Skip to main content

Modi withdrew farm laws as BJP found west UP Jat-Muslim communal divide 'failing'

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat* 

The announcement for repealing the three notorious farm laws that were passed by Parliament is definitely a big victory for the farmers' movement and those who have been protesting against these unjust laws for the last one year. The government failed to the extent that BJP lost one of its oldest allies Akali Dal when the government took this decision; it felt that farmers would be tired of the protests and would go back to home after some time, but that did not happen.
BJP tried its best, and we saw all kinds of efforts to damage the protests. Initially, farmers were threatened with counter protests. Farmers faced "protests" at the Singhu border as well as the Tikri border when local goons were brought in to oppose the farmers under the pretext that it was disturbing traffic and creating problems for the locals.
Then came the historic day. The farmers decided to march on in Delhi on the Republic Day on their tractors. Police hesitantly gave them permission but managed to create chaos at the Red Fort. The government got a handle to suppress the movement, called its participants anti-national. Pimps on prime time were already shouting loudly to take ‘stern’ action against the ‘terrorists'.
Every effort was made to instigate the locals against the farmers. A swift police action was being planned at all the three border areas. Uttar Pradesh chief minister Adityanath thought that it was a suitable time to act at the Ghazipur border. However, Bharatiya Kisan Union (BKU) leader Rakesh Tikait's address to farmers at Ghazipur border with tears flowing from his eyes created a massive outrage in the entire western Uttar Pradesh belt.
The authorities in Mujaffarnagar warned their counterparts in Ghaziabad to desist from taking any action as it would only create a massive crisis. Rakesh Tikait’s call made the farmers more determined as they started marching towards the Ghazipur border. Before January 26, 2021, it was Singhu border which was the main scene of action, but after Rakesh Tikait’s call, the Ghazipur border became the focal point of the farmers' movement.
The massive participation of the farmers from western Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Haryana thwarted the move of the ruling party to make it national vs anti-national issue. It faced with the predicament to deal with its own constituency, which had voted for it massively in the last two general elections, and in 2017 in the Uttar Pradesh assembly elections.
If it were merely an issue of Punjab farmers, BJP would have succeeded in isolating them by inciting the "we versus them" issue. But it failed because BKU led by Rakesh Tikait became more vocal and participated with greater strength.
In the last one year over 750 farmers got killed in the peaceful protests. While all those who laid down their lives for a cause are called ‘shaheed’ or ‘martyrs’, it should not be ignored or forgotten that ultimately it is the Union government, its political leadership of the day, that failed them and looked extremely insensitive to the basic demands of the farmers.
Anyone who is aware of the extremities of north Indian weather can vouch for how difficult and hard it would have been for men, women and children of all ages to sleep under the open sky in hot humid months from April onwards, followed by rainy season in monsoon, and again extremely cold weather, particularly from December to February. Many famers, meanwhile, were compelled to commit suicide.
However, we heard not a single word of sympathy or solidarity. In the last seven or eight years since Narendra Modi became Prime Minister, the government, BJP or its ministers have never ever uttered a single word on deaths of people in movements, whether students' protests, or protests against Citizenship Amendment Act-National Register of Citizens (CAA-NRC) or farmers’ protests.
The whole premise and focus of the governance model was to completely ignore or shout down the stories of pain, agony and anger. So much was the insensitivity that the government patted on its back for ‘successfully' handling of the Corona crisis even when all saw, India was one of the worst in handling the crisis with over 4.65 lakh deaths, yet there was not a single word of moaning, sympathy or failure.
Instead, anyone questioning the government was shouted down and faced stringent laws. Sections of media became lapdog of the government, which had already completely lost its credibility. They were busy merely broadcasting stories to malign the opponents and glorifying the ‘supreme leader’. All this only created extreme insensitivity in society, where deaths and brutality were normalised.
One should not forget how the lopdog media was ‘monitoring’ everything at the protest sites. Fake news ‘reporters’ were pushed to the protest sites to bring stories of dissent among farmers to ‘show’ the to the ‘world’ how ‘lavishly’ the farmers were living at the protest sites. It was said that the farmers were drinking milk, eating dry fruits and living in luxurious AC huts.
Many times, it was also shown as if they were not farmers but goons and terrorists. But all of it failed. Having been to some of these protest sites and speaking to many people, including activists and those associated with the movement, I can only say that I found political understanding of the farmers far superior to that of the urban English-speaking middle classes.
Farmers resorted to different kinds of protests, but everything was peaceful and democratic. The entire movement is an example of how to fight peacefully against a repressive regime. But it is also a fact that the current regime could not afford to antagonise the powerful farming communities in the election season.
According to an article published in "Down to Earth" magazine, the total number of farm related protests in 2020 was 2,188 as per National Crime Record Bureau data, which was 19% more than the previous year. It also reported that prior to that farm protests had considerably reduced in India -- particularly after the 2013 land acquisition Act was passed, which made ‘consent’ an extremely important factor even as offering reasonable compensation for the acquired land with stringent terms and conditions.
However, things changed in the last two years. There were several all-India general strikes called by farmers, several chakka jams and rail rokos, mostly peaceful, even when the police resorted to highhandedness.
The horrific incident in Lakhimpur Khiri where the son of a Union minister was involved in crushing several farmers and a journalist under his fast moving SUV is still fresh in the minds of the farmers. The minister is still there and his ‘illustrious’ son got arrested only after the Supreme Court intervened. It defines how the government under the current regime has been functioning and ‘cares' for public opinion.
One man who stood apart in the entire exercise and spoke with courage and conviction is Congress leader Rahul Gandhi
While the chums of the government were freely abusing the opponent, misusing the Constitution and had no faith in India’s inclusive pluralistic culture, those who questioned the unconstitutional means and deeds of the ruling party were arrested under stringent laws where procedures were created to humiliate and intimidate them. The fake news wallahs, who abused the Constitution, were provided Z plus security but no questions were asked.
It is ironic that the farm laws were passed through highly undemocratic means. As the opposition was protesting in Parliament in support of the demands of the farmers, the government was determined to crush the opposition voice. It brought in ‘experts’ to unleash its propaganda against the farmers and support the laws.
One man who stood apart in this entire exercise and spoke with courage and conviction is Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, who on the floor of the house as well as elsewhere said that the government would have to withdraw these laws. Mark my word, he had said, the government would have to withdraw the laws. He proved correct and today stands taller than any of his contemporaries.
The Prime Minister's speech announcing the withdrawal of the three farm laws appeared to suggest he was sure that ‘majority’ of farmers all over the country actually ‘supported’ the laws as it would have benefitted them. Modi claimed, the ‘government’ was unable to convince only a ‘few’ of the farmers and that he did not want to make anyone feel left out, hence in the greater ‘national’ interest, he was withdrawing the laws.
Though the manner of the announcement itself was highly objectionable and unconstitutional, as the Prime Minister or any minister is not supposed to announce any policy level decision outside Parliament, the fact is, Modi and BJP do everything according to their political calculations. They found the party was finding it difficult for the Uttar Pradesh elections due for early next year, hence the announcement.
Modi made the announcement on Guru Nanak Jayanti and the birthday of former prime minister Indira Gandhi. The entire country erupted in joy after he made the announcement of repealing the law. It was unthinkable in recent times for Modi to concede defeat or regret on anything. But the political fallout of the farm laws was much more powerful and dangerous for the Prime Minister and the government than what they had thought.
Meanwhile, one should not forget what the government is doing by coming up with new amendments and new bills. They are amending the Indian Forest Act to help their crony friends at the cost of Adivasi lives. They want to dilute every environmental safeguard from laws. They are doing everything to remove the ‘consent’ clause from the land acquisition Act so that they can do things at the cronies' whims and fancies.
Like what it did after withdrawing its amendments to the land acquisition Act, 2013, the government will definitely work on a different plan to bring in farm laws, so one needs to be alert. It can act through States by suggesting land is a state subject. Various States have already amended their land laws as per the guidelines of the Centre. If things don’t work politically, judiciary is an alternative given the current trends in the judiciary.
Former Supreme Court judge Justice Arun Mishra's observations on land acquisition, forests and slum dwellers are a case in pont. In his view, Adivasis are ‘encroachers’ on their own land which they have protected for centuries. One of his orders was reversed when there was a huge uproar. Justice Mishra is now chief of the National Human Rights Commission, openly endorsing government policies on everything.
One shouldn't also forget the statement by the National Security Adviser at the police academy in Hyderabad that the ‘fourth generation’ war should be fought against ‘civil society’. When the top officer of the government thinks this way, it is clear how they want to ‘govern’ the country. It is ‘My way or High way’ where the common persons will find it hard to walk through without the preconditions imposed on them by those in power or who manage them.
Nor should one ignore the fact that the withdrawal of these laws is not love for the farmers but to get back to the basics of elections. Western Uttar Pradesh, particularly Jats, became the supporters of BJP in the last two decades. After the Mandalisation of Indian politics, Jats sided more and more with the upper caste parties and BJP was natural for them. BJP’s Hindutva agenda got pushed in the farming belt through 2013 Mujaffarnagar riots which isolated Muslims in the region and made them unwanted.
The polarisation has always been used by BJP for its power games but in the process Jats got politically marginalised. So much so that in a State like Haryana, where Jats voted for BJP, the party has a chief minister belonging to the Khatri community.
The farmers' movement has brought back the old Jat pride as also their association with Muslims. Jat-Muslim unity actually was the last thing that BJP could think of, as it is bound to create an extremely difficult situation for the party in western Uttar Pradesh, where party leaders are unable to make any visit in their constituencies.
---
*Human rights defender

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Critics of your government should not be in jail: PUCL shoots open letter to Modi

Counterview Desk In an open letter, Ravikiran Jain, national president, and Dr V Suresh, general secretary, People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) have taken strong exception to Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s view that raising human rights issues can ‘tarnish’ the country’s reputation, stating, those who raise human rights concerns do it “through established United Nations mechanisms such as the UN Human Rights Council, the Office of the UN High Commissioner of Human Rights.”

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

When judges behave more like priests, delivering sermons from high podium...

By Ajit Singh*  The theory of separation of power found its origins in ancient Greece but with the passage of time it became widespread in other parts of Europe. Early proponent of the theory Greek philosopher Aristotle in “Politics” argued that implementation of constitution in letter and spirit can only be possible if the three elements among whom the power has been distributed are well arranged.

Covid appropriate behaviour? Why masks can't be suitable in hot, humid climate

By Dr Amitav Banerjee* Appearances can be deceptive. So can be Covid Appropriate Behaviour (CAB). An anecdote illustrates this well known cliché. A man who is very particular about hygiene decides to eat out. After a rather long search, he spots a restaurant which has a spotlessly clean exterior and he walks in.

Muck being thrown in Uttarakhand rivers: Villagers face 'existential' crisis

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  The Uttarakhand government must act fast to clear the path of Dhauli Ganga river about two kilometres ahead of village Neeti and about one kilometre from Ghamsali village, which is about 90 kilometer from Joshi Math town in district Chamoli. The creation of an artificial lake due to throwing of muck and mud can create a catastrophic situation like what happened on February 7, 2021-- the Rishi Ganga-Dhauli Ganga tragedy at Tapovan and Raini village in which over 200 people lost their life.

How Indore turned into water minus city after authorities 'managed' Water Plus title

Water harvester cleaning up hyacinth from an Indore river By Rahul Banerjee*  Recently, the city of Indore was declared the first Water Plus city in India under the Swachh Sarvekshan programme of the Ministry of Housing and Urban Development for its ostensibly exemplary waste water management. However, the reality is quite different as a detailed study of the prevailing wastewater management situation in the city shows.

UP govt 'ignoring' demand to fill up teachers' posts despite unemployment: Rights groups

Sandeep Pandey with Shikha Pal Counterview Desk  Commenting on the unique protest undertaken by Shikha Pal atop an overhead water tank for nearly four months, the Socialist Party (India), in association with several civil rights group, Yuva Shakti Sangathan, Socialist Yuvjan Sabha and Rihai Manch, have wondered why has the Yogi Adityanath government is so “insensitive” towards her demands and is looking the “other way.”

Restricting use of public places for religious purpose: Will Gehlot govt respect HC order?

By Kavita Srivastava*  The People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL), Rajasthan, has welcomed the judgment of the Rajasthan High Court dismissing the petition by Pooja Gurnani which challenged a circular of the Rajasthan government which restrained the construction of a ‘Pooja Sthal’ in the premises of a police station.

Rehabilitation site 'offered' to 6000 displaced Khori villagers not livable: Team Saathi

By Our Representative  Second round of the Chitthi Andolan (letter movement) of the Khori village residents, whose more than 6,000 houses were demolished as they were allegedly built on forest land, has begun, with hundreds of them telling the authorities of the Municipal Corporation, Faridabad, that no one has received the promised financial assistance of meagre Rs 2,000.