Skip to main content

Climate change: Indifferent youth, lack of local action behind governance failure

By Mansee Bal Bhargava* 

As a governance scholar-teacher-learner, it is an undying belief that the individual is the core unit and thus influences any governance decision and action. Besides, a belief that grounded-local solutions are key to any large (regional-national-global) problems like climate change. This belief can be extended to the philosophy of self-organization, which is also fundamental to governance research and practice. Self-organization, when looked from an institutional perspective, is a group of individuals having some perception and preference, coming together under an institution by setting up some instructions to follow and setting up institutional prerogatives or collective goals.
The 26th Conference of the Parties (COP26) is global level institution formed by the nation states to address the climate change and take climate decisions-actions. The 2021 United Nations 26th Climate Change Conference, known as the COP26, is organized at Glasgow from 31st October to 12th November 2021 with designate president, Alok Sharma.
The COP26 brought together country-industry-academic leaders and eminent others to discuss ways to accelerate action towards the goals of the Paris Agreement and the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change.
In the COP26, scientists and UN officials have warned governments for pragmatic actions to reduce emissions in order to curtail the rising unprecedented disasters worldwide. Since the earth’s climate has reached a new high with rise in greenhouse gas emissions and global temperatures.
If things have worsened in the years despite the commitments signed by the countries in the Paris Agreement, it is worth asking whether the COP26 will do any wonders. Though, the congregation was skewed with dominance of the big boys meet who have been doing business as usual, the meagre participation of other gender and youth still managed to make their perspectives noticeable.
Talking about India where the voice of other genders and youth is a bare tokenism, agree or not, we are not succeeding on achieving the global goals through the country level commitments made by the governments because, the climate change governance seeks equal participation of all sections, even including independent voices of/for the bio-diversity.
To add to the apathy is the poor understanding of the distinction between governance and government among all. That, the failure to achieve climate action goals (or other initiatives) is a governance challenge where though leaders promise minimum government and maximum governance but perform just the opposite by playing power games instead of empowering the citizens.
When the group of influential individuals (mostly men) holding positions make certain promises, it becomes their responsibility to also communicate those promises into actionable plans to the local authority as well as acceptable projects to the citizens, importantly in language/s they understand.
Unless most citizens understand the global-national goals and participate in the local actions, the governmentalized (and masculine) efforts will continue to be challenging. Climate change is an example of that! Though it is difficult to convey and convince the minimum government and maximum governance to the public at large, at least I have the privilege of teaching that to the youth.
How to bring citizens in the governance process in the first place, is more of a challenge for government before even the citizens understand the problem and chose to participate. It is difficult to make Citizens participate but not impossible.
One of the ways to make citizens participate is engaging them in dialogues which is a crucial part of building trust for any collective actions. Since, the climate change discourse predominantly is about sustainable development for the future generations, the article focusses to engage the youth in climate change induced COP26.
I reached out to nearly 50 youth from across the country who I know are directly-indirectly involved in environment studies-activities. They were requested to share their thoughts on COP26. It took a week in receiving the responses before writing this article. Ironically, only nine youth responded.
It teaches me that most of the youth are either indifferent to such activities or disinterested or unaware or don’t see sharing thought makes any difference (a typical prisoner’s dilemma situation). Nevertheless, it is important to take note of the thoughts of those who responded. So, here are their thoughts as what do they believe and feel about the climate change COP26 happening-decisions and what does that mean as a local level governance:
  1. Srishti Ramnani from New Delhi shares that, this event should be an opportunity to discuss the steady health of the environment and not adding on random targets by the delegates which are not assessed in terms of environmental costs (as derivatives of environmental impacts). Perhaps, learning the economic future value of resources by the leaders can set forth some serious targets. So, let the youth be the representative at such forums to globally educate the 'evolutionary mechanisms' that should actually be adopted for the environment.
  2. Kalpana Patel from Jabalpur shares that, the COP26 is one of the best opportunities to discuss the concerning effects of climate change. The discussion should be more action- oriented and should aim at practically possible aims and targets. Another major aspect that needs to be addressed is about the equity in sharing the responsibilities and burdens globally. Acknowledging the fact that we all have to take steps to minimise the climate change, the world leaders cannot ignore the fact of developed nations' contribution to this global rise in temperature. After all growth and sustainability must go hand in hand and one cannot be achieved at the cost of the other.
  3. Mohammad Imroz from Hajipur, Bihar shares that, the COP26 is a great platform where the country addresses its environment-related problem and discusses the solution to climate change. However, the COP26 should plan to work on how to work on the ground level and how to improve it, with a focus on promoting education, training, and public awareness of climate change as one of the biggest causes of climate change. The impact falls on the people of the middle-class and poverty-stricken families. In this epoch, youth coming into environmental education and environmental training should be given more preference as we know that youth is a crucial factor to address the issues of any country and for economic growth. In COP26, India has taken a significant step with its 450-gigawatt renewable target and national and this step can prove to be very good at controlling the climate change of India and also in economic growth.
  4. Sayyad Sahil Ahmed from Greater Noida shares that, the COP26 is the best platform to integrate our efforts towards making our environment healthy. Planning should be done whole to part, but execution must be done in part to whole in order to include local efforts in the picture. COP26 goals can only be achieved if everyone realizes their short term and long-term responsibilities related to consumption as well as production. Youth should be included in such talks as well as in decision making to make long-term goals look realistic. In developing countries like India, it becomes necessary to first educate a larger audience about this mission in simpler terms and to present to them the favourable outcomes of working together in this direction.
  5. Yukti Sharma from New Delhi shares that the COP26 is the summit to bring the parties together to accelerate the actions decided towards mainly climate change. Talking about net zero emissions and decarbonization, finding nature-based solutions to the problem of climate change are secondary things in the context that the approach of all these should start from the local levels. Until and unless the needs of the poor are balanced with the natural ecosystem, as well as scientific strategies to tackle emissions, no strategy is going to work. The conference should have local level discussions. Starting from the most polluting cities, (for ex. Delhi), such conferences may have representatives, having deep insights of the reason for such major causes, irrespective of how to reduce it. Proposing strategies on a higher level and understanding the strategy on a lower level makes the difference here.
  6. Gaurav Fouzdar from Agra shares that, the COP26 will be a very important climate subject for India. As India is heading towards use of non-fossil fuel energy and renewable energy resources. To achieve these goals the efforts must be contributed from the local level. Awareness about the agenda must be discussed at local level to increase the awareness which will directly impact in understanding of long term and short-term responsibilities and duty of individuals. Introduction of new technology and new research which are being done in the field of climate change and reduction of carbon levels must be appreciated at all levels.
  7. Bhumika Khatreja from Sonepat shares that, the commitment to achieve net zero emissions by 2070 was much needed as being the 3rd largest emitter of carbon. As a youth of the developing nation, in my view India should focus more on ‘Adaptation than Mitigation’. The need to reduce the greenhouse gases caused by human activities is the main driver of climate change globally. But it should not hamper the development of the nation. The actions at the local level will sum up to form a big change therefore the strategies made need to be considerate of all the sections of the society so that they can be adopted as a whole.
  8. Bharg Modi from Dahod shares that, we are currently in a climate crisis and during such time, do we really need a conference like COP26? All the world leaders used their private aircrafts to reach there and the venue where the conference is going on also needs electricity, water, food to welcome all the leaders. World leaders don't travel alone; they have their whole team with them. It is too late for us to talk about climate change. We have to start working with what we have with us. Developing nations are pointing their fingers towards developed nations that have created all the mess, in the time of crisis playing blame games will not save anyone because climate change will affect everyone. Developed nations promised 100 billion dollars to help the developing nations and they are giving it in the form of loans. Developing nations want grants not loans because they have so many things on their platter and if they have to repay the loans then survival of those nations will get difficult.
  9. Chetan Malusare from Pune shares that, since the goals under COP26 are legally bound, countries can set up non-binding national targets or Nationally Determined Contributions (NDC), including climate related targets to greenhouse emission reduction under some policies and measures by governments. But now, countries asked to revise NDCs before COP26 as they are considered not adequate. Many aspects discussed in this meeting like Climate finance where money provided to emerging countries from public and private sources, phasing out of coal usage, reduce methane emission which is the central issue as it can heat the planet 80 times more than carbon dioxide result from transportation, usage of some natural resources, livestock and other agricultural practices and land uses, and carbon trading mechanism where rich nations could hive off some of their carbon reduction.
The responses on the COP26 by the above few shall set a trust from the future generation. They are my learning for how the future governance discourse will shape climate change and other social-ecological matters in the country. They are a hope to do things differently than the present time business as usual mode of governmental-exclusive way of climate governance. They are also a hope to change the way we at present perceive climate change and prefer mitigation-adaptation.
---
*Entrepreneur | Researcher | Educator. A water enthusiast, a governance scholar, and a keen political observer. More about the work of Mansee is at: www.mansee.in

Comments

TRENDING

Whither Govt of India strategy to reduce import dependence on crude oil, natural gas?

By NS Venkataraman*  India presently imports around 80% of it’s crude oil requirement and around 50% of its natural gas requirements . As the domestic production of crude oil and natural gas are virtually stagnant and the domestic demand is increasing at around 7% per annum, India’s steadily increasing dependence on import of the vital energy source is a matter of high energy security concern. This is particularly so, since the price of crude oil and natural gas are considerably fluctuating / increasing in the global market due to geo political factors, which are beyond the control of India. India has promised to achieve zero emission by the year 2070, which mean that the level of emission has to start declining at slow and steady rate from now onwards. It is now well recognized that global emission is caused largely due to use of coal as fuel and natural gas as fuel and feedstock. While burning of coal as fuel cause emission of global warming carbon dioxide gas and sulphur

'Massive concern for people': Modi seeking to turn India into global manufacturing hub

By Shankar Sharma*  The news item quoting Narendra Modi at the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) meet, "Want to turn India into a manufacturing hub: PM Modi at SCO Summit" should be of massive concern to our people. One can only continue to be shocked by such policies, which can be termed as ill-conceived to say the least. Without objectively considering the environmental and social impacts on our communities in the medium to long term, such policies will also result in massive economic impacts because a lack of environmental and social perspective cannot be economically attractive either. In order to become the global manufacturing hub, India will have to meet an enormous demand for energy of various kinds, and in order to meet this much energy demand the economy has to manufacture enormous number of appliances/ gadgets/ machineries (to generate and distribute commercial forms of energy such as coal, nuclear, gas, hydro, and renewable energy (RE) sources such as so

Denying dissent democratic space in Gujarat: 'sad narrative of eroding ethical values'

By Sandeep Pandey*  A padyatra (foot march) was to be taken out between 26 September and 4 October, 2022 from Randhikpur village in Dahod district of Gujarat to Ahmedabad to apologise to Bilkis Bano. Randhikpur is Bilkis Bano’s village. In 2002 Gujarat communal violence she was gang raped, her 3 years old daughter, another child in womb and a total of 14 family members were killed. 11 people were convicted and sentenced for life in 2008. However, on 15 August, 2022 after Prime Minister Narendra Modi made a speech from Red Fort appealing to people to change their attitude towards women and treat them with respect, a district level committee of Panchmahal decided to release the 11 rapists and murderers. A Bhartiya Janata Party leader described four of these criminals as virtuous Brahmins. Before the padyatra could begin from Randhikpur, on 25 September night, 7 activists were picked up from Godhra corporator Hanif Kalandar’s house where they had gone for d

Pesticide companies' lobbying 'seriously impairing' basics of governance, regulation

Dr Narasimha Reddy Donthi*  The Indian agricultural sector is grappling with low incomes, shortage of natural resources, increasing pest incidence and low public investments in research and extension. Pest attacks are increasing. Previously unknown pests are attacking crops. Farmers, indebted as they are due to various market mechanisms, are finding it hard to protect their crop investments. Thus, farmers are pushed into the conundrum of pesticide usage by pesticide markets and companies. Pesticide usage in India is increasingly becoming a regulatory problem. Regulation has not been effective in the face of such challenges. Scientific expertise on pesticides is often subsumed in the policy tradeoffs that, in the ultimate scenario, encourage production and marketing of Highly Hazardous Pesticides (HHPs). Expert Committee reports, which are recommending withdrawal of certain HHPs, are not being acted upon. Lobbying by pesticide companies has seriously impaired the basics of governance an

Kerala health bill public hearing? Here the minister 'ensured' cameras were turned off

By Our Representative  On Friday, September 30, 2022, about 100 members of the general public gathered at the conference room of the collectorate at Ernakulam, Kerala, to express their apprehensions about the Kerala Public Health Bill, 2021, which the state assembly referred to a 15-member select committee chaired by state health and family welfare minister, Veena George. Minister Veena George asserted at the outset that this was a sitting of the select committee, and all cameras would need to be turned off. Advocate PA Pouran, general secretary of the People’s Union for Civil Liberties in Kerala, stood up in protest, arguing that the meeting was a public hearing and should ideally be televised to reach vast numbers of people. Other members of the audience protested too, but the minister insisted that the gathering was part of a sitting of the select committee.  “Why then did you invite all of us?” protested George Mathew, who had arrived from Aluva and earlier served as a member of t

How Gandhian values have become 'casualty' in India under majoritarian BJP rule

By Sandeep Pandey*  A Muslim youth was beaten recently when he tried to witness the famous garba performance during the Hindu religious nine days festival of Navratri in Gujarat. There was a time when Muslims could easily participate in Garbha events in an atmosphere of cordiality. Bilkis Bano was gang raped in 2002 Gujarat communal violence, her 3 years old daughter, the child in womb and a total of 14 family members were killed. 11 accused were awarded life term. However, recently a District level committee has decided to release all the culprits. A ruling Bhartiya Janata Party leader has described some of these criminals as virtuous Brahmins, the highest among the Hindu hierarchical caste system. In a communally polarized Gujarat today most Muslims feel offended by the decision of the government and BJP supporters either justify the release of rapists and murderers or just ignore the ignominious decision. Mahatma Gandhi came from the Guj

GoI 'feeling threatened' by forces which can potentially fight 'Brahmanical fascism'

Counterview Desk  A network of civil rights and people’s organisations , Campaign Against State Repression (CASR)*, has characterised the recently-imposed ban on Popular Front of India (PFI), National Confederation of Human Rights Organizations (NCHRO) and other organisations as “Brahmanical Hindutva fascist” move of the Government of India (GoI), calling it “onslaught on democratic dissent”. In a statement, CASR said, the move is aimed at terrorizing and vilifying the Muslim community, adding, at the same time, the GoI is curbing any protest and demonstration against the “fascist diktat of ban”, with peoplebeing “detained and arrested.” It added, “This kind of attack on right to oppose or criticize any step of government should be conceived as an attack on the very democratic values of the people.” Text : On 28 September 2022, Central Government led by BJP-RSS banned the Popular Front of India, National Confederation of Human Rights Organizations, Campus Front of India, National Wom

Golwalkar's views on tricolour, martyrs, minorities, caste as per RSS archives

By Shamsul Islam*  First time in the history of independent India, the in-charge minister of the Cultural Ministry in the current Modi government, Prahlad Singh Patel, has glorified MS Golwalkar, second supremo of the RSS and the most prominent ideologue of the RSS till date, on his birth anniversary, February 19. In a tweet he wrote : “Remembering a great thinker, scholar, and remarkable leader #MSGolwalkar on his birth anniversary. His thoughts will remain a source of inspiration & continue to guide generations.”

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Paradox? Heavy military deployment has had 'tangible success' in enhancing J&K security

By Katarzyna Rybarczyk*  An ethnically diverse Himalayan region of Kashmir has been a subject of a territorial dispute between India and Pakistan since the partition in 1947. Despite both countries claiming full control over the region’s entirety, Kashmir is divided between them, into an Indian-administered part and a Pakistan-administered part. For the last three decades, Indian-controlled Kashmir has been characterised by unrest due to a separatist insurgency opposing the Indian rule. Although India’s fragile relationship with Kashmir is not a new issue, tensions intensified when in 2019 India revoked Article 370, depriving the region of its special status and a certain degree of autonomy attributed to it. Article 370 allowed Kashmir to have its own constitution and to make decisions regarding property ownership and permanent residency. As a result, Indians from other parts of the country were not able to purchase property and settle in Kashmir. Scrapping Kashmir’s special status me