Skip to main content

How wars are undermining climate promises even as accelerating global warming

By N.S. Venkataraman* 
  
Since 1995, global climate conferences have convened annually, with the 29th Conference of Parties (COP29) held in November 2024. These gatherings attract world leaders and generate extensive media coverage, raising hopes of decisive strategies to address the climate emergency. Yet, despite lofty promises and ambitious targets, the crisis remains unabated.  
Each COP has become a stage for “ready-made speeches” filled with pledges to cut fossil fuel use and reduce emissions of carbon dioxide, methane, sulphur dioxide, and nitrous oxide. Animated debates focus on funding commitments from developed nations to developing ones. But meteorological agencies continue to report rising global temperatures, accelerating Arctic ice melt, erratic monsoons, and worsening ecological disruptions.  
Even as leaders speak eloquently of climate responsibility, many simultaneously indulge in wars that devastate the environment. The conflicts between Russia and Ukraine, Israel and Iran, Israel and Lebanon, Afghanistan and Pakistan, and other skirmishes unleash drones, missiles, and explosives that pollute air, soil, and water, destroy ecosystems, and release massive carbon emissions. The environmental fallout of war extends far beyond the battlefields, affecting citizens worldwide who have no role in these decisions.  
Scientists are striving to develop eco-friendly technologies—electric vehicles, hydrogen processes, solar and wind energy—but their progress is undermined by the destructive indulgence of war. The contradiction is stark: while technologists work to mitigate climate change, warlords undo their efforts, rendering COP proceedings hollow exercises.  
Meanwhile, fossil fuel production continues unabated. Nations such as China, India, Australia, and Indonesia expand coal use, while oil- and gas-rich countries resist curbing extraction. Methane emissions, among the most potent drivers of global warming, show no signs of decline.  
The fundamental issue is the lack of genuine commitment from governments. Loud talk and tall claims cannot substitute for responsible action. Without peace, climate protection is impossible. As long as wars rage unchecked, the hope of resolving the climate crisis remains a mirage.  
---  
*Trustee, Nandini Voice for the Deprived, Chennai

Comments

TRENDING

Ahmedabad world’s least climate resilient major city: AlphaGeo study

By Rajiv Shah  A new study has ranked Ahmedabad as the least climate-resilient major city in the world , highlighting a dangerous gap between the city’s extreme physical vulnerability to climate hazards and its capacity to adapt. Cited by The New York Times , the analysis, conducted by geospatial artificial intelligence firm AlphaGeo , places the Indian city at the top of a list of global urban centres most exposed to climate risk.

The making of a self-made woman: How eighty sheep changed everything for Kalawati Ninama

By Vikas Meshram*  About forty-two kilometres from Rajasthan's Banswara district, in the tribal heartland of Ghatol block, lies the small village of Ubapana. This is where Kalawati Ninama, her husband Dhulji, and their four children make their home. Their days unfold much like those of their neighbours—bustling mornings, long hours of farm labour through the afternoon, and evenings spent tending livestock. For this family, farming and livestock were once simply a means of putting food on the table. Today, they have become the sturdy foundation of something far greater: genuine self-sufficiency.

India has spent billions on skilling. Where are the jobs?

By Vikas Gupta   India loves the photograph of a certificate ceremony. A minister on a stage. A banner bearing the word “skill.” Young people holding folders that promise a future. It is a reassuring image because it tells us the problem has a manageable answer: train the young, make them job-ready, and work will follow.