Skip to main content

Farm laws 'look good' on paper to an MBA or economics graduate, but wouldn’t work

By Anurag*
MSP or Minimum Support Price sits at the very core of this protest by various farmers’ unions across the nation. The income level of the farmers in India is among the lowest. And when tw-thirds of the nation’s population is suffering and has not seen much improvement since the independence, you have got to stop and start thinking and analysing.
Most of the farmers in India barely make their ends meet. They are not here for luxurious lifestyle. They are here to survive. Lakhs of farmers have committed suicide over the last decade. Sadly, the government has failed them by not taking cognizance of that fact. State machineries have let them down, a big time, by not doing anything to end their miseries.
If we closely look and analyse the current farmers’ protests and their demands, we do not see them making any demands for their upliftment or for their betterment. They are just protesting so that they do not get deprived of the means and their rights that they currently have with them. Think about that for a second.
They are protesting because someone else decided for their future, without asking them. They are here just to make sure that whatever little they have with themselves; those are not taken away from them. They are apprehensive of the intention and the possible results coming out of these three farm laws.
And rightly so. For example, see other agricultural related schemes. In most of these schemes, farmers do not get the sole and whole benefits. Some sound very good on paper, but if we see their implementation, it is not even close to being called as optimal or just acceptable. It does not take a rocket scientist to figure out as to why farmers’ conditions have only worsened over the years.
These laws may sound and look good on paper to an MBA or Economics graduate, but the ground reality is far away from what these laws appear to be. One does not have to actually be on the ground to see them. See the example of farmers from Bihar. The Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC) system is not there in Bihar, which these farm laws are trying to bypass and gradually remove.
A system of free market that these farm laws project to create, is already there in Bihar. I have myself seen my maternal-grandfather selling his maize and paddy way below the just price. Same is the story of every other farmer in Bihar, and many more states. The current system is working like a parasite, sucking blood from the marginalised farmers. They do not get MSP on any farm produce. But these farm laws will not help them.
The current system is working like a parasite, sucking blood from marginalised farmers. They do not get MSP on any farm produce
What the farmers are demanding is very basic. They do not want to be left at the mercy of traders or big corporates. They would never survive in such a condition. All these three specific farm laws are connected, and works against the farmers’ benefits. If the government thinks otherwise, it should make laws pertaining to the apprehensions of the farmers.
Mere assurance would little to thwart away their fears. Attempts are being made to showcase the protest in a bad light, giving it some political and divisive angles. Some are alleging that only the affluent farmers and middlemen are protesting as these laws negatively affect just their interests. Do not make the mistake of agreeing to this narrative.
The only reason the poorest of the farmers are not there on the streets is because they simply can’t afford to. They could not even afford to be away from any possible earning, whatever little it might be, even for a day. This is what the situation at the ground is.
The way forward? ‘Repeal the laws’ is what the farmers are demanding. A deadlock is there and neither parties are budging from their stands. The government has to make inroads in convincing the farmers. If not, maybe it would be right in taking them back. If any such law is to be made, it has to be made by following and going through the due process of law, by engaging in a dialogue with all the stakeholders involved.
Send back these bills to the Parliament Select Committees or the Standing Committees. Have debates. Guarantee them MSP as a law, as they do not want to live in uncertainty as to what happens after a period of five or ten years from now. Engage with them, listen to them and do the right thing. Modify the grey areas. Remove the parts for which the farmers are apprehensive about. After all it is for their betterment, right?
---
*Student, Indian Institute of Management (IIM), Indore

Comments

TRENDING

Was Netaji forced to alter face, die in obscurity in USSR in 1975? Was he so meek?

  By Rajiv Shah   This should sound almost hilarious. Not only did Subhas Chandra Bose not die in a plane crash in Taipei, nor was he the mysterious Gumnami Baba who reportedly passed away on 16 September 1985 in Ayodhya, but we are now told that he actually died in 1975—date unknown—“in oblivion” somewhere in the former Soviet Union. Which city? Moscow? No one seems to know.

Love letters in a lifelong war: Babusha Kohli’s resistance in verse

By Ravi Ranjan*  “War does not determine who is right—only who is left.” Bertrand Russell’s words echo hauntingly in our times, and few contemporary Hindi poets embody this truth as profoundly as Babusha Kohli. Emerging from Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, Kohli has carved a unique space in literature by weaving together tenderness, protest, and philosophy across poetry, prose, and cinema. Her work is not merely artistic expression—it is resistance, refuge, and a call for peace.

Asbestos contamination in children’s products highlights global oversight gaps

By A Representative   A commentary published by the International Ban Asbestos Secretariat (IBAS) has drawn attention to the challenges governments face in responding effectively to global public-health risks. In an article written by Laurie Kazan-Allen and published on March 5, 2026, the author examines how the discovery of asbestos contamination in children’s play products has raised questions about regulatory oversight and international product safety. The article opens by reflecting on lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic, noting that governments in several countries were slow to respond to early warning signs of the crisis. Referring to the experience of the United Kingdom, the author writes that delays in implementing protective measures contributed to “232,112 recorded deaths and over a million people suffering from long Covid.” The commentary uses this example to illustrate what it describes as the dangers of underestimating emerging threats. Attention then turns...

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

India’s green energy push faces talent crunch amidst record growth at 16% CAGR

By Jag Jivan*  A new study by a top consulting firm has found that India’s cleantech sector is entering a decisive growth phase, with strong policy backing, record capacity additions and surging investor interest, but facing mounting pressure on talent supply and rising compensation costs .

The kitchen as prison: A feminist elegy for domestic slavery

By Garima Srivastava* Kumar Ambuj stands as one of the most incisive voices in contemporary Hindi poetry. His work, stripped of ornamentation, speaks directly to the lived realities of India’s marginalized—women, the rural poor, and those crushed under invisible forms of violence. His celebrated poem “Women Who Cook” (Khānā Banātī Striyāṃ) is not merely about food preparation; it is a searing indictment of patriarchal domestic structures that reduce women’s existence to endless, unpaid labour.

The price of silence: Why Modi won’t follow Shastri, appeal for sacrifice

By Arundhati Dhuru, Sandeep Pandey*  ​In 1965, as India grappled with war and a crippling food crisis, Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri faced a United States that used wheat shipments under the PL-480 agreement as a lever to dictate Indian foreign policy. Shastri’s response remains legendary: he appealed to the nation to skip one meal a day. Millions of middle-class households complied, choosing temporary hunger over the sacrifice of national dignity. Today, India faces a modern equivalent in the energy sector, yet the leadership’s response stands in stark contrast to that era of self-reliance.

Beyond sattvik: Purity, caste and the politics of the Indian kitchen

By Rajiv Shah   A few week ago, I was forwarded an article that appeared in the British weekly The Economist . Titled “Caste and cuisine: From honeycomb curry to blood fry: India’s ‘untouchable’ cooking”, it took me back to what I had blogged about what was called a “ sattvik food festival”, an annual event organised by former Indian Institute of Management-Ahmedabad professor Anil Gupta.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".