Skip to main content

Bureaucrats in India, China fail to convince politicians about natural resource abuse

By Shankar Sharma*

This line of thinking, as suggested in the following links, can be said to be very unfortunate and disastrous for the humanity: China urges developed countries to take the lead in cutting out coal; There’s an $80-billion hole in India’s climate pledge; After Glasgow, world needs urgent action to stave off catastrophe; and Sixty years of climate change warnings: the signs that were missed (and ignored).
The two of the largest, densely populous and highest polluters, India and China, seem to have commonality at least on such irresponsible line of thinking.
Have the bloated bureaucracy in these two counties failed to convince their political leaders that the level of fossil fuel burning as we seem them today, which can only increase exponentially in a BAU scenario, and the larger threats of Climate Change will devastate every section of our own people much before impacting the rich countries? The inevitability of the calamitous abuse of our natural resources because of the ever growing demand for fossil fuels should have been crystal clear to them by this time. Is it acceptable to the bureaucracy and political leaders that such continued abuse of nature will not only make our people much more impoverished in the short-term, but will also aggravate Climate Change/climate emergency/global warming?
Is it that the pollution /contamination of air, water and soil across the length and breadth of the two countries, which is invariably linked to enormous number of industrial /commercial activities to over-exploit the conventional energy technologies and fossil fuels, as being highlighted by Delhi/Beijing air pollution and health concerns, are not evident to them?
The rich countries also may have larger resource base, lower population and money to face Climate Change. They may also have lesser risks from CC.
In such a scenario shall we rely on the money from those rich countries to protect our own interests? Can our bureaucracy confidently state that our societies in general, and the governments in particular, have honestly done all that is feasible to meet the legitimate needs for energy of all sections of our societies, and to uplift them from the clutches of poverty with the resources made available to our country during the last 70 years?
Has the efficiency level of harnessing /utilising various forms of energy in our countries achieved a level which is comparable to the best in the world; how much is the potential of such energy efficiency gains feasible with our existing energy infrastructure?
Unless we seek honest and credible answer to these questions, it will be foolhardy to expect rich countries to do anything more than what we want to do; irrespective of the fact as to who is primarily responsible for the mess we are in. Such an expectation/demand from rich countries may appear legitimate in the international fora, but no one else is going to protect the primary interests of our people that our own governments.
Such expectations, are very much similar to scenario wherein India may seeking reparations running to Trillions of British Pounds for the loss and damage they have heaped on our people during the illegal occupation of our land for more than 200 years. Such a thing will never happen.
Let us honestly do all that is feasible within our own country first, while continuing to put pressure on rich/ polluter countries to provide compensation to the poor countries. We must not wait for the aid to come from outside for us to start doing anything or everything feasible.

*Power & Climate Policy Analyst, Vijayanagar 1st stage, Sagara, Karnataka

Comments

TRENDING

'Modi govt's assault on dissent': Foreign funds of top finance NGO blocked

By Rajiv Shah  In a surprise move, the Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, has cancelled the foreign funding license of the well-known advocacy group, Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA), known for critically examining India's finance and banking sectors from human rights and environmental angle.

Misleading ads 'manipulate, seduce, lure' to market unhealthy harmful food

By Our Representative  The Nutrition Advocacy in Public Interest (NAPI) in its new report “50 Shades of Food Advertising” has sought to expose how seductive, luring, manipulative or deceptive these advertisements can be. Consequences of such advertising are increased intake of unhealthy food products that is associated with obesity and diabetes, it says. 

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

'Failure of governance': India, China account for 54% pollution-related deaths globally

By Vikas Parsaram Meshram*   A recent report jointly prepared by UNICEF and the independent research organization Health Effects Institute has been released, and the statistics within it are alarming. It states that in 2021, air pollution caused the deaths of 2.1 million Indians, including 169,000 children who hadn't yet fully experienced life. These figures are indeed distressing and raise questions about why there hasn't been more serious effort in this direction, putting policymakers to shame. 

August 9 to be observed as Corporates Quit India day: Top farmers' group

By Our Representative A recent general body meeting of the Samyukt Kisan Morcha (SKM), the top farmers' organisation, stated hat "there is no need for any illusion of change in the pro-corporate policies of the BJP-NDA government" following the recent elections in which BJP failed to achieve even simple majority. It insisted,  Prime Minister Narendra Modi "is hell bent" to continue 'business as usual' policies.

Over 3.8 billion animals at risk: India on crossroad in animal welfare practices

By Rupali Soni*  In a collaborative effort, the India Animal Fund and Dasra have unveiled their report , "Our Shared Future | Securing Animal Welfare, Human Wellbeing, and Sustainability in India." This landscape report provides a thorough overview of animal welfare and underscores its indispensable role within India's socio-economic and ecological frameworks. It also illustrates how animal welfare is intricately intertwined with public health, labor welfare, and climate resilience.

Belgian report alleges MNC Etex responsible for asbestos pollution in Madhya Pradesh town Kymore: COP's Geneva meet

By Our Representative A comprehensive Belgian report has held MNC Etex , into construction business and one of the richest, responsible for asbestos pollution in Kymore, an industrial town in in Katni district of Madhya Pradesh. The report provides evidence from the ground on how Kymore’s dust even today is “annoying… it creeps into your clothes, you have to cough it”, saying “It can be deadly.”

Maharashtra govt's proposed bill may be used against 'dissenting' journalists, writers, filmmakers, artists

Counterview Desk  The People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL), Maharashtra, strongly objecting to what it calls “repressive and unconstitutional” Maharashtra Special Public Security Bill 2024, has demanded the proposed law be scrapped in its entirety. In its Statement of Objects and Reasons for the Bill, PUCL noted,  the broad and non-descript label of ‘urban naxal’ has been used, which is actually a “common slur used for any citizen who expresses their opposition to state policy or is not aligned with right-wing majoritarian views."