Skip to main content

Abuse of power? Supreme Court seems to be 'interfering' in all sorts of matters

Kamal Nath 
By NS Venkataraman*
It seemed surprising, even shocking, when recently the Supreme Court thought it fit to stay the October 30 order of the Election Commission, revoking the “star campaigner” status of former Madhya Pradesh chief minister Kamal Nath. Are the Supreme Court judges suffer from a superiority complex vis a vis that of the Election Commissioners?
The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court appears to have failed to keep in mind that the Election Commission is a constitutional body, as much as the judiciary is. Both these constitutional bodies have a definite role to play and have been vested with authority to ensure orderliness and fair play in their domain.
The Chief Justice of India, heading a three judge bench, said the Election Commission had no power to determine who should be the “star campaigner” of a political party. The Chief Justice further asked the Election Commission “who gives you the power to determine who is the leader of the party. We are staying this order. You have no power.”
In recent times, the judiciary has been repeatedly accused of overreaching its powers and interfering in matters that have nothing to do with the interpretation of law and are entirely within the administrative power and responsibilities of the government. The Supreme Court has even interfered in matters relating to conducting NEET examinations and several other purely administrative decisions.
Who has given the powers to the Supreme Court to interfere in such administrative decisions? Judges seem to think that they have the inherent powers to interfere in all sorts of matters and sometimes, even take cases on their own when nobody has filed a complaint.
If the judiciary, which is a constitutional body , thinks that it has inherent and sky high powers, then it should respect the inherent powers of the Election Commission too, which is also a constitutional body.
In the last several years, the judiciary has repeatedly overruled the decisions of the Election Commission on various matters and reduced the status of the Election Commission to that of a litigant. Is it not a case of abuse of power by the judiciary?
In the process, the judiciary has systematically reduced the powers and status of the Election Commission and have virtually made it a laughing stock, eroding the independence of the Election Commission.
What is particularly unfortunate is that the Election Commissioners have not cared to challenge the judiciary for over ruling their decisions and they seem to have failed to realize the fact that Election Commission is an independent constitutional body. Now, the situation is so bad that Election Commissioners seem to fear the judges and hesitate to take decisions thinking that the judges may overrule them.
Why are Election Commissioners so submissive and lack confidence to assert their authority given to them by the Constitution?
Why are Election Commissioners so submissive and lack confidence to assert their authority given to them by the Constitution? As far as the election matters are concerned, the Election Commission should be the ultimate authority and their decisions have to be accepted in toto. If this would not be so, then there is no meaning in viewing the Election Commission as a constitutional body.
Probably one and perhaps the only reason why Election Commissioners do not protect the image and authority of the Election Commission is that most of the Election Commissioners are former bureaucrats, who are used to accept commands rather than deliver commands in their entire career.
Perhaps, if judges were to be appointed as Election Commissioners, then the judges in the courts would be hesitant to overrule the decisions of the Election Commission, since judges as Election Commissioners would protest and even defy the directives of the judiciary. Judges as election commissioners would quote the constitutional provisions and the judges in the courts would have to listen when confronted.
In ensuring peaceful, orderly and honest elections in India, Election Commission has the most important role to play. It would be a dangerous trend to belittle the Election Commission by the judiciary, as a weakened Election Commission would be the death knell for conducting fair elections and these elections are the essential aspect of healthy democracy.
---
*Trustee, Nandini Voice for The Deprived, Chennai

Comments

TRENDING

AMR: A gathering storm that threatens a century of progress in medicine

By Bobby Ramakant*  A strategic roundtable on “Charting a new path forward for global action against Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR)” was organised at the 77th World Health Assembly or WHA (WHA is the apex decision-making body of the World Health Organization – WHO, which is attended by all countries that are part of the WHO – a United Nations health agency). AMR is among the top-10 global health threats “Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) is a growing and urgent crisis which is already a leading cause of untimely deaths globally. More than 2 people die of AMR every single minute,” said Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Director General of the WHO. “AMR threatens to unwind centuries of progress in human health, animal health, and other sectors.”

New Odia CM's tribal heritage 'sets him apart' from Hindutva Brahminical norms

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak*  Mohan Charan Majhi took the oath as the new Chief Minister of Odisha following the electoral defeat of the BJD led by Naveen Patnaik, who served as Chief Minister for twenty-four years. The new Chief Minister is the son of a security guard and a four-time MLA who hails from the remote village of Raikala in the Keonjhar district. He belongs to the Santali tribe and comes from a working-class family. Such achievements and political mobilities are possible only in a democratic society. Majhi’s leadership even in the form of symbolic representation in a democracy deserves celebration.

What stops Kavach? Why no time to focus on common trains meant for common people?

By Atanu Roy  A goods train rammed into Kanchenjunga Express on 17th June morning in North Bengal. This could have been averted if the time tested anti-collision system (Kavach) was in place. 

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Saving farmers and consumers from GM crops and food: Philippines court shows the way

By Bharat Dogra*  At a time when there is increasing concern that powerful GM crop lobbyists backed by enormous resources of giant multinational companies may be able to bulldoze food safety and environmental concerns while pushing GM crops, a new hope has appeared in the form of a court decision from the Philippines. 

Top Punjab Maoist who failed to analyse caste question, promoted economism

By Harsh Thakor*  On June 15th we commemorated the 15th death anniversary of Harbhajan Singh Sohi or HBS, a well known Communist leader in Punjab. He expired of a heart attack in Bathinda in 2009.