Skip to main content

15th Finance Commission recommendations are overtly pro-urban, to 'hit' federal spirit

By Tikender Singh Panwar* 

For the next five years, the road map for devolution of funds to the states recommended by the 15th Finance Commission (XV FC) is ready. The commission had many meetings in the last few years, and last year of Covid-19 pandemic turned out to be a natural corollary from which lessons are to be learned.
However, the recommendations tend to belie the states' aspirations and the people from getting a due share. The structure of recommendations is more discretionary with the Union. The funds devolved based on need and equity have fallen from 92.5 percent to 75 percent, 25 percent based on efficiency and performance. This has hit the federal spirit.
For the first time in the running commentary, one finds mention of the states' responsibility to the sovereign-for a national cause:
"…State finances have become a crucial lynchpin of India's fiscal framework. Overall, as stipulated by the FRBM Act, 2003 (as amended in 2018), we believe that the States must partner with the Union Government in pursuit of medium-term consolidation of debt and firmly place India's sovereign debt to GDP ratio on a sustainable footing in the medium term. They must partner with the Union Government in developing new ways to support their residents, the economy as a whole, and India's global engagements. Hence, the debt and fiscal trajectory of the general government envisages this partnership of both the Union and the States to achieve the key features of macroeconomic stabilization by way of sustainable levels of debt and fiscal deficit."
The commission made two quotes in the beginning of the main report which are contradictory to each other. The first one is Mahatma Gandhi's quote where it states that "the future depends on what we do in the present". The focus is on planning and why present is more important. The second one is from the Roman philosopher Marcus Aurelius: "Never let the future disturb you. You will meet it, if you have to, with the same weapons of reason which today are you against the present." Apparently, the XV FC report is also quite contradictory to the quotes.
In the running commentary, the recommendations mention the unusual times and challenges posed by Covid-19; however, it does not ameliorate the concerns effectively.

Recommendations for urban areas

Urban areas accounts for 34 percent of the population and contributes 67 percent to the GDP. Ghastly scenes of the inequity led to reverse migration of the workers from the cities during the lockdown. Thus, it was expected that greater emphasis on FC recommendations would be to affect this aspect directly. However, this aspect remained unnoticed by the commission.
The total outlay for the urban is more than the XIV FC; however, it is a status quo in actual terms. The XIV commission's total outlay was Rs 87,144 crore, and 15 percent of this was not released. Hence, the actual expenditure was Rs 74,529 crore. The total outlay for the urban local bodies (ULBs) for 2021-26 is Rs 1,21,055 crores. However, there is a shortfall from Rs 25,098 in 2020 crore to Rs 22,114 crore in 2021. The grant to ULBs is 11.71 percent of the total grant (10.33 lakh crore) in five years.
The criteria for grants to local bodies are distributed amongst states based on population and area, with 90 percent and 10 percent weightage.
There are two conditions to availing of these grants:
  • The local bodies will have to publish provisional and audited accounts
  • Fixing minimum floor rates for property taxes by states, and improvement in property tax collection
Grants will not be released to local bodies after March 2024 if the state does not constitute and State Finance Commission and act upon its recommendations.
The XV FC has categorically stated:
"We recommend the provision of a one-year window for notifying the floor rates of property tax; this will trigger in two stages from 2022-23. In the first stage, States are expected to notify the floor rates and operationalize the arrangements in 2021-22. The condition of notifying the floor rates of property tax will apply for eligibility of grants from 2022-23. Once the floor is notified, the condition of growth in property tax collection being at least as much as the simple average growth rate of the State's own GSDP in the most recent five years will be measured and taken into account from 2023-24 onwards."
Another fund called the challenge fund is opened up for million-plus cities. This will be linked to these cities' performance in improving air quality and meeting service level benchmarks urban drinking water supply, sanitation, and solid waste management. The total fund under this head is Rs 26,057 crores for five years.
The XV FC missed the core element in the devolution of funds. Addressing the issue of equity and transforming the large informal sector to almost 93 percent in the cities is an important challenge.

Meagre allocation to ULBs

The devolution of a mere 11 percent is meager to meet any of the challenges faced by cities. According to a high-powered committee set up by the Ministry of Urban Development in 2011, urban infrastructure investment requirements are estimated to be Rs 50,000 crore in 2013 (0.75 percent of GDP), and Rs 4 lakh crore by 2032 (1.5 percent of GDP).
Currently, the total outlay from the XV FC and the union budget is not even 0.19 percent. Urban grants mergerly stand at 0.07 percent. Urban local bodies' total expenditure is continuously shrinking from 1.74 percent of GDP in 1990 to near one percent in 2011.
The memorandum of the ministry of housing and urban affairs submitted to the XV FC sums the municipalities' requirements: "A substantial increase in grants is needed for bridging the resource gap of municipalities, which is anticipated at Rs. 12.27 lakh crore over the period 2021-22 to 2025-26. Devolution to municipalities may be increased by at least four times (Rs. 3,48,575 crore), as compared to the FC-XIV award."

Paranoid collection of property tax

Secondly, the paranoia over the collection of property tax and linking it to availing the grant must be given up. No doubt that the property tax is one of the important sources of resource mobilization in the municipalities but to over centralize it would be erroneous. 
The provision for asking the state governments to decide the property tax floor area rate is entirely flawed. Every town and city has a different capacity, and even intra-city differences in property appreciation exist. This task must be left out to the municipalities and not to the state governments.
The previous year has been a year of disaster for the people and many businesses. A complete waive off of property taxes, especially from the hospitality industry, and in lieu of that, a grant could have been a better option.

Delusion of cities as engines of growth

The notion of cities being the engines of growth continue to plague the XV FC. Since the UN-Habitat III there has been a concerted effort to focus on sustainability goals and not treat cities as market entrepreneurs. Unsustainable cities have been complemented with humongous inequity. The measures should reduce such inequality.
Unfortunately, the recommendations continue with the same jargon and intent. It is evident with the language of the report emphasizing on creating PPP model contracts, modernizing municipal budgeting, evolving national municipal borrowing framework including provisions equivalent to the Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management (FRBM) Act for urban local bodies. 
These recommendations originates from the conventional mindset of cities being converted into attractive investment zones. These insinuations are berserk. Not realising the fact that nearly 90 percent of the urban local bodies are unable to even meet their salary expenditure.
Further, XV FC does not address the widening inequality in cities. It was expected to create a separate fund for the urban employment guarantee or likewise to address acute unemployment existing in the cities; akin to what it has recommended on pollution and air quality.

Health intervention: A welcome move

The commission’s recommendations on the health sector with granting an outlay of Rs 70,051 crore is a welcome move. Taking a cue from the Kerala experience which is affirmatively quoted in the report the commission has admired the people's plan of the Kerala government started in 1996 where 35-40 percent of the state government's developmental budget was marked to local governments.
Universal comprehensive health care is planned to be provided through urban health and wellness centres and polyclinics. Linking it with the urban local bodies is a welcome move. The state governments must provide space and capacity for this idea to bloom and as the pandemic has proven the public health institutions stand as a saviour. How will this be effectively implemented in absence of both will and resources will have to be watched keenly in the coming years?
---
*Former deputy mayor of Shimla

Comments

TRENDING

What's behind public sector banks showing huge profits in 2nd quarter of 2022-23?

By Thomas Franco*  The quarter two results of the public sector banks (PSBs) appear to be noteworthy compared to a few years ago. All these banks showed good profits in the financial year 2021-22. Twelve PSBs made a net profit of Rs 25,685 crore in quarter 2 of FY23 and a total of Rs 40,991 crore in the first half of 2023. The combined profit of 12 banks in March 2022 was Rs 66,539 crore which was 110% more than 2021 – Rs. 31,816 crore. The Asset Quality Review of 2015 saw a surge in NPAs of PSBs jumping to Rs 8.96 lakh crore in March 2018 from Rs 2.17 lakh crore in March 2014. This was simply because the norms for NPAs were changed from 180 days to 90 days, and all restructuring of even genuine accounts was done away with. In 2018 NPA of SBI was 5.73% which has come down to 0.8% in Q2 of FY23. The NPA of Canara Bank has come down to 2.19% from 7.48% in Mar 2018. The same trend is seen in all public banks. Now SBI has seen a jump of 74% in its net profit, while Canara Bank’s profit is

Economist-editor's allegations on Narmada defamatory, baseless: Medha Patkar

Counterview Desk  In a reply directly addressed to well-known economist, journalist and columnist Swaminathan S Anklesaria Aiyar’s two articles in the Times of India (republished here and here ), calling them defamatory and wondering whether they were borne out of “ignorance or a conspiracy through political alliance”, Narmada Bachao Andolan leader Medha Pakar has said that the Narmada Sardar Saravar Project and the people's movement by adivasis, farmers, labourers, fish workers, potters and all the generations’ old communities from the river valley have suddenly come to be focused on, since the Gujarat elections are in the doorstep. She believes that while the “defamatory accusations with baseless conceptions such as ‘urban naxals’ are to be laughed at as the electoral strategic moves, one gets shocked to read the articles by a known old columnist like Swaminathan Ankalesaria Aiyar, published in a reputed daily like the Times of India." According to her, Aiyar’s two articl

Business back to normal? IIM-A survey says, sales expectations have sharply improved

By Our Representative  The Indian Institute of Management’s Business Inflation Expectations Survey (BIES), which polls a panel of business leaders to find out their perception of slack in economy, including their inflation expectations, year-ahead cost expectations and the factors influencing price changes, such as profit and sales levels, etc., has said that the cost perceptions data indicates signs of moderation in price pressures. Carried out for September, the survey says, the cost pressure of the reporting firms has shifted from “very significant increase (over 6%) to moderate increase (3.1% to 6%).” It adds, “The percentage of firms perceiving over 10% cost increase y-o-y has declined. Over 21% of the firms in September 2022 round of the survey perceive that costs have increased very significantly (over 10%) – down from 26% recorded in August 2022.” Claiming to be a unique survey, in that it goes straight to businesses -- the price setters -- rather than to consumers or household

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Hindutva groups threat to peace, freedom: US diaspora groups tell FBI, other govt depts

By Our Representative  The Islamophobic and neo-Nazi ideology of Hindutva is a clear and present danger to peace and freedoms in the United States, a coalition of civil rights organizations told key officials of the U.S. Attorney General’s Office, the US Department of Justice (DOJ), and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) at a recent event in Edison, New Jersey. At the event titled United Against Hate, activists from American Muslims for Democracy (AMD), Hindus for Human Rights (HfHR) and Indian American Muslim Council (IAMC) made detailed presentations on this ideology of Hindu supremacism that is committing mass persecution of India’s Muslims and Christians and is rearing its ugly head in New Jersey as well as across the US. Attending the event were David S Leonardis, Special Investigator from the New Jersey Department of Law & Public Safety; Michael E Campion, Chief of the Civil Rights Division for the US Attorney General's Office; and Jonathan R Norbut of the U.S. Dep

GoI's productivity linked incentives to corporates 'without independent analysis'

Counterview Desk  Wondering how prudent is the Government of India's (GoI's) Productivity Linked Incentive (PLI) scheme, EAS Sarma, former secretary, GoI, in a representation to Nirmala Sitharaman, Union finance minister, has said it appears to be nothing more than subsidy to the private sector without any responsibility. Giving a specific example against the backdrop of announcement of 50% subsidy covering the project cost of the Vedanta Group's decision to set up a semiconductor fabrication plant in Gujarat, in collaboration with Foxconn, Sarma says, "The total cost of this project is reported to be Rs 1,54,000 crore. 50% of this works out to Rs 77,000 crore." Stating that this creates the impression that the entire subsidy allocation for the semiconductor manufacturing sector would be appropriated by this company, Sarma says, "The Gujarat government did not lag behind in liberally announcing similar incentives for the Vedanta-Foxconn project. It offered 7

As polls approach, electorate 'failing to realise': Gujarat model is in a shambles

By DN Rath*  Gujarat assembly elections, scheduled to be held on 1 and 5 December 2022, is viewed by many as dress rehearsal for the 2024 Lok Sabha elections. When the suffering people have been pointing towards redressal of some local issues like absence of cleanliness, sewage problem, shortage of water supply, troubles created by stray cattle, insufficiency of streetlights, etc., it is evident that they are not fully aware that assembly elections are being fought on ideological standpoints and policy decisions. Nor is there the realisation that the state is in a shambles and the much-trumpeted ‘Gujarat model’ of development has proved to be a hoax. Like other states, the people of Gujarat are also back-broken by steep rise in prices to the tune of 400% in last 20 years. It is not that the government cannot control the spurt in prices if it so wants. Apart from the fact that price rise is an inevitability in a capitalist economy, artificial shortage triggered by massive hoarding, b

BJP poll gimmick? Bilkis Bano rape case 'pardon' vs Rajiv assassins' release

By Sandeep Pandey*  Supreme Court has released six convicts in the Rajiv Gandhi assassination case. This was bound to happen as earlier AG Perarivalan was released in the same case, setting a precedent. Even though four of them are Sri Lankans but a popular Tamil sentiment favoured the release of these convicts which is why Tamil political parties supported this and resolutions were passed by different governments in Tamil Nadu to his effect.  Rajiv Gandhi paid the price of sending Indian Peace Keeping Force to Sri Lanka where it got entangled with Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam and eventually the whole operation ended up is a fiasco.  However, most importantly Sonia and Priyanka Gandhi and probably Rahul too do not have any objections to the release of these convicts. In fact, Sonia Gandhi played an important role in getting the death sentence of the only lady among the convicts Nalini commuted to life term through the Tamil Nadu Governor. Priyanka visited Nalini in Vellore Jail and

Amit Shah accused of inciting communal passion: Demand to postpone Gujarat polls

Counterview Desk  In an email representation to the Election Commission of India (ECI), Dr EAS Sarma, former secretary to the Government of India, has objected to the statement reported to have been made by Union home minister Amit Shah, who allegedly justified the 2002 Gujarat riots stating that certain sections of people “taught a lesson” to the rioters. Noting that the statement, if correct, “in effect implies those other than the law enforcement authorities had taken law into their hands”, Sarma says, “Shah's statement needs to be viewed by the ECI in conjunction with the reported fact that it was the Union Home Ministry that cleared the release of the eleven rape convicts in the Bilkis Bano case, directly related to the infamous Godhra incidents in 2002, which triggered the shameful sequence of events that shook the nation's conscience.” According to Sarma, if the statement is true, “I am constrained to draw the inevitable inference that it would have already impacted th