Skip to main content

Believe this: US' 95% of Covid cases are Omicron, India's 2%, model Gujarat's 0.43%

 
By Rajiv Shah 
Scanning through news stories on Omicron, the new Covonavirus variant said to have been found in South Africa, I came across an interesting story, published in the New York-based network, CBS News. According to this story, published a couple of days ago, “The Omicron variant made up around 95.4% of new Covid-19 cases in the US last week, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said.”
It added, “Only two regions of the US -- New England and part of the Midwest -- have yet to reach 90% locally. The Delta variant, which was dominant up until a few weeks ago, makes up nearly all the other cases.”
I got interested in this news item after I found that in my state, Gujarat, they were reporting very few Omicron cases, if one goes by the data fished out by the State government. Last weekend, on Saturday, for instance, Gujarat reported just about 23 new Omicron cases, which is said to have taken the tally of the “highly infectious” variant to 136, the State health department data said.
This comes, to -- imagine! – less than 0.43% of the total Covid cases in Gujarat, which was 5,396 cases on that day. What a sharp contrast, I thought, if one compares to what one find in the US. A report said,  the 5,396 cases was the highest reported tally in 24 hours, with daily cases increasing 10-fold from 51 on December 19.
This made me look at the total Covid and Omicron cases India reported in India on that day: It was 1,41,986 on Saturday. However, on the same very day, the Union Ministry of Health and Family Welfare said, there just about 3,071 cases (or just about 2.16%) of the Omicron variant reported from across India.
So, should one conclude that “model” Gujarat was doing an excellent job in containing Omicron? If India was doing much, much better than the US, Gujarat was doing it far better than even India, if one goes by the official data released in US, India and Gujarat.
Currently "holidaying" in US, I decided to contact one of my journalist friends in Gujarat to find out whether this is true. He agreed that there was a “story here”, but revealed to me that the State government had “virtually stopped” doing what is called “genome sequencing” for Omicron.
Looking at stories that emanated from Gujarat, I came across one in "Indian Express", which said, the State’s high-profile laboratory in Gandhinagar, the State capital, the Gujarat Biotechnology Research Centre (GBRC), was receiving just about “five to seven ‘high priority’ samples per day “for genome sequencing ever since the guidelines in view of the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 came into effect with nearly 10 per cent of the samples detected with Omicron so far.”
I said to myself: Wow! What a model I have back home! Just 10% of 5-7 samples per day were Omicron! Less than one per day! This was of course about a week ago, but ever since the number of “high priority” cases being sent to GBRC may have gone up, I presumed.
I recalled: About two years ago, I had read about a controversy surrounding GBRC: When the number of deaths as a result of Covid drastically went up in April 2020, with the State government in a fix on explaining as to why it may have happened, the GBRC director came up with the theory what the high Covid-19 mortality rate in Gujarat could be due to the dominance of the L-type strain of coronavirus, found to have been more prevalent in Wuhan in China, where the outbreak started.
The story, carried in several dailies, quoted the director as stating, “Analysis done by scientists abroad has shown that the L-type strain has been dominant where more mortality is reported among coronavirus patients. This strain was found to be more prevalent in Wuhan."
Ironically, and this is very amusing, as this conclusion was based on examining Covid sample from just one patient. “The coronavirus sample we collected from a patient for genome sequence contained the L-type strain. This strain has a much higher virulence as compared to the S-strain,” the GBRC director reportedly said. The story I am quoting appeared in “The Hindu” on April 26, 2020.
Within two days, the online news portal, run by well-known journalist Shekhar Gupta, “The Print”, carried a strong refutation, suggesting that as of April 2020 – two years ago -- “there weren’t different strains of the novel coronavirus, just different mutations.”
Total number of deaths in Gujarat last year was a whopping 230% higher than what they were in 2018-19, the non-Covid years
The long report, full of technical details, stated, “In some media reports that appeared in India, Chaitanya Joshi, director of the state-run GBRC in Gandhinagar, which itself sequenced the novel coronavirus and provided data to Next Strain, was quoted as saying that L-type is known to cause higher mortality and that analysis done by scientists abroad have confirmed this.”
It underlined, “Joshi, who specialises in veterinary and animal sciences, said, ‘The coronavirus sample we collected from a patient for genome sequence contained the L-type strain. This strain has a much higher virulence as compared to the S-strain’.”
The report, by Sandhya Ramesh, insisted, “But there has been no such finding in the scientific community. This unproven theory about varying virulence is frequently used the world over to explain deaths or disease patterns that are not yet understood.”
Asserting that “Gujarat is wrong”, the refutation said, the L-type strain was considered “aggressive” due to its widespread prevalence, which by itself was affected by mobility restrictions and physical distancing measures, but “reports of one ‘strain’ being more deadly than the other have been regularly debunked by virologists online, including by the founders of Next Strain, a public database onto which sequenced genomes are uploaded.”
One has only to recall how Gujarat has been trying to underplay a huge spike in deaths as a result of Covid. According to one report, which appeared in “The Times of India”, Ahmedabad, a couple of days ago, the total number of deaths in Gujarat last year was a whopping 230% higher than what they were in 2018-19, the non-Covid years. And this was higher than any other State of India.
The report said, “A paper by researchers from India, Canada and the US indicated that the overall all-cause death during April-May 2021 peak Covid second wave was 230% higher in Gujarat as compared to average monthly mortality recorded in 2018-19. According to the estimates, Gujarat’s death toll rose from average 17,000 per month to 39,000 per month during April-May 2021.”
“This was the highest among 16 Indian states under survey. The paper, published in the international journal Science, claimed that the all-India excess was 120% as the deaths rose from average 3.75 lakh to 4.5 lakh for the two months”, the report said.

Comments

TRENDING

Whither space for the marginalised in Kerala's privately-driven townships after landslides?

By Ipshita Basu, Sudheesh R.C.  In the early hours of July 30 2024, a landslide in the Wayanad district of Kerala state, India, killed 400 people. The Punjirimattom, Mundakkai, Vellarimala and Chooralmala villages in the Western Ghats mountain range turned into a dystopian rubble of uprooted trees and debris.

Election bells ringing in Nepal: Can ousted premier Oli return to power?

By Nava Thakuria*  Nepal is preparing for a national election necessitated by the collapse of KP Sharma Oli’s government at the height of a Gen Z rebellion (youth uprising) in September 2025. The polls are scheduled for 5 March. The Himalayan nation last conducted a general election in 2022, with the next polls originally due in 2027.  However, following the dissolution of Nepal’s lower house of Parliament last year by President Ram Chandra Poudel, the electoral process began under the patronage of an interim government installed on 12 September under the leadership of retired Supreme Court judge Sushila Karki. The Hindu-majority nation of over 29 million people will witness more than 3,400 electoral candidates, including 390 women, representing 68 political parties as well as independents, vying for 165 seats in the 275-member House of Representatives.

Gig workers hold online strike on republic day; nationwide protests planned on February 3

By A Representative   Gig and platform service workers across the country observed a nationwide online strike on Republic Day, responding to a call given by the Gig & Platform Service Workers Union (GIPSWU) to protest what it described as exploitation, insecurity and denial of basic worker rights in the platform economy. The union said women gig workers led the January 26 action by switching off their work apps as a mark of protest.

'Condonation of war crimes against women and children’: IPSN on Trump’s Gaza Board

By A Representative   The India-Palestine Solidarity Network (IPSN) has strongly condemned the announcement of a proposed “Board of Peace” for Gaza and Palestine by former US President Donald J. Trump, calling it an initiative that “condones war crimes against children and women” and “rubs salt in Palestinian wounds.”

India’s road to sustainability: Why alternative fuels matter beyond electric vehicles

By Suyash Gupta*  India’s worsening air quality makes the shift towards clean mobility urgent. However, while electric vehicles (EVs) are central to India’s strategy, they alone cannot address the country’s diverse pollution and energy challenges.

Jayanthi Natarajan "never stood by tribals' rights" in MNC Vedanta's move to mine Niyamigiri Hills in Odisha

By A Representative The Odisha Chapter of the Campaign for Survival and Dignity (CSD), which played a vital role in the struggle for the enactment of historic Forest Rights Act, 2006 has blamed former Union environment minister Jaynaynthi Natarjan for failing to play any vital role to defend the tribals' rights in the forest areas during her tenure under the former UPA government. Countering her recent statement that she rejected environmental clearance to Vendanta, the top UK-based NMC, despite tremendous pressure from her colleagues in Cabinet and huge criticism from industry, and the claim that her decision was “upheld by the Supreme Court”, the CSD said this is simply not true, and actually she "disrespected" FRA.

With infant mortality rate of 5, better than US, guarantee to live is 'alive' in Kerala

By Nabil Abdul Majeed, Nitheesh Narayanan   In 1945, two years prior to India's independence, the current Chief Minister of Kerala, Pinarayi Vijayan, was born into a working-class family in northern Kerala. He was his mother’s fourteenth child; of the thirteen siblings born before him, only two survived. His mother was an agricultural labourer and his father a toddy tapper. They belonged to a downtrodden caste, deemed untouchable under the Indian caste system.

MGNREGA: How caste and power hollowed out India’s largest welfare law

By Sudhir Katiyar, Mallica Patel*  The sudden dismantling of MGNREGA once again exposes the limits of progressive legislation in the absence of transformation of a casteist, semi-feudal rural society. Over two days in the winter session, the Modi government dismantled one of the most progressive legislations of the UPA regime—the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA).

Fragmented opposition and identity politics shaping Tamil Nadu’s 2026 election battle

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  Tamil Nadu is set to go to the polls in April 2026, and the political battle lines are beginning to take shape. Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to the state on January 23, 2026, marked the formal launch of the Bharatiya Janata Party’s campaign against the ruling Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK). Addressing multiple public meetings, the Prime Minister accused the DMK government of corruption, criminality, and dynastic politics, and called for Tamil Nadu to be “freed from DMK’s chains.” PM Modi alleged that the DMK had turned Tamil Nadu into a drug-ridden state and betrayed public trust by governing through what he described as “Corruption, Mafia and Crime,” derisively terming it “CMC rule.” He claimed that despite making numerous promises, the DMK had failed to deliver meaningful development. He also targeted what he described as the party’s dynastic character, arguing that the government functioned primarily for the benefit of a single family a...