Skip to main content

Why Govt of India fears release of Dr Saibaba, a person with 90% disabilities? asks wife

By A Representative 

The wife of Dr GN Saibaba, jailed wheelchair bound former professor of Delhi University with 90% disability and several severe comorbidities, has complained that, despite her husband was tested Covid-19 positive on February 12, he was not taken to hospital, wondering, “Why is a person suffering from post-polio paralysis, a person who cannot walk, a person whose heart and mind work but every other part of his body is affected, not being given bail? Why is the state afraid of giving him bail?”
Addressing media conference in Delhi organised by the Committee for the Defence and Release of Dr GN Saibaba, who is lodged at the anda cell (solitary confinement) of Nagpur Central Prison on being arrested on May 9, 2014 on charges of having Naxalite-Maoist links, Vasantha said, 13 out of 25 people in his barrack tested positive. Despite this, not just he but none of the inmates were taken to the hospital. They were provided basic antibiotics and told to fend for themselves.
She further said, Dr Saibaba was not allowed to meet his dying mother or even perform the last rites after her death. When so many others were being given parole, bail or even being acquitted after being released from jail, why is Dr Saibaba still being held in custody?, she asked, pointing towards the terror she felt when she heard of Kanchan Nannaware, a prisoner with a severe ailment in the heart who was operated on and died during surgery, a surgery performed without informing her husband or family.
General secretary of the National Platform for the Rights of the Disabled (NPRD) Muralidharan told media, “The experience of Dr Saibaba amounts to nothing but torture, cruelty and indignity.” As someone speaking for the rights of persons with disabilities, he said, “We are demanding that they implement the laws enshrined in the Constitution”, adding, denial of assistive devices like wheelchairs for persons who cannot walk amounts to torture. “In light of the torture faced by him, Dr Saibaba must be released”, he added.
Former president of the Delhi University Teachers’ Association (DUTA) Nandita Narain, “Today, justice looks at the face of the person standing before it and gives justice accordingly. If you are a Saibaba, Sudha Bharadwaj or others, false cases are foisted on you, something proved beyond doubt by the Arsenal Report.” She added, “We are here to demand his release on bail and proper medical treatment instead of the anda cell.”
Speaking of the use of electronic evidence to accuse, charge and convict dissenting voices, well-known Supreme Court advocate Prashant Bhushan said, the manner in which emails are planted in computers, as revealed by the Arsenal Consulting Report, suggests the need to take up Justice DY Chandrachud’s dissent in the Supreme Court in the petition filed by Romila Thapar and others in light of the Bhima Koregaon arrests where emails which were allegedly recovered from the computers of people using a language unknown to its purported author.
Today, anyone who questions the government is targeted. They are not afraid of Dr Saibaba's body but his brain
He said, “They are now going after everyone who is seen as against the government. They have even gone after journalists who have written stories against the government. The method of doing this is by making any kind of charge. As seen in the Delhi Riots case, they have gone after people against whom they have no evidence, people like Devangana Kalita, Safoora Zargar, Umar Khalid besides many others, all of whom are targeted under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA).”
Bhushan felt that this law is utilised due to the provision where at the first instance, without any investigation into the facts of the case, the judge is expected to establish if there is a prima facie case against the accused. He stated, “Unless the police are held accountable for foisting false cases, they will go on doing this.” Likewise, he added, the continued incarceration of Dr Saibaba amounts to torture and he called on the courts, the establishment and the others to ensure that he is released immediately.
Drawing connections between the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act, Sedition Act, the role of the BJP-RSS and the incarceration of Dr Saibaba, former CPI Member of Parliament in the Rajya Sabha D Raja said, “Today, anyone who questions the government is targeted. We are facing a grave threat to the ethos that we have been proud of. Today, we are witnessing fascist rule.” He wondered why is the government afraid of Dr Saibaba, pointing out, “They are not afraid of his body but his brain.”
A member of the defence committee for Dr Saibaba, filmmaker Sanjay Kak said, the threat to Dr Saibaba’s life “is also a threat to us and what lies ahead for all of us”. Prof Parminder Singh added, Dr Saibaba stood in defence the basic rights of the people of this country to their livelihood, resources and culture, one reason why the demand for his release becomes absolutely urgent and legitimate, as his incarceration is part of the onslaught against all those who speak against the attack on the resources of this country.
Well-known writer Arundhati Roy, pointing out how how the incarceration of Dr Saibaba, a person in judicial custody, amounts to torture every single day that he spends behind bars, said, “Every single day something irreversible is happening to him. This is every day, slowly taking something away from him. While there is a sliding scale of access on the basis of ability, caste, class etc., for a person like Dr. Saibaba who is paralysed waist down, for him even in judicial custody he is tortured every day and everything that happens to him is irreversible.”
She said, “What we are witnessing now is not politics, it is pathology”, pointing out, “We have to remember that some of the best lawyers in this country, including Dr. Saibaba’s lawyer, Adv Surendra Gadling, is in jail. “Anyone who stands up for anyone is in jail”, she said, adding, ,“Today, it is dangerous to be in the defence committee. Whoever speaks for Dr Saibaba is likely to be picked up, be it Rona Wilson, Hany Babu and others.”

Comments

TRENDING

From plagiarism to proxy exams: Galgotias and systemic failure in education

By Sandeep Pandey*   Shock is being expressed at Galgotias University being found presenting a Chinese-made robotic dog and a South Korean-made soccer-playing drone as its own creations at the recently held India AI Impact Summit 2026, a global event in New Delhi. Earlier, a UGC-listed journal had published a paper from the university titled “Corona Virus Killed by Sound Vibrations Produced by Thali or Ghanti: A Potential Hypothesis,” which became the subject of widespread ridicule. Following the robotic dog controversy coming to light, the university has withdrawn the paper. These incidents are symptoms of deeper problems afflicting the Indian education system in general. Galgotias merely bit off more than it could chew.

Covishield controversy: How India ignored a warning voice during the pandemic

Dr Amitav Banerjee, MD *  It is a matter of pride for us that a person of Indian origin, presently Director of National Institute of Health, USA, is poised to take over one of the most powerful roles in public health. Professor Jay Bhattacharya, an Indian origin physician and a health economist, from Stanford University, USA, will be assuming the appointment of acting head of the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), USA. Bhattacharya would be leading two apex institutions in the field of public health which not only shape American health policies but act as bellwether globally.

The 'glass cliff' at Galgotias: How a university’s AI crisis became a gendered blame game

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan*  “She was not aware of the technical origins of the product and in her enthusiasm of being on camera, gave factually incorrect information.” These were the words used in the official press release by Galgotias University following the controversy at the AI Impact Summit in Delhi. The statement came across as defensive, petty, and deeply insensitive.

Farewell to Saleem Samad: A life devoted to fearless journalism

By Nava Thakuria*  Heartbreaking news arrived from Dhaka as the vibrant city lost one of its most active and committed citizens with the passing of journalist, author and progressive Bangladeshi national Saleem Samad. A gentleman who always had issues to discuss with anyone, anywhere and at any time, he passed away on 22 February 2026 while undergoing cancer treatment at Dhaka Medical College Hospital. He was 74. 

Growth without justice: The politics of wealth and the economics of hunger

By Vikas Meshram*  In modern history, few periods have displayed such a grotesque and contradictory picture of wealth as the present. On one side, a handful of individuals accumulate in a single year more wealth than the annual income of entire nations. On the other, nearly every fourth person in the world goes to bed hungry or half-fed.

From ancient wisdom to modern nationhood: The Indian story

By Syed Osman Sher  South of the Himalayas lies a triangular stretch of land, spreading about 2,000 miles in each direction—a world of rare magic. It has fired the imagination of wanderers, settlers, raiders, traders, conquerors, and colonizers. They entered this country bringing with them new ethnicities, cultures, customs, religions, and languages.

Thali, COVID and academic credibility: All about the 2020 'pseudoscientific' Galgotias paper

By Jag Jivan*    The first page image of the paper "Corona Virus Killed by Sound Vibrations Produced by Thali or Ghanti: A Potential Hypothesis" published in the Journal of Molecular Pharmaceuticals and Regulatory Affairs , Vol. 2, Issue 2 (2020), has gone viral on social media in the wake of the controversy surrounding a Chinese robot presented by the Galgotias University as its original product at the just-concluded AI summit in Delhi . The resurfacing of the 2020 publication, authored by  Dharmendra Kumar , Galgotias University, has reignited debate over academic standards and scientific credibility.

'Serious violation of international law': US pressure on Mexico to stop oil shipments to Cuba

By Vijay Prashad   In January 2026, US President Donald Trump declared Cuba to be an “unusual and extraordinary threat” to US security—a designation that allows the United States government to use sweeping economic restrictions traditionally reserved for national security adversaries. The US blockade against Cuba began in the 1960s, right after the Cuban Revolution of 1959 but has tightened over the years. Without any mandate from the United Nations Security Council—which permits sanctions under strict conditions—the United States has operated an illegal, unilateral blockade that tries to force countries from around the world to stop doing basic commerce with Cuba. The new restrictions focus on oil. The United States government has threatened tariffs and sanctions on any country that sells or transports oil to Cuba.

Conversion laws and national identity: A Jesuit response response to the Hindutva narrative

By Rajiv Shah  A recent book, " Luminous Footprints: The Christian Impact on India ", authored by two Jesuit scholars, Dr. Lancy Lobo and Dr. Denzil Fernandes , seeks to counter the current dominant narrative on Indian Christians , which equates evangelisation with conversion, and education, health and the social services provided by Christians as meant to lure -- even force -- vulnerable sections into Christianity.