Skip to main content

Govt of India 'using FCRA' to criminalise NGOs: Raid on People's Watch for 2012 case

Counterview Desk 

Reacting to the registration of FIR by the CBI against the Centre for Promotion of Social Concerns (CPSC) and its initiative, People’s Watch on January 6, 2022 for alleged Foreign Contribution Regulation Act (FCRA) violations for the year 2012, and raids conducted by CBI officials at their office in Madurai on January 8, 2022, India's top human rights organisation, People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) has called it a reflection of "increasing criminalization and denial of permissions under FCRA to civil society organisations (CSOs).
Stating that CSOs working on democratic rights, environmental rights, civil liberties and social justice issues in the country, a statment signed by Dr V Suresh, general secretary, PUCL, has urged the Central government to "immediately stop the use of FCRA as a weapon to repress dissenting voices in the civil society and create hurdles in the valuable work of NGOs in the field of human rights."

Text:

PUCL condemns the raid conducted by CBI at the office of People’s Watch – Tamil Nadu, a programme of Centre for Promotion of Social Concerns (CPSC), in Madurai on January 8, 2022 from 10.30 am to 8.30 p.m. The raid was conducted following a search warrant dated January 7, 2022 issued in respect of an FIR dated January 6, 2022 filed against CPSC, People’s Watch represented by Executive Director, and Unknown Persons, under Section 120B r/w Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and offences under the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010 (FCRA).
The CBI prosecution of CPSC – People’s Watch is exposed as nothing but a witch hunt by the fact that the criminal case has been registered in relation to the show cause notices issued by the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) in 2012 and 2013, which were challenged before the Delhi High Court in WP No 1594 of 2014. The High Court passed orders in the proceeding permitting CPSC to operate the FCRA bank account. Since no further action was taken by the MHA, the matter was eventually disposed of as infructuous.
Thereafter, the MHA refused to renew the FCRA of CPSC in October 2016. CPSC filed WP No 10527 of 2016 challenging the same before the Delhi High Court, which is currently pending. Very crucially, there is no reference to or allegations of criminal acts committed made in the proceedings before the Delhi High Court till date. It thus becomes explicitly clear that the CBI’s action of launching criminal prosecution in 2022 for actions going back almost a decade is just an act of persecution by the CBI and the MHA.
CPSC and its initiative, People’s Watch, have a consistent and continuous record of raising issues of human rights concerns and rights violations at grassroots, national and international level, and have continued to do so even after the revocation of their FCRA. Their contribution in upholding constitutional values and international principles of human rights in the country is significant and immense.
They have monitored and documented from inception in 1995, human rights violations both in Tamil Nadu as also in other states, relating to caste atrocities, communal violence, custodial torture and attacks on human rights defenders across India. They have an outstanding record of imparting human rights education in schools and colleges across many states in India and also ensuring access to justice and accountability of human rights institutions.
Given their long record of challenging oppressive state actions and human rights violations, it is not difficult to understand that the actions launched against them are brazen and vindictive acts of reprisal for their steadfast and unwavering work in the field of human rights. The registration of the FIR against them is another flagrant abuse of the process of law by the CBI.
What is striking is the failure of the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) to effectively intervene in the matter inspite of taking up the matter suo moto. In effect they have been a silent spectator to the misuse of FCRA against civil society organisations.

Weaponising FCRA: Growing list of persecuted organisations

The FCRA-linked actions against CPSC - People’s Watch are not occurring in isolation. They are part of a growing trend under the present regime, of targeting civil society organisations on allegations of FCRA violations accompanied by arbitrary and capricious refusal to extend license to receive funding from foreign sources.
Notably, the CBI had previously launched similarly false and frivolous cases against acclaimed human rights organisations like Sabrang and Lawyers Collective. Organisations such as Greenpeace and Amnesty International India were forced to stop their work in India following suspension and freezing of their FCRA accounts. FCRA licenses of several organisations in the country have been revoked, refused or not renewed, adversely affecting not only their functioning but also important human rights interventions and advocacy work that they were involved in.

Amendments to FCRA Laws, 2020: Enabling persecution

The FCRA law has witnessed major amendments in 2020 that make it increasingly difficult for NGOs to receive or utilize foreign funding. The law as it stands today gives unaccountable and disproportionate powers to the executive making it easy for the present government to vindictively use it against civil society organisations raising difficult questions.
CBI had previously launched similar false and frivolous cases against human rights organisations Sabrang and Lawyers' Collective
The latest of the amendments introduced in 2020, during the Covid-19 pandemic, without any stakeholder consultation (a time when civil society organisations were at the forefront of relief and advocacy efforts), restrict NGOs from sub-granting to other organisations and to centralise the inflow of foreign funds by providing that the NGOs can receive foreign funds only in a designated bank account opened with SBI Bank in Delhi.
On January 1, 2022, the FCRA licenses of 12,580 organisations such as Oxfam India, Azim Premji Foundation, Common Cause, Jamia Millia Islamia, Lady Shriram College for Women, Satyajit Ray Film and TV Institute amongst others stood lapsed/ ceased/rejected, leaving only 16,829 organisations with FCRA licenses. Shockingly, the FCRA license was not renewed of Mother Teresa’s charitable trust Missionaries of Charity (MoC) who work with the destitute, forgotten and voiceless of our society; it was because of the international condemnation of such brazenly unfair action that the FCRA license of the Missionaries of Charity was reinstated on January 7, 2022, along with 78 others.
The manner in which FCRA law has been used by the government to silence and target civil society organisations is violative of Article 19 of the Indian Constitution, which grants freedom of speech and expression, assembly and association, and to work, to all organisations; it is also violative of Article 21 -- Right to Life -- and other constitutional rights of the citizens that these organisations support and stand up for. 
These actions of the government and law enforcement agencies also fall foul of the international principles of human rights including the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the UN Declaration on Human Rights Defenders.
Very importantly, in June 2016, the UN Special Rapporteurs on (i) Human Rights Defenders, (ii) Freedom of opinion and expression and (iii) rights to Freedom of Peaceful Assembly and Association had issued a joint communication calling upon the Indian Government “to repeal the FCRA, which is been increasingly used to obstruct civil society’s access to foreign funding, and fails to comply with international human rights norms and standards”. 
In spite of the serious criticisms and apprehensions expressed by the international human rights community and civil society in India, the misuse of the law has continued unabated and the law has been made increasingly draconian.
PUCL hence expresses serious concern over the use and misuse of FCRA against activists and civil society organisations, which will undoubtedly affect human rights initiatives and the valuable work conducted by them for marginalized and oppressed communities, and also cause a chilling effect in society.
PUCL calls upon the Central government to immediately withdraw the FIR lodged against CPSC and its programme wing, People’s Watch, and stops using the FCRA law to criminalise, vilify, silence and stop the work of activists and civil society organisations in the country.

Comments

TRENDING

Muted profit margins, moderate increase in costs and sales: IIM-A survey of 1000 cos

By Our Representative  The Indian Institute of Management-Ahmedabad’s (IIM-A's) latest Business Inflation Expectations Survey (BIES) has said that the cost perceptions data obtained from India’s business executives suggests that there is “mild increase in cost pressures”.

What's Bill Gates up to? Have 'irregularities' found in funding HPV vaccine trials faded?

By Colin Gonsalves*  After having read the 72nd report of the Department Related Parliamentary Standing Committee on alleged irregularities in the conduct of studies using HPV vaccines by PATH in India, it was startling to see Bill Gates bobbing his head up and down and smiling ingratiatingly on prime time television while the Prime Minister lectured him in Hindi on his plans for the country. 

Magnetic, stunning, Protima Bedi 'exposed' malice of sexual repression in society

By Harsh Thakor*  Protima Bedi was born to a baniya businessman and a Bengali mother as Protima Gupta in Delhi in 1949. Her father was a small-time trader, who was thrown out of his family for marrying a dark Bengali women. The theme of her early life was to rebel against traditional bondage. It was extraordinary how Protima underwent a metamorphosis from a conventional convent-educated girl into a freak. On October 12th was her 75th birthday; earlier this year, on August 18th it was her 25th death anniversary.

Alleged killing of another Bangladesh youth inside Indian territory: NHRC inquiry sought

By Kirity Roy* There was yet another incident of the killing of a Bangladeshi youth by the Border Security Force personnel attached with ‘Barthar’ BOP of ‘G’ Company of 75 BSF Battalion. In last five years several incidents of killings happened under this police station’s jurisdiction and the cases will get the award as “Not Guilty” as usual.

Govt putting India's professionals, skilled, unskilled labour 'at mercy of' big business

By Thomas Franco, Dinesh Abrol*  As it is impossible to refute the report of the International Labour Organisation, Chief Economic Advisor Anantha Nageswaran recently said that the government cannot solve all social, economic problems like unemployment and social security. He blamed the youth for not acquiring enough skills to get employment. Then can’t the people ask, ‘Why do we have a government? Is it not the government’s responsibility to provide adequate employment to its citizens?’

IMA vs Ramdev: Why what's good or bad for goose should be good or bad for gander

By Dr Amitav Banerjee, MD* Baba Ramdev and his associate Balkrishna faced the wrath of the Supreme Court for their propaganda about their Ayurvedic products and belittling mainstream medicine. Baba Ramdev had to apologize in court. His apology was not accepted and he may face the contempt of court with harsher punishment. The Supreme Court acted on a public interest litigation (PIL) moved by the Indian Medical Association (IMA).

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Modi model, Hindutva icon 'justified' alliance with Muslim League before Independence

By Shamsul Islam*  Our PM describes himself as ‘Hindu’ nationalist and member of RSS. He proudly shares the fact that he was groomed to be a political leader by one of the two fathers of the Hindutva politics, MS Golwalkar (the other being VD Savarkar) and given the task of establishing Hindutva polity in India after eradicating secularism.

Indians witnessing 'regression to Hindutva politics' under Modi ahead of elections

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak*  The forthcoming general election in India, scheduled from April 19, 2024, to June 1, 2024, to elect the 543 members of the 18th Lok Sabha and the new Government of India, carries immense significance for the preservation of India's identity as a liberal, secular, and constitutional democracy.

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.