Skip to main content

'Vilification' of People's Watch: Tamil Nadu CM told to withdraw consent to CBI

Counterview Desk 

Henri Tiphagne, Executive Director, People's Watch, in a memorandum shared with Tamil Nadu MPs, has said that the Government of India action against the Madurai-based advocacy group under the foreign funding law on the basis of "totally wrong facts", coming up almost after 10 years, should be "brought to a closure."
Asking them to impress upon the Tamil Nadu Chief Minister to withdraw the proposal to accord permission to the CBI dated December 2, 2020 by the previous AIADMK government, he insisted, the MPs must also "raise the issue in Parliament in order to stop "vilification and witch-hunt against human rights organizations working Tamil Nadu, as well as in the Asia Pacific region internationally and the United Nations."

Text:

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) formally visited our office at 32 Besant Road, Madurai on January 1, 2022 with a search warrant, dated January 7, 2022, issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate of Madurai.
The accused in the CBI FIR include i) Centre for Promotions of Social Concerns (CPSC) -- represented by its trustees, ii) People’s Watch -- represented by its Executive Director, and iii) unknown persons. As the FIR indicates, the alleged criminal offences falls under IPC and Foreign Contribution Regulation Act (FCRA), 2010. 
Since these are all matters dealing with our 1st, 2nd and 3rd show-cause-notice issued by the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) in the year 2012 and 2013 -- which we have duly challenged before the Delhi High Court in WP (C) No 1594 of 2014. Kindly find enclosed the above mentioned court order dated April 28, 2015.
To put it in context -- our FCRA was valid and in operation in 2015 and 2016, and thereafter by virtue of a two-line order by the MHA it remained unrenewed and the challenge to the same is pending now before the Delhi High Court in W.P. (C) No. 10527 of 2016.
This writ petition is still pending today. The counter affidavit of the MHA in the said writ petition, W.P. (C) No. 10527 of 2016, is enclosed (Kindly go through Para 5(iii)). Not once in the 2014 and 2016 writ petitions, WP (C) No. 1594 of 2014 and WP (C) No 10527 of 2016, has there been any reference to CBI or criminal offense committed by us.
We also filed a Writ Petition (C) No. 1646/2017 challenging a show-cause-notice and the suspension order that was issued to us, in early 2017. However, the same was withdrawn by the MHA in May 17, 2017, and received by us on May 22, 2017, as a result that writ petition was also closed. Therefore, all this is to indicate to you that nothing criminal exists.
We have collated all the documents pertaining to the case here. In this, you will find updates of all our FCRA papers from 2012 onwards till date.
The Enclosure 01, which is the response of the Hon’ble Minister in Lok Sabha on July 8, 2014, indicated in Annexure 4 on page no.23 states that the Ministry of Home Affairs had given the case of CPSC from Tamil Nadu to the ADGP in Tamil Nadu in July 2012. We are unaware of what has happened to this investigation and have received no updates on the same.
However, from the FIR and the annexed documents, along with the FIR we see GO (2D) No 309 dated December 2, 2020 which relates to CPSC, Madurai, issued by the Government of Tamil Nadu, Home Department (Page No 112). It is this order that the previous government (AIADMK) had decided to accept the proposal of - for the CBI to investigate CPSC, Madurai. The decision was made without any reference to earlier referred investigations by our ADGP of Tamil Nadu in July 2012.
The enclosures also include court orders obtained by us before the Delhi High Court in 2014, subsequent to three FCRA suspensions, each spanning duration of 180 days dated July 16, 2012, February 18, 2013 and September 16, 2013. Upon these orders referred above, our FCRA bank accounts were opened by the IOB located in Chokkikulam, Madurai and we operational in 2015 and 2016 up until October 29, 2016.
On October 29, 2016, during the previous BJP government, our FCRA renewal application was refused. Our challenge is pending before the Delhi High Court in WP (C) No10527/2016.
The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) had also approached us regarding our FCRA non-renewal, the case of which was pending from 2016 till January 25, 2021 -- and was subsequently closed.
Having placed before you the case details, we urge you to:
  1. Act upon this FIR which has been registered on the basis of totally wrong facts by the CBI and coming almost 10 years after the alleged occurrence, and to ensure that the same is brought to a closure;
  2. Impress upon the Hon’ble Chief Minister to withdraw the proposal to accord permission to the CBI dated December 2, 2020, without any reference whatsoever, to the investigations already undertaken by the ADGP Tamil Nadu in July 2012 as stated by the Hon’ble Minister of State for Home Affairs in the Lok Sabha on July 8, 2014;
  3. Kindly raise the issue in Parliament with reference to specific appeals made by the UN Special Rapporteurs to our government as well as the NHRC -- as is enclosed within, leading to a vilification and witch-hunt against human rights organizations working from the state of Tamil Nadu, as well as in the Asia Pacific region internationally and the United Nations;
  4. Appeal to the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) reminding them of their duty to protect human rights defenders from the State -- attempting to criminalize their activities.
We will be extremely grateful and thankful to you for your actions in this regard.
---
Click here for documents submitted to MPs

Comments

TRENDING

Delhi Jal Board under fire as CAG finds 55% groundwater unfit for consumption

By A Representative   A Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of India audit report tabled in the Delhi Legislative Assembly on 7 January 2026 has revealed alarming lapses in the quality and safety of drinking water supplied by the Delhi Jal Board (DJB), raising serious public health concerns for residents of the capital. 

Advocacy group decries 'hyper-centralization' as States’ share of health funds plummets

By A Representative   In a major pre-budget mobilization, the Jan Swasthya Abhiyan (JSA), India’s leading public health advocacy network, has issued a sharp critique of the Union government’s health spending and demanded a doubling of the health budget for the upcoming 2026-27 fiscal year. 

Iswar Chandra Vidyasagar’s views on religion as Tagore’s saw them

By Harasankar Adhikari   Religion has become a visible subject in India’s public discourse, particularly where it intersects with political debate. Recent events, including a mass Gita chanting programme in Kolkata and other incidents involving public expressions of faith, have drawn attention to how religion features in everyday life. These developments have raised questions about the relationship between modern technological progress and traditional religious practice.

Stands 'exposed': Cavalier attitude towards rushed construction of Char Dham project

By Bharat Dogra*  The nation heaved a big sigh of relief when the 41 workers trapped in the under-construction Silkyara-Barkot tunnel (Uttarkashi district of Uttarakhand) were finally rescued on November 28 after a 17-day rescue effort. All those involved in the rescue effort deserve a big thanks of the entire country. The government deserves appreciation for providing all-round support.

Jayanthi Natarajan "never stood by tribals' rights" in MNC Vedanta's move to mine Niyamigiri Hills in Odisha

By A Representative The Odisha Chapter of the Campaign for Survival and Dignity (CSD), which played a vital role in the struggle for the enactment of historic Forest Rights Act, 2006 has blamed former Union environment minister Jaynaynthi Natarjan for failing to play any vital role to defend the tribals' rights in the forest areas during her tenure under the former UPA government. Countering her recent statement that she rejected environmental clearance to Vendanta, the top UK-based NMC, despite tremendous pressure from her colleagues in Cabinet and huge criticism from industry, and the claim that her decision was “upheld by the Supreme Court”, the CSD said this is simply not true, and actually she "disrespected" FRA.

Pairing not with law but with perpetrators: Pavlovian response to lynchings in India

By Vikash Narain Rai* Lynch-law owes its name to James Lynch, the legendary Warden of Galway, Ireland, who tried, condemned and executed his own son in 1493 for defrauding and killing strangers. But, today, what kind of a person will justify the lynching for any reason whatsoever? Will perhaps resemble the proverbial ‘wrong man to meet at wrong road at night!’

Zhou Enlai: The enigmatic premier who stabilized chaos—at what cost?

By Harsh Thakor*  Zhou Enlai (1898–1976) served as the first Premier of the People's Republic of China (PRC) from 1949 until his death and as Foreign Minister from 1949 to 1958. He played a central role in the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) for over five decades, contributing to its organization, military efforts, diplomacy, and governance. His tenure spanned key events including the Long March, World War II alliances, the founding of the PRC, the Korean War, and the Cultural Revolution. 

'Threat to farmers’ rights': New seeds Bill sparks fears of rising corporate control

By Bharat Dogra  As debate intensifies over a new seeds bill, groups working on farmers’ seed rights, seed sovereignty and rural self-reliance have raised serious concerns about the proposed legislation. To understand these anxieties, it is important to recognise a global trend: growing control of the seed sector by a handful of multinational companies. This trend risks extending corporate dominance across food and farming systems, jeopardising the livelihoods and rights of small farmers and raising serious ecological and health concerns. The pending bill must be assessed within this broader context.

Climate advocates face scrutiny as India expands coal dependence

By A Representative   The National Alliance for Climate and Environmental Justice (NACEJ) has strongly criticized what it described as coercive actions against climate activists Harjeet Singh and Sanjay Vashisht, following enforcement raids reportedly carried out on the basis of alleged violations of foreign exchange regulations and intelligence inputs.