Skip to main content

Gujarat social activist moves Supreme Court against Waqf Amendment Act 2025

By A Representative 
Mujahid Nafees, noted social activist and Convener of the Minority Coordination Committee Gujarat, has filed a writ petition in the Supreme Court of India, challenging the constitutional validity of the Waqf Amendment Act 2025. The move comes amid growing concerns from sections of the Muslim community regarding what is seen as an attempt to weaken the religious and historical foundation of waqf institutions in India.
The petition highlights a series of sweeping amendments to the original Waqf Act, 1995, now renamed the Unified Waqf Management, Empowerment, Efficiency, and Development Act, 1995. Nafees argues that the renaming itself is an erosion of the Act’s religious and cultural identity.
Central to the petition is the allegation that the amendments pave the way for government overreach, expropriation of ancestral waqf lands, and dilution of Muslim representation in the management of waqf properties. Among the most controversial changes are the replacement of the Survey Commissioner with the district Collector, elimination of the concept of “Waqf by User,” and the inclusion of non-Muslim members in Waqf Boards and the Central Waqf Council.
Further, the petition contends that several amendments—including changes to member disqualification rules, removal of the procedure for chairperson removal, and the relaxation of criteria for CEO appointments—pose a direct threat to the community’s autonomy over waqf affairs. Other concerns include reduced powers of the Waqf Tribunal, increased potential for prolonged litigation, and criminalization or penalization of Mutavallis (waqf caretakers) under certain provisions.
The plea emphasizes that the cumulative effect of the amendments points to a broader motive to centralize control and undermine the independence and religious sanctity of waqf properties. By omitting or altering over two dozen sections—from property determination and audit clauses to disqualification and liability norms—the Act, the petition claims, not only violates personal liberties but also compromises the effectiveness of waqf institutions across the country.
Mujahid Nafees has urged the Hon’ble Supreme Court to strike down the Waqf Amendment Act 2025, calling it unconstitutional and discriminatory. He maintains that the amendments infringe upon religious freedom, misrepresent the spirit of waqf, and threaten the community’s right to manage its own endowments.

Comments

TRENDING

Can free‑living Indian street dogs teach us about how to care for pet dogs?

By Daniel Ramp, Kapil Vishwas Patwardhan, Rosalie Chapple  We give our pet dogs shelter, veterinary care, affection, training and play. We decide when they eat, where they sleep, when they go outside, who they meet, and how they move through the world.

A path of self-reliance in place of migration: Saplings, nutrition gardens and perseverance

By Vikas Meshram*  In the tribal belt stretching from Banswara to Dahod, the day often begins with a glance at the sky. The fields are small, the land uneven and sloping, and irrigation mostly means whatever the rain chooses to give. Yet in the villages of this region, a different story has been unfolding over the past few years. Sitting in meetings of Vaagdhara’s Gram Swaraj groups, farmers have begun to treat water, forest, land, livestock and seed as their real capital. 

100,000 dead, 4 million displaced: Myanmar's post-coup war grinds on as the junta loses ground

By Nava Thakuria*  At least 100,000 people, including civilians, have been killed in Myanmar's conflicts since the military coup of 1 February 2021, according to the UN. Kelley Anne Eckels-Currie, UN Special Rapporteur on human rights in Myanmar, gave the figure to the UN General Assembly in New York on 27 October 2026. She called President Min Aung Hlaing a tyrant who still deliberately attacks civilians to force them into submission.