 'didn't respond'

By Shamsul Islam*
National Emergency was imposed on the country by then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi on June 25-26, 1975, and it lasted for 19 months. This period is considered as ''dark times' for Indian democratic polity. Indira Gandhi claimed that due to Jaiprakash Narayan's call to the armed forces to disobey the 'illegal' orders of Congress rulers had created a situation of anarchy and there was danger to the existence of Indian Republic so there was no alternative but to impose Emergency under article 352 of the Constitution.

Clean chit to British rulers, Muslim League? Karnataka to have Veer Savarkar flyovers

By Shamsul Islam*
The BJP government of Karnataka led by BS Yediyurappa is going to honour Hindutva icon VD Savarkar by naming two of the newly built major flyovers in Bangalore and Mangalore after him. There was a huge uproar against this decision of the RSS-BJP government as many pro-Kannada organisations with opposition parties and liberal-secular organizations questioned the logic to ignore so many freedom fighters, social reformers and others from within the state.

Hurried nod to Western Ghat projects: 16 lakh Goans' water security 'jeopardised'

Counterview Desk
Taking strong exception to "virtual clearances" to eco-sensitive projects in the Western Ghats, the National Alliance of People’s Movements (NAPM) in a statement has said urged for a review of the four-lane highway, 400 KV transmission line and double tracking of the railway line through the Bhagwan Mahavir Wildlife Sanctuary and Mollem National Park in Goa.

Disturbing signal? Reliance 'shifting focus' away from Indian petrochemical sector

By NS Venkataraman*
Reliance Industries Ltd (RIL), a large Indian company, has expanded and grown in a spectacular manner during the last few decades, like of which no industrial group in India has performed before. RIL is now involved in multi various activities relating to petroleum refineries, petrochemicals, oil and gas exploration, coal bed methane, life sciences, retail business, communication network, (Jio platform) media/entertainment etc.

Case for nationalising India's healthcare system amidst 'strong' private control

Counterview Desk
A draft discussion note, prepared by Dr Maya Valecha, a Gujarat-based gynecologist and activist, sent to the People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) as also a large number of activists, academics and professionals as an email alert, is all set to create a flutter among policy experts for its strong insistence on nationalizing India’s healthcare system.