Skip to main content

The greatest threat to our food system: The aggressive push for GM crops

By Bharat Dogra 
Thanks to the courageous resistance of several leading scientists who continue to speak the truth despite increasing pressures from the powerful GM crop and GM food lobby, the many-sided and in some contexts irreversible environmental and health impacts of GM foods and crops, as well as the highly disruptive effects of this technology on farmers, are widely known today. 
Instead of acknowledging these concerns, however, the GM lobby based in certain Western countries—supported by giant multinational corporations—has continued to push aggressively for the spread of GM crops in more countries and the increased import of GM food and feed. The pressures exercised by US-based lobbyists, in particular, have been extremely strong and have become even more dangerous as US trade policy turns increasingly aggressive.
While high tariffs make headlines across the world, the attempt to use trade negotiations to impose GM crops or weaken resistance to GM food imports could prove even more harmful in the long run. The problems of US farmers, too, stem from big business domination of agriculture, which has degraded the farming environment and exploited farmers—forcing them to buy costly inputs while selling their produce cheaply. Yet manipulative propagandists distract attention from this injustice by claiming that opening international markets to America's GM products is the solution. This is entirely false. To help US farmers, they must also be freed from corporate control.
Instead, the US is pushing harder than ever to spread GM crops and technology to regions where prospects for ecological, soil-friendly farming could be destroyed by GM varieties and the accompanying agrochemicals, including herbicides. Monsanto faced countless lawsuits due to the harms associated with its products. It then merged with another corporate giant—Bayer of Germany—combining forces to expand the spread of GM crops. China, which many had hoped would provide resistance, has unfortunately shown limited commitment on this matter.
This places a particularly heavy responsibility on India’s policy makers to show global leadership by firmly opposing GM food crops and GM food imports, despite very strong pressure from the US (assisted by local collaborators). India should instead position itself as a leading centre for GM-free, naturally grown food. That is where the future lies. The country has already made the mistake of introducing GM cotton and must not compound this error by approving GM food crops or permitting GM food imports.
As the push for GM mustard intensifies, it should be stated unequivocally that edible oils, being crucial to daily diets, require the highest level of precaution. GM mustard must be firmly rejected.
Multinational companies have already gained significant control over the critical seed sector. Should they succeed in spreading GM technology across the global South—especially in major countries like India—they will secure dominance over the world’s food and farming systems, with disastrous consequences for farmers, biodiversity and humanity.
One of the earliest senior scientists to warn against this threat was the late Dr Pushpa M. Bhargava, founder of the Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology and former Vice Chairperson of the National Knowledge Commission. Considered a mentor by many people’s science movements, he was appointed by the Supreme Court of India to observe the Genetic Engineering Appraisal Committee because of his widely acknowledged expertise and integrity.
It is therefore relevant to recall his views. He stated, “There are over 500 research publications by scientists of indisputable integrity and without conflict of interest that establish harmful effects of GM crops on human, animal and plant health and on the environment and biodiversity... On the other hand, virtually every paper supporting GM crops is by scientists who have a declared conflict of interest or whose credibility can be doubted.”
In a review published in The Tribune titled "Food Without Choice", he drew attention to efforts by “a small but powerful minority” to promote GM crops to serve the interests of multinational corporations (especially US-based), the bureaucracy, political establishments and “a few unprincipled and unethical scientists and technologists who can be used as tools.” He warned that the ultimate aim—led by Monsanto—was to gain control over Indian agriculture and food production, which would undermine food security, farmer security and rural livelihoods.
Dr Bhargava’s concerns are echoed by many other scientists across the world. The Independent Science Panel (ISP), comprising experts from multiple disciplines and countries, has stated clearly that “GM crops have failed to deliver promised benefits and are posing escalating problems on farms.” They note that transgenic contamination is unavoidable, meaning GM and non-GM agriculture cannot coexist. They further warn that no convincing evidence exists to prove GM safety; instead, rising evidence points to risks that could cause irreversible harm to health and the environment.
Their report, The Case for a GMO-free Sustainable World, highlights further dangers inherent to genetic engineering, including enhanced risks of horizontal gene transfer and the possibility of creating dangerous pathogens. The infamous “accidental” creation of a killer mouse virus in 2001 illustrates these fears. Newer genetic engineering techniques such as DNA shuffling allow the creation of millions of novel recombinant viruses in minutes—far beyond anything produced through evolution—and these tools rely heavily on disease-causing organisms and even potential bio-weapon materials.
In this background, proposals to introduce GM mustard in India must be taken extremely seriously. Oilseed crops demand the highest caution, as edible oils are used in nearly every cooked meal. Mustard also has medicinal uses; its leaves are eaten as vegetables, and its oilcake feeds dairy cattle.
India is richly endowed with diverse, high-nutrition oilseeds—groundnut, mustard, sesame and many others—well-suited to local soils and crop rotations. Past efforts to build self-reliance in edible oils using these traditional varieties have succeeded when pursued sincerely. Yet powerful corporate interests are pushing an oilseed path based on GM crops and imported technologies, despite well-documented environmental and safety hazards.
Mute Schimpf of Friends of the Earth Europe warns that biotech firms are seeking sweeping patents that could cover even natural plants with similar traits—enabling them to monopolize seeds and restrict farmers’ rights. This represents a worsening of what many call the “great gene robbery.”
As global awareness of GM risks grows, billion-dollar multinational interests are trying to blur public understanding through new terms such as “gene-edited crops.” They argue that gene-edited plants should not face the same scrutiny as GMOs. But in July 2018, the European Court of Justice ruled that gene-edited crops must be regulated exactly like GMOs.
Earlier, Dr Janet Cotter and Dr R. Steinbrecher concluded in The Ecologist that gene-edited crops and animals must be considered GMOs. The Court later agreed, noting that gene-editing techniques allow direct genetic modification with risks similar to transgenics, and at a scale impossible with conventional breeding.
Greenpeace EU’s Franziska Achterberg welcomed the verdict, calling deregulated release of new GMOs “illegal and irresponsible,” particularly given the risk of unintended mutations. Friends of the Earth also applauded the ruling.
India must exercise extreme caution, as powerful interests are pushing aggressively to introduce GM food crops and use gene-editing loopholes to secure approvals. The current battles over GM mustard and gene-edited crops illustrate the enormous corporate drive to penetrate India’s food system—with support from a network of local collaborators. These struggles are not only about mustard or brinjal; they concern the future of India’s agriculture, food safety, biodiversity and sovereignty. Our vigilance must therefore be collective, informed and unwavering—especially at a time when the US is deploying aggressive trade tactics to pressure countries to accept GM crops, food and feed.
---
The writer is Honorary Convener, Campaign to Save Earth Now. His recent books include India’s Quest for Sustainable Farming and Healthy Food, Planet in Peril, Man over Machine, and 14 Crucial Questions on GM Crops (and its Hindi edition)

Comments

TRENDING

From colonial mercantilism to Hindutva: New book on the making of power in Gujarat

By Rajiv Shah  Professor Ghanshyam Shah ’s latest book, “ Caste-Class Hegemony and State Power: A Study of Gujarat Politics ”, published by Routledge , is penned by one of Gujarat ’s most respected chroniclers, drawing on decades of fieldwork in the state. It seeks to dissect how caste and class factors overlap to perpetuate the hegemony of upper strata in an ostensibly democratic polity. The book probes the dominance of two main political parties in Gujarat—the Indian National Congress and the BJP—arguing that both have sustained capitalist growth while reinforcing Brahmanic hierarchies.

Plastic burning in homes threatens food, water and air across Global South: Study

By Jag Jivan  In a groundbreaking  study  spanning 26 countries across the Global South , researchers have uncovered the widespread and concerning practice of households burning plastic waste as a fuel for cooking, heating, and other domestic needs. The research, published in Nature Communications , reveals that this hazardous method of managing both waste and energy poverty is driven by systemic failures in municipal services and the unaffordability of clean alternatives, posing severe risks to human health and the environment.

From protest to proof: Why civil society must rethink environmental resistance

By Shankar Sharma*  As concerned environmentalists and informed citizens, many of us share deep unease about the way environmental governance in our country is being managed—or mismanaged. Our complaints range across sectors and regions, and most of them are legitimate. Yet a hard question confronts us: are complaints, by themselves, effective? Experience suggests they are not.

Kolkata event marks 100 years since first Communist conference in India

By Harsh Thakor*   A public assembly was held in Kolkata on December 24, 2025, to mark the centenary of the First Communist Conference in India , originally convened in Kanpur from December 26 to 28, 1925. The programme was organised by CPI (ML) New Democracy at Subodh Mallik Square on Lenin Sarani. According to the organisers, around 2,000 people attended the assembly.

Dalit woman student’s death sparks allegations of institutional neglect in Himachal college

By A Representative   A Dalit rights organisation has alleged severe caste- and gender-based institutional violence leading to the death of a 19-year-old Dalit woman student at Government Degree College, Dharamshala, Himachal Pradesh, and has demanded arrests, resignations, and an independent inquiry into the case.

Economic superpower’s social failure? Inequality, malnutrition and crisis of India's democracy

By Vikas Meshram  India may be celebrated as one of the world’s fastest-growing economies, but a closer look at who benefits from that growth tells a starkly different story. The recently released World Inequality Report 2026 lays bare a country sharply divided by wealth, privilege and power. According to the report, nearly 65 percent of India’s total wealth is owned by the richest 10 percent of its population, while the bottom half of the country controls barely 6.4 percent. The top one percent—around 14 million people—holds more than 40 percent, the highest concentration since 1961. Meanwhile, the female labour force participation rate is a dismal 15.7 percent.

Urgent need to study cause of large number of natural deaths in Gulf countries

By Venkatesh Nayak* According to data tabled in Parliament in April 2018, there are 87.76 lakh (8.77 million) Indians in six Gulf countries, namely Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). While replying to an Unstarred Question (#6091) raised in the Lok Sabha, the Union Minister of State for External Affairs said, during the first half of this financial year alone (between April-September 2018), blue-collared Indian workers in these countries had remitted USD 33.47 Billion back home. Not much is known about the human cost of such earnings which swell up the country’s forex reserves quietly. My recent RTI intervention and research of proceedings in Parliament has revealed that between 2012 and mid-2018 more than 24,570 Indian Workers died in these Gulf countries. This works out to an average of more than 10 deaths per day. For every US$ 1 Billion they remitted to India during the same period there were at least 117 deaths of Indian Workers in Gulf ...

The architect of Congolese liberation: The life and legacy of Patrice Lumumba

By Harsh Thakor*  Patrice Émery Lumumba remains a central figure in the history of African decolonization, serving as the first Prime Minister of the independent Republic of the Congo. Born on July 2, 1925, Lumumba emerged as a radical anti-colonial leader who sought to unify a nation fractured by decades of Belgian rule. His tenure, however, lasted less than seven months before his dismissal and subsequent assassination on January 17, 1961.

Venezuela and the crisis of global order: Erosion of rules-based international order

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  The American attack on Venezuela violates every principle of international law that the collective West claims to uphold. The response from the European Union—“we are monitoring the situation”—exposes the hollowness of these claims. WhatsApp gossipers may celebrate this as an act of “bravery,” but what kind of bravery is it to intimidate a neighbour that is neither large in size nor strong in military power?