Skip to main content

Proposed changes in FCA to open gates for India's timber lobby, cause desertification

By Shankar Sharma*

Letter to the secretary, Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEF&CC), Government of India, on the proposed amendments in the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980:
Greetings from Sagar, Western Ghats, Karnataka!
I was shocked to learn the intention of the Government to bring amendments to Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, notified for the information of the public and the state governments and calling for the comments/ suggestions on the proposed amendments within Oct,2021 vide notification ref cited above.
At a time when the planet is experiencing a climate emergency, any change in the law or practices which can lead to further loss of forest and vegetation cover should not even be considered as worthy of our examination.
In this regard I am appalled by the fact that our country has only 23% of the geographical area under forests but in reality we have only 11% in true sense of forests and the rest are of open rocky, desert, salty sea shores etc. declared as forests against the forest policy of 33% of the total area of the country to be under forests.
Thousands of hectares of original forest lands are being routinely diverted every year for various non-forestry purposes, including those forest lands within the legally Protected Areas (PAs), and there seems no indication of such forest land diversion stopping in the near future. In such a scenario of continuing abuse of forest wealth, it should be unthinkable to dilute any provision of law to protect forest cover.
The ministry should recognise the critical reasoning behind the global scientific community's recommendation to protect half the planet as the best way to fight climate change and biodiversity loss. The proposed amendment will in no way support such a recommendation, but on the contrary it clearly opposes such science based opinion, and can only help a few corporate houses in looting the forest wealth at enormous cost to the larger society.
The FCA, 1980 and the amendments to it in 1988 were with good intentions to save the existing forests from the diversion for non-forestry purposes for agriculture, housing, mining, roads, railways, military and other institutions, hydroelectricity and irrigation river valley developmental projects etc. by the State governments without taking appropriate action to protect the interest of the environment, ecology, biodiversity and wildlife of the country.
The Act also imposed restrictions to take permission of the Parliament for such de-reservation subjecting to raising compensatory afforestation elsewhere with the cost of the proponents equal to the area lost and also levy of NPV (Net Present Value) etc. This Act had put a break for all the releases of forests for the above purposes by the State governments all over India. 
In spite of it, a lot of forest areas were de-reserved for many government projects and for mining in the country. The compensatory afforestation is not compensating the forests lost due to many reasons. The virgin forests lost once are lost forever for the environment, ecology and the wildlife.
The FCA 1980 was the most feared Act so far in the minds of the bureaucracy since 1980. The prescription of the punishment for those who violate the provisions while taking decisions for allowing forests to be used for non-forestry purpose was a scare for the officers especially for the foresters (forests) and revenue (government lands containing forests) without subjecting for all the formalities within the Act, Rules and the guidelines issued from time to time by the Government of India.
This FCA ensured these wings of the executive not succumb to the pressures/influences of the other departments’ officers/ leaders/public to permit the forests/trees to be cut without subjecting them to the laws of the land.
Thus it saved a lot of forests/trees from diversion/cutting and forced creation of new forests in lieu of the forests lost by collecting compensation for the forests/trees lost and land for the forest land diverted for afforestation.
The judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the WP 202/1995 of TN Godavaraman Thirumulpad V/s Union of India and others was a landmark judgment in saving the forests as per the dictionary meaning of forests either in forests, govt waste lands or in private lands since 1996.
Forest Rights Act gave huge negative blow for conservation of forests and wildlife with provision to de-reserve forests
So many directions were issued by the MoEFCC with reference to the judgments on the impact assessments (IAs) concerned to the environment, forests and wildlife filed in the Hon’ble Supreme Court.
Even the forest encroachments were evicted on war footing in many states. In spite of it the forests are not safe since the development projects and the mining activities continued to get the forests de-notified for their use and caused loss of virgin forests/trees.
The proposed amendment to FCA 1980 can only lead to further degradation of whatever was left from the glorious forest wealth of 1947. At a time when the planet is experiencing climate emergency, and when the protection and enhancement of tropical forests and massive afforestation is considered to be critical to arrest the runaway climate change, the license to loot the sparsely remaining patches of forests through the proposed amendment can only be termed as suicidal for the entire country as well as humanity.
The Schedule Tribes and Other Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act (FRA), 2006 gave huge negative blow for the conservation of forests and the wildlife with provision to de-reserve the forests without subjecting them to the FCA. 
The release of reserved forests under FRA, caused for regularization of encroachments, release of forest lands affecting for degrading and fragmentation of the forests and conservation of wildlife very badly – the result “man-wild animals conflicts” all over India in the fringes of the forests/protected areas.
The biodiversity, ecology and environment of the country are being affected very badly. The nation is already facing the wrath of nature in the form of global warming, melting of snow caps in the Himalayas, rising sea level of the Bay of Bengal and the Arabian Sea, cyclones, unusual rains causing floods or droughts and pandemics etc.
The proposed amendments to the FCA 1980 will cut the arms of FCA in protecting the existing wood lots/government waste lands (revenue waste lands) and trees along highways, railways, military establishments and government institutions and also in urban areas for development of infrastructures.
It will open Pandora’s box for grant of revenue lands to the public by the Revenue Department officers to release openly for popularity and for other consideration to make the States’ land banks empty for all purposes in the future in addition to allowing for cutting and clearing of all trees growths in such lands throwing the wildlife in to open lands to aggravate the man-animals conflicts.
Further, it will open the gates for the timber lobby to go ahead with the Trees Preservation Act's provisions without subjecting it to FCA and compensatory plantations etc. to massacre the trees and flood the market for some time causing desertification.
The sudden flooding of timber to the market will gradually decline and will force import of timber with the double cost which is Rs 40,000 crore per annum in the present scenario in addition to causing untold mystery for the climate, ecology, environment and wildlife of the country.
The act of nullifying the powers given by the Hon’ble Supreme Court to the MoEFCC in the judgment of WP 202/1995 by amending the FCA by the MoEFCC is a heart burning retrogatory step to favour the infrastructure developing departments like highways, railways, irrigation, PWD, mining and urban department is very sad and it will be a curse for the conservation of the wildlife, biodiversity, climate and the people in the long run.
Under the circumstances explained above, I urge the government to not to dilute the FCA 1980 to the level of 1980s; and drop the other considerations for the amendments to nullify the powers given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court to the FCA, 1980 in the interest of the ecology, environment, climate, wildlife and the people since forests is only the source to protect all the life forms on the earth from the disasters.
Basing on the above facts, I strongly oppose the proposed amendments to the FCA, 1980.
Regards, Shankar Sharma
---
*Power and climate policy analyst

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Critics of your government should not be in jail: PUCL shoots open letter to Modi

Counterview Desk In an open letter, Ravikiran Jain, national president, and Dr V Suresh, general secretary, People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) have taken strong exception to Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s view that raising human rights issues can ‘tarnish’ the country’s reputation, stating, those who raise human rights concerns do it “through established United Nations mechanisms such as the UN Human Rights Council, the Office of the UN High Commissioner of Human Rights.”

When judges behave more like priests, delivering sermons from high podium...

By Ajit Singh*  The theory of separation of power found its origins in ancient Greece but with the passage of time it became widespread in other parts of Europe. Early proponent of the theory Greek philosopher Aristotle in “Politics” argued that implementation of constitution in letter and spirit can only be possible if the three elements among whom the power has been distributed are well arranged.

'We are scared to even raise our voice': Delhi sewer workers tell roundtable

By Our Representative  A roundtable attended by more than 100 sewer workers in Delhi, saw sharp voices against the contract system, poor wages and lack of any social benefits. Organised by the Dalit Adivasi Shakti Adhikar Manch (DASAM), which has refused to reveal the identity of the sewer workers who spoke on the occasion for fear of retaliation from the authorities, saw workers complain that have been working for more than 10 years, hoping that someday they would be made permanent.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Muck being thrown in Uttarakhand rivers: Villagers face 'existential' crisis

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  The Uttarakhand government must act fast to clear the path of Dhauli Ganga river about two kilometres ahead of village Neeti and about one kilometre from Ghamsali village, which is about 90 kilometer from Joshi Math town in district Chamoli. The creation of an artificial lake due to throwing of muck and mud can create a catastrophic situation like what happened on February 7, 2021-- the Rishi Ganga-Dhauli Ganga tragedy at Tapovan and Raini village in which over 200 people lost their life.

How Indore turned into water minus city after authorities 'managed' Water Plus title

Water harvester cleaning up hyacinth from an Indore river By Rahul Banerjee*  Recently, the city of Indore was declared the first Water Plus city in India under the Swachh Sarvekshan programme of the Ministry of Housing and Urban Development for its ostensibly exemplary waste water management. However, the reality is quite different as a detailed study of the prevailing wastewater management situation in the city shows.

UP govt 'ignoring' demand to fill up teachers' posts despite unemployment: Rights groups

Sandeep Pandey with Shikha Pal Counterview Desk  Commenting on the unique protest undertaken by Shikha Pal atop an overhead water tank for nearly four months, the Socialist Party (India), in association with several civil rights group, Yuva Shakti Sangathan, Socialist Yuvjan Sabha and Rihai Manch, have wondered why has the Yogi Adityanath government is so “insensitive” towards her demands and is looking the “other way.”

Restricting use of public places for religious purpose: Will Gehlot govt respect HC order?

By Kavita Srivastava*  The People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL), Rajasthan, has welcomed the judgment of the Rajasthan High Court dismissing the petition by Pooja Gurnani which challenged a circular of the Rajasthan government which restrained the construction of a ‘Pooja Sthal’ in the premises of a police station.

Rehabilitation site 'offered' to 6000 displaced Khori villagers not livable: Team Saathi

By Our Representative  Second round of the Chitthi Andolan (letter movement) of the Khori village residents, whose more than 6,000 houses were demolished as they were allegedly built on forest land, has begun, with hundreds of them telling the authorities of the Municipal Corporation, Faridabad, that no one has received the promised financial assistance of meagre Rs 2,000.