Skip to main content

Florida as 'permissible base' for operations aimed at regime change in Havana

By Manolo De Los Santos 

On the morning of February 25, 2026, Cuban authorities thwarted yet another terrorist attack one mile off the country’s northern coast. When it was over, four men lay dead, six more were wounded and in Cuban custody, and a high-speed boat registered in Florida (FL7726SH) sat disabled, its deck littered with assault rifles, handguns, Molotov cocktails, and bulletproof vests.
The attack has brought to the fore a discussion of the long and often forgotten history of terrorist attacks that Cuba has faced in the 66 years since its revolution and what actors, state and otherwise, have been behind them.
The attack
Early on February 25, an unidentified and unannounced speed boat entered Cuban waters. When the Cuban Coast Guard approached it to identify the vessel, the boat’s crew opened fire without warning. The assailants, armed with assault rifles and Molotov cocktails, wounded the Cuban patrol commander before the guards returned fire in self-defense.
Reports from Miami-based journalists have confirmed that this was not a journey to rescue Cuban migrants as some are attempting to say but, in fact, an organized, armed expedition to engage in violent actions on Cuban soil.
On shore, Cuban authorities arrested Duniel Hernández Santos, an operative who had recently arrived from the United States to welcome the infiltration team.
The US government has not yet made an official comment condemning the attack on Cuba’s sovereignty and Secretary of State Marco Rubio has stated that the US will conduct its own independent investigation.
The events of February 25, 2026, however, represent far more than an isolated incident of maritime violence. Terrorist attacks against Cuba, in many historic cases directly sponsored by the United States, have been a central component of the sustained campaign waged by Washington against the Cuban people for more than six decades. Such attacks and others like it are the logical outcome and intended consequences of the Trump administration’s escalation of a state of war and a fuel blockade deliberately crafted to make the Cuban people suffer, destabilize a sovereign nation, and undermine its government.
The geography of this ongoing conflict is particularly telling, as the state of Florida has for decades functioned as a launching pad for paramilitary groups that have operated with varying degrees of official tolerance from US authorities. According to the preliminary investigation by Cuba’s Ministry of the Interior, many of the individuals involved in the attack, such as Amijail Sánchez González and Leordan Enrique Cruz Gómez, were already known to authorities for their involvement in illegal and terrorist activities. This suggests another troubling reality: the United States continues to allow its territory to be used as a staging ground for planning and executing armed attacks against a neighboring country.
This violence at sea represents the paramilitary manifestation of a broader campaign of economic warfare and terror waged through more sophisticated means by the US naval armada in the Caribbean, yet both approaches share the identical objective of bringing about the collapse of the Cuban state through sustained pressure and destabilization.
The war on Cuba
Since the triumph of the Cuban Revolution in 1959, Cuban authorities have documented approximately 5,780 separate terrorist acts directed against their country. These statistics represent far more than mere numbers on a page. These attacks cut short the lives of 3,478 and left thousands more with permanent disabilities. The methods employed throughout this long history have certainly varied according to the circumstances and capabilities available at different periods, but the underlying cruelty has remained remarkably consistent across the decades.
Among the most devastating tactics employed was biological warfare, exemplified by the 1981 dengue fever epidemic that claimed the lives of 101 children, primarily infants and young children. The sabotage campaigns orchestrated against the island were equally destructive, with declassified documents revealing that during a single six-month period in the 1960s, the CIA successfully smuggled approximately 75 tons of explosives onto the island with the specific purpose of destroying factories, plantations, transportation infrastructure, and other facilities essential to the nation’s economic survival and development.
Perhaps most horrific of all was the 1976 bombing of Cubana Flight 455, which resulted in the deaths of all 73 people aboard, including the teenage members of Cuba’s fencing team, and stands as one of the earliest acts of aviation terrorism ever perpetrated in the Western Hemisphere. The masterminds behind this atrocity, Luis Posada Carriles and Orlando Bosch, subsequently lived out their remaining years freely in Miami, with their unbothered existence sending a clear and unmistakable message from the US government that individuals who direct terrorist violence against Cuba will find safe haven and protection within Florida’s borders.
The armed incursions conducted by groups such as Alpha 66 and others based in the United States constitute the overt and violent edge of a US government policy whose foundations were explicitly laid out in the infamous 1960 Mallory memorandum. That document candidly called for bringing about hunger, desperation, violence, and ultimately the overthrow of the Cuban government through systematically denying the nation access to money and essential supplies. The US economic blockade, maintained for decades with increasing severity and through financial strangulation, has resulted in scarcity of food, essential medicines, and fuel necessary for basic functioning. The designation of Cuba as a state sponsor of terrorism, most recently reaffirmed in 2025 by Trump, has prevented the country from engaging in normal financial transactions and international trade that are essential for any nation’s survival and development. The support, whether direct or through implicit tolerance, of paramilitary groups contributes to physical destabilization that results in continued loss of life and destruction of infrastructure vital to the Cuban people’s ability to survive.
There exists a profound and bitter irony in the US government’s 2025 decision to once again designate Cuba as a state sponsor of terrorism. Throughout the entire sixty-six-year period during which Washington has applied this and other labels to Cuba, it has actually been Cuba that has consistently been the victim of a sustained terror campaign organized, funded, and systematically ignored by successive American administrations.
The violent confrontation off the coast of Cuba on February 25, 2026 was not an accident or a coincidence, but the direct and foreseeable consequence of the refusal of US officials to accept the reality of Cuban sovereignty and the right of the Cuban people to determine their own destiny without external interference or manipulation. In responding to this terrorist attack, Cuba acts in full accordance with international law, specifically Article 51 of the United Nations Charter, which guarantees 'the inherent right of individual or collective self-defense if an armed attack occurs against a member state.'
Ultimately, Marco Rubio and the US government must answer ​​why a group of terrorists residing in the United States conspired to orchestrate acts of terror against the Cuban people, utilizing weapons purchased in the United States and operating a boat departing from a Florida port. As long as Washington continues to treat Florida as a permissible base for operations aimed at regime change in Havana, and as long as it continues to weaponize its financial system to economically strangle the island, this cycle of violence will inevitably continue, claiming lives and perpetuating the suffering of the Cuban people.
As the Trump administration presses forward with the sixty-six-year war against Cuba, inducing famine through a cruel fuel blockade and permitting terrorist attacks from its soil, the Cuban people refuse to break. They continue to weather the storm, standing tall against an empire that has failed, for over six decades, to bend them to its will.
---
This article was produced by Globetrotter. Manolo De Los Santos is Executive Director of The People’s Forum and a researcher at Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research. His writing appears regularly in Monthly Review, Peoples Dispatch, CounterPunch, La Jornada, and other progressive media. He coedited, most recently, Viviremos: Venezuela vs. Hybrid War (LeftWord, 2020), Comrade of the Revolution: Selected Speeches of Fidel Castro (LeftWord, 2021), and Our Own Path to Socialism: Selected Speeches of Hugo Chávez (LeftWord, 2023)

Comments

TRENDING

Modi’s Israel visit strengthened Pakistan’s hand in US–Iran truce: Ex-Indian diplomat

By Jag Jivan   M. K. Bhadrakumar , a career diplomat with three decades of service in postings across the former Soviet Union, Pakistan, Iran, Afghanistan, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Germany, and Turkey, has warned that the current truce in the US–Iran war is “fragile and ridden with contradictions.” Writing in his blog India Punchline , Bhadrakumar argues that while Pakistan has emerged as a surprising broker of dialogue, the durability of the ceasefire remains uncertain.

Manufacturing, services: India's low-skill, middle-skill labour remains underemployed

By Francis Kuriakose* The Indian economy was in a state of deceleration well before Covid-19 made its impact in early 2020. This can be inferred from the declining trends of four important macroeconomic variables that indicate the health of the economy in the last quarter of 2019.

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”

Why Indo-Pak relations have been on 'knife’s edge' , hostilities may remain for long

By Utkarsh Bajpai*  The past few decades have seen strides being made in all aspects of life – from sticks and stones to weaponry. The extreme case of this phenomenon has been nuclear weapons. The menace caused by nuclear weapons in the past is unforgettable. Images of Hiroshima and Nagasaki from 1945 come to mind, after the United States dropped two atomic bombs on the cities.

Food security? Gujarat govt puts more than 5 lakh ration cards in the 'silent' category

By Pankti Jog* A new statistical report uploaded by the Gujarat government on the national food security portal shows that ensuring food security for the marginalized community is still not a priority of the state. The statistical report, uploaded on December 24, highlights many weaknesses in implementing the National Food Security Act (NFSA) in state.

The soundtrack of resistance: How 'Sada Sada Ya Nabi' is fueling the Iran war

​ By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  ​The Persian track “ Sada Sada Ya Nabi ye ” by Hossein Sotoodeh has taken the world by storm. This viral media has cut across linguistic barriers to achieve cult status, reaching over 10 million views. The electrifying music and passionate rendition by the Iranian singer have resonated across the globe, particularly as the high-intensity military conflict involving Iran entered its second month in March 2026.

Lata Mangeshkar, a Dalit from Devdasi family, 'refused to sing a song' about Ambedkar

By Pramod Ranjan*  An artist is known and respected for her art. But she is equally, or even more so known and respected for her social concerns. An artist's social concerns or in other words, her worldview, give a direction and purpose to her art. History remembers only such artists whose social concerns are deep, reasoned and of durable importance. Lata Mangeshkar (28 September 1929 – 6 February 2022) was a celebrated playback singer of the Hindi film industry. She was the uncrowned queen of Indian music for over seven decades. Her popularity was unmatched. Her songs were heard and admired not only in India but also in Pakistan, Bangladesh and many other South Asian countries. In this article, we will focus on her social concerns. Lata lived for 92 long years. Music ran in her blood. Her father also belonged to the world of music. Her two sisters, Asha Bhonsle and Usha Mangeshkar, are well-known singers. Lata might have been born in Indore but the blood of a famous Devdasi family...

'Batteries now cheap enough for solar to meet India's 90% demand': Expert quotes Ember study

By A Representative   Shankar Sharma, Power & Climate Policy Analyst, has urged India’s top policymakers to reconsider the financial and ecological implications of the country’s energy transition strategy in light of recent global developments. In a letter dated April 10, 2026, addressed to the Union Ministers of Finance, Power, New & Renewable Energy, Environment, Forest & Climate Change, and the Vice Chair of NITI Aayog, with a copy to the Prime Minister, Sharma highlighted concerns over India’s ambitious plans for coal gasification and the Prototype Fast Breeder Reactor (PFBR).

Labour unrest in Manesar trigger tensions: Recently enacted labour codes blamed

By A Representative   A civil rights coalition has expressed concern over recent developments in the industrial hub of Manesar in Haryana, where a series of labour actions and police responses have drawn attention. A statement, released by the Campaign Against State Repression (CASR), said it stood in solidarity with workers in IMT Manesar and other parts of the country, while also alleging instances of police excess during ongoing unrest.