Skip to main content

Supreme Court, a favourite whipping horse for restless people, can't be assessed in isolation

By Salman Khurshid*

Of late the Supreme Court had become a favourite whipping horse for restless people. Those who are by nature and training careful use respectable syntax and vocabulary but others resort to expressions that cannot but damage the standing of the Court. The serious concerns being expressed suggest a deep disappointment with the outcomes of proceedings in the recent times of challenge.
It is often suggested that the Court is sentinel on the qui vive and understandably expectations run high particularly when other institutions appear to be failing. Justified as the expectations might be one must understand that the Court cannot be assessed in isolation. To begin with although described as a Court in reality it is several Courts comprising two or three judges.
Like all other human beings they are not identical and have differing perceptions. The history of the Court is replete with instances and periods when the character of the Court had swung from activist to conservative, resistant to pliable. Those of us familiar with Court can tell one period apart from another, one judge from another.
A passage from the dissent of Justice HR Khanna in Keshavanand Bharti is very instructive:
“Assuming that under the sway of some overwhelming im- pulse, a climate is created wherein cherished values like liberty and freedom lose their significance in the eyes of the people and their representatives and they choose to do away with all fundamentals rights by amendment of the Constitution, a restricted interpretation of Article 368 would not be of much avail.
“The people in such an event would forfeit the claim to have fundamentals rights and in any case fundamental rights would not in such an event save the people from political enslavement, social stagnation or mental servitude.
“I may in this context refer to the words of Learned Hand in his eloquent address on the Spirit of Liberty: ‘I often wonder whether we do not rest our hopes too much upon Constitutions, upon laws and upon courts. These are false hopes; believe me these are false hopes...Liberty lies in the hearts of men and women; when it dies there, no Constitution, no law, no court can save it; no Constitution, no law, no court can even do much to help it’.”

Is that a sort of mea culpa of the courageous judge who is remembered for his dissent for liberty and freedom in the habeas corpus case? Or is it an insightful admission that the ultimate preservation of democracy and rights rests upon the shoulders of the citizen and the constitutional Courts can only assist the citizen’s quest for dignity, not take on the entire burden?
Judges erred in holding Habeas Corpus to be suspended during the Emergency, only to graciously admit later to have made a mistake
My friends who speak an uncompromising language of rights have my unqualified admiration that will only grow immeasurably if they are adversely affected by their candour. However, the trouble is that we live in an imperfect world and the imperfections of democracy are only a part of it. 
Heroism might work in revolutions but our contemporary everyday existence is far from a revolution, no matter how we might describe it with a tinge of romance. Discarding the black and white binary of choice we must learn to deal with shades of grey. And in the process not to be unreasonable in our expectations of the institutions we cherish.
Salman Khurshid
There is of course an appeal that one can and must make to the judges we respect. We put our faith in them and trust them in matters of life and death, next to God alone. We are at times disappointed in their decisions and even unable to understand. But there is comfort in knowing that in the end justice will not elude us.
We know that there are times that we cause distress and show disquiet but only to finally bow to the their wisdom. Our allegiance and respect is neither contrived, nor hypocritical, if with a touch of theatre. Without the judges where would be? But equally without us what would there be for them?
Thus in these trying and perilous times we need that sacred relationship to endure. Our society is under unimagined stress with legitimate and illegitimate contests and claims for garnering resources. The judges by definition must preside over that and but for them we will be hopelessly lost. It is for that reason, if not nobler thoughts, that we pray for the well being and preservation of the judges.
But, with respect, a caveat to remember that it was great judges who erred in holding Habeas Corpus to be suspended during the Emergency, only to graciously admit later to have made a mistake. They went on to write great judgments in the years beyond. For a system that lays great importance on precedent is it too much to ask to embrace greatness without hesitation or interruption. When the pot calls the kettle black and morality is contested, who but you must preserve sanity and humanity. Generations to come will be eternally in debt, my lords.
---
*Congress leader, senior Supreme Court advocate, former Union external affairs minister. Source: Author’s Facebook timeline

Comments

TRENDING

IMA vs Ramdev: Why what's good or bad for goose should be good or bad for gander

By Dr Amitav Banerjee, MD* Baba Ramdev and his associate Balkrishna faced the wrath of the Supreme Court for their propaganda about their Ayurvedic products and belittling mainstream medicine. Baba Ramdev had to apologize in court. His apology was not accepted and he may face the contempt of court with harsher punishment. The Supreme Court acted on a public interest litigation (PIL) moved by the Indian Medical Association (IMA).

Women innovators on simple, revolutionary alternate solutions for water problems

By Proshakha Maitra, Mansee Bal Bhargava* The detrimental effects of uncontrolled population rise and accelerated change in the global climate have posed tremendous pressure on the water and sanitation. This calls all stakeholders, from both developed and developing nations, to improve their resilience and to instigate sustainability. It is more crucial than ever to optimise the use of the resources we have on hand since the world population is projected to reach 9.7 billion by 2050.

Magnetic, stunning, Protima Bedi 'exposed' malice of sexual repression in society

By Harsh Thakor*  Protima Bedi was born to a baniya businessman and a Bengali mother as Protima Gupta in Delhi in 1949. Her father was a small-time trader, who was thrown out of his family for marrying a dark Bengali women. The theme of her early life was to rebel against traditional bondage. It was extraordinary how Protima underwent a metamorphosis from a conventional convent-educated girl into a freak. On October 12th was her 75th birthday; earlier this year, on August 18th it was her 25th death anniversary.

Alleged killing of another Bangladesh youth inside Indian territory: NHRC inquiry sought

By Kirity Roy* There was yet another incident of the killing of a Bangladeshi youth by the Border Security Force personnel attached with ‘Barthar’ BOP of ‘G’ Company of 75 BSF Battalion. In last five years several incidents of killings happened under this police station’s jurisdiction and the cases will get the award as “Not Guilty” as usual.

Modi model, Hindutva icon 'justified' alliance with Muslim League before Independence

By Shamsul Islam*  Our PM describes himself as ‘Hindu’ nationalist and member of RSS. He proudly shares the fact that he was groomed to be a political leader by one of the two fathers of the Hindutva politics, MS Golwalkar (the other being VD Savarkar) and given the task of establishing Hindutva polity in India after eradicating secularism.

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Crusader for people’s causes, this Hollywood actor entered 'unexplored zones' in US

By Harsh Thakor*  Marlon Brando on April 3rd completes his birth centenary. He perished in 2004, on July 1, aged 80 years. Arguably in Hollywood Brando penetrated sensitivity and versatility at an unparalleled scale and discovered new horizons or explored path breaking zones in acting.

Nuclear power expansion: Is AEC's new, 'unrealistic' target fully backed by PMO?

By Shankar Sharma*  Another unrealistic and tall claim by Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) has been announced: India is eyeing 100 GW nuclear power by 2047, the AEC chairman  AK Mohanty   has said. A few years ago, the dream target for the Indian nuclear establishment was 275,000 MWe of nuclear power by 2050 (as per DAE document of 2008 "A Strategy for the Growth of Electricity in India”). Now this target of 100 GW nuclear power by 2047. And as at the end of February 2024, the actual nuclear power capacity was only 7,480 MWe, which formed only 1.7% of the total power capacity in the country. 

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.

How huge crowd at Mukhtar Ansari funeral is comparable to BJP's 'people's court' talk

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  The massive crowd at the funeral of Mukhtar Ansari in Mohammadabad reflects the power and influence that his family wields in the area. One can't deny that he had enormous power in Ghazipur and Mau districts. But the crowd that came and chanted slogans in his favour does not exonerate him of his conviction by the court.  It is important that we understand this.