NSA’s comments on temple looting factually incorrect, say political observers

By A Representative

has drawn significant criticism from political and civil society circles following his address at the in on . Speaking to a gathering of roughly 3,000 young delegates, the 81-year-old NSA invoked historical grievances, suggesting that India’s ancestors remained "helpless, mute spectators" while villages were burned and temples were looted.

While acknowledging that "revenge" is not an ideal term, he described it as a "powerful force" and called upon the youth to "avenge" India’s history by rebuilding a nation based on its own values and beliefs.

The remarks have triggered a sharp rebuttal from various quarters, with critics arguing that his characterization of the Indian people as passive is both factually incorrect and politically dangerous. Historical experts have pointed out that India’s past is defined by a legacy of resistance, citing uprisings against foreign invasions and the eventual defeat of colonial rule as proof that the country was never truly helpless.

Opposition figures, including former , have described the rhetoric as a "" that could incite communal tension, while Congress spokespersons questioned the appropriateness of a high-ranking security official using such provocative language.

Adding to the controversy, some historians have contested Doval's claim that Indian civilizations never attacked others or destroyed places of worship. They cite the ’s and documented instances of internal temple desecration during as evidence of a more complex reality. Concerns have also been raised that focusing on historical "vengeance" may distract the youth from contemporary priorities like education, employment, and social harmony.

, a spokesperson for the Socialist Party (India), headed by well kmown activist-scholar , joined the chorus of disapproval, stating that such language from a constitutional authority poses a threat to social harmony and the rule of law.

The party emphasized that India’s strength lies in its democratic consciousness and justice rather than a politics of retaliation, urging that the younger generation be encouraged toward development instead of being pushed into a "war-like mindset" based on a distorted view of the past.

Comments

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

Four women lead the way among Tamil Nadu’s Muslim change-makers

By Syed Ali Mujtaba* A report published by Awaz–The Voice (ATV), a news platform, highlights 10 Muslim change-makers in Tamil Nadu, among whom four are women. These individuals are driving social change through education, the arts, conservation, and activism. Representing diverse fields ranging from environmental protection and literature to political engagement and education, they are working to improve society across the state.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

'Big blow to crores of farmers’: Opposition mounts against US–India trade deal

By A Representative Farmers’ organisations and political groups have sharply criticised the emerging contours of the US–India trade agreement, warning that it could severely undermine Indian agriculture, depress farm incomes and open the doors to genetically modified (GM) food imports in violation of domestic regulatory safeguards.

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman* In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

Samyukt Kisan Morcha raises concerns over ‘corporate bias’ in seed Bill

By A Representative The Samyukt Kisan Morcha (SKM) has released a statement raising ten questions to Union Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan regarding the proposed Seed Bill 2025, alleging that the legislation is biased in favour of large multinational and domestic seed corporations and does not adequately safeguard farmers’ interests.

Search This Blog