Skip to main content

Madhav Gadgil: Scientist, democrat, and tireless champion of India’s ecological conscience

By Parineeta Dandekar, Himanshu Thakkar* 
“At the ground level people are really interested and they want to get involved… our report, if nothing else, seems to have served the purpose of triggering such interest,” said Dr. Madhav Gadgil while delivering a lecture on “Democracy and Ecology in Contemporary India” in Delhi in July 2013. He was speaking about the 2010–11 report of the Western Ghats Ecology Expert Panel (WGEEP), which he chaired—one of his most significant contributions to environmental governance in India.
One of us accompanied him during parts of that journey: long days of back-to-back meetings in remote corners of the Western Ghats, listening to people rarely heard in public policy. These gatherings were not limited to plants, trees, or rivers; they were conversations about how villagers imagined development, and how their lands should be treated. No official process had ever asked them these questions. It was environmental democracy—messy, vibrant, and beautiful. It was almost unprecedented then, and remains rare even today.
Predictably, a report grounded in the wisdom and rights of local communities was unacceptable to vested interests. In Maharashtra, Karnataka, and Kerala, politicians distorted its content, spread misinformation, and fuelled fear. The government appointed a High-Level Working Group under Dr. K. Kasturirangan to dilute WGEEP’s recommendations, producing a document deeply at odds with facts and science. Yet, under Gadgil’s leadership, the Western Ghats briefly glimpsed a more hopeful future.
The Gadgil Report remains a reference work for ecologically informed river management. Unsurprisingly, one of its key contributors was the late Dr. Latha Anantha, a central figure in Kerala’s movement against the Athirapilly Dam. Dr. Gadgil had earlier played an important role in the historic Silent Valley campaign, which led to sweeping environmental reforms; he supported struggles such as Narmada Bachao Andolan and the community-led campaign against Athirapilly.
He hailed the Plachimada movement—which forced Coca-Cola to shut operations through a Panchayat-led struggle—as a powerful affirmation of grassroots democracy. His work against chemical pollution in the Lote-Parshuram industrial belt remains a cornerstone for affected communities.
Dr. Gadgil consistently insisted that environmental governance must be participatory, transparent, and informed by local knowledge. He cited the Australian “River Watch” programme—where citizens track river health using biological indicators—as a model India should adopt. He argued that India’s progress requires a bottom-up approach, strengthened scientific temper, revitalised traditional wisdom, and unwavering rule of law. Visionary in scope, WGEEP even recommended frameworks for decommissioning dams—something India still lacks policy for.
His legacy also includes drafting the National Biodiversity Act (2002) and helping establish the Centre for Ecological Sciences at the Indian Institute of Science. As former Environment Minister Jairam Ramesh observed, “Nation builders come in many forms. Gadgil was definitely one of them.”
When asked whether community perceptions were “scientific,” he was firm: local communities know their environment best and must help shape decisions about its use. Even on climate change, he emphasised the safeguarding of natural ecosystems to ensure resilience for those most exposed.
In a 2014 SANRDP report on dams for Mumbai, he wrote presciently: “People at the grass roots are best aware of what is happening to natural, human and social capital… What we need to focus on is implementing constitutional provisions for protecting the environment and empowering the people.”
Recipient of the Padma Shri, Padma Bhushan and international honours, Gadgil influenced the direction of institutions such as the Botanical and Zoological Survey of India. A rigorous scientist, he was equally at home in forests and hamlets—sharing meals, learning from villagers, writing about community-conserved spaces, and standing with those fighting to protect them. His belief in people was so deep that within conservation circles he seemed radical. Yet when floods devastated Kerala in 2018, when landslides struck Wayanad in 2024 and the Western Ghats in 2023, and when industrial pollution in Lote-Parshuram drew global attention, his warnings rang painfully true.
Dr. Madhav Gadgil leaves behind an intellectual legacy and a democratic ecological ethic urgently needed in the India of today. He will be deeply missed—especially now, when his voice is needed more than ever.
---
*With South Asia Network on Dams, Rivers and People. Source: sandrp.in 

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan  The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

Four women lead the way among Tamil Nadu’s Muslim change-makers

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  A report published by Awaz–The Voice (ATV), a news platform, highlights 10 Muslim change-makers in Tamil Nadu, among whom four are women. These individuals are driving social change through education, the arts, conservation, and activism. Representing diverse fields ranging from environmental protection and literature to political engagement and education, they are working to improve society across the state.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra   We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

'Big blow to crores of farmers’: Opposition mounts against US–India trade deal

By A Representative   Farmers’ organisations and political groups have sharply criticised the emerging contours of the US–India trade agreement, warning that it could severely undermine Indian agriculture, depress farm incomes and open the doors to genetically modified (GM) food imports in violation of domestic regulatory safeguards.

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram   The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman*  In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative   A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

Samyukt Kisan Morcha raises concerns over ‘corporate bias’ in seed Bill

By A Representative   The Samyukt Kisan Morcha (SKM) has released a statement raising ten questions to Union Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan regarding the proposed Seed Bill 2025, alleging that the legislation is biased in favour of large multinational and domestic seed corporations and does not adequately safeguard farmers’ interests.