Skip to main content

Rights group alleges Muslim voters wrongly deleted after demolition in Ahmedabad

By A Representative
 
The Minority Coordination Committee (MCC) Gujarat has written to the Chief Electoral Officer of the state alleging that over a thousand Muslim voters from Akbarnagar in Ahmedabad’s Bapunagar constituency have been wrongly removed from the electoral rolls following a demolition drive. In a letter dated 17 January 2026, addressed to Harit Shukla, IAS, the MCC claims that 1,206 residents of Akbarnagar’s “Chhapra” locality, who were previously listed as eligible voters in Part 173 of the 49-Bapunagar Assembly seat, have been excluded from the ongoing Special Summary Revision.
According to the MCC, the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation demolished homes in the locality, forcing families to relocate to different parts of the city. Despite this, residents were expected to submit enumeration forms to Booth Level Officers for inclusion in the updated electoral list. The letter alleges that enumeration forms were initially distributed and collected, and that 308 residents submitted filled forms and received signed acknowledgements from the BLO. However, MCC says distribution was abruptly halted after a communication reportedly linked to the area’s sitting MLA from the BJP, and many residents were denied forms altogether.
The draft electoral list published during the revision process, the committee states, does not include names of residents from the demolished settlement. When checking the ASD list, affected voters were reportedly marked under the category “Uncollectable Enumeration Forms,” implying forms were not returned, which the MCC alleges is incorrect and an attempt to disenfranchise displaced voters.
The MCC further alleges discrimination, pointing out that residents of Chandola Lake—whose houses were also demolished—were provided special camps to complete voter documentation and their names appear in the current draft rolls. The letter questions how two groups in similar situations received different treatment and whether the Election Commission is acting under political pressure.
The communication cites provisions in the Representation of the People Act requiring advance notice and an opportunity to respond before any voter’s name is deleted, arguing that these safeguards were violated. It urges the Chief Electoral Officer to immediately organise special camps for Akbarnagar residents, restore their names to the rolls, and take legal action against officials who allegedly acted under partisan influence.
The letter is signed by Mujahid Nafees, convenor of the Minority Coordination Committee Gujarat, and was submitted on 17 January 2026.

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan  The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra   We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram   The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman*  In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

'Big blow to crores of farmers’: Opposition mounts against US–India trade deal

By A Representative   Farmers’ organisations and political groups have sharply criticised the emerging contours of the US–India trade agreement, warning that it could severely undermine Indian agriculture, depress farm incomes and open the doors to genetically modified (GM) food imports in violation of domestic regulatory safeguards.

Penpa Tsering’s leadership and record under scrutiny amidst Tibetan exile elections

By Tseten Lhundup*  Within the Tibetan exile community, Penpa Tsering is often described as having risen through grassroots engagement. Born in 1967, he comes from an ordinary Tibetan family, pursued higher education at Delhi University in India, and went on to serve as Speaker of the Tibetan Parliament-in-Exile from 2008 to 2016. In 2021, he was elected Sikyong of the Central Tibetan Administration (CTA), becoming the second democratically elected political leader of the administration after Lobsang Sangay. 

From Puri to the State: How Odisha turned the dream of drinkable tap water into policy

By Hans Harelimana Hirwa, Mansee Bal Bhargava   Drinking water directly from the tap is generally associated with developed countries where it is considered safe and potable. Only about 50 countries around the world offer drinkable tap water, with the majority located in Europe and North America, and a few in Asia and Oceania. Iceland, Switzerland, Finland, Germany, and Singapore have the highest-quality tap water, followed by Canada, New Zealand, Japan, the USA, Australia, the UK, Costa Rica, and Chile.

Territorial greed of Trump, Xi Jinping, and Putin could make 2026 toxic

By N.S. Venkataraman*  The year 2025 closed with bloody conflicts across nations and groups, while the United Nations continued to appear ineffective—reduced to a debate forum with little impact on global peace and harmony.