Revisiting the Supreme Court verdict on Tamil Nadu bills: A constitutional perspective

By N.S. Venkataraman*

On April 8, 2025, a two-judge bench of the Supreme Court of India criticized the Tamil Nadu Governor for not providing assent to ten bills passed by the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly, keeping them pending for several months. The Court went so far as to approve the bills themselves, despite the fact that the Governor had forwarded them to the President of India, who subsequently rejected some of them.

This decision by the Court has brought to the forefront questions regarding the balance of power between the judiciary and the office of the President of India. By effectively approving the bills that the President had already rejected, the judgment raises constitutional concerns and may risk creating a constitutional imbalance. It has also prompted discussions about whether the judiciary exceeded its authority by acting in a space traditionally occupied by the legislature, the executive, and ultimately the President.

Reactions to the verdict have been mixed. While some politicians have welcomed the judgment, several legal experts have expressed reservations. The broader principle often cited in the justice system is that judgments must be both legally sound and appear to be fair and comprehensive in spirit. In this context, questions are being raised about whether the Supreme Court took a sufficiently holistic view of the issue.

The bills in question pertain to the governance of state universities in Tamil Nadu, where the Governor traditionally holds the position of Chancellor. These legislative proposals aim to transfer the power to appoint Vice-Chancellors from the Governor to the state government. This effectively places the responsibility with the Chief Minister and other political appointees, removing an important buffer of independent oversight.

The role of the Governor, a nominee of the President of India, includes ensuring that universities are managed in accordance with constitutional principles and educational standards, rather than being influenced by political considerations. Universities are not administrative departments or state-run enterprises, and thus require a level of autonomy and non-partisan oversight.

There are broader concerns related to governance in India, including accusations of nepotism and corruption in states governed by political parties. In such a context, placing the control of Vice-Chancellor appointments entirely in the hands of the ruling party could lead to appointments based on political considerations rather than merit. In the past, there have been allegations of political interference in such appointments in Tamil Nadu.

Another contentious aspect is the Tamil Nadu government's opposition to including a University Grants Commission (UGC) nominee on the selection committee for Vice-Chancellors. This contradicts established procedures that include UGC representation, given that the UGC, as a central agency, provides significant funding and oversight. The inclusion of a UGC nominee ensures that appointees meet national standards and that public funds are managed responsibly.

The judiciary appears to have interpreted the Governor’s delay as obstructionism, without adequately examining the broader implications of the proposed legislative changes. The impact of approving all bills passed by a state assembly without scrutiny, particularly in areas affecting national interest and constitutional balance, has not been sufficiently addressed in the verdict.

Given the complex nature of Indian federalism, where state leaders sometimes express unwillingness to implement central laws, there is a need for checks and balances. In this instance, the President of India exercised her constitutional authority by rejecting certain bills, believing them to be against the national interest. Questioning this decision by the Supreme Court introduces further tension between constitutional institutions.

---

*Trustee, Nandini Voice for the Deprived, Chennai

Comments

Plastic burning in homes threatens food, water and air across Global South: Study

By Jag Jivan In a groundbreaking study spanning 26 countries across the Global South , researchers have uncovered the widespread and concerning practice of households burning plastic waste as a fuel for cooking, heating, and other domestic needs. The research, published in Nature Communications , reveals that this hazardous method of managing both waste and energy poverty is driven by systemic failures in municipal services and the unaffordability of clean alternatives, posing severe risks to human health and the environment.

Economic superpower’s social failure? Inequality, malnutrition and crisis of India's democracy

By Vikas Meshram India may be celebrated as one of the world’s fastest-growing economies, but a closer look at who benefits from that growth tells a starkly different story. The recently released World Inequality Report 2026 lays bare a country sharply divided by wealth, privilege and power. According to the report, nearly 65 percent of India’s total wealth is owned by the richest 10 percent of its population, while the bottom half of the country controls barely 6.4 percent. The top one percent—around 14 million people—holds more than 40 percent, the highest concentration since 1961. Meanwhile, the female labour force participation rate is a dismal 15.7 percent.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

From colonial mercantilism to Hindutva: New book on the making of power in Gujarat

By Rajiv Shah Professor Ghanshyam Shah ’s latest book, “ Caste-Class Hegemony and State Power: A Study of Gujarat Politics ”, published by Routledge , is penned by one of Gujarat ’s most respected chroniclers, drawing on decades of fieldwork in the state. It seeks to dissect how caste and class factors overlap to perpetuate the hegemony of upper strata in an ostensibly democratic polity. The book probes the dominance of two main political parties in Gujarat—the Indian National Congress and the BJP—arguing that both have sustained capitalist growth while reinforcing Brahmanic hierarchies.

History, culture and literature of Fatehpur, UP, from where Maulana Hasrat Mohani hailed

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat* Maulana Hasrat Mohani was a member of the Constituent Assembly and an extremely important leader of our freedom movement. Born in Unnao district of Uttar Pradesh, Hasrat Mohani's relationship with nearby district of Fatehpur is interesting and not explored much by biographers and historians. Dr Mohammad Ismail Azad Fatehpuri has written a book on Maulana Hasrat Mohani and Fatehpur. The book is in Urdu. He has just come out with another important book, 'Hindi kee Pratham Rachna: Chandayan' authored by Mulla Daud Dalmai.' During my recent visit to Fatehpur town, I had an opportunity to meet Dr Mohammad Ismail Azad Fatehpuri and recorded a conversation with him on issues of history, culture and literature of Fatehpur. Sharing this conversation here with you. Kindly click this link. --- *Human rights defender. Facebook https://www.facebook.com/vbrawat , X @freetohumanity, Skype @vbrawat

The greatest threat to our food system: The aggressive push for GM crops

By Bharat Dogra Thanks to the courageous resistance of several leading scientists who continue to speak the truth despite increasing pressures from the powerful GM crop and GM food lobby , the many-sided and in some contexts irreversible environmental and health impacts of GM foods and crops, as well as the highly disruptive effects of this technology on farmers, are widely known today.

UP tribal woman human rights defender Sokalo released on bail

By A Representative After almost five months in jail, Adivasi human rights defender and forest worker Sokalo Gond has been finally released on bail.Despite being granted bail on October 4, technical and procedural issues kept Sokalo behind bars until November 1. The Citizens for Justice and Peace (CJP) and the All India Union of Forest Working People (AIUFWP), which are backing Sokalo, called it a "major victory." Sokalo's release follows the earlier releases of Kismatiya and Sukhdev Gond in September. "All three forest workers and human rights defenders were illegally incarcerated under false charges, in what is the State's way of punishing those who are active in their fight for the proper implementation of the Forest Rights Act (2006)", said a CJP statement.

Would breaking idols, burning books annihilate caste? Recalling a 1972 Dalit protest

By Rajiv Shah A few days ago, I received an email alert from a veteran human rights leader who has fought many battles in Gujarat for the Dalit cause — both through ground-level campaigns and courtroom struggles. The alert, sent in Gujarati by Valjibhai Patel, who heads the Council for Social Justice, stated: “In 1935, Babasaheb Ambedkar burnt the Manusmriti . In 1972, we broke the idol of Krishna , whom we regarded as the creator of the varna (caste) system.”

May the Earth Be Auspicious: Vedic ecology and contemporary crisis in Ashok Vajpeyi’s poetry

By Ravi Ranjan* Ashok Vajpeyi, born in 1941, occupies a singular position in contemporary Hindi poetry as a poet whose work quietly but decisively reorients modern literary consciousness toward ethical, ecological, and civilizational questions. Across more than six decades of writing, Vajpeyi has forged a poetic idiom marked by restraint, philosophical attentiveness, and moral seriousness, resisting both rhetorical excess and ideological simplification.

Search This Blog