Skip to main content

Why corporate takeover of agriculture, whose growth rate 'outpaced' industry, services?

By Dr Gian Singh* 

Financial data released by the National Statistical Office on February 26, 2021 have suggested a slight improvement (0.4 per cent) in the economic growth rate. This marks the end of the technical recession that had been going on during the first two quarters in the financial year (FY) 2020-21. 
During the first quarter of fiscal 2020-21 (April-June), the economic growth rate was reported to be (-)23.9 per cent,  now revised to (-)24.4 per cent; during the second quarter (July-September), the economic growth rate was (-)7.5 per cent. In the third quarter, it was 0.4 per cent, which offset the technical recession that emerged in the first two quarters. However, the situation is still remains dire.
Economic growth rate is projected to slow to (-)8 per cent for FY2020-21. During the three quarters of this financial year, the agricultural sector of the economy made a tremendous contribution. It recorded 3, 3.4 and 3.9 per cent growth rate, respectively.
While manufacturing and construction in the industrial sector returned to positive growth during the third quarter, the positive growth in this sector was in the case of large units, while the position of smaller units remained depressing. In the services sector finance, real estate, professional services, electricity, gas, and water supply returned to positive growth, though trade, hotels, transportation, and communications which could provide more employment remained in a state of crisis.
There has been a slight increase in household spending during the festive season, but the Covid-19 pandemic has left households strained in terms of employment and incomes due to ack of government support. At present, the growing number of victims of this pandemic seems to be leading to economic despair and adversely affect economic growth rate.
Economic growth figures are loud enough to make you think seriously. Even at such times, the rulers, without leaving any stone unturned to give false consolations to the common man, deliberately use the services of pro-government and pro-corporate economists to weave a web of statistics in which the common man is confused.
Claims to fill their stomachs were easy to refute. Despite the fact that these economists are well aware of the reality, they have been fabricating data and conducting conclusion oriented studies in the hope of getting some petty meaningless favours for themselves. They are seen openly propagating these conclusion oriented studies beyond their normal capacity.
Sometimes the concepts of economic growth and economic development are used interchangeably by some people, which is not fair. Economic growth rate represents an increase or contraction in GDP, while economic development reflects the living standards of the people. 
The main determinants of economic development are the level of literacy and education of the people, the level and standard of health services including the number of doctors and other paramedical staff per 1,000 persons and the standard of services rendered by them, the availability of housing and their readiness, various aspects of the environment and the average age of the people.
A positive or negative economic growth rate in a country is said to indicate the economic progress of that country. Positive economic growth can be significant, but far more important knows how and for what it is doing. 
If the economic growth rate of a country is higher than the population growth rate of that country, then it can be considered good only if it reduces the economic and other disparities amongst different sections of the people and improves the living standards of the common people. In this regard, it is also important to know that in doing so, the interests of future generations must be taken into account.
The performance of the agricultural, industrial and services sectors of the country's economy during the first three quarters of the financial year (April-June, July-September, and October-December) shows that during this period the economic growth rate of agricultural sector is excellent. The ray of hope of the economy is only agriculture sector.
The pandemic of Covid-19 has made it clear to the world that human beings can survive without cars, bungalows, planes, phones and the like, but the lifeline of humanity is only agriculture. Given this fact and the performance of various sectors of the economy during the first three quarters of the current financial year in the country, it is incumbent upon the rulers of the country to ensure support to the agricultural sector and its hard-working farmers, farm labourers and rural artisans.
Special attention should be paid to protect the interests of the agriculture sector. In fact, in 2020 the country's rulers went in the opposite direction and enacted three agricultural laws. With regard to these laws, the Central Government is claiming and propagating that these laws will double the income of farmers and increase the welfare of consumers.
From the ongoing dialogue in this regard, it is clear that these laws will be against the interests of farmers, farm labourers, rural artisans and consumers and will also pose a threat to the food security of the country. Realizing these facts, the farmers' organizations had urged the Central Government not to enact these laws. 
After the enactment of these laws, the farmers' organizations have been constantly struggling for their repeal. This struggle was started by the farmers 'organizations of Punjab and other farmers' organizations of the country joined the struggle.
After the dialogue on these agricultural laws, other sections of the society joined in this struggle and in the present times it has become a mass struggle struggle. Although at some times there were strained relations between the farmers and the farm labourers on certain issues, the farm labourers have joined the farmer struggle to the best of their ability keeping in view their larger interests.
Corporate agriculture is bound to displace agriculturally dependent farmers, farm labourers, rural artisans, other sections
Given the tremendous contribution made by the agricultural sector to the country's economic growth during the Covid-19 epidemic, it is the duty of the Central government to provide all possible assistance to all sections dependent on the sector for their livelihood.
But the Central government is helping the corporate world to take over the agricultural sector through the three agricultural laws enacted during 2020 and its other policies. With the full implementation of these laws, corporate agriculture will come into being. Corporate agriculture is bound to displace agriculturally dependent farmers, farm labourers, rural artisans and other sections related to the sector.
The serious consideration in this regard is where the workers of these sections will get new employment and social security after this displacement. The potential for new employment in the industrial and services sectors is negligible and will continue to decline in the years to come. The Covid-19 pandemic has exposed the social security claims of workers in both these sectors. Already about 50 per cent of the country's population, which depends on agriculture for their livelihood, is being given only about 16 per cent of the national income.
Research studies conducted in Punjab and other parts of the country have revealed that almost all marginal and small farmers, farm labourers and rural artisans are born into poverty and debt, live their hard life in poverty and debt, leaving behind the mountain of debt and abject poverty, they either die a death of depravation or when all hopes for their lives are dashed, they are on the verge of suicide.
With the exception of the large farmers, the marginal, small, semi-medium and medium farmers and farm labourers are so indebted that they are not even in a position to pay interest on the loans. These sections also have to take loans to keep the stove burning for only two meals a day. The worst of these categories are the farm labourers and the rural artisans as they have no means of production other than selling their labour.
According to the 66th round of the National Sample Survey, 92.8 per cent of the country's workers were in informal employment during 2009-10. The percentage of informally employed workers has increased further during the last 10 years as the axe is being sharpened on the public sector. Informal workers remain uncertain about whether they will be able to find employment for the coming day.
It is very important to know a very sad fact regarding the general consumers that the Niti Aayog has suggested for reduction of food subsidies to reduce the fiscal deficit. If this is done then the already poor condition of ordinary consumers will get worse. Doing so would be neither in the interest of ordinary workers nor of the country.
To accelerate the country's economic growth, the government needs to formulate and implement policies that ensure a minimum level of income for the agriculturally dependent classes and the informally employed workers so that they can earn a living to meet their basic needs in a respectful manner.
To do so, the corporate world-friendly economic development model must be replaced by the people-friendly and nature-friendly economic development model. In such a model, tax rates on the rich will have to be increased and tax collection will have to be ensured. It is important to establish and develop public sector undertakings and regularly monitor and regulate the private sector entities.
---
*Former Professor, Department of Economics, Punjabi University, Patiala. A version of this article has been published in The Citizen

Comments

TRENDING

Delhi Jal Board under fire as CAG finds 55% groundwater unfit for consumption

By A Representative   A Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of India audit report tabled in the Delhi Legislative Assembly on 7 January 2026 has revealed alarming lapses in the quality and safety of drinking water supplied by the Delhi Jal Board (DJB), raising serious public health concerns for residents of the capital. 

Advocacy group decries 'hyper-centralization' as States’ share of health funds plummets

By A Representative   In a major pre-budget mobilization, the Jan Swasthya Abhiyan (JSA), India’s leading public health advocacy network, has issued a sharp critique of the Union government’s health spending and demanded a doubling of the health budget for the upcoming 2026-27 fiscal year. 

Pairing not with law but with perpetrators: Pavlovian response to lynchings in India

By Vikash Narain Rai* Lynch-law owes its name to James Lynch, the legendary Warden of Galway, Ireland, who tried, condemned and executed his own son in 1493 for defrauding and killing strangers. But, today, what kind of a person will justify the lynching for any reason whatsoever? Will perhaps resemble the proverbial ‘wrong man to meet at wrong road at night!’

Stands 'exposed': Cavalier attitude towards rushed construction of Char Dham project

By Bharat Dogra*  The nation heaved a big sigh of relief when the 41 workers trapped in the under-construction Silkyara-Barkot tunnel (Uttarkashi district of Uttarakhand) were finally rescued on November 28 after a 17-day rescue effort. All those involved in the rescue effort deserve a big thanks of the entire country. The government deserves appreciation for providing all-round support.

Iswar Chandra Vidyasagar’s views on religion as Tagore’s saw them

By Harasankar Adhikari   Religion has become a visible subject in India’s public discourse, particularly where it intersects with political debate. Recent events, including a mass Gita chanting programme in Kolkata and other incidents involving public expressions of faith, have drawn attention to how religion features in everyday life. These developments have raised questions about the relationship between modern technological progress and traditional religious practice.

Jayanthi Natarajan "never stood by tribals' rights" in MNC Vedanta's move to mine Niyamigiri Hills in Odisha

By A Representative The Odisha Chapter of the Campaign for Survival and Dignity (CSD), which played a vital role in the struggle for the enactment of historic Forest Rights Act, 2006 has blamed former Union environment minister Jaynaynthi Natarjan for failing to play any vital role to defend the tribals' rights in the forest areas during her tenure under the former UPA government. Countering her recent statement that she rejected environmental clearance to Vendanta, the top UK-based NMC, despite tremendous pressure from her colleagues in Cabinet and huge criticism from industry, and the claim that her decision was “upheld by the Supreme Court”, the CSD said this is simply not true, and actually she "disrespected" FRA.

Zhou Enlai: The enigmatic premier who stabilized chaos—at what cost?

By Harsh Thakor*  Zhou Enlai (1898–1976) served as the first Premier of the People's Republic of China (PRC) from 1949 until his death and as Foreign Minister from 1949 to 1958. He played a central role in the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) for over five decades, contributing to its organization, military efforts, diplomacy, and governance. His tenure spanned key events including the Long March, World War II alliances, the founding of the PRC, the Korean War, and the Cultural Revolution. 

Uttarakhand tunnel disaster: 'Question mark' on rescue plan, appraisal, construction

By Bhim Singh Rawat*  As many as 40 workers were trapped inside Barkot-Silkyara tunnel in Uttarkashi after a portion of the 4.5 km long, supposedly completed portion of the tunnel, collapsed early morning on Sunday, Nov 12, 2023. The incident has once again raised several questions over negligence in planning, appraisal and construction, absence of emergency rescue plan, violations of labour laws and environmental norms resulting in this avoidable accident.

'Threat to farmers’ rights': New seeds Bill sparks fears of rising corporate control

By Bharat Dogra  As debate intensifies over a new seeds bill, groups working on farmers’ seed rights, seed sovereignty and rural self-reliance have raised serious concerns about the proposed legislation. To understand these anxieties, it is important to recognise a global trend: growing control of the seed sector by a handful of multinational companies. This trend risks extending corporate dominance across food and farming systems, jeopardising the livelihoods and rights of small farmers and raising serious ecological and health concerns. The pending bill must be assessed within this broader context.