Skip to main content

Increasing campus crackdown: Why ruling classes fear and attack higher education?

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak
 
The increasing attacks on higher educational institutions and universities reflect a deeper malaise within the ruling classes. President Donald Trump’s criticisms of American universities and attacks on universities such as Columbia and Harvard, along with the BJP led Indian government's actions under Prime Minister Narendra Modi targeting institutions like Jawaharlal Nehru University, the University of Hyderabad, and Jadavpur University, are notable examples of the growing threats faced by centers of learning and inquiry. 
These examples are not limited to the United States and India; universities across Europe and other regions are also facing similar threats from ruling elites. These threats extend beyond funding cuts, political intimidation, bureaucratic harassment, government and legal pressure. Students, teachers, and researchers are increasingly facing physical danger—not only to their lives and livelihoods but also to their passionate commitment to the production and dissemination of knowledge. 
The Education Under Attack 2024 report, published by the Global Coalition to Protect Education from Attack (GCPEA), revealed that approximately 6,000 attacks on educational institutions occurred in 2022 and 2023—representing a nearly 20 percent increase compared to the previous two years. More than 10,000 students, teachers, and academics were harmed, injured, or killed in these incidents, many of which took place in regions affected by wars and armed conflict.
Historically, attacks on intellectuals and institutions of higher learning are nothing new. Feudal landlords, monarchs, colonial rulers, reactionary religious forces, and dominant ruling classes have long felt threatened by reason, science, and secular knowledge that challenge prevailing power structures. Universities and institutions of higher education have traditionally served as spaces for emancipatory, independent, and critical thinking—forms of thought that inherently question and resist hegemonic authority and status quo. These institutions not only produce and disseminate knowledge but also play a vital role in deepening democracy and advancing decolonisation. 
The scientific ethos and egalitarian culture that define higher education are often deeply unsettling for ruling elites, as they disrupt entrenched hierarchies and systems of control. The current wave of attacks on universities, higher educational institutions, and the very idea of higher education draws its strength from a long historical lineage of ruling-class assaults on spaces of critical thought.
The new wave of attacks on universities and higher institutions of learning began with the commodification, commercialisation, marketisation, privatisation, and modularisation of higher education. This was followed by a systematic effort to undermine the humanities, social sciences, and liberal arts—disciplines increasingly devalued under the pretext of employability and the utilitarian logic of skill-based knowledge transfer. 
These assaults were not accidental but carefully orchestrated to align education with the needs of capitalism and the ruling classes. The aim was to reshape universities into institutions that produce a compliant workforce stripped of the capacity to critically examine exploitative working conditions or challenge systemic inequalities. Governments and university administrations have, to a large extent, succeeded in this endeavour by closing down departments and programs in the humanities, social sciences, and liberal arts.
Although states, governments, funding bodies, and university leadership have succeeded in weakening the production of emancipatory knowledge, they have failed to extinguish the youthful spirit, independence, egalitarian values, secular environment, and critical ethos that continue to thrive in campuses and classrooms. Within these spaces, teachers and researchers persist in producing and disseminating knowledge that promotes scientific consciousness—one that empowers people to resist the bigotry and control of the ruling classes. 
Despite the antagonistic environment shaped by a compliance-driven culture of surveillance over students and faculty, smear campaigns branding university communities as radical, leftist, elitist, or anti-national, and the systematic curbing of academic freedom through funding cuts, students and staff have continued to defy these pressures. The students and staffs have refused to transform their universities into machineries of compliance. They remain committed to generating knowledge and cultivating consciousness that challenge conformity and promote emancipatory praxis. 
So, the renewed intensity in attacks on higher educational institutions, universities, and intellectuals reflects a deeper malaise within the ruling classes—one rooted in insecurity, fear of dissent, and an urgent drive to consolidate ideological control. This broader assault reveals a fundamental truth: the ruling elites no longer trust their ability to maintain legitimacy through democratic consent. Instead, they turn to coercion and control, enforcing a culture of compliance aimed at dismantling critical thought and silencing those who dare to question or challenge the status quo.
What ruling classes fear is not merely academic critique, but education itself—as a democratising force capable of awakening political consciousness, empowering people to interrogate systems and conditions of exploitation, and imagine just, alternative futures. By silencing campuses, the ruling classes seek to silence the future—eroding democratic rights and reinforcing a social, political, economic and cultural order grounded in inequality and repression.
History bears witness to the vital role that universities, institutions of higher learning, and intellectuals have played in the revolutionary upsurges of societies against patriarchy, feudalism, monarchy, colonialism, apartheid, capitalism, and imperialism. The more repression is imposed, the more it fuels tireless and enduring resistance—resistance that persists until power is ultimately challenged, overturned and defeated. Therefore, let universities, institutions of learning and their campuses stand as territories of resistance—spaces where the struggle for a progressive transformation of society takes root, aiming to build a future free from all forms of inequality and exploitation. True knowledge does not domesticate—it emancipates.

Comments

TRENDING

Plastic burning in homes threatens food, water and air across Global South: Study

By Jag Jivan  In a groundbreaking  study  spanning 26 countries across the Global South , researchers have uncovered the widespread and concerning practice of households burning plastic waste as a fuel for cooking, heating, and other domestic needs. The research, published in Nature Communications , reveals that this hazardous method of managing both waste and energy poverty is driven by systemic failures in municipal services and the unaffordability of clean alternatives, posing severe risks to human health and the environment.

Economic superpower’s social failure? Inequality, malnutrition and crisis of India's democracy

By Vikas Meshram  India may be celebrated as one of the world’s fastest-growing economies, but a closer look at who benefits from that growth tells a starkly different story. The recently released World Inequality Report 2026 lays bare a country sharply divided by wealth, privilege and power. According to the report, nearly 65 percent of India’s total wealth is owned by the richest 10 percent of its population, while the bottom half of the country controls barely 6.4 percent. The top one percent—around 14 million people—holds more than 40 percent, the highest concentration since 1961. Meanwhile, the female labour force participation rate is a dismal 15.7 percent.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

From colonial mercantilism to Hindutva: New book on the making of power in Gujarat

By Rajiv Shah  Professor Ghanshyam Shah ’s latest book, “ Caste-Class Hegemony and State Power: A Study of Gujarat Politics ”, published by Routledge , is penned by one of Gujarat ’s most respected chroniclers, drawing on decades of fieldwork in the state. It seeks to dissect how caste and class factors overlap to perpetuate the hegemony of upper strata in an ostensibly democratic polity. The book probes the dominance of two main political parties in Gujarat—the Indian National Congress and the BJP—arguing that both have sustained capitalist growth while reinforcing Brahmanic hierarchies.

The greatest threat to our food system: The aggressive push for GM crops

By Bharat Dogra  Thanks to the courageous resistance of several leading scientists who continue to speak the truth despite increasing pressures from the powerful GM crop and GM food lobby , the many-sided and in some contexts irreversible environmental and health impacts of GM foods and crops, as well as the highly disruptive effects of this technology on farmers, are widely known today. 

History, culture and literature of Fatehpur, UP, from where Maulana Hasrat Mohani hailed

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  Maulana Hasrat Mohani was a member of the Constituent Assembly and an extremely important leader of our freedom movement. Born in Unnao district of Uttar Pradesh, Hasrat Mohani's relationship with nearby district of Fatehpur is interesting and not explored much by biographers and historians. Dr Mohammad Ismail Azad Fatehpuri has written a book on Maulana Hasrat Mohani and Fatehpur. The book is in Urdu.  He has just come out with another important book, 'Hindi kee Pratham Rachna: Chandayan' authored by Mulla Daud Dalmai.' During my recent visit to Fatehpur town, I had an opportunity to meet Dr Mohammad Ismail Azad Fatehpuri and recorded a conversation with him on issues of history, culture and literature of Fatehpur. Sharing this conversation here with you. Kindly click this link. --- *Human rights defender. Facebook https://www.facebook.com/vbrawat , X @freetohumanity, Skype @vbrawat

UP tribal woman human rights defender Sokalo released on bail

By  A  Representative After almost five months in jail, Adivasi human rights defender and forest worker Sokalo Gond has been finally released on bail.Despite being granted bail on October 4, technical and procedural issues kept Sokalo behind bars until November 1. The Citizens for Justice and Peace (CJP) and the All India Union of Forest Working People (AIUFWP), which are backing Sokalo, called it a "major victory." Sokalo's release follows the earlier releases of Kismatiya and Sukhdev Gond in September. "All three forest workers and human rights defenders were illegally incarcerated under false charges, in what is the State's way of punishing those who are active in their fight for the proper implementation of the Forest Rights Act (2006)", said a CJP statement.

Would breaking idols, burning books annihilate caste? Recalling a 1972 Dalit protest

By Rajiv Shah  A few days ago, I received an email alert from a veteran human rights leader who has fought many battles in Gujarat for the Dalit cause — both through ground-level campaigns and courtroom struggles. The alert, sent in Gujarati by Valjibhai Patel, who heads the Council for Social Justice, stated: “In 1935, Babasaheb Ambedkar burnt the Manusmriti . In 1972, we broke the idol of Krishna , whom we regarded as the creator of the varna (caste) system.”

May the Earth Be Auspicious: Vedic ecology and contemporary crisis in Ashok Vajpeyi’s poetry

By Ravi Ranjan*  Ashok Vajpeyi, born in 1941, occupies a singular position in contemporary Hindi poetry as a poet whose work quietly but decisively reorients modern literary consciousness toward ethical, ecological, and civilizational questions. Across more than six decades of writing, Vajpeyi has forged a poetic idiom marked by restraint, philosophical attentiveness, and moral seriousness, resisting both rhetorical excess and ideological simplification.