Skip to main content

Supreme Court verdict on halal certification: Implications for India's food industry

By Syed Ali Mujtaba  
In Uttar Pradesh, the Office of the Commissioner, Food Safety and Drug Administration sparked controversy on November 18, 2023, by notifying a ban on food products with halal certification, except for those meant for export.  
Halal India Private Limited and other organizations challenged this notification in the Supreme Court. They argued that the ban on halal-certified products is unconstitutional, infringes on their rights, and causes unnecessary market divisions.  
A two-judge bench of the Supreme Court issued immediate protection to Halal India Private Limited, emphasizing that the ban could disrupt their ongoing trade and consumer market, thus warranting such measures.  
The defendants’ legal team explained that halal certification programs cater to diverse customer preferences, functioning as an elective lifestyle choice. They stressed that purchasing halal-certified products is entirely voluntary.  
On the other side, Uttar Pradesh government's legal representative, Tushar Mehta, expressed surprise over the certification of non-meat products, arguing that those rejecting halal practices face higher prices for certified products.  
Arguments in Favor of Halal Certification  
Proponents highlight several advantages of halal certification:  
1. Consumer trust: The halal stamp reassures Muslim consumers that their food adheres to Islamic dietary laws, fostering trust and confidence.  
2. Economic growth: The halal market, part of a trillion-dollar global economy, offers businesses opportunities for expansion, especially in Muslim-majority nations.  
3. Quality assurance: Products undergo rigorous inspections and audits, ensuring higher quality and safety standards for all consumers.  
4. Cultural inclusivity: Halal certification supports multiculturalism by catering to diverse dietary needs, fostering inclusiveness.  
5. Tourism benefits: Hospitality and tourism sectors benefit by accommodating religious Muslim tourists, enhancing travel experiences and boosting tourism.
Arguments Against Halal Certification  
Critics point out the following concerns:  
1. Economic burden: Halal certification increases costs for manufacturers and non-Muslim consumers.  
2. Animal welfare: Halal slaughter practices face criticism for perceived cruelty.  
3. Market segmentation: Halal branding may alienate non-Muslim consumers, leading to market fragmentation.  
4. Fraudulent practices: Lack of standardization in halal certification can lead to misuse and erosion of consumer trust.  
5. Freedom of choice: Critics argue that halal certification might restrict freedom of choice and breach secular principles.  
Legal and Market Implications  
The ongoing Supreme Court case pits religious compliance and market expansion against economic, ethical, and regulatory concerns. The verdict will likely have far-reaching implications for India’s food production, hospitality businesses, and export market.  
The Supreme Court’s ruling may establish a legal precedent for other states and shape the long-term trajectory of India's food business sector, balancing consumer protection and market dynamics.  
---  
Syed Ali Mujtaba is a journalist based in Chennai

Comments

TRENDING

Arrival of USS Lincoln: A ‘leisure trip’ to Thailand or a neo-colonial move to commodify women?

By Benyasiri Eimviriyapong   The arrival of the USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN-72) for a ‘leisure trip’ in Thailand before returning to its campaign of destruction against the people of West Asia demands immediate interrogation and opposition. For us Thai people, and those in sites of American plunder across the globe, this a rattling of the US’ cold war colonial chains on its most loyal lap dog, while conducting a war of aggression in Iran and the ongoing genocide in Palestine. In allowing the USS Lincoln to dock, the Thai ruling elites are once again facilitating a system of imperial violence that extends far beyond Southeast Asian borders, a system which in our case, is predicated on sexual violence and femicide.

PIL seeks suspension of school-based HPV vaccination over consent violations

By A Representative   The Universal Health Organisation (UHO) has filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Supreme Court of India seeking judicial intervention to ensure that the country's nationwide Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccination Programme complies with constitutional guarantees of informed consent , bodily autonomy, transparency, and accountability.

Pilgrimage or pollution? The waste crisis of Indian faith

By Raj Kumar Sinha*  In today's times, there are certain issues that are constantly talked about and discussed, yet no visible impact seems to be made. Beyond water, soil, and pollution, one crisis that continues to be overlooked is waste. Like other life-threatening problems, waste too is gradually moving toward burying and obliterating us. After the Kanwar Yatra in Haridwar, approximately 8,000 tonnes of waste were left behind on the riverbanks, including bottles filled with urine.