Skip to main content

Mahua Moitra expelled from Parliament for 'fearlessly' exposing crony capitalism: PUCL

Counterview Desk 

Top civil rights organisation People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL), commenting on the expulsion of Trinamool MP Mahua Moitra from Parliament, has said the move is against the principle of natural justice, adding, it is meant to silence dissent.
Demanding Moitra's reinstatement, it said, the decision of the House to expel Moitra -- who had been particularly tenacious in targeting someone she calls as Mr A and his group the ‘A company’ -- is "legally untenable", pointing out, the Ethics Committee which recommended the action submitted a "partisan report."
According to PUCL, "By expelling Moitra, the BJP is exposing the patriarchal mindset which is unable to tolerate women who fearlessly expose the BJP’s constitutional wrongs."

Text:

The PUCL condemns the decision of the Lok Sabha to expel Trinamool Congress (TMC) Member of Parliament, Mahua Moitra, for allegedly accepting cash for asking questions in parliament as being rife with procedural irregularities and substantively unjust.
The decision of the house to expel Moitra by a legally untenable voice vote was based on the report of the Ethics Committee which recommended expulsion. The ethics committee had no conclusive evidence of a cash trail leading to Moitra, and asked the investigating agencies such as the Central Bureau of Investigation and Enforcement Directorate to unearth this trail. The sharing of password and login details to the parliamentary website did not violate any existing rule or law. The Committee vaguely surmised that this sharing of credentials compromised national security without providing any evidence. Mahua Moitra was not given a chance to cross-examine the complainant or the other witnesses. Without following due process, the committee went on to recommended expulsion in a decision in which six members voted for while four members submitted dissent notes.
It was this partisan report which formed the basis of the Lok Sabha deciding the expel Mahua Moitra. To perhaps hide the blatantly partisan nature of the decision of the Ethics Committee the proceedings of the Lok Sabha in which the consequential decision to deprive the over 14 lakh voting population of Krishnagar of their representative was done without adhering to any of the principles of natural justice.
It reeks of a kangaroo court when the report of the Committee of Ethics was tabled in the Lok Sabha at noon, and a motion for the expulsion of the said member was moved at 2 pm on the same day, giving Members no time to read or study or apply themselves to the contents of the Report. Most damningly, Mahua Moitra was given the serious punishment of expulsion without giving her a chance to respond or answer in her defence, in the Lok Sabha.
Right from the decision of the Committee on Ethics to the final expulsion, parliamentary procedure seems to have been instrumentalised to serve a political aim. Clearly the political aim is to silence a fearless voice of dissent in Indian Parliament. Why is the Modi government so troubled by Mahua Moitra?
Mahua Moitra has been particularly tenacious in targeting someone she calls as Mr A and his group the ‘A company’, who travels with the ‘Prime Minister on delegations’ and ‘meets heads of state on visits to India’ and makes it appear that ‘India is the Prime Minister and the Prime Minister is him’ and ‘makes it appear to the world’ that he is the ‘remote control behind the Prime Minister’ and that ‘by obliging him, you oblige the Prime Minister’.
Mahua presciently pointed out to seven early signs of fascism, in which she signposted the importance of dissent
Apart from bringing the attention of Indians to crony capitalism she has been fearless in pointing to the direction India is heading towards. In her first speech in Parliament, she presciently pointed out to seven early signs of fascism, in which she signposted the importance of dissent. One of the signs of fascism she highlighted was a ‘resounding disdain for human rights at every level of the government’. Today she is a victim of that very contempt for human rights.
One cannot ignore the fact that the targeting of Mahua Moitra reeks of a patriarchal mindset. In particular the questioning before the Ethics Committee violated her right to privacy and dignity. The crass, crude and irrelevant nature of the questioning forced Moitra to walk out of the proceedings along with all other opposition MPs. By expelling Moitra, the BJP is exposing the patriarchal mindset which is unable to tolerate women who fearlessly expose the BJP’s constitutional wrongs.
The expulsion of Mahua Moitra is not only procedurally wrong and substantively unjust, but hits at the roots of parliamentary democracy. A decision to deprive over 14 lakh voting members of the parliamentary constituency of Krishnanagar of their representative in Parliament, is an action with disenfranchises 1.4 million people at a stroke and was done without the decision being in accordance with the due process of law. One of the conditions for the successful working of democracy is a strong opposition and if particularly vocal members of the opposition can be targeted for expulsion without meeting the standard of a just reasonable and fair procedure, then parliamentary democracy itself is under threat.
For all these reasons, it's vitally important that Mahua Moitra be reinstated as a member of parliament. To not do so will further endanger the failing health of constitutional democracy in India.
-- Kavita Srivastava, President, V Suresh, General Secretary, PUCL

Comments

TRENDING

Modi’s Israel visit strengthened Pakistan’s hand in US–Iran truce: Ex-Indian diplomat

By Jag Jivan   M. K. Bhadrakumar , a career diplomat with three decades of service in postings across the former Soviet Union, Pakistan, Iran, Afghanistan, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Germany, and Turkey, has warned that the current truce in the US–Iran war is “fragile and ridden with contradictions.” Writing in his blog India Punchline , Bhadrakumar argues that while Pakistan has emerged as a surprising broker of dialogue, the durability of the ceasefire remains uncertain.

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”

Why Indo-Pak relations have been on 'knife’s edge' , hostilities may remain for long

By Utkarsh Bajpai*  The past few decades have seen strides being made in all aspects of life – from sticks and stones to weaponry. The extreme case of this phenomenon has been nuclear weapons. The menace caused by nuclear weapons in the past is unforgettable. Images of Hiroshima and Nagasaki from 1945 come to mind, after the United States dropped two atomic bombs on the cities.

Manufacturing, services: India's low-skill, middle-skill labour remains underemployed

By Francis Kuriakose* The Indian economy was in a state of deceleration well before Covid-19 made its impact in early 2020. This can be inferred from the declining trends of four important macroeconomic variables that indicate the health of the economy in the last quarter of 2019.

Food security? Gujarat govt puts more than 5 lakh ration cards in the 'silent' category

By Pankti Jog* A new statistical report uploaded by the Gujarat government on the national food security portal shows that ensuring food security for the marginalized community is still not a priority of the state. The statistical report, uploaded on December 24, highlights many weaknesses in implementing the National Food Security Act (NFSA) in state.

The soundtrack of resistance: How 'Sada Sada Ya Nabi' is fueling the Iran war

​ By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  ​The Persian track “ Sada Sada Ya Nabi ye ” by Hossein Sotoodeh has taken the world by storm. This viral media has cut across linguistic barriers to achieve cult status, reaching over 10 million views. The electrifying music and passionate rendition by the Iranian singer have resonated across the globe, particularly as the high-intensity military conflict involving Iran entered its second month in March 2026.

Lata Mangeshkar, a Dalit from Devdasi family, 'refused to sing a song' about Ambedkar

By Pramod Ranjan*  An artist is known and respected for her art. But she is equally, or even more so known and respected for her social concerns. An artist's social concerns or in other words, her worldview, give a direction and purpose to her art. History remembers only such artists whose social concerns are deep, reasoned and of durable importance. Lata Mangeshkar (28 September 1929 – 6 February 2022) was a celebrated playback singer of the Hindi film industry. She was the uncrowned queen of Indian music for over seven decades. Her popularity was unmatched. Her songs were heard and admired not only in India but also in Pakistan, Bangladesh and many other South Asian countries. In this article, we will focus on her social concerns. Lata lived for 92 long years. Music ran in her blood. Her father also belonged to the world of music. Her two sisters, Asha Bhonsle and Usha Mangeshkar, are well-known singers. Lata might have been born in Indore but the blood of a famous Devdasi family...

'Batteries now cheap enough for solar to meet India's 90% demand': Expert quotes Ember study

By A Representative   Shankar Sharma, Power & Climate Policy Analyst, has urged India’s top policymakers to reconsider the financial and ecological implications of the country’s energy transition strategy in light of recent global developments. In a letter dated April 10, 2026, addressed to the Union Ministers of Finance, Power, New & Renewable Energy, Environment, Forest & Climate Change, and the Vice Chair of NITI Aayog, with a copy to the Prime Minister, Sharma highlighted concerns over India’s ambitious plans for coal gasification and the Prototype Fast Breeder Reactor (PFBR).

Health Day ads spark row as NAPi targets Britannia campaign, criticizes celebrity endorsement

By A Representative   The advocacy group Nutrition Advocacy in Public Interest (NAPi) has raised concerns over what it describes as misleading advertising of ultra-processed food products (UPFs), particularly those high in sugar, fat and salt, calling for stricter regulations and an end to such promotions across media platforms.