Skip to main content

Ambedkar’s legacy vs rise of self-styled Babas, Brahminical priesthood, Bania corporates

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat* 
Dr. B.R. Ambedkar is not just a historical figure for the Bahujan Samaj; he is a guiding light, a father figure whose contributions shape their daily lives. Beyond philosophy or politics, Ambedkar’s legacy is rooted in fostering a scientific temperament and a spirit of inquiry. These principles must become integral to our lives and those of our children, especially in an era where superstitious Brahmanical values are being repackaged as Indian culture. Such blind faith makes us vulnerable to exploitation and undermines our well-being. From Buddha to Kabir, Raidas to Nanak, Phule to Periyar, and Ambedkar to Bhagat Singh, India’s great thinkers urged us to question, not accept, what is presented to us.
The rise of self-styled "Babas" reflects a revival of Brahmin-dominated priesthood, backed by Bania-led corporates, reducing other communities to mere spectators in their power games. This caste-class dominance fears the growing assertion of marginalized groups seeking their rightful place in public life. Ambedkar’s thought transcends mere rationalism, guiding us toward humanism rooted in Buddha’s principles of Karuna (compassion) and Maitri (fraternity). He envisioned equality and liberty achieved not through violence but through fraternity—a vision incompatible with Manuwadi prejudice that discriminates based on birth. While Ambedkar rarely used the term "Manuwad," he frequently critiqued Brahmanism as the root of social inequity.
Ambedkar’s humanism is our path to liberation. Yet, the state must also play its role by upholding constitutional values, strengthening directive principles, and bolstering the public sector to ensure equal opportunities for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, and backward classes. A secular, neutral state apparatus, free from favoring any faith, is non-negotiable.
Today, the Bahujan Samaj faces multiple assaults. The Mahabodhi Temple in Gaya remains under Brahmanical control; it must be handed over to Buddhists for management. The reservation system is undermined by backdoor entries like lateral recruitment, often favoring Brahmin-Bania elites. The systematic weakening of public sector institutions—banks, railways, airlines—hurts marginalized communities, while the private sector lacks fair representation. Universities and schools are being reshaped to serve dominant caste interests, with curricula sidelining rationalist voices and introducing Brahmanical rituals as "tradition."
This is a moment to unite diverse communities. Our differences are real, but our shared struggles and aspirations are greater. The Constitution, a monumental document of reconciliation, binds us together. Its framers—despite ideological differences—collaborated without compromising their principles. We must do the same, making constitutional values our social and cultural foundation. That would be the truest tribute to Baba Saheb Ambedkar.
#JaiBhim
---
*Human rights defender 

Comments

TRENDING

Right to walk, right to livelihood: Clearing footpaths 'can't mean' clearing out the urban poor

By Aseem Mishra*    India’s cities are locked in a quiet but intensifying struggle over one of their most contested public spaces: the footpath. For pedestrians, a footpath is basic infrastructure—a strip of ground that should allow people to move safely, independently and with dignity. For millions of informal workers, the same stretch of pavement is a workplace, a source of daily income and often the difference between survival and destitution.

Ample evidence of child labour in South Gujarat's cash rich sugarcane belt: Study

By Rajiv Shah A recent German government-funded study , undertaken jointly by the NGO Prayas Centre for Labour Research and Action and the Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung, which mainly deals examines the working conditions of migrant workers in the cash-rich sugarcane zone of South Gujarat, has gone a long way to suggest large scale prevalence of child labour during the harvesting season.

Women lawyers petition Supreme Court, seek reconsideration of Aug 4 order on bar council co-option

By A Representative   A group of women advocates who stood sixth and seventh among female candidates in the recent Bar Council elections have filed a petition before the Supreme Court, seeking a recall and reconsideration of the Court’s August 4 order determining the mechanism for co-opting women into State Bar Councils.