Skip to main content

Possible to reduce accidents by half in a decade, would prevent 1.7 million deaths a yr

By Bharat Dogra 
Accidents are one of the biggest causes of human distress. In any single year, about 3.5 million persons are likely to die because of accidents. However it is the number of injuries and disabilities resulting from all accidents (including road, workplace, domestic and other accidents) which is truly staggering—about 600 million in a year (including about 395 million injuries caused in workplace accidents alone, according to ILO data).
Several serious injuries and disabilities caused by accidents can cause a lot of distress and disruption in the life of victims and their family members. By their very definition accidents are sudden happenings which take victims and those close to them by surprise. Hence shock and trauma associated with accidents can be very high. While much can be done and of course should be done to reduce this distress, the best line of defense is to try to reduce the possibility of accidents as much as possible. By identifying carefully the most common causal factors and making well thought-out efforts to reduce them, working simultaneously on several fronts, it is possible to bring a significant reduction in the number of accidents within a relatively short time. Reducing accidents by half within a decade or so at global level is an achievable target. This would mean preventing 1.7 million deaths in a year and preventing as many as 300 million painful injuries and disabilities in a single year, compared to present levels.
For this we need to simultaneously reduce road and all transport accidents, workplace accidents, accidents in educational institutions, domestic accidents and accidents at all crowded places.
The most important tasks in the world at present are—checking climate change and other serious environmental problems, creating a no-war future and eliminating all weapons of mass destruction to protect the life-nurturing capacity of earth. Although this is the most important global task, there are many difficulties in this. While engaging in this protection with great dedication, side-by-side we need a more soft target which can give us a sense of achievement and teach us how best to achieve international cooperation for common objectives. If we can save 1.7 million human lives and avoid 300 million painful injuries in a year, this would surely give all people involved in such a word-wide campaign a great sense of purpose and a real sense of achievement which they can carry forward further for protecting the basic and essential life-nurturing conditions of our planet.
Hence a worldwide campaign to prevent and reduce accidents as much as possible can be one of the most promising and noble areas for working together at international level. This can be one of the most creative campaigns with possibilities of very useful, innovative and exciting work at the level of families, communities, educational institutions, trade unions, governments as well as non-government organizations.
---
The writer is Honorary Convener, Campaign to Save Earth Now. His recent books include "Planet in Peril", "Man over Machine" and "A Day in 2071"

Comments

TRENDING

Civil society at a crossroads: Service delivery vs. rights in the fight for social change

Counterview News   In the latest episode of the podcast Unmute , hosts Gagan Sethi and Minar Pimple convened a profound conversation with two veteran development practitioners to dissect a persistent tension within civil society: the perceived divide between service delivery and the struggle for rights. The episode, titled "Beyond Service Delivery: Civil Society, Rights, and the Politics of Social Change," featured Apoorva Oza , a development practitioner with decades of experience in rural development and institution-building, and Professor Dipa Sinha , a development economist known for her work on food, nutrition, gender, and social policy.

Bangkok IMF-World Bank meetings: New reports put India's debt, climate, accountability crisis in focus

Counterview News   As the World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF) concluded their Annual Meetings in Bangkok this week, civil society groups and policy experts outside the official proceedings released two critical documents challenging the institutions' legacy and prescriptions for Asia, calling for a fundamental overhaul of the global financial architecture.

European banks accused of coal double standard after shunning Adani’s Galilee mine in Australia

By Rajiv Shah    European banks that helped shut down Adani ’s Galilee Basin coal frontier in Australia a decade ago are now bankrolling a far larger coal expansion just 150 kilometres away, according to a new report from Reclaim Finance and partner NGOs. The study , "Coal Hypocrisy: European Banks’ Double Standard on Thermal and Metallurgical Coal in Australia", finds that 19 European banks provided US$30.3 billion to companies planning metallurgical coal expansion in Queensland’s Bowen Basin between 2021 and 2025, out of a total of US$105.9 billion from international banks.