Skip to main content

'Migrants excluded': Delhi’s women’s day gift turns into a citizenship test

By A Representative 
On March 2, 2026, President Draupadi Murmu launched the Delhi Government’s Pink Saheli Card, one of four schemes dedicated to women, promising free mobility on DTC buses. The initiative was showcased again on March 8, International Women’s Day, when Chief Minister Rekha Gupta boarded a DTC bus to highlight the Saheli Pink National Common Mobility Card (NCMC). The card allows women and transgender residents of Delhi to travel free on buses, but not on the metro or RRTS services, where regular fares still apply.  
The scheme has drawn criticism for its eligibility criteria. The card requires proof of residence through Aadhaar or voter ID verification, excluding large sections of migrant workers and students who form a significant part of Delhi’s population. According to the Delhi Economic Survey (2022–23), nearly 283,000 people migrated to the city in 2021 in search of jobs. By restricting access to residents alone, the government has politicized what many see as a basic civic facility.  
Concerns have also been raised about surveillance. The card requires phone verification and carries the holder’s photograph, raising questions about privacy and the government’s intent in branding it as a “national” card while limiting its scope to Delhi. Critics argue that this transforms mobility into a matter of citizenship, adding layers of monitoring to everyday travel.  
The initiative has been compared to the earlier pink-ticket system introduced by the AAP government in 2019, which offered free bus rides to women. The current government has repackaged it as its own achievement, timed to coincide with International Women’s Day. Observers note that a day meant to celebrate the socialist roots of women’s rights has instead been used for political symbolism.  
In a statement, the People’s Union for Democratic Rights (PUDR) said: “Given the political chicanery evident in the eligibility and surveillance criteria of the Pink Saheli Card, PUDR hopes that the people of the city will demand and ensure a more inclusive system for people’s right to travel without inconvenience and surveillance.”  
The debate underscores how civic facilities, when tied to identity verification and surveillance, risk becoming instruments of political control rather than genuine empowerment.

Comments

TRENDING

Gujarat Sachivalaya blacklists, denies entry to woman social activist: Will NHRC probe?

By Kantilal Parmar*  I have approached the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) seeking an independent, impartial, and transparent investigation into a serious incident that took place at the Gujarat Secretariat in Gandhinagar on August 18, 2026. The matter concerns social activist and women’s rights leader Chandrikaben Solanki, who, according to the information available to me, was denied an entry pass to the Secretariat when she went there to meet Gujarat’s Social Justice and Empowerment Minister, Dr. Manishaben Vakil, to raise an issue concerning social justice.

Tibetan activist’s self-immolation sparks fresh concerns over cultural rights

By Kumar Krishnan*  The question of Tibet has once again entered international discourse, raising difficult questions about human rights, religious freedom, cultural identity, language, and the relationship between political power and the rights of indigenous communities. On 20 August 2026, the Kashag and the Tibetan Parliament-in-Exile jointly organised a solidarity prayer service and peace march to mark the 49th day since the death of Lobga Rangzen, a Tibetan activist who died after self-immolating on 2 July in front of the United Nations Headquarters in New York.

IMF's policies 'stabilise' external creditors' balance sheets, 'generate' crisis in Africa

By Grieve Chelwa, Vijay Prashad   Across Africa, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) presents itself as the custodian of macroeconomic stability. Its latest Article IV staff reports on Ethiopia . Malawi , Nigeria , South Africa , and Zambia are written for economies with very different histories and institutions. Yet they converge on a familiar prescription: fiscal consolidation, tighter monetary policy, market-determined exchange rates, subsidy reform, deregulation and ‘private-sector-led growth’. No serious economist can dismiss macroeconomic stability.