Skip to main content

Was it freedom of expression when Arnab Goswami called activists anti-national?

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*

India’s prime time 'hyper entertainer', Arnab Goswami, was arrested by the Maharashtra police for charges of 'abetment of suicide' of an architect and his mother, who has worked for the so-called 'number one' channel, but did not get paid. Distressed, it has been alleged, the mother-and-son duo committed suicide in 2018.
The police at that time 'investigated' the matter and found no foul play and closed the case. The distraught family was running from pillar to post, yet the then chief minister Devendra Fednavis and his administration protected Arnab, the person accused of abetment, of all the allegations.
In fact, Fadnavis should face an independent commission for upturning the entire Bhima Koregaon violence case into a conspiracy theory and then putting so many intellectuals in jail. A chargesheet has just been filed after nearly one-and-a-half years against Anand Teltumbde, Varavara Rao, Gautam Navlakha, Stan Swamy, Sudha Bhardwaj and others who are not the persons who would ever spread hatred.
One may disagree with the political views of these intellectuals, with but nothing can be found in their writings which could be termed as anti-national or inciting hatred. Most of the time they have been speaking of the Constitution and the rule of law, and yet they face the tyranny of the state.
No doubt, none can or should justify police action to intimidate journalists. But as for Arnab, I am sure, police appears to have done its homework pretty well. It went to his home to arrest him in the morning. Perhaps that was not a great time as far as Arnab was concerned, as he wanted to make everything a public spectacle, as his channel had done it with Rhea Chakraborty, sought to be accused of abetting actor Sushant Singh Rajput’s suicide, when she was arrested.
The police requested Arnab to cooperate while he was accusing them of 'beating' him up. Perhaps, even in his arrest, Arnab was thinking of TRP for his channel and wanted his wife and son to broadcast live the 'entire' event with him as an 'anchor' on the live show. A clip spread around by his Republic TV showed the reporter virtually crying that his boss was being taken away in a police van.
Most of the time activists have been speaking of the Constitution and the rule of law, yet they face the tyranny of the state and Arnab's channel
The news of Arnab’s arrest spread like wildfire on social media. ‘Bhakts' and patrons of the ruling party, as also senior ministers of the Modi government, spoke for him in order to pressure and embarrass the Maharashtra government -- though it wasn’t the best of the time, as most in the media, especially TV channels, were busy with 'experts' on US elections.
An interesting part of Arnab's 'power' was prompt statements made by his 'rivals' as well as various associations. The Editors Guild condemned the Maharashtra government's act and many channels suggested that they differed with Arnab's style but condemned the 'assault on the freedom of expression'.
The argument about freedom of expression was soon questioned. Critics called it hollow, as in Arnab’s definition of the term, anyone who disagreed with him could be subjected to his bullying tactics and was anti-national, corrupt and a Naxal, and those who agreed with him won accolades, as they fitted in his narrative of legitimizing the Sangh Parivar.
Indeed, Arnab's show is not really news. It is actually hate campaign. One may argue that he has, after all, the right to speak. Freedom of expression is fine, but under the guise of freedom one cannot run fake news propaganda of the ruling party to discredit opponents, including activists. Indeed, Arnab's show is not meant for free and frank discussion on different issues, but to create an atmosphere of hate towards those who disagree with the ruling party.
Those who speak for Arnab should see how how anti-Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) protesters have been treated and charged with sedition, how a reporter faced FIR for reporting on hunger, how a journalist was arrested under various charges for a tweet against a BJP chief minister, how a Kerala journalist was arrested under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA) just because he was going to report on Hathras.
Indeed, Arnab is not Ramnath Goenka who fought against Indira Gandhi’s authoritarian ways. Arnab's hate campaign is not 'freedom'. If he had stood for freedom, he should have used his medium to decry all forms of fascism, suppression and religious hatred. Just promoting one kind of narrative and creating false narrative about others, insulting people on the show and carrying out sinister and planned propaganda, is not journalism.
It is time Arnab listened to his own arguments on Sushant Singh Rajput's case to keep Rhea Chakbarborty in jail. He considered word of the 'investigating agencies' as gospel truth. With with his arrest, will Arnab have a change of heart that all that the investigators say is not the final truth and people have the right to get legal aid, and let the process of law take its own course?
---
*Human rights defender

Comments

TRENDING

What's Bill Gates up to? Have 'irregularities' found in funding HPV vaccine trials faded?

By Colin Gonsalves*  After having read the 72nd report of the Department Related Parliamentary Standing Committee on alleged irregularities in the conduct of studies using HPV vaccines by PATH in India, it was startling to see Bill Gates bobbing his head up and down and smiling ingratiatingly on prime time television while the Prime Minister lectured him in Hindi on his plans for the country. 

Muted profit margins, moderate increase in costs and sales: IIM-A survey of 1000 cos

By Our Representative  The Indian Institute of Management-Ahmedabad’s (IIM-A's) latest Business Inflation Expectations Survey (BIES) has said that the cost perceptions data obtained from India’s business executives suggests that there is “mild increase in cost pressures”.

Magnetic, stunning, Protima Bedi 'exposed' malice of sexual repression in society

By Harsh Thakor*  Protima Bedi was born to a baniya businessman and a Bengali mother as Protima Gupta in Delhi in 1949. Her father was a small-time trader, who was thrown out of his family for marrying a dark Bengali women. The theme of her early life was to rebel against traditional bondage. It was extraordinary how Protima underwent a metamorphosis from a conventional convent-educated girl into a freak. On October 12th was her 75th birthday; earlier this year, on August 18th it was her 25th death anniversary.

Alleged killing of another Bangladesh youth inside Indian territory: NHRC inquiry sought

By Kirity Roy* There was yet another incident of the killing of a Bangladeshi youth by the Border Security Force personnel attached with ‘Barthar’ BOP of ‘G’ Company of 75 BSF Battalion. In last five years several incidents of killings happened under this police station’s jurisdiction and the cases will get the award as “Not Guilty” as usual.

Govt putting India's professionals, skilled, unskilled labour 'at mercy of' big business

By Thomas Franco, Dinesh Abrol*  As it is impossible to refute the report of the International Labour Organisation, Chief Economic Advisor Anantha Nageswaran recently said that the government cannot solve all social, economic problems like unemployment and social security. He blamed the youth for not acquiring enough skills to get employment. Then can’t the people ask, ‘Why do we have a government? Is it not the government’s responsibility to provide adequate employment to its citizens?’

IMA vs Ramdev: Why what's good or bad for goose should be good or bad for gander

By Dr Amitav Banerjee, MD* Baba Ramdev and his associate Balkrishna faced the wrath of the Supreme Court for their propaganda about their Ayurvedic products and belittling mainstream medicine. Baba Ramdev had to apologize in court. His apology was not accepted and he may face the contempt of court with harsher punishment. The Supreme Court acted on a public interest litigation (PIL) moved by the Indian Medical Association (IMA).

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Modi model, Hindutva icon 'justified' alliance with Muslim League before Independence

By Shamsul Islam*  Our PM describes himself as ‘Hindu’ nationalist and member of RSS. He proudly shares the fact that he was groomed to be a political leader by one of the two fathers of the Hindutva politics, MS Golwalkar (the other being VD Savarkar) and given the task of establishing Hindutva polity in India after eradicating secularism.

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.

Youth as game changers in Lok Sabha polls? Young voter registration 'is so very low'

By Dr Mansee Bal Bhargava*  Young voters will be the game changers in 2024. Do they realise this? Does it matter to them? If it does, what they should/must vote for? India’s population of nearly 1.3 billion has about one-fifth 19.1% as youth. With 66% of its population (808 million) below the age of 35, India has the world's largest youth population. Among them, less than 40% of those who turned 18 or 19 have registered themselves for 2024 election. According to the Election Commission of India (ECI), just above 1.8 crore new voters (18-and 19-year-olds) are on the electoral rolls/registration out of the total projected 4.9 crore new voters in this age group.