Skip to main content

Bureaucrats in India, China fail to convince politicians about natural resource abuse

By Shankar Sharma*

This line of thinking, as suggested in the following links, can be said to be very unfortunate and disastrous for the humanity: China urges developed countries to take the lead in cutting out coal; There’s an $80-billion hole in India’s climate pledge; After Glasgow, world needs urgent action to stave off catastrophe; and Sixty years of climate change warnings: the signs that were missed (and ignored).
The two of the largest, densely populous and highest polluters, India and China, seem to have commonality at least on such irresponsible line of thinking.
Have the bloated bureaucracy in these two counties failed to convince their political leaders that the level of fossil fuel burning as we seem them today, which can only increase exponentially in a BAU scenario, and the larger threats of Climate Change will devastate every section of our own people much before impacting the rich countries? The inevitability of the calamitous abuse of our natural resources because of the ever growing demand for fossil fuels should have been crystal clear to them by this time. Is it acceptable to the bureaucracy and political leaders that such continued abuse of nature will not only make our people much more impoverished in the short-term, but will also aggravate Climate Change/climate emergency/global warming?
Is it that the pollution /contamination of air, water and soil across the length and breadth of the two countries, which is invariably linked to enormous number of industrial /commercial activities to over-exploit the conventional energy technologies and fossil fuels, as being highlighted by Delhi/Beijing air pollution and health concerns, are not evident to them?
The rich countries also may have larger resource base, lower population and money to face Climate Change. They may also have lesser risks from CC.
In such a scenario shall we rely on the money from those rich countries to protect our own interests? Can our bureaucracy confidently state that our societies in general, and the governments in particular, have honestly done all that is feasible to meet the legitimate needs for energy of all sections of our societies, and to uplift them from the clutches of poverty with the resources made available to our country during the last 70 years?
Has the efficiency level of harnessing /utilising various forms of energy in our countries achieved a level which is comparable to the best in the world; how much is the potential of such energy efficiency gains feasible with our existing energy infrastructure?
Unless we seek honest and credible answer to these questions, it will be foolhardy to expect rich countries to do anything more than what we want to do; irrespective of the fact as to who is primarily responsible for the mess we are in. Such an expectation/demand from rich countries may appear legitimate in the international fora, but no one else is going to protect the primary interests of our people that our own governments.
Such expectations, are very much similar to scenario wherein India may seeking reparations running to Trillions of British Pounds for the loss and damage they have heaped on our people during the illegal occupation of our land for more than 200 years. Such a thing will never happen.
Let us honestly do all that is feasible within our own country first, while continuing to put pressure on rich/ polluter countries to provide compensation to the poor countries. We must not wait for the aid to come from outside for us to start doing anything or everything feasible.

*Power & Climate Policy Analyst, Vijayanagar 1st stage, Sagara, Karnataka

Comments

TRENDING

BRICS ends, but Bangladesh's empty chair says more than any declaration

By Nava Thakuria  The 18th BRICS Leaders' Summit, hosted by India at Bharat Mandapam in New Delhi on 12-13 September 2026, has concluded with leaders formally adopting the New Delhi Declaration. The gathering, themed "Building for Resilience, Innovation, Cooperation and Sustainability," drew Russian President Vladimir Putin, Chinese President Xi Jinping, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and other leaders of the now 11-member bloc, along with heads of partner organisations such as ASEAN, the African Union and the Eurasian Economic Union. Diplomats had worked through the final hours to bridge differences — notably between Iran and the UAE over West Asian tensions — before the declaration was signed.

Swaminarayan, untouchability and the 'we are not Hindu' argument

By Rajiv Shah   Following my blog on why the Eiffel Tower authorities should take all the blame for giving in to the Swaminarayan sadhus ’ bizarre demand to “invisibilise” women, including its female staff, during their visit to the internationally renowned Paris tourist centre on September 5, an interesting comment by one of the top academics drew my attention to something I vaguely knew about one of India’s most powerful and richest religious sects.

BAPS, the Eiffel Tower and the curious silence on secularism

By Rajiv Shah   I was a little surprised to see how some of those whom I respect for taking a firm stand on patriarchal issues reacted to the manner in which they responded to the recent incident in Paris, in which women employees of the Eiffel Tower were asked to remain "invisible" on September 5 when 100 BAPS sadhus visited one of the world's top tourist destinations.