Climate catastrophe: 67 NGOs call on banks to cease financing metallurgical coal

By Julia Hovenier, Helen Burley*
A global group of 67 organisations led by BankTrack and Reclaim Finance is calling on 50 of the world’s largest banks to end all financial support for new metallurgical coal production and expansion. Metallurgical coal represents 14% of the world’s coal. Unlike thermal coal, it is predominately used for steelmaking and is refined into coke, a material combined with iron ore in a blast furnace to produce primary steel [1].
“The green steel transition is already underway, but financial institutions continue to invest in metallurgical coal—a dead end for the global steel industry and for the climate,” said Julia Hovenier, Banks and Steel Campaigner at BankTrack. "To prevent stranded assets and avoid deepening the climate emergency with their dollars, banks must swiftly adopt policies that halt the expansion of metallurgical coal."
According to a recent report by Reclaim Finance, while thermal coal investments face scrutiny for health and climate risks, metallurgical coal investments persist with less attention from banks. Despite 250 financial institutions adopting policies against thermal coal since the 2015 Paris Agreement, only 9 have similar policies for metallurgical coal.
Since 2016, the world’s biggest banks have provided US $557 billion in finance to the 50 biggest developers in the metallurgical coal sector. In 2021, the International Energy Agency said existing mines were sufficient to meet coking coal demand through 2050. Despite this, there are plans for new production capacities of 406 Mt per year, corresponding to more than a third of total consumption in 2021.
Due to its continued reliance on coal, the steel sector is responsible for an estimated 11% of global CO2 emissions and almost 30% of all industrial emissions. From mining to processing to transportation to combustion, metallurgical coal unleashes massive amounts of greenhouse gas emissions. If the banking industry continues to allow “business as usual” practices to continue, coal-based steelmaking is projected to consume nearly 25% of the world's remaining carbon budget by 2050.
The letters sent to 50 banks today call on them to end financial support for projects and companies that are investing in new metallurgical coal production and expansion. Of the 9 banks that have policies restricting finance for metallurgical coal, including BNP Paribas, Société Générale, HSBC, Westpac, and Caixa Bank, only three have corporate level exclusions [2]. This is despite the fact that only 1.4% of financing for met coal was direct project-financing since 2016.
“The world must urgently move away from coal-based steel production, and financial institutions bear a crucial responsibility in accommodating this transition,” emphasised Cynthia Rocamora, Industry Campaigner at Reclaim Finance. “It’s time to stop all types of finance for all types of new coal projects—thermal and metallurgical included.”
You can access the letter here.

Notes

[1] Primary steel is steel made from iron ore. It’s differentiated from secondary steel, which is made by recycling scrap steel.
[2] Reclaim Finance’s Coal Policy Tracker was updated in November 2023 to reflect the metallurgical coal policies of banks. They found that only nine banks have any policies regarding metallurgical coal: La Banque Postale, Societe Generale, BNP Paribas, CaxiaBank, Cathay United Bank, Lloyds Banking Group, Macquarie, HSBC, and Westpac. Of those nine, only the following three have corporate exclusions: Lloyds Banking Group, Societe Generale, and Macquarie. However, Reclaim Finance has analysed them all as “weak” exclusions because they do not directly target developers of new metallurgical coal projects.
---
Julia Hovenier is Banks and Steel Campaigner, BankTrack; Helen Burley is with International Media, Reclaim Finance

Comments

US govt funding 'dubious PR firm' to discredit anti-GM, anti-pesticide activists

By Our Representative The Alliance for Sustainable & Holistic Agriculture (ASHA) has vocally condemned the financial support provided by the US Government to questionable public relations firms aimed at undermining the efforts of activists opposed to pesticides and genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in India.

Modi govt distancing from Adanis? MoEFCC 'defers' 1500 MW project in Western Ghats

By Rajiv Shah Is the Narendra Modi government, in its third but what would appear to be a weaker avatar, seeking to show that it would keep a distance, albeit temporarily, from its most favorite business house, the Adanis? It would seem so if the latest move of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEFCC) latest to "defer" the Adani Energy’s application for 1500 MW Warasgaon-Warangi Pump Storage Project is any indication.

Bayer's business model: 'Monopoly control over chemicals, seeds'

By Bharat Dogra* The Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) has rendered a great public service by very recently publishing a report titled ‘Bayer’s Toxic Trails’ which reveals how the German agrochemical giant Bayer has been lobbying hard to promote glyphosate and GMOs, or trying to “capture public policy to pursue its private interests.” This report, written by Joao Camargo and Hans Van Scharen, follows Bayer’s toxic trail as “it maintains monopolistic control of the seed and pesticides markets, fights off regulatory challenges to its toxic products, tries to limit legal liability, and exercises political influence.”

Militants, with ten times number of arms compared to those in J&K, 'roaming freely' in Manipur

By Sandeep Pandey* The violence which shows no sign of abating in the ongoing Meitei-Kuki conflict in Manipur is a matter of concern. The alienation of the two communities and hatred generated for each other is unprecedented. The Meiteis cannot leave Manipur by road because the next district North on the way to Kohima in Nagaland is Kangpokpi, a Kuki dominated area where the young Kuki men and women are guarding the district borders and would not let any Meitei pass through the national highway.

105,000 sign protest petition, allege Nestlé’s 'double standard' over added sugar in baby food

By Kritischer Konsum* 105,000 people have signed a petition calling on Nestlé to stop adding sugar to its baby food products marketed in lower-income countries. It was handed over today at the multinational’s headquarters in Vevey, where the NGOs Public Eye, IBFAN and EKO dumped the symbolic equivalent of 10 million sugar cubes, representing the added sugar consumed each day by babies fed with Cerelac cereals. In Switzerland, such products are sold with no added sugar. The leading baby food corporation must put an end to this harmful double standard.

Can voting truly resolve the Kashmir issue? Past experience suggests optimism may be misplaced

By Raqif Makhdoomi* In the politically charged atmosphere of Jammu and Kashmir, election slogans resonated deeply: "Jail Ka Badla, Vote Sa" (Jail’s Revenge, Vote) and "Article 370 Ka Badla, Vote Sa" (Article 370’s Revenge, Vote). These catchphrases dominated the assembly election campaigns, particularly across Kashmir.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

NITI Aayog’s pandemic preparedness report learns 'all the wrong lessons' from Covid-19 response

Counterview Desk The Universal Health Organisation (UHO), a forum seeking to offer "impartial, truthful, unbiased and relevant information on health" so as to ensure that every citizen makes informed choices pertaining to health, has said that the NITI Aayog’s Report on Future Pandemic Preparedness , though labelled as prepared by an “expert” group, "falls flat" for "even a layperson".

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded reaction in the form of a link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.

Search This Blog